-
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A,... Jan 2020Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with increased risk of falls, cognitive impairment and death, as well as a reduced quality of life. Although it is presumed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is associated with increased risk of falls, cognitive impairment and death, as well as a reduced quality of life. Although it is presumed to be common in older people, estimates of its prevalence vary widely. This study aims to address this by pooling the results of epidemiological studies.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest were searched. Studies were included if participants were more than 60 years, were set within the community or within long-term care and diagnosis was based on a postural drop in systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥20 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥10 mmHg. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Random and quality effects models were used for pooled analysis.
RESULTS
Of 23,090 identified records, 20 studies were included for community-dwelling older people (n = 24,967) and six were included for older people in long-term settings (n = 2,694). There was substantial variation in methods used to identify OH with differing supine rest duration, frequency and timing of standing BP, measurement device, use of standing and tilt-tables and interpretation of the diagnostic drop in BP. The pooled prevalence of OH in community-dwelling older people was 22.2% (95% CI = 17, 28) and 23.9% (95% CI = 18.2, 30.1) in long-term settings. There was significant heterogeneity in both pooled results (I2 > 90%).
CONCLUSIONS
OH is very common, affecting one in five community-dwelling older people and almost one in four older people in long-term care. There is great variability in methods used to identify OH.
Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Global Health; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Independent Living; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30169579
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly188 -
Seizure Oct 2018Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is a common presentation in primary care. Over 90% of these are due to epileptic seizures (ES), syncope, or psychogenic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is a common presentation in primary care. Over 90% of these are due to epileptic seizures (ES), syncope, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Misdiagnosis rates are as high as 30%.
METHODS
Systematic review of inter-ictal clinical criteria to aid differential diagnosis of TLOC. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases, as well as relevant grey literature depositories and citations of relevant reviews and guidelines for studies giving sensitivity and specificity of inter-ictal clinical characteristics used to differentiate between causes of TLOC. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and performed critical appraisal of included articles. We performed a narrative synthesis of included studies.
RESULTS
Of 1023 results, 16 papers were included. Two compared syncope, ES, and PNES; all others compared ES and PNES. All were at significant risk of bias in at least one domain. 6 studied patient symptoms, 6 medical and social history, 3 witness reports and 1 examination findings. No individual criterion differentiated between diagnoses with high sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a lack of validated diagnostic criteria to help clinicians assessing patients in primary or emergency care settings to discriminate between common causes of TLOC. Performance may be improved by combining sets of criteria in a clinical decision rule, but no such rule has been validated prospectively against gold-standard diagnostic criteria.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Diagnosis, Differential; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Humans; Syncope; Unconsciousness
PubMed: 30145472
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.08.012 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Dec 2018Cardiac syncope heralds significantly higher mortality compared with syncope due to noncardiac causes or unknown etiology, commonly considered a benign event. A few... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Cardiac syncope heralds significantly higher mortality compared with syncope due to noncardiac causes or unknown etiology, commonly considered a benign event. A few epidemiologic studies have examined the outcome of noncardiac/unexplained syncope comparing individuals with and without syncope, but with controversial results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify whether history of noncardiac/unexplained syncope is associated with increased all-cause mortality in the general population.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Our systematic review of the literature published between January 1, 1966, and March 31, 2018 sought prospective, observational, cohort studies reporting summary-level outcome data about all-cause mortality in subjects with history of noncardiac/unexplained syncope compared with syncope-free participants. Adjusted hazard ratios were pooled through inverse variance random-effect meta-analysis to compute the summary effect size. Meta-regression models were performed to explore the effect of age, cardiovascular risk factors, or other potential confounders on the measured effect size. We identified four studies including 287 382 individuals (51.6% men; age, 64 ± 12 years): 38 843 with history of noncardiac/unexplained syncope and 248 539 without history of syncope. The average follow-up was 4.4 years. History of noncardiac/unexplained syncope was associated with higher all-cause mortality (pooled adjusted hazard ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.23). Meta-regression analysis showed a stronger positive relationship proportional to aging and increasing prevalence of diabetes and hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS
This study-level meta-analysis showed that among older, diabetic and/or hypertensive individuals, history of noncardiac/unexplained syncope, even in the absence of an obvious cardiac etiology, is associated with higher all-cause mortality.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Population Surveillance; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Syncope
PubMed: 30106212
DOI: 10.1111/jce.13715 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2018Short-stay units are hospital units that provide short-term care for selected patients. Studies have indicated that short-stay units might reduce admission rates, time... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Short-stay units are hospital units that provide short-term care for selected patients. Studies have indicated that short-stay units might reduce admission rates, time of hospital stays, hospital readmissions and expenditure without compromising the quality of care. Short-stay units are often defined by a target patient category, a target function, and a target time frame. Hypothetically, short-stay units could be established as part of any department, but this review focuses on short-stay units that provide care for participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions.
