-
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Jun 2020The MPFL reconstruction is performed either via a single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) procedure. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review...
INTRODUCTION
The MPFL reconstruction is performed either via a single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) procedure. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review comparing SB versus DB graft for recurrent patellofemoral instability, to summarize current evidence, and to clarify the role of both techniques. We focused on clinical scores, physical examination, complications, revision surgeries, and failures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In May of 2019 the main online databases were accessed. All the clinical studies treating isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability through a single and/or double-bundle graft were enrolled in the present systematic review. Only articles reporting primary isolated MPFL reconstruction, reporting a minimum of 12-months follow-up were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS
The scores of interest were in favour of the DB cohort: Kujala (+ 3.2, P = 0.03), Lysholm (+ 5.1, P = 0.001), Tegner (+ 0.3, P = 0.2), IKDC (+ 5.4, P = 0.01), VAS (+ 0.8, P = 0.3), ROM (+ 9.96, P = 0.04). In the DB graft, a reduction of overall complications (OR 0.59; P = 0.1), further surgeries (OR 0.64; P = 0.12) and re-dislocations (OR 0.61; P = 0.16) was observed. The SB group reported a reduction in the post-operative apprehension test (OR 2.42; P = 0.24).
CONCLUSION
Current study support the use of double-bundle tendon graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.
Topics: Femur; Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Orthopedic Procedures; Patella; Plastic Surgery Procedures
PubMed: 32086557
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03376-9 -
Journal of Orthopaedics 2020Patellar dislocations are a significant injury with the potential for long term problems. Little work has been done on establishing the mechanism by which this injury... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patellar dislocations are a significant injury with the potential for long term problems. Little work has been done on establishing the mechanism by which this injury occurs.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the mechanism of injury of a patella dislocation based on the available published literature and compare them to already proposed theories.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted following searches performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE and ProQuest from the earliest year of indexing using the following search terms in any combination: "patella", "dislocation", "mechanism of injury", "anatomy", "biomechanical" and "risk factor". A broad inclusion criteria was used that included studies that looked at patellar dislocations and instability with respect to the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) kinematics or altered kinematics of the PFJ. Studies that did not address the kinematics or biomechanics of the PFJ were excluded. Studies were appraised based on their methodology using a combination of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool and the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies.
RESULTS
113 studies were identified from a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and ProQuest databases. Following application of our inclusion criteria, a total of 23 studies were included in our review. 18 of these studies were cadaveric biomechanical studies. The remaining studies were anatomical, imaging based, and a computer simulation based study.
CONCLUSIONS
These biomechanical and kinematic studies provide some evidence that a dislocation is likely to occur during early knee flexion with external rotation of the tibia and contraction of the quadriceps. There is limited evidence to support other elements of proposed mechanisms of dislocation.
PubMed: 32042233
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.018 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Jul 2020After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of...
INTRODUCTION
After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons as graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in October 2019. All clinical trials using the semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon grafts for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum of 12-month follow-up were considered. The PEDro score was used for the methodological quality assessment.
RESULTS
Data from 1491 procedures were collected. The mean follow-up was 36.12 months. There was comparability among the patient baseline. All the scores of interests (Kujala, Tegner, Lysholm) and range of motion scored better in the semitendinosus group. Moreover, in favour of the semitendinosus group, a statistically significant reduction of the revision surgeries and re-dislocations were evidenced. Apprehension test and persistent instability sensation found any statistical correlations.
CONCLUSION
Isolated MPFL reconstruction through semitendinosus tendon graft performed better than the gracilis in selected patients suffering from recurrent patellofemoral instability.
Topics: Gracilis Muscle; Hamstring Tendons; Humans; Knee Joint; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Range of Motion, Articular; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Recurrence; Reoperation
PubMed: 32008097
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02636-z -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jun 2020Recurrent patellofemoral instability is a common knee injury in skeletally immature patients. Many surgical techniques have been described in the literature, all with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Recurrent patellofemoral instability is a common knee injury in skeletally immature patients. Many surgical techniques have been described in the literature, all with different success rates. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after surgical treatment using MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques in skeletally immature patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify all original articles concerning the surgical treatment for patellofemoral instability in skeletally immature patients and that reported post-operative recurrent patellofemoral instability rates. Subsequently a risk of bias assessment was conducted and a meta-analysis was performed on reported post-operative recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques.
