-
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine Jun 2023The present review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the currently available data and to compare the important clinical and functional outcomes in patients with...
The present review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the currently available data and to compare the important clinical and functional outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures who were treated using deltoid split (DS) or deltopectoral (DP) surgical approaches. The PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that reported functional outcome data of patients with fracture of proximal humerus who were surgically treated using DS and DP approaches. A total of 14 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The duration of surgery [min; weighted mean difference (WMD), -16.44; 95% CI, -(25.25-7.63)], amount of blood loss [ml; WMD, -57.99; 95% CI, -(102.74-13.23)] and time to bone union [weeks WMD, -1.66; 95% CI, -(2.30-1.02)] was comparatively lower in patients that underwent DS. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain and quality of life scores, range of movement and risk of complications between the DS and the DP groups. Patients in the DS group had improved shoulder function and constant shoulder score (CSS) at 3 months post-surgery (WMD, 6.36; 95% CI, 1.06-11.65). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of CSS and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The activity of daily living (ADL) score was significantly improved in the DS group at 3 (WMD, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.40-2.06), 6 (WMD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.25) and 12 months (WMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.18-1.47) after the surgery. The present results suggested that DS and DP surgical approaches were associated with similar clinical outcomes. The DS approach was associated with certain perioperative benefits, as well as reduced time to bone union, improved shoulder function in the early postoperative period and improved ADL scores. These benefits may be considered while choosing between these two surgical approaches.
PubMed: 37229316
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.11995 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Aug 2023Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.
METHODS
Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.
RESULTS
A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Humeral Fractures; Fracture Healing; Bone Plates; Radial Neuropathy; Humerus; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37093269
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04836-8 -
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Sep 2023Silicone radial head prostheses (SRHP) are considered obsolete due to reports of frequent failure and destructive silicone-induced synovitis. Considering the good...
BACKGROUND
Silicone radial head prostheses (SRHP) are considered obsolete due to reports of frequent failure and destructive silicone-induced synovitis. Considering the good outcomes of modern non-radial silicone joint implants, the extent of scientific evidence for this negative view is unclear. The aim of this research was to systematically analyze the clinical evidence on complications and outcomes of SRHP and how SRHP compare to both non-SRHP and silicone prostheses of other joints.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted through the Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases.
RESULTS
Eight cohort studies were included, consisting of 142 patients and follow-up periods ranging from 23 months to 8 years. Average patient satisfaction was 86%, range of 71%-100%, and 58 complications were seen, but no cases of synovitis. These outcomes were in line with non-SRHP. Four case series with 11 cases of synovitis were found, all due to implant fractures years to decades after implantation. Six systematic reviews of currently used non-radial silicone joint implants showed excellent outcomes with low complication rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Since SRHP have satisfactory clinical results and an acceptable complication rate when selecting a patient group