-
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jul 2023An increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA) is a predisposing factor for recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs), and combined procedures including derotational distal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
An increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA) is a predisposing factor for recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs), and combined procedures including derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) have been shown to be good options.
PURPOSE
To investigate the safety and effectiveness of combined DDFO on clinical and radiological outcomes to treat RPDs with an increased FAA.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
This review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. We searched 7 databases for articles from inception to March 10, 2023, that reported outcomes after combined DDFO in patients with an RPD and increased FAA. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Outcomes evaluated were functional scores, redislocation rates, complications, satisfaction, and radiological parameters. A meta-analysis was performed to pool functional scores, with data reported as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Included were 8 studies of 189 knees from 183 patients, with a mean patient age of 22.4 years and a mean follow-up of 33.4 months. The mean preoperative FAA ranged from 31° to 42.70°, and the mean postoperative FAA ranged from 10° to 19.08°. Significant improvements were found in the Kujala score (MD, 26.96 [95% CI, 23.54 to 30.37]), Lysholm score (MD, 26.17 [95% CI, 22.13 to 30.22]), visual analog scale score for pain (MD, -2.61 [95% CI, -3.12 to -2.10]), and Tegner activity score (MD, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.79]). No subluxation or redislocation occurred. The overall complication rate was 10.6%, and most of the complications were pain (60%) and limited knee activity (20%). The overall satisfaction rate was 83.3%. The patellar tilt angle significantly decreased from 40.7° ± 11.9° to 20.5° ± 8.7° and from 26.35° ± 6.86° to 11.65° ± 2.85° in 2 studies.
CONCLUSION
Combined DDFO was found to be safe and effective for the treatment of RPDs and an increased FAA by addressing both patellar dislocations and torsional malalignment. However, because of the lack of comparisons, it remains to be investigated when DDFO should be combined in such patients.
PubMed: 37465210
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231181601 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Sep 2023The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is now routinely utilized to help determine whether a realignment procedure is necessary for patients with patellar... (Review)
Review
Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Has Better Diagnostic Reliability Than Tubercle-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distance For Predicting Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review.
OBJECTIVE
The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is now routinely utilized to help determine whether a realignment procedure is necessary for patients with patellar instability. The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance has been explored as an alternative measurement. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of TT-TG and TT-PCL; to explore whether there is a relationship between the TT-PCL and the TT-TG distance; to determine whether there is a relationship between the TT-TG and TT-PCL distances and knee rotation; and to compare the abilities of the TT-PCL distance and the TT-TG distance with predicted patellar instability.
METHOD
This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to September 2021 to identify clinical studies comparing TT-TG and TT-PCL distances to patellar instability. Data on patient baseline characteristics, TT-TG and TT-PCL distances, inter-observer reliability, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were recorded. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment form recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
RESULT
Twenty studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 2330 knees from 2260 patients. The current study showed that TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar observer reliability. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-TG ranged from 0.807 to 0.98 and 0.553 to 0.99, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-PCL ranged from 0.553 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.981, respectively. Six studies compared the AUC for predicting patellar instability and showed that TT-TG had better predictive performance than TT-PCL. Three studies reported a correlation between TT-TG and knee rotation, but no such relationship was found for TT-PCL. Eight studies reported a weak or moderate correlation between TT-TG and TT-PCL.
CONCLUSION
TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar inter- and intra-rater reliability (as measured by ICC), but TT-TG has greater discriminatory power to predict patellar instability than TT-PCL (as measured by AUC values and odds ratio). However, considering trochlear dysplasia and individual variations, future studies need to find more accurate and individualized methods to predict patellar instability.
Topics: Humans; Posterior Cruciate Ligament; Patellofemoral Joint; Joint Instability; Reproducibility of Results; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Observer Variation; Tibia; Patellar Dislocation
PubMed: 37427672
DOI: 10.1111/os.13819 -
Knee Surgery & Related Research Jun 2023This study sought to clarify treatment evidence to treat patellar dislocation by evaluating which treatment could yield better improvement of clinical outcomes for acute... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study sought to clarify treatment evidence to treat patellar dislocation by evaluating which treatment could yield better improvement of clinical outcomes for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents 18 years of age or younger.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for relevant articles comparing clinical outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents published from March 2008 to August 2022. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The quality assessment of each study was investigated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) critical appraisal scoring system and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale scores. To calculate the overall combined effect size for each outcome, Review Manager Version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford) was employed.
