-
Neurology Jan 2024Bisphosphonates are routinely used to treat osteoporosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a rare, severely debilitating neuromuscular disease. We...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Bisphosphonates are routinely used to treat osteoporosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a rare, severely debilitating neuromuscular disease. We sought to synthesize and grade benefits and harms evidence of bisphosphonates in glucocorticoid-treated patients with DMD.
METHODS
In this systematic review (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42020157606), we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for articles published from inception up to and including March 31, 2023, reporting results in any language from any study type. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.
RESULTS
We identified 19 publications involving 1,010 children and adults from 12 countries across all inhabited continents except South America. We found high-quality evidence that bisphosphonates significantly increase the areal lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z score in glucocorticoid-treated patients with DMD. The greatest improvements were recorded in controlled settings among patients treated with intravenous zoledronate. Evidence of benefits to fracture risks was inconclusive and/or of low quality, primarily due to lack of controlled data and small samples. Bisphosphonates were generally well-tolerated, although adverse events related to the first infusion (i.e., "acute phase reaction") were frequently reported.
DISCUSSION
There is high-quality evidence supporting the use of bisphosphonates to increase the areal lumbar spine BMD Z score in patients with DMD and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Our synthesis and grading affirm current recommendations put forward in the 2018 DMD Clinical Care Considerations and should be helpful in raising awareness about anticipated benefits of bisphosphonates, prevailing unmet needs, and potential safety issues in their use.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Diphosphonates; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Glucocorticoids; Zoledronic Acid; Osteoporosis
PubMed: 38165327
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207948 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023In traditional Chinese medicine, Jintiange capsules are frequently used to treat metabolic bone diseases and strengthen bones and tendons. The main component of...
Efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine Jintiange capsules in the postoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
In traditional Chinese medicine, Jintiange capsules are frequently used to treat metabolic bone diseases and strengthen bones and tendons. The main component of Jintiange capsules is bionic tiger bone powder. However, the active ingredients and proteins are derived from other animal bones, with chemical profiles similar to that of natural tiger bone. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of Jintiange capsules, a Chinese herbal medicine, in the postoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
METHODS
In this systematic review, literature was retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Web of Science, the Wanfang Database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Chinese VIP Database from inception to July 2023. The primary outcome measures were the bone mineral density (BMD) and effective rate. The secondary outcome measures were the visual analog pain score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Cobb's angle, serum osteocalcin, serum alkaline phosphatase, and adverse events. RevMan 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software were used for data analysis.
RESULTS
We enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on 1,642 patients in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis illustrated that Jintiange capsules significantly increased the BMD of the lumbar spine ( < 0.00001), femoral neck ( = 0.0005), and whole body ( = 0.01). The subgroup analysis of Jintiange capsules combination therapy showed that the BMD of the lumbar spine and whole body was significantly improved with Jintiange capsules ( < 0.00001). The test for the overall effect showed that Jintiange capsules had a significantly higher effective rate than the control groups ( = 0.003). Additionally, the overall effect test showed that Jintiange capsules decreased the VAS and ODI ( < 0.00001) and Cobb's angle ( = 0.02), and improved serum OC and ALP ( < 0.00001) compared with the controls. Furthermore, the pooled analysis of adverse reactions showed no serious impacts on the treatment of OVCFs.
CONCLUSION
Jintiange capsules demonstrate high safety and efficacy in the treatment of OVCFs, including increasing BMD, the lift effect rate, serum OC levels, and pain relief, decreasing the ODI, serum ALP levels, and adverse events, and improving Cobb's angle. Additional research is required to validate the efficacy of Jintiange capsules for the postoperative treatment of OVCFs.: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.