OBJECTIVES
To assess beneficial and harmful effects of short-stay unit hospitalisation compared with usual care in people with internal medicine diseases and conditions.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trials registers up to 13 December 2017 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We also searched several grey literature sources and performed a forward citation search for included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials, comparing hospitalisation in a short-stay unit with usual care (hospitalisation in a traditional hospital ward or other services). We defined a short-stay unit to be a hospital ward where the targeted length of stay in hospital for patients was five days or less. We included both multipurpose and specialised short-stay units. Participants were adults admitted to hospital with an internal medicine disease or condition. We excluded surgical, obstetric, psychiatric, gynaecological, and ambulatory participants. Trials were included irrespective of publication status, date, and language.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of each included trial. We measured intervention effect sizes by meta-analyses for two primary outcomes, mortality and serious adverse events, and one secondary outcome, hospital readmission. We narratively reported the following important outcomes: quality of life, activities of daily living, non-serious adverse events, and costs. We used risk ratio differences of 15% for mortality and of 20% for serious adverse events for minimal relevant clinical consideration. We rated the certainty of the evidence and the strength of recommendations of the outcomes using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 19 records reporting on 14 randomised trials with a total of 2872 participants. One trial was ongoing. Thirteen trials evaluated short-stay unit hospitalisation for six specific conditions (acute decompensated heart failure (one trial), asthma (one trial), atrial fibrillation (one trial), chest pain (seven trials), syncope (two trials), and transient ischaemic attack (one trial)) and one trial investigated participants presenting with miscellaneous internal medicine disease and conditions. The components of the intervention differed among the trials as dictated by the trial participants' condition. All included trials were at high risk of bias.The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. Consequently, it is uncertain whether hospitalisation in short-stay units compared with usual care reduces mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.15) 5 trials (seven additional trials reporting on 1299 participants reported no deaths in either group)); serious adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.54; 7 trials (one additional trial with 108 participants reported no serious adverse events in either group)), and hospital readmission (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.19, 8 trials (one additional trial with 424 participants did not report results for participants)). There was not enough information to confirm or refute that short-stay unit hospitalisation had relevant effects on quality of life, activities of daily living, non-serious adverse events, and costs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the quantity and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Consequently, it is uncertain whether there are any beneficial or harmful effects of short-stay unit hospitalisation for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions - more trials comparing the effects of short-stay units with usual care are needed. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risk of bias and low risks of random errors to improve the overall confidence in the evidence.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Asthma; Atrial Fibrillation; Chest Pain; Heart Failure; Hospital Mortality; Hospital Units; Humans; Internal Medicine; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Length of Stay; Patient Readmission; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Syncope; Time Factors
PubMed: 30102428
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012370.pub2 -
The Western Journal of Emergency... May 2018We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify predictors of serious clinical outcomes after an acute-care evaluation for syncope. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify predictors of serious clinical outcomes after an acute-care evaluation for syncope.
METHODS
We identified studies that assessed for predictors of short-term (≤30 days) serious clinical events after an emergency department (ED) visit for syncope. We performed a MEDLINE search (January 1, 1990 - July 1, 2017) and reviewed reference lists of retrieved articles. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a serious clinical event (composite of mortality, arrhythmia, ischemic or structural heart disease, major bleed, or neurovascular event) within 30 days. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio of findings for the primary outcome. We created summary estimates of association on a variable-by-variable basis using a Bayesian random-effects model.
RESULTS
We reviewed 2,773 unique articles; 17 met inclusion criteria. The clinical findings most predictive of a short-term, serious event were the following: 1) An elevated blood urea nitrogen level (positive likelihood ratio [LR+]: 2.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.15, 5.42]); 2); history of congestive heart failure (LR+: 2.65, 95%CI [1.69, 3.91]); 3) initial low blood pressure in the ED (LR+: 2.62, 95%CI [1.12, 4.9]); 4) history of arrhythmia (LR+: 2.32, 95%CI [1.31, 3.62]); and 5) an abnormal troponin value (LR+: 2.49, 95%CI [1.36, 4.1]). Younger age was associated with lower risk (LR-: 0.44, 95%CI [0.25, 0.68]). An abnormal electrocardiogram was mildly predictive of increased risk (LR+ 1.79, 95%CI [1.14, 2.63]).