RESULTS
Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one prospective study were investigated. In terms of pain [mean difference (MD) 6.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-11.45, I 0%], there were significantly better outcomes in conservative group. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in any evaluated outcomes such as redislocation [risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% CI 0.72-2.54, I 65%], Kujala score (MD 3.92, 95% CI -0.17 to 8.01, I 0%), Tegner score (MD 1.04, 95% CI -0.04 to 2.11, I 71%), or subjective results (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.34, I 33%) between conservative and surgical treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite better pain outcomes with conservative group, the present study revealed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between conservative treatment and surgical treatment in children and adolescents with acute patellar dislocation. Since there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups, routine surgical treatment is not advocated for treating acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents.
PubMed: 37349852
DOI: 10.1186/s43019-023-00189-z -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... May 2023Patellar instability is a common and disabling clinical condition. Treatment of acute primary patellar dislocation aims to reduce the risk of recurrence or painful... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patellar instability is a common and disabling clinical condition. Treatment of acute primary patellar dislocation aims to reduce the risk of recurrence or painful subluxation and improve function. However, the actual clinical efficacy of any management modality following an acute dislocation has never been demonstrated in prospective or retrospective studies, and the optimal way in which the various management modalities should be used is at best unclear.
METHODS
A search was conducted in PubMed, Bireme and Embase databases. Inclusion criteria followed the acronym PICOS, (P) subjects with patellar instability, (I) therapeutic interventions, (C) placebo or control or surgical treatments, (O) rate of dislocations and function, and (S) clinical trials. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms used were: (("patellar instability") OR ("patellar dislocation")) AND ((physiotherapy) OR (rehabilitation) OR ("conservative treatment") OR (therapy) OR (therapeutic)). The risk of bias was analysed using the PeDRO scale.
RESULTS
Seven randomized controlled trials including 282 patients were considered. The quality of studies detailing the results of conservative treatment was higher than that of surgical procedures, but all studies have relatively low methodological quality. Four studies compared physiotherapeutic interventions with surgical procedures, and three studies compared conservative intervention techniques.
CONCLUSION
An unstructured lower limb physical therapy programme evidences similar outcomes to specific exercises. Surgical management is associated with a lower rate of re-dislocation; however, whether surgery produces greater functional outcomes than conservative management is still unclear. The use of a knee brace with a limited range of motion, stretching and neuromuscular exercises are the most commonly recommended physiotherapy methodologies.
Topics: Humans; Conservative Treatment; Joint Instability; Patellar Dislocation; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37254200
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03867-6 -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Feb 2023The purpose of this systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair and medial reefing...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair and medial reefing for patients with first-time patellar dislocation.
METHODS
Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched up to May 8, 2022. Only articles treating first-time patellar dislocation with MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair and medial reefing were included in the analysis. Eligible identification, data extraction, quality assessment and statistical analysis were performed by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome measures were the incidences of postoperatively redislocation and reoperation. The second outcomes were the Kujala functional score and complications (including infection, osteoarthritis, and loss of range of motion).
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies involving 668 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of which, four studies involving 126 patients were in MPFL reconstruction group, ten studies involving 220 patients in MPFL repair group and 9 studies involving 322 patients in medial reefing group. Our results showed that the MPFL reconstruction (1.8%, 95% CI - 0.5 to 4.0%) had a significantly lower rate of postoperative redislocation and reoperation rate than the MPFL repair (15.4%, 95% CI 5.2-25.7%) and medial reefing (18.0%, 95% CI 9.3-26.7%). Besides, no significant differences were found in the Kujala score and complication rate among the three treatments.
CONCLUSION
The available evidence demonstrated that MPFL reconstruction could achieve significantly lower redislocation rate and reoperation rate than MPFL repair and medial reefing after first-time patella dislocation. Furthermore, there was not enough evidence to reveal that MPFL reconstruction provided better functional outcome compared with MPFL repair and medial reefing. MPFL reconstruction is a preferred surgical treatment for patients with first-time patellar dislocation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV.