PubMed: 38162884
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1289818 -
Maturitas Feb 2024Age-related sarcopenia, resulting from a gradual loss in skeletal muscle mass and strength, is pivotal to the increased prevalence of functional limitation among the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Age-related sarcopenia, resulting from a gradual loss in skeletal muscle mass and strength, is pivotal to the increased prevalence of functional limitation among the older adult community. The purpose of this meta-analysis of individual patient data is to investigate the difference in health-related quality of life between sarcopenic individuals and those without the condition using the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire. A protocol was published on PROSPERO. Multiple databases and the grey literature were searched until March 2023 for studies reporting quality of life assessed with the SarQoL for patients with and without sarcopenia. Two researchers conducted the systematic review independently. A two-stage meta-analysis was performed. First, crude (mean difference) and adjusted (beta coefficient) effect sizes were calculated within each database; then, a random effect meta-analysis was applied to pool them. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q-test and I value. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the source of potential heterogeneity. The strength of evidence of this association was assessed using GRADE. From the 413 studies identified, 32 were eventually included, of which 10 were unpublished data studies. Sarcopenic participants displayed significantly reduced health-related quality of life compared with non-sarcopenic individuals (mean difference = -12.32; 95 % CI = [-15.27; -9.37]). The model revealed significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed a substantial impact of regions, clinical settings, and diagnostic criteria on the difference in health-related quality of life between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic individuals. The level of evidence was moderate. This meta-analysis of individual patient data suggested that sarcopenia is associated with lower health-related quality of life measured with SarQoL.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Sarcopenia; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 38142467
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107902 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Mar 2024Bisphosphonates (BPs) are one of the most often used drugs to lower fracture risk in osteoporosis patients; nonetheless, BPs have been linked to atypical femoral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are one of the most often used drugs to lower fracture risk in osteoporosis patients; nonetheless, BPs have been linked to atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Teriparatide (TPTD) is a parathyroid hormone analogue and anabolic drug that may accelerate fracture repair. TPTD has been considered as a possible treatment for AFF, particularly those caused by BP use. We evaluate the effect of TPTD on AFF in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A thorough search of: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane was conducted on August 2, 2023. Trials evaluating the effect of TPTD on the incidence of: complete bone healing, non-union, early and delayed bone union, progression of incomplete AFF to complete AFF, and time to bone union were included. Using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4, the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies.
RESULTS
Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. TPTD significantly increased the incidence of early bone union (RR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.13, 1.87], P = 0.004) and time to bone union (MD = -1.56, 95% CI [-2.86, -0.26], P = 0.02) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed in terms of complete bone healing (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.99, 1.13], P = 0.12), non-union (RR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.22, 1.04], P = 0.06), and progression of incomplete AFF to complete AFF (RR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.04, 1.97], P = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS
TPTD is an effective therapy for enhancing and hastening healing following AFF, particularly in postoperative settings. Future large randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm or dispute the results.
Topics: Humans; Teriparatide; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Femoral Fractures; Osteoporosis; Diphosphonates; Femur
PubMed: 38135789
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05171-8 -
International Journal of Clinical... Apr 2024Ibandronate is effective in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, but experimental evidence offers conflicting results regarding nonvertebral fractures. Real-world... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ibandronate is effective in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, but experimental evidence offers conflicting results regarding nonvertebral fractures. Real-world evidence has been published evaluating the anti-nonvertebral fracture effect of ibandronate.
AIM
This meta-analysis of observational studies assessed the effectiveness of ibandronate in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis.
METHOD
Pubmed/Embase databases were searched for observational studies. Risks of nonvertebral fractures and hip fractures were the outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed pooling rate ratios (RRs), using random-effects models. Data were reanalysed in sensitivity analyses considering Knapp-Hartung method and Bayesian random-effects.