RESULTS
Of the 21 eligible studies (448 knees in 389 patients), 10 studies reported on MPFL reconstruction techniques using different grafts and fixation techniques and 11 reported on other soft tissue realignment procedures. In total, 62 of the 448 (13.8%) treated knees showed recurrent patellofemoral instability during follow-up. The overall pooled recurrent patellofemoral instability rate was estimated to be 0.08 (95% CI 0.02-0.16). For MPFL reconstruction techniques, the pooled recurrent patellofemoral instability rate was estimated to be 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.09). For the other soft tissue realignment techniques, the pooled rate was estimated to be 0.15 (95% CI 0.04-0.31). No statistically significant difference in recurrent patellofemoral instability rates between MPFL reconstruction techniques and other soft tissue realignment techniques were found (n.s.). There was a large variation in treatment effects over different settings, including what effect is to be expected in future patients.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after MPFL reconstruction techniques are in the range of instability rates after other soft tissue realignment techniques. The clinical relevance of this study is that it provides clinicians with the best currently available evidence on recurrent patellofemoral instability rates after surgical treatment for patellofemoral instability in skeletally immature patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31392368
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05656-3 -
Medicine Jul 2019To systematically review the efficacy of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for acute patellar dislocation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To systematically review the efficacy of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for acute patellar dislocation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched up to February 12, 2019. After removing duplicates, preliminary screening, and reading the full texts, we finally selected 16 articles, including 11 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies. The quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by Jadad score or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) as effect variables. The clinical parameters assessed included mean Kujala score, rate of redislocation, incidence of patellar subluxation, patient satisfaction, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Evidence levels were determined using GRADE profile.
RESULTS
The 16 included studies involved 918 cases, 418 in the surgical group and 500 in the nonsurgical group. The results of the meta-analysis showed higher mean Kujala score (SMD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.3, 1.28], P = .002) and lower rate of redislocation (OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.3, 0.63], P < .00001) in the surgical group than the nonsurgical group, but showed insignificant differences in the incidence of patellar subluxation (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.36, 1.03], P = .06), satisfaction of patients (OR = 1.44, 95% CI [0.64, 3.25], P = .38), and VAS (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI [-0.36, 9.03], P = .84).
CONCLUSION
For patients with primary acute patellar dislocation, surgical treatment produces a higher mean Kujala score and a lower rate of redislocation than nonsurgical treatment.
Topics: Conservative Treatment; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Patellar Dislocation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31335681
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016338 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2019Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is regularly combined with a tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) in cases of recurrent patellar instability with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is regularly combined with a tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) in cases of recurrent patellar instability with underlying structural deformity. However, these indications for a TTT have recently come into question. This study aimed to assess the traditional indications by comparing the outcomes of isolated and combined MPFLR for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies were those which reported the outcomes of either isolated or combined or both MPFLR. Studies were required to report at least one of the following: redislocation rate, revision due to instability, or the Kujala score.
RESULTS
We found no difference between isolated and combined MPFLR in terms of redislocation ( p = 0.48), revisions due to instability ( p = 0.36), positive apprehension tests ( p = 0.25), or the Kujala score ( p = 0.58). Combined reconstruction presented more complications compared to isolated procedures ( p = 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between studies investigating isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction MPFLR performed in patients with normal tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances only or in patients with both normal and elevated TT-TG distances.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the published data, there is no difference in outcomes between isolated and combined MPFLR. Underlying structural deformity did not demonstrate any significant effect on the success of the isolated MPFLR. Although there are definite indications for combined reconstruction, the current evidence suggests that our inclusion criteria may not be entirely correct. Further study is required to clarify and refine the true indications for combined MPFLR.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III, meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Orthopedic Procedures; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Plastic Surgery Procedures
PubMed: 30798706
DOI: 10.1177/2309499018820698 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Sep 2018Trochleoplasty aims to restore patellar stability. Various techniques have been described and almost all authors report successful results. However, the procedure has a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Trochleoplasty aims to restore patellar stability. Various techniques have been described and almost all authors report successful results. However, the procedure has a significant risk of complications. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the rate of complications after the various techniques used for trochleoplasty procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies on patients with recurrent patellar instability treated with a trochleoplasty with or without additional procedure, and reported complications were included. The primary outcome was the rate of complications per technique. A meta-analysis was performed whenever three or more studies per surgical technique could be included.