CONCLUSION
We identified specific risk factors that may aid clinical judgment and that should be considered in the development of future risk-prediction tools for serious clinical events after an ED visit for syncope.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Biomarkers; Emergency Service, Hospital; Heart Diseases; Humans; Hypotension; Mortality; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Syncope
PubMed: 29760850
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2018.2.37100 -
JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology Apr 2017The aims of this study were to quantify the degree of improvement in vasovagal syncope after assessment and to identify predictive factors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The aims of this study were to quantify the degree of improvement in vasovagal syncope after assessment and to identify predictive factors.
BACKGROUND
No treatments for vasovagal syncope have been proved effective, but patients in all prospective studies appear to show a reduction in the likelihood of fainting.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of studies published from 1993 through 2013. Inclusion criteria were: 1) vasovagal syncope frequency in the preceding 1 to 2 years; and 2) the proportion of subjects with syncope in at least the first follow-up year. Random-effects methods were used.
RESULTS
Of 338 screened studies, 17 were analyzed, with a mean of 112 subjects (range 9 to 511 subjects). In the preceding epoch, 97% of subjects fainted, with 2.6 ± 1.0 syncopal spells per year. In the follow-up year, the proportion of patients with ≥1 syncope recurrence was 677 of 1,912 (35.4%), and in the meta-analysis, the proportion of subjects fainting was only 0.44 (95% confidence interval: 0.41 to 0.46; p < 0.001). Subjects in larger studies were less likely to faint than those in randomized trials (relative risk: 0.35 vs. 0.55; p = 0.004). The probabilities of ≥1 syncope recurrence in the observational versus randomized studies were 0.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.37) and 0.54 (95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 0.62), respectively (p < 0.001). None of the degree of blinding, type of intervention, age, sex, and number of recent faints predicted the probability of syncope recurrence. Heterogeneity was very high in all analyses (I = 60% to 96%).
CONCLUSIONS
The spontaneous remission rate in highly symptomatic syncope patients is high, and remission occurs in all types of studies. Improvement was more likely in larger and observational studies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission, Spontaneous; Syncope, Vasovagal
PubMed: 29759452
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.10.012 -
Vaccine Jan 2018Clusters of anxiety-related adverse events following immunization (AEFI) have been observed in several countries and have disrupted country immunization programs. We... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Clusters of anxiety-related adverse events following immunization (AEFI) have been observed in several countries and have disrupted country immunization programs. We conducted a systematic literature review to characterize these clusters, to generate prevention and management guidance for countries.
METHODS
We searched seven peer-reviewed databases for English language reports of anxiety-related AEFI clusters (≥2 persons) with pre-specified keywords across 4 categories: symptom term, cluster term, vaccine term, and cluster AEFI phenomenon term/phrase. All relevant reports were included regardless of publication date, case-patient age, or vaccine. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and identified articles for full review. Data on epidemiologic/clinical information were extracted from full text review including setting, vaccine implicated, predominant case-patient symptoms, clinical management, community and media response, and outcome/impact on the vaccination program.
RESULTS
Of 1472 abstracts reviewed, we identified eight published clusters, from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions except the African Region. Seven clusters occurred among children in school settings, and one was among adult military reservists. The size and nature of these clusters ranged from 7 patients in one school to 806 patients in multiple schools. Patients' symptoms included dizziness, headache, and fainting with rapid onset after vaccination. Implicated vaccines included tetanus (2), tetanus-diphtheria (1), hepatitis B (1), oral cholera (1), human papillomavirus (1), and influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 (2). In each report, all affected individuals recovered rapidly; however, vaccination program disruption was noted in some instances, sometimes for up to one year.
CONCLUSIONS
Anxiety-related AEFI clusters can be disruptive to vaccination programs, reducing public trust in immunizations and impacting vaccination coverage; response efforts to restore public confidence can be resource intensive. Health care providers should have training on recognition and clinical management of anxiety-related AEFI; public health authorities should have plans to prevent and effectively manage anxiety-related AEFI clusters. Prompt management of these occurrences can be even more important in an era of social media, in which information is rapidly spread.
