-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Aortic valve disease is a common condition that is easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum longitudinally down the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Aortic valve disease is a common condition that is easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum longitudinally down the centre ("median sternotomy") and replacing the valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. Median sternotomy is generally well tolerated, but as less invasive options have become available, the efficacy of limited incisions has been called into question. In particular, the effects of reducing the visibility and surgical access has raised safety concerns with regards to the placement of cannulae, venting of the heart, epicardial wire placement, and de-airing of the heart at the end of the procedure. These difficulties may increase operating times, affecting outcome. The benefits of smaller incisions are thought to include decreased pain; improved respiratory mechanics; reductions in wound infections, bleeding, and need for transfusion; shorter intensive care stay; better cosmesis; and a quicker return to normal activity.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy in people with aortic valve disease requiring surgical replacement.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, clinical trials registries, and manufacturers' websites from inception to July 2016, with no language limitations. We reviewed references of identified papers to identify any further studies of relevance.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing aortic valve replacement via a median sternotomy versus aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy. We excluded trials that performed other minimally invasive incisions such as mini-thoracotomies, port access, trans-apical, trans-femoral or robotic procedures. Although some well-conducted prospective and retrospective case-control and cohort studies exist, these were not included in this review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial papers to extract data, assess quality, and identify risk of bias. A third review author provided arbitration where required. The quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology and results of patient-relevant outcomes were summarised in a 'Summary of findings' table.
MAIN RESULTS
The review included seven trials with 511 participants. These included adults from centres in Austria, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, and Egypt. We performed 12 comparisons investigating the effects of minimally invasive limited upper hemi-sternotomy on aortic valve replacement as compared to surgery performed via full median sternotomy.There was no evidence of any effect of upper hemi-sternotomy on mortality versus full median sternotomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 2.82; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality). There was no evidence of an increase in cardiopulmonary bypass time with aortic valve replacement performed via an upper hemi-sternotomy (mean difference (MD) 3.02 minutes, 95% CI -4.10 to 10.14; participants = 311; studies = 5; low quality). There was no evidence of an increase in aortic cross-clamp time (MD 0.95 minutes, 95% CI -3.45 to 5.35; participants = 391; studies = 6; low quality). None of the included studies reported major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as a composite end point.There was no evidence of an effect on length of hospital stay through limited hemi-sternotomy (MD -1.31 days, 95% CI -2.63 to 0.01; participants = 297; studies = 5; I = 89%; very low quality). Postoperative blood loss was lower in the upper hemi-sternotomy group (MD -158.00 mL, 95% CI -303.24 to -12.76; participants = 297; studies = 5; moderate quality). The evidence did not support a reduction in deep sternal wound infections (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.30; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality) or re-exploration (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.13; participants = 511; studies = 7; moderate quality). There was no change in pain scores by upper hemi-sternotomy (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.33, 95% CI -0.85 to 0.20; participants = 197; studies = 3; I = 70%; very low quality), but there was a small increase in postoperative pulmonary function tests with minimally invasive limited sternotomy (MD 1.98 % predicted FEV1, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.33; participants = 257; studies = 4; I = 28%; low quality). There was a small reduction in length of intensive care unit stays as a result of the minimally invasive upper hemi-sternotomy (MD -0.57 days, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.20; participants = 297; studies = 5; low quality). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was not reduced with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through limited compared to full sternotomy (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.07 to 4.89; participants = 240; studies = 3; moderate quality), neither were postoperative ventilation times (MD -1.12 hours, 95% CI -3.43 to 1.19; participants = 297; studies = 5; low quality). None of the included studies reported cost analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence in this review was assessed as generally low to moderate quality. The study sample sizes were small and underpowered to demonstrate differences in outcomes with low event rates. Clinical heterogeneity both between and within studies is a relatively fixed feature of surgical trials, and this also contributed to the need for caution in interpreting results.Considering these limitations, there was uncertainty of the effect on mortality or extracorporeal support times with upper hemi-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement compared to full median sternotomy. The evidence to support a reduction in total hospital length of stay or intensive care stay was low in quality. There was also uncertainty of any difference in the rates of other, secondary outcome measures or adverse events with minimally invasive limited sternotomy approaches to aortic valve replacement.There appears to be uncertainty between minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via upper hemi-sternotomy and conventional aortic valve replacement via a full median sternotomy. Before widespread adoption of the minimally invasive approach can be recommended, there is a need for a well-designed and adequately powered prospective randomised controlled trial. Such a study would benefit from performing a robust cost analysis. Growing patient preference for minimally invasive techniques merits thorough quality-of-life analyses to be included as end points, as well as quantitative measures of physiological reserve.