RESULTS
The selection process resulted in 20 studies included for analysis. A lateral facet elevating trochlear osteotomy was reported by two studies, ten studies reported on a Bereiter trochleoplasty, five on a Dejour trochleoplasty, one on an arthroscopic technique, one on a 'modified' technique and one on a recession wedge trochleoplasty. Meta-analysis showed that proportion of recurrent dislocation was 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.07) for Bereiter trochleoplasty and 0.02 (95% CI 0-0.08) for Dejour trochleoplasty. These proportions were 0.06 (95% CI 0.02-0.13) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03-0.27) for recurrent instability, 0.07 (95% CI 0.02-0.19) and 0.12 (95% CI 0.00-0.91) for patellofemoral osteoarthritis and 0.08 (95% CI 0.04-0.14) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.11-0.32) for further surgery respectively.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that the complications after a Bereiter and Dejour trochleoplasty including additional procedures are in the range of those of other patellar stabilizing procedures. For four other techniques, no meta-analysis could be performed. The clinical relevance of this study is that it provides clinicians with the best currently available evidence on the rate of complications after trochleoplasty procedures. This can be helpful in the process of deciding whether or not to perform such a procedure, and can be used to better inform patients about the advantages and disadvantages of different trochleoplasty procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Femur; Humans; Joint Instability; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Osteotomy; Patella; Patellar Dislocation
PubMed: 29210022
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4766-5 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Nov 2016A patellar dislocation is a common knee injury in the young, athletic patient population. Recent trends indicate that the use of long-term nonoperative treatment is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A patellar dislocation is a common knee injury in the young, athletic patient population. Recent trends indicate that the use of long-term nonoperative treatment is decreasing, and surgical intervention is more commonly recommended for those patients who fail initial nonoperative management with recurrent patellar dislocations. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has become increasingly utilized in this regard.
PURPOSE
To evaluate outcomes, particularly return to sports and its relationship to postoperative instability, of isolated MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocations.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A review of the current literature was performed using the terms "medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction" and "MPFL reconstruction" in the electronic search engines PubMed and EBSCOhost (CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus) on July 29, 2015, yielding 1113 abstracts for review. At the conclusion of the search, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review of the literature. Means were calculated for population size, age, follow-up time, and postoperative Tegner scores. Pooled estimates were calculated for postoperative Kujala scores, return to play, total risk of postoperative instability, risk of positive apprehension sign, and risk of reoperation.
RESULTS
The mean patient age associated with MPFL reconstruction was 24.4 years, with a mean postoperative Tegner score of 5.7. The pooled estimated mean postoperative Kujala score was 85.8 (95% CI, 81.6-90.0), with 84.1% (95% CI, 71.1%-97.1%) of patients returning to sports after surgery. The pooled total risk of recurrent instability after surgery was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.1%), with a positive apprehension sign risk of 3.6% (95% CI, 0%-7.2%) and a reoperation risk of 3.1% (95% CI, 1.1%-5.0%).
CONCLUSION
A high percentage of young patients return to sports after isolated MPFL reconstruction for chronic patellar instability, with short-term results demonstrating a low incidence of recurrent instability, postoperative apprehension, and reoperations.