RESULTS
Six cohort studies were included. Overall, once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate reduced the risk of nonvertebral fractures (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Similar results were obtained when the comparison was restricted to once-monthly 150 mg risedronate, but no differences were found when the comparator was other oral bisphosphonates (weekly alendronate/risedronate). Ibandronate didn't significantly change the risk of hip fractures (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.89-1.76). The risk of hip fracture was comparable between once monthly, 150 mg oral ibandronate and other oral bisphosphonates. Intravenous ibandronate was not effective in reducing hip fractures comparing to intravenous zoledronate. The low number of studies diminished the robustness of sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
Results suggest that once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate may be as effective as other oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures. However, uncertainty associated to the small number of included studies, which are characterized by heterogeneous demographics and methodologies, precluded definitive conclusions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ibandronic Acid; Risedronic Acid; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Bayes Theorem; Osteoporosis; Hip Fractures; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38112890
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01666-x -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Feb 2024Osteosarcopenia is defined as the concurrent occurrence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Osteosarcopenia is defined as the concurrent occurrence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the global prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of osteosarcopenia. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022351229). PubMed, Cochrane, Medline and Embase were searched from inception to February 2023 to retrieve eligible observational population-based studies. Pooled osteosarcopenia prevalence was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI), and subgroup analyses were performed. The risk factor of osteosarcopenia and its association with clinical outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I test. Study quality was assessed using validated instruments matched to study designs. The search identified 55 158 studies, and 66 studies (64 404 participants, mean age from 46.6 to 93 years) were analysed in the final analysis, including 48 cross-sectional studies, 17 cohort studies and 1 case-control study. Overall, the pooled prevalence of osteosarcopenia was 18.5% (95% CI: 16.7-20.3, I = 98.7%), including 15.3% (95% CI: 13.2-17.4, I = 97.6%) in men and 19.4% (95% CI: 16.9-21.9, I = 98.5%) in women. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia diagnosed using sarcopenia plus osteopenia/osteoporosis was 20.7% (95% CI: 17.1-24.4, I = 98.55%), and the prevalence of using sarcopenia plus osteoporosis was 16.1% (95% CI: 13.3-18.9, I = 98.0%). The global osteosarcopenia prevalence varied in different regions with 22.9% in Oceania, 21.6% in Asia, 20.8% in South America, 15.7% in North America and 10.9% in Europe. A statistically significant difference was found in the subgroups of the study population between the hospital (24.7%) and community (12.9%) (P = 0.001). Frailty (OR = 4.72, 95% CI: 2.71-8.23, I = 61.1%), malnutrition (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.40, I = 50.0%), female sex (OR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.96-8.69, I = 73.0%) and higher age (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.15, I ==86.0%) were significantly associated with a higher risk for osteosarcopenia. Meta-analysis of cohort studies showed that osteosarcopenia significantly increased the risk of fall (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.20-1.97; I = 1.0%, three studies), fracture (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.61-2.81; I = 67.8%, seven studies) and mortality (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.34-2.28; I = 0.0%, five studies). Despite the heterogeneity arising from varied definitions and criteria, our findings highlight a significant global prevalence of osteosarcopenia and its negative impact on clinical health. Standardizing diagnostic criteria for osteosarcopenia would be advantageous in the future, and early detection and management should be emphasized in this patient population.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Sarcopenia; Cross-Sectional Studies; Case-Control Studies; Osteoporosis; Fractures, Bone
PubMed: 38086772
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13392 -
BMJ Open Dec 2023Early identification of fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis is essential. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising technique to predict the risk, whereas... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Early identification of fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis is essential. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising technique to predict the risk, whereas its predictive performance remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the predictive efficiency of ML for the risk of fracture in patients with osteoporosis.
METHODS
Relevant studies were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) until 31 May 2023. A meta-analysis of the C-index was performed using a random-effects model, while a bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed according to the types of ML models and fracture sites.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies were included in our meta-analysis, involving 15 209 268 patients, 86 prediction models specifically developed for the osteoporosis population and 41 validation sets. The most commonly used predictors in these models encompassed age, BMI, past fracture history, bone mineral density T-score, history of falls, BMD, radiomics data, weight, height, gender and other chronic diseases. Overall, the pooled C-index of ML was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.78) in the training set and validation set, respectively; the pooled sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.84) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.81) in the training set and validation set, respectively; and the pooled specificity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90) in the training set and validation set, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
ML has a favourable predictive performance for fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. However, most current studies lack external validation. Thus, external validation is required to verify the reliability of ML models.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022346896.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Reproducibility of Results; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38070927
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071430 -
Nutrients Nov 2023Multiple studies have indicated that distinct metabolites are involved in the occurrence and development of osteopenia (ON) and osteoporosis (OP); however, these... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Multiple studies have indicated that distinct metabolites are involved in the occurrence and development of osteopenia (ON) and osteoporosis (OP); however, these metabolites in OP and ON have not yet been classified and standardized. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 21 articles aiming to investigate the distinct metabolites in patients with ON and OP. The quality of the included articles was generally high; seventeen studies had >7 stars, and the remaining four received 6 stars. This systematic review showed that three metabolites (phosphatidylcholine (PC) (lipid metabolites), galactose (carbohydrate metabolites), and succinic acid (other metabolites)) increased, four (glycylglycine (gly-gly), cystine (amino acids), sphingomyelin (SM) (lipid metabolites) and glucose (carbohydrate metabolites)) decreased, and five (glutamine, hydroxyproline, taurine (amino acids), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) (lipid metabolites), and lactate (other metabolites)) had conflicting directions in OP/ON. The results of the meta-analysis show that gly-gly (MD = -0.77, 95%CI -1.43 to -0.11, = 0.02) and cystine (MD = -5.52, 95%CI -7.35 to -3.68, < 0.00001) decreased in the OP group compared with the healthy control group. Moreover, LPC (MD = 1.48, 95%CI 0.11 to 2.86, = 0.03) increased in the OP group compared with the healthy control group. These results indicate that distinct metabolites were associated with ON and OP, which could be considered a predictor for OP.