Topics: Anxiety; Dizziness; Global Health; Headache; Humans; Immunization; Immunization Programs; Syncope; Vaccines
PubMed: 29198916
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.017 -
Korean Circulation Journal Sep 2017Trapped thrombus in patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a rare complication of pulmonary embolism that may lead to tragic clinical events. The aim of this study was to...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Trapped thrombus in patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a rare complication of pulmonary embolism that may lead to tragic clinical events. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal treatment for different clinical situations in patients with trapped thrombus in a PFO by conducting a literature review.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
A PubMed database search was conducted from 1991 through 2015, and 194 patients (185 articles) with trapped thrombus in a PFO were identified. Patient characteristics, paradoxical embolic events, and factors affecting 60-day mortality were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Among all patients, 112 (57.7%) were treated with surgery, 28 with thrombolysis, and 54 with anticoagulation alone. Dyspnea (79.4%), chest pain (33.0%), and syncope (17.5%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Pretreatment embolism was found in 37.6% of cases, and stroke (24.7%) was the most common event. Surgery was associated with fewer post-treatment embolic events than were other treatment options (p=0.044). In the multivariate analysis, initial shock or arrest, and thrombolysis were independent predictors of 60-day mortality. Thrombolysis was related with higher 60-day mortality compared with surgery in patients who had no initial shock or arrest.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review showed that surgery was associated with a lower overall incidence of post-treatment embolic events and a lower 60-day mortality in patients with trapped thrombus in a PFO. In patients without initial shock or arrest, thrombolysis was related with a higher 60-day mortality compared with surgery.
PubMed: 28955396
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2016.0295 -
Scientific Reports Sep 2017Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder but data on survival rates are still conflicting and have not so far been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder but data on survival rates are still conflicting and have not so far been quantitatively reviewed. The aim of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of cohort studies to assess pooled survival rates and prognostic factors for survival in patients with HCM. Nineteen studies were included representing 12,146 HCM patients. The pooled 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 98.0%, 94.3%, 82.2% and 75.0%, respectively. Among patients with HCM, age, NYHA functional class, family history of sudden death (FHSD), syncope, atrial fibrillation, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT), maximum left ventricular wall thickness and obstruction were significant prognostic factors for cardiovascular death. For sudden cardiac death, FHSD, nsVT, and obstruction showed significant predictive values. Moreover, estimation of population attributable risk (PAR) suggested that nsVT was the strongest predictor for cardiovascular death (13.02%, 95% CI 3.60-25.91%), while left ventricular outflow tract obstruction/mid-ventricular obstruction (LVO/MVO) was the strongest predictor for all-cause death and sudden cardiac death (10.09%, 95% CI 4.72-20.42% and 16.44%, 95% CI 7.45-31.55%, respectively). These risk factors may thus be useful for identifying HCM patients who might benefit from early diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Young Adult
PubMed: 28931939
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12289-4 -
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology... Mar 2018The total cosine R-to-T (TCRT), a vectorcardiographic marker reflecting the spatial difference between the depolarization and repolarization wavefronts, has been used to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The total cosine R-to-T (TCRT), a vectorcardiographic marker reflecting the spatial difference between the depolarization and repolarization wavefronts, has been used to predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in different clinical settings. However, its prognostic value has been controversial.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the significance of TRCT in predicting arrhythmic and/or mortality endpoints.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase databases were searched through December 31, 2016.
RESULTS
Of the 890 studies identified initially, 13 observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 11,528 patients, mean age 47 years old, 72% male, were followed for 43 ± 6 months. Data from five studies demonstrated lower TCRT values in myocardial infarction patients with adverse events (syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death) compared to those without these events (mean difference = -0.36 ± 0.05, p < .001; I = 48%). By contrast, only two studies analyzed outcomes in heart failure, and pooled meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant difference in TCRT between event-positive and event-negative patients (mean difference = -0.01 ± 0.10, p > .05; I = 80%).
CONCLUSION
TCRT is lower in MI patients at high risk of adverse events when compared to those free from such events. It can provide additional risk stratification beyond the use of clinical parameters and traditional electrocardiogram markers. Its value in other diseases such as heart failure requires further studies.
Topics: Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Female; Humans; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Vectorcardiography; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 28901628
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12495