Topics: Humans; Incidence; Joint Instability; Patellar Dislocation; Patellar Ligament; Postoperative Period; Recurrence; Return to Sport; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26872895
DOI: 10.1177/0363546515624673 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2015Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. Following reduction of the dislocation, conservative... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. Following reduction of the dislocation, conservative (non-surgical) rehabilitation with physiotherapy may be used. Since recurrence of dislocation is common, some surgeons have advocated surgical intervention rather than non-surgical interventions. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating people with primary or recurrent patellar dislocation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, ZETOC, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and a variety of other literature databases and trial registries. Corresponding authors were contacted to identify additional studies. The last search was carried out in October 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating lateral patellar dislocation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently examined titles and abstracts of each identified study to assess study eligibility, extract data and assess risk of bias. The primary outcomes we assessed were the frequency of recurrent dislocation, and validated patient-rated knee or physical function scores. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences MD) for continuous outcomes. When appropriate, we pooled data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five randomised studies and one quasi-randomised study. These recruited a total of 344 people with primary (first-time) patellar dislocation. The mean ages in the individual studies ranged from 19.3 to 25.7 years, with four studies including children, mainly adolescents, as well as adults. Follow-up for the full study populations ranged from two to nine years across the six studies. The quality of the evidence is very low as assessed by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) criteria, with all studies being at high risk of performance and detection biases, relating to the lack of blinding.There was very low quality but consistent evidence that participants managed surgically had a significantly lower risk of recurrent dislocation following primary patellar dislocation at two to five years follow-up (21/162 versus 32/136; RR 0.53 favouring surgery, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.87; five studies, 294 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 222 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 104 fewer (95% CI 149 fewer to 28 fewer) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery. Similarly, there is evidence of a lower risk of recurrent dislocation after surgery at six to nine years (RR 0.67 favouring surgery, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.08; two studies, 165 participants), but a small increase cannot be ruled out. Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 336 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 110 fewer (95% CI 195 fewer to 27 more) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery.The very low quality evidence available from single trials only for four validated patient-rated knee and physical function scores (the Tegner activity scale, KOOS, Lysholm and Hughston VAS (visual analogue scale) score) did not show significant differences between the two treatment groups.The results for the Kujala patellofemoral disorders score (0 to 100: best outcome) differed in direction of effect at two to five years follow-up, which favoured the surgery group (MD 13.93 points higher, 95% CI 5.33 points higher to 22.53 points higher; four studies, 171 participants) and the six to nine years follow-up, which favoured the non-surgical treatment group (MD 3.25 points lower, 95% CI 10.61 points lower to 4.11 points higher; two studies, 167 participants). However, only the two to five years follow-up included the clear possibility of a clinically important effect (putative minimal clinically important difference for this outcome is 10 points).Adverse effects of treatment were reported in one trial only; all four major complications were attributed to the surgical treatment group. Slightly more people in the surgery group had subsequent surgery six to nine years after their primary dislocation (20/87 versus 16/78; RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.89, two studies, 165 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of subsequent surgery in 186 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 11 more (95% CI 76 fewer to 171 more) people per 1000 having subsequent surgery after primary surgery.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although there is some evidence to support surgical over non-surgical management of primary patellar dislocation in the short term, the quality of this evidence is very low because of the high risk of bias and the imprecision in the effect estimates. We are therefore very uncertain about the estimate of effect. No trials examined people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Adequately powered, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials, conducted and reported to contemporary standards, are needed. To inform the design and conduct of these trials, expert consensus should be achieved on the minimal description of both surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the anatomical or pathological variations that may be relevant to both choice of these interventions and the natural history of patellar instability. Furthermore, well-designed studies recording adverse events and long-term outcomes are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Patellar Dislocation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 25716704
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008106.pub3 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Aug 2014With improved understanding of the biomechanical importance of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), its reconstruction for patellar dislocation has become... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
With improved understanding of the biomechanical importance of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), its reconstruction for patellar dislocation has become increasingly popular. The aim of this systematic review was to critically determine the effectiveness of MPFL reconstruction for patellar dislocation.
HYPOTHESIS
MPFL reconstruction for patellar dislocation leads to a low redislocation rate with improved Kujala scores.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using Embase and Medline (Ovid) databases. Inclusion criteria included first-time and recurrent patellar dislocation, subluxation, or persistent instability with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and documentation of postoperative redislocation rate or Kujala score. The studies were systematically appraised, and a meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 3 parallel case series, and 17 case series. There were a total of 655 knees in the review, with an age range at time of surgery from 11 to 52 years. The pooled postoperative redislocation rate from all 17 case series showed a mean of 2.44%. The pooled preoperative Kujala scores from 12 case series showed a mean of 51.6 (95% CI, 46.71-56.49). The pooled postoperative Kujala scores from 16 case series showed a mean of 87.77 (95% CI, 85.15-90.39).
CONCLUSION
Although the studies were of low quality, the meta-analysis of 17 case series shows that MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation results in a significant improvement in Kujala scores, a low redislocation rate, and acceptable complication rate. Randomized trials would be needed to draw influences on the superiority of MPFL reconstruction compared with other treatments.
PubMed: 26535352
DOI: 10.1177/2325967114544021