Topics: Humans; Cystine; Osteoporosis; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Amino Acids; Lysophosphatidylcholines; Carbohydrates
PubMed: 38068753
DOI: 10.3390/nu15234895 -
International Journal of Implant... Dec 2023This systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of intraoral scan (IOS) impressions of implant-supported restorations in in vivo studies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of intraoral scan (IOS) impressions of implant-supported restorations in in vivo studies.
METHODS
A systematic electronic search and review of studies on the accuracy of IOS implant impressions were conducted to analyze the peer-reviewed literature published between 1989 and August 2023. The bias analysis was performed by two reviewers. Data on the study characteristics, accuracy outcomes, and related variables were extracted. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials was performed to investigate the impact of IOS on peri-implant crestal bone loss and the time involved in the impression procedure.
RESULTS
Ten in vivo studies were included in this systematic review for final analysis. Six studies investigated the trueness of IOS impressions, but did not reach the same conclusions. One study assessed the precision of IOS impressions for a single implant. Four clinical studies examined the accuracy of IOS implant impressions with a follow-up of 1-2 years. In full arches, IOS impression procedure needed significantly less time than conventional one (mean difference for procedure time was 8.59 min [6.78, 10.40 min], P < 0.001), prosthetic survival rate was 100%, and marginal bone levels of all participants could be stably maintained (mean difference in marginal bone loss at 12 months was 0.03 mm [-0.08, 0.14 mm], P = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of IOS impressions of implant-supported restorations varied greatly depending on the scanning strategy. The trueness and precision of IOS in the partial and complete arches remain unclear and require further assessment. Based on follow-up clinical studies, IOS impressions were accurate in clinical practice. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as some evidences are obtained from the same research group.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Research Design; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Clonal Hematopoiesis; Electronics
PubMed: 38055096
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00517-8 -
BMC Geriatrics Dec 2023Both osteoporosis and cognitive impairment affect overall health in elderly individuals. This study aimed to investigate the association between cognitive impairment and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Both osteoporosis and cognitive impairment affect overall health in elderly individuals. This study aimed to investigate the association between cognitive impairment and the risk of osteoporosis.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the association between osteoporosis and cognitive impairment from their inception until August 2023. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) of osteoporosis in patients with cognitive impairment. Subgroup analysis was used to detect the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was used to test the robustness of the pooled results. Funnel plots, Egger's test, and Begg's test were used to test publication bias.
RESULTS
Ten studies involving 9,872 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with cognitive impairment had an increased risk of osteoporosis (RR = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-1.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are at 1.7-fold risk of osteoporosis compared with the control group (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.23-2.37, p = 0.001), and sex, cognitive classification, study region, study design, and study quality might be the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the pooled results. No significant publication bias was found (Begg's test, p = 0.474; Egger's test, p = 0.065).
CONCLUSION
Current evidence suggests that patients with cognitive impairment are at increased risk of osteoporosis, especially patients with AD.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Cognitive Dysfunction; Osteoporosis; Alzheimer Disease; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 38049723
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04548-z