PubMed: 36777132
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00770-w -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2023Patellar (knee cap) dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. It affects up to 42/100,000 people, and is most... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patellar (knee cap) dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. It affects up to 42/100,000 people, and is most prevalent in those aged 20 to 30 years old. It is uncertain whether surgical or non-surgical treatment is the best approach. This is important as recurrent dislocation occurs in up to 40% of people who experience a first time (primary) dislocation. This can reduce quality of life and as a result people have to modify their lifestyle. This review is needed to determine whether surgical or non-surgical treatment should be offered to people after patellar dislocation.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating people with primary or recurrent patellar dislocation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and trial registries in December 2021. We contacted corresponding authors to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating primary or recurrent lateral patellar dislocation in adults or children.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent patellar dislocation, and patient-rated knee and physical function scores. Our secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, return to former activities, knee pain during activity or at rest, adverse events, patient-reported satisfaction, patient-reported knee instability symptoms and subsequent requirement for knee surgery. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 10 studies (eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two quasi-RCTs) of 519 participants with patellar dislocation. The mean ages in the individual studies ranged from 13.0 to 27.2 years. Four studies included children, mainly adolescents, as well as adults; two only recruited children. Study follow-up ranged from one to 14 years. We are unsure of the evidence for all outcomes in this review because we judged the certainty of the evidence to be very low. We downgraded each outcome by three levels. Reasons included imprecision (when fewer than 100 events were reported or the confidence interval (CI) indicated appreciable benefits as well as harms), risk of bias (when studies were at high risk of performance, detection and attrition bias), and inconsistency (in the event that pooled analysis included high levels of statistical heterogeneity). We are uncertain whether surgery lowers the risk of recurrent dislocation following primary patellar dislocation compared with non-surgical management at two to nine year follow-up. Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 348 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, we found that 157 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 209 fewer to 87 fewer) had recurrent dislocation between two and nine years after surgery (8 studies, 438 participants). We are uncertain whether surgery improves patient-rated knee and function scores. Studies measured this outcome using different scales (the Tegner activity scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm, Kujala Patellofemoral Disorders score and Hughston visual analogue scale). The most frequently reported score was the Kujala Patellofemoral Disorders score. This indicated people in the surgical group had a mean score of 5.73 points higher at two to nine year follow-up (95% CI 2.91 lower to 14.37 higher; 7 studies, 401 participants). On this 100-point scale, higher scores indicate better function, and a change score of 10 points is considered to be clinically meaningful; therefore, this CI includes a possible meaningful improvement. We are uncertain whether surgery increases the risk of adverse events. Based on an assumed risk of overall incidence of complications during the first two years in 277 people out of 1000 in the non-surgical group, 335 more people per 1000 (95% CI 75 fewer to 723 more) had an adverse event in the surgery group (2 studies, 144 participants). Three studies (176 participants) assessed participant satisfaction at two to nine year follow-up, reporting little difference between groups. Based on an assumed risk of 763 per 1000 non-surgical participants reporting excellent or good outcomes, seven more participants per 1000 (95% CI 199 fewer to 237 more) reported excellent or good satisfaction. Four studies (256 participants) assessed recurrent patellar subluxation at two to nine year follow-up. Based on an assumed risk of patellar subluxation in 292 out of 1000 in the non-surgical group, 73 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 146 fewer to 35 more) had patellar subluxation as a result of surgery. Slightly more people had subsequent surgery in the non-surgical group. Pooled two to nine year follow-up data from three trials (195 participants) indicated that, based on an assumed risk of subsequent surgery in 215 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, 118 fewer people per 1000 (95% CI 200 fewer to 372 more) had subsequent surgery after primary surgery.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain whether surgery improves outcome compared to non-surgical management as the certainty of the evidence was very low. No sufficiently powered trial has examined people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Adequately powered, multicentre, randomised trials are needed. To inform the design and conduct of these trials, expert consensus should be achieved on the minimal description of both surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the pathological variations that may be relevant to both choice of these interventions.
Topics: Adult; Child; Adolescent; Humans; Young Adult; Patellar Dislocation; Fractures, Bone; Knee Joint; Patella; Quality of Life
PubMed: 36692346
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008106.pub4 -
British Journal of Sports Medicine Dec 2022To identify and quantify potential risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) following traumatic knee injury. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Risk factors for knee osteoarthritis after traumatic knee injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies for the OPTIKNEE Consensus.