Topics: Aged; Aortic Valve; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reoperation; Sternotomy; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 28394022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2 -
Sleep Mar 2017The presence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is known to impact long-term cardiovascular morbidity in adults; however, the long-term effects in children are poorly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The presence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is known to impact long-term cardiovascular morbidity in adults; however, the long-term effects in children are poorly understood. We aimed to systematically review and synthesize studies published to date on the long-term effects of SDB in children.
STUDY DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic review using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus (all indexed years).
METHODS
We searched for English-language articles containing original human data from prospective studies, with ≥7 participants, in children ≤18 years of age. Data regarding study design, demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, level of evidence, and risk of bias were obtained. Articles were independently reviewed by three investigators. Retrospective and cross-sectional studies were excluded.
RESULTS
Of 1701 identified abstracts, 25 articles (combined n = 1418) were ultimately included. All studies reported longitudinal outcomes following treatment of SDB, 21 studies exclusively reporting outcomes after adenotonsillectomy. Therefore, studies were combined to objectively assess the effect of SDB treatment on cardiovascular outcomes. Although all cardiovascular parameters were within the normal range at baseline, at follow-up there was a significant decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular end diastolic diameter, heart rate, mitral Em/Am ratio, and C-reactive protein. There was no significant change in interventricular septum thickness, left ventricular parameters (shortening fraction, systolic and end diastolic diameters, ejection fraction, posterior wall thickness, isovolumetric relaxation time), left atrial diameter, and aortic and pulmonary valve peak velocities.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies assessing the long-term cardiovascular effects of SDB in children are limited. The available literature indicates effects on autonomic function, right, and left heart function following treatment for SDB. However, well-designed, large-scale, prospective cohort studies (using standardized outcomes) are needed to better understand the relationship of cardiovascular morbidity in the context of pediatric SDB.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Cardiovascular Diseases; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Heart Rate; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Tonsillectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28329042
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsx015 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2017In the recent years, a variety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures have emerged that may provide a treatment option to participants suffering from... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In the recent years, a variety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) procedures have emerged that may provide a treatment option to participants suffering from moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of BLVR on the short- and long-term health outcomes in participants with moderate to severe COPD and determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of each individual technique.
SEARCH METHODS
Studies were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (CAGR) and by handsearching of respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. All searches are current until 07 December 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included studies reported as full text, those published as abstract only and unpublished data, if available.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent review authors assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. Where possible, data from more than one study were combined in a meta-analysis using RevMan 5 software.
MAIN RESULTS
AeriSealOne RCT of 95 participants found that AeriSeal compared to control led to a significant median improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) (18.9%, interquartile range (IQR) -0.7% to 41.9% versus 1.3%, IQR -8.2% to 12.9%), and higher quality of life, as measured by the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (-12 units, IQR -22 units to -5 units, versus -3 units, IQR -5 units to 1 units), P = 0.043 and P = 0.0072 respectively. Although there was no significant difference in mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.90, 95% CI 0.14 to 62.15), adverse events were more common for participants treated with AeriSeal (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.34 to 10.24). The quality of evidence found in this prematurely terminated study was rated low to moderate. Airway bypass stentsTreatment with airway bypass stents compared to control did not lead to significant between-group changes in FEV (0.95%, 95% CI -0.16% to 2.06%) or SGRQ scores (-2.00 units, 95% CI -5.58 units to 1.58 units), as found by one study comprising 315 participants. There was no significant difference in mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.77), nor were there significant differences in adverse events (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.73) between the two groups. The quality of evidence was rated moderate to high. Endobronchial