OBJECTIVE
To identify and quantify potential risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) following traumatic knee injury.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analyses that estimated the odds of OA for individual risk factors assessed in more than four studies using random-effects models. Remaining risk factors underwent semiquantitative synthesis. The modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for prognostic factors guided the assessment.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL searched from inception to 2009-2021.
ELIGIBILITY
Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies assessing risk factors for symptomatic or structural OA in persons with a traumatic knee injury, mean injury age ≤30 years and minimum 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS
Across 66 included studies, 81 unique potential risk factors were identified. High risk of bias due to attrition or confounding was present in 64% and 49% of studies, respectively. Ten risk factors for structural OA underwent meta-analysis (sex, rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, ACL reconstruction (ACLR), ACLR age, ACLR body mass index, ACLR graft source, ACLR graft augmentation, ACLR+cartilage injury, ACLR+partial meniscectomy, ACLR+total medial meniscectomy). Very-low certainty evidence suggests increased odds of structural OA related to ACLR+cartilage injury (OR=2.31; 95% CI 1.35 to 3.94), ACLR+partial meniscectomy (OR=1.87; 1.45 to 2.42) and ACLR+total medial meniscectomy (OR=3.14; 2.20 to 4.48). Semiquantitative syntheses identified moderate-certainty evidence that cruciate ligament, collateral ligament, meniscal, chondral, patellar/tibiofemoral dislocation, fracture and multistructure injuries increase the odds of symptomatic OA.
CONCLUSION
Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that various single and multistructure knee injuries (beyond ACL tears) increase the odds of symptomatic OA. Risk factor heterogeneity, high risk of bias, and inconsistency in risk factors and OA definition make identifying treatment targets for preventing post-traumatic knee OA challenging.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Consensus; Knee Injuries; Cohort Studies; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Risk Factors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36455966
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105496 -
Journal of Orthopaedics and... Aug 2022This systematic review investigates the role of synthetic graft for primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with recurrent...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review investigates the role of synthetic graft for primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on clinical scores and the rate of complications.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The main online databases were accessed in January 2022 without time constraints. All clinical studies investigating the use of synthetic grafts for MPFL reconstruction were accessed. Revision settings were not considered. Only articles reporting data on patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were eligible. Studies regarding congenital or acute patellofemoral dislocation were excluded. Only studies performing a follow-up longer than 24 months were considered.
RESULTS
Data on 199 patients [mean age 22.3 (range 19.0-28.0) years] were collected. The mean follow-up was 60.5 (39.0-142.8) months. All the scores of interest improved at last follow-up: Kujala (+ 24.8; P = 0.0002), Lysholm (+ 42.0; P = 0.02), Tegner (+ 1.2; P = 0.03), IKDC (+ 20.9; P = 0.02). Post-operatively, a positive apprehension test was detected in 6.1% (7/115) of patients, and a sensation of instability was reported by 1.5% (3/199) of patients. The rate of re-dislocations was 2.5% (5 of 199 patients), and revision procedures were performed in less than 1% (1 of 199) of patients.
CONCLUSION
Synthetic graft may be reliable and feasible for primary MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Joint Instability; Knee Joint; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Young Adult
PubMed: 35996063
DOI: 10.1186/s10195-022-00660-9 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Feb 2022This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.
CONCLUSION
Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Orthopedic Procedures; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 35193641
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03008-5 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jan 2022Patellar dislocations in patients presenting with recurrent patellofemoral instability can damage the surrounding structures, limiting patient's participation to...
BACKGROUND
Patellar dislocations in patients presenting with recurrent patellofemoral instability can damage the surrounding structures, limiting patient's participation to recreational activities and quality of life. This study evaluated frequency, location, and extent of associated injuries in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Web of Science databases were accessed in July 2021. All the published clinical studies reporting frequency, location, and extent of soft tissue lesions in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations were accessed.
RESULTS
Data from 9 articles (232 patients) were retrieved. The mean age of the included patients was 21.2 ± 5.6 years. 84.8% of patients suffering from recurrent patellar dislocations demonstrated patellar chondral defects: medial facet (34.9%), while patellar crest (34.8%) and lateral facet (17%). 27.8% of patients demonstrated trochlear chondral injuries.
CONCLUSION
Chondral defects of the medial facet and the crest of the patella are the most common in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Joint Instability; Male; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Patellar Ligament; Patellofemoral Joint; Quality of Life; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 35101078
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02911-1