coilsThree studies comprising 461 participants showed that treatment with endobronchial coils compared to control led to a significant between-group mean difference in FEV (10.88%, 95% CI 5.20% to 16.55%) and SGRQ (-9.14 units, 95% CI -11.59 units to -6.70 units). There were no significant differences in mortality (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.67 to 3.29), but adverse events were significantly more common for participants treated with coils (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.23). The quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Endobronchial valvesFive studies comprising 703 participants found that endobronchial valves versus control led to significant improvements in FEV (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64) and scores on the SGRQ (-7.29 units, 95% CI -11.12 units to -3.45 units). There were no significant differences in mortality between the two groups (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.43) but adverse events were more common in the endobronchial valve group (OR 5.85, 95% CI 2.16 to 15.84). Participant selection plays an important role as absence of collateral ventilation was associated with superior clinically significant improvements in health outcomes. The quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Intrabronchial valvesIn the comparison of partial bilateral placement of intrabronchial valves to control, one trial favoured control in FEV (-2.11% versus 0.04%, P = 0.001) and one trial found no difference between the groups (0.9 L versus 0.87 L, P = 0.065). There were no significant differences in SGRQ scores (MD 2.64 units, 95% CI -0.28 units to 5.56 units) or mortality rates (OR 4.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 28.94), but adverse events were more frequent (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.48 to 7.84) in participants treated with intrabronchial valves. The lack of functional benefits may be explained by the procedural strategy used, as another study (22 participants) compared unilateral versus partial bilateral placement, finding significant improvements in FEV and SGRQ when using the unilateral approach. The quality of evidence ranged between moderate to high. Vapour ablationOne study of 69 participants found significant mean between-group differences in FEV (14.70%, 95% CI 7.98% to 21.42%) and SGRQ (-9.70 units, 95% CI -15.62 units to -3.78 units), favouring vapour ablation over control. There was no significant between-group difference in mortality (OR 2.82, 95% CI 0.13 to 61.06), but vapour ablation led to significantly more adverse events (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.00 to 14.97). The quality of evidence ranged from low to moderate.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Results for selected BLVR procedures indicate they can provide significant and clinically meaningful short-term (up to one year) improvements in health outcomes, but this was at the expense of increased adverse events. The currently available evidence is not sufficient to assess the effect of BLVR procedures on mortality. These findings are limited by the lack of long-term follow-up data, limited availability of cost-effectiveness data, significant heterogeneity in results, presence of skew and high CIs, and the open-label character of a number of the studies.
Topics: Bronchi; Bronchoscopy; Humans; Pneumonectomy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28230230
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012158.pub2 -
Meta Gene Sep 2016Warfarin is the most commonly used antithrombotic drug. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 1173 and VKORC1-1639 influence warfarin... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Warfarin is the most commonly used antithrombotic drug. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 1173 and VKORC1-1639 influence warfarin maintenance dosage. We aimed to determine the impact of SNPs of these genes on mean daily warfarin dosage (MDWD) in Han-Chinese patients.
METHODS
Strict literature inclusion criteria were established, and literature searching was performed on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for English articles and CNKI, CBM and Wanfang database for Chinese articles before September 2, 2014. Revman 5.3 was used to analyze the relationship between gene SNPs and MDWD in Han-Chinese subjects.
RESULTS
We included 33 studies researching the impact of gene SNPs on MDWD in Han-Chinese subjects. CYP2C9 *3/*3, *1/*3 and *3 carriers needed a 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.0%-81.0%), 28% (22.0%-33.0%) and 26% (21.0%-32.0%) lower MDWD, respectively, than CYP2C9 *1/*1 carriers. CYP4F2 TT, CT and T carriers required a 18% (7.0%-30.0%), 7% (7.0%-7.0%) and 11% (7.0%-14.0%) higher MDWD, respectively, than CYP4F2 CC carriers. VKORC1 1173 CC, CT and C carriers required a 98% (78.0%-118.0%), 49% (37.0%-62.0%) and 56% (44.0%-67.0%) higher MDWD, respectively, than VKORC1 1173 TT carriers. VKORC1-1639 GG, GA and G carriers needed a 101% (53.0%-149.0%), 40% (36.0%-45.0%) and 38% (35.0%-42.0%) higher MDWD, respectively, than VKORC1-1639 AA carriers.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis is the first to report the relationship between genotypes and MDWD among Han-Chinese patients. The results showed that SNPs of CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 1173 and VKORC1-1639 significantly influenced the MDWD in Han-Chinese patients.
PubMed: 27617219
DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2016.07.002 -
Clinical Kidney Journal Aug 2016The aim of this systematic review is to examine the literature for the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement...
BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review is to examine the literature for the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) based on transapical (TA) versus transfemoral (TF) approaches.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted utilizing Embase, Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through December 2015. Studies that reported relative risk, odds ratio or hazard ratio comparing the AKI risk in patients who underwent TA-TAVR versus TF-TAVR were included. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random effect, generic inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Seventeen cohort studies with 5085 patients were enrolled in the analysis to assess the risk of AKI in patients undergoing TA-TAVR versus TF-TAVR. The pooled RR of AKI in patients who underwent TA-TAVR was 2.26 (95% CI 1.79-2.86) when compared with TF-TAVR. When meta-analysis was confined to the studies with adjusted analysis for confounders evaluating the risk of AKI following TAVR, the pooled RR of TA-TAVR was 2.89 (95% CI 2.12-3.94). The risk for moderate to severe AKI [RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.57-1.80)] in patients who underwent TA-TAVR compared with TF-TAVR was not significantly higher.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis demonstrates an association between TA-TAVR and a higher risk of AKI. Future studies are required to assess the risks of moderate to severe AKI and mortality following TA-TAVR versus TF-TAVR.
PubMed: 27478597
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw055 -
International Journal of Surgery... Sep 2016Minimal access valve surgery, both mitral and aortic, may be related to improvement in specific post-operative outcomes, therefore may be beneficial for the subgroup of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Minimal access valve surgery, both mitral and aortic, may be related to improvement in specific post-operative outcomes, therefore may be beneficial for the subgroup of the elderly referred for valve surgery.
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified several different studies, of which 6 fulfilled criteria for meta-analysis. Outcomes for a total of 1347 patients (675 conventional standard sternotomy and 672 minimally invasive valve surgery) were assessed with a meta-analysis using random effects modeling. Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis with quality scoring were also assessed. The primary endpoint was early mortality. Secondary endpoints included intra and post-operative outcomes.
RESULTS
In the context of elderly patients, minimal access valve surgery conferred comparable early mortality to standard sternotomy (odd ratio (OR) 0.79, CI [0.40,1.56], p = 0.50) with no heterogeneity (p = 0.13); it was also associated with reduced mechanical intubation time (OR 0.48, CI [0.30,0.78], p = 0.003) and reduced post-operative length of stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) -2.91, CI [-3.09, -2.74] p < 0.00001), however both cardio-pulmonary bypass time and cross clamp time were longer (WMD 24.29, CI [22.97, 25.61] p < 0.00001 and WMD 8.61, CI [7.61, 9.61], p < 0.00001, respectively); subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant reduced post-operative length of stay for both minimally invasive aortic and mitral surgery (WMD -2.84, CI [-3.07, -2.60] p < 0.00001 and WMD -2.98, CI [-3.25, -2.71] p < 0.00001 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp time, minimally invasive valve surgery is a safe alternative to standard sternotomy in the elderly, with similar early mortality, and improvements in intubation time as well as length of stay.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Valve; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Humans; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Mitral Valve; Models, Statistical; Observational Studies as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27131758
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.040 -
European Journal of Vascular and... May 2016The growth rates of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and factors influencing their expansion are poorly understood. This study aimed to review systematically published... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND
The growth rates of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and factors influencing their expansion are poorly understood. This study aimed to review systematically published literature describing TAA expansion and examine factors that may be associated with this.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed until 30 April 2015. Studies describing rates of TAA growth were identified and systematically reviewed. Outcomes of interest were TAA growth rates and associated factors. Study quality was assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality checklists for cohort studies.
RESULTS
Eleven publications, involving 1383 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Included studies were generally low in quality. Aneurysm measurement and growth-rate estimation techniques were inconsistently reported. Mean growth rates for all TAAs ranged from 0.2 to 4.2 mm/year. Mean growth rates for ascending and aortic arch aneurysms ranged from 0.2 to 2.8 mm/year, while those for descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysms ranged from 1.9 to 3.4 mm/year in studies reporting according to anatomical location. Large aneurysm size, distal aneurysm locations, presence of Marfan's syndrome, and bicuspid aortic valve were consistently associated with accelerated TAA growth. Presence of chronic dissection and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder were also implicated as risk factors for faster TAA growth. Associations between medical comorbidity and aneurysm expansion were conflicting. Previous aortic surgery and anticoagulants were reported to have a protective effect on aneurysm growth in two studies.
CONCLUSION
There is a shortfall in the understanding of TAA expansion rates. Existing studies are heterogeneous in methodology and reported outcomes. Identified unifying themes suggest that TAAs grow at a slow rate with large presenting diameter, distal aneurysm, and history of bicuspid aortic valve or Marfan's syndrome serving as main risk factors for accelerated aneurysm growth. High-quality studies with a standardised approach to TAA growth assessment are required.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Disease Progression; Humans; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26947541
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.017 -
Heart, Lung and Vessels 2015Reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract is the most commonly performed valve repair/replacement procedure in congenital cardiac surgery. There is an...
INTRODUCTION
Reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract is the most commonly performed valve repair/replacement procedure in congenital cardiac surgery. There is an ongoing shortage of homografts, and existing bioprosthetic options suffer from substantial rates of structural valve deterioration over time. The Medtronic Freestyle valve is used extensively in the aortic position, but little data is available on its performance in the pulmonary position.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies reporting echocardiographic and clinical outcomes, including reintervention and functional status, associated with the Freestyle valve in the pulmonary position for both Ross and congenital surgery.
RESULTS
13 observational studies including 334 patients with a mean follow-up of 34 months (range 10-98 months) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Structural valve deterioration occurred in 4.8% (95% confidence interval 0.8-10.6%) of patients. Reintervention was required in 1.1% (95% confidence interval 0.0-3.3%). Freedom from symptoms of heart failure occurred in 97.7% (94.6-99.7%). The results did not change substantially when analysed according to Ross or congenital surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
The Freestyle valve performs well at short-term follow-up and provides a viable alternative when homografts are unavailable. Further long-term studies are required to better assess its role in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.
PubMed: 26811836
DOI: No ID Found -
Respiratory Care Nov 2015This systematic review examines levels of evidence and recommendation grades of various therapeutic interventions of inspiratory muscle training in people who have had a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review examines levels of evidence and recommendation grades of various therapeutic interventions of inspiratory muscle training in people who have had a stroke. Benefits from different levels of force and resistance in respiratory muscles are shown in this population. This review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) directives and was completed in November 2014. The search limits were studies published in English between 2004 and 2014. Relevant studies were searched for in MEDLINE, PEDro, OAIster, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, DOAJ, Cochrane, Embase, Academic Search Complete, Fuente Académica, and MedicLatina. Initially, 20 articles were identified. After analyzing all primary documents, 14 studies were excluded. Only 6 studies were relevant to this review. Three different types of interventions were found (maximum inspiratory training, controlled training, and nonintervention) in 3 different groups. One specific study compared 3 inspiratory muscle training groups with a group of breathing exercises (diaphragmatic exercises with pursed lips) and a control group. Future long-term studies with larger sample sizes are needed. It is necessary to apply respiratory muscle training as a service of the national health system and to consider its inclusion in the conventional neurological program.
Topics: Breathing Exercises; Humans; Respiratory Muscles; Spirometry; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation
PubMed: 26493591
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03981 -
Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery May 2015Discordance between studies drives continued debate regarding the best management of asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of the present study was to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Discordance between studies drives continued debate regarding the best management of asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of management plans for asymptomatic severe MR, and compare the effectiveness of a strategy of early surgery to watchful waiting.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were excluded if they: (I) lacked a watchful waiting cohort; (II) included symptomatic patients; or (III) included etiologies other than degenerative mitral valve disease. The primary outcome of the study was all-cause mortality at 10 years. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality, repair rate, repeat mitral valve surgery, and development of new atrial fibrillation.
RESULTS
Five observational studies were eligible for review and three were included in the pooled analysis. In asymptomatic patients without class I triggers (symptoms or ventricular dysfunction), pooled analysis revealed a significant reduction in long-term mortality with an early surgery approach [hazard ratio (HR) =0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.71]. This survival benefit persisted in a sub-group analysis limited to patients without class II triggers (atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension) [relative risk (RR) =0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.98]. Aggregate rates of operative mortality did not differ between treatment arms (0.7% vs. 0.7% for early surgery vs. watchful waiting). However, significantly higher repair rates were achieved in the early surgery cohorts (RR =1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite disagreement between individual studies, the present meta-analysis demonstrates that a strategy of early surgery may improve survival and increase the likelihood of mitral valve repair compared with watchful waiting. Early surgery may also benefit patients when instituted prior to the development of class II triggers.
PubMed: 26309823
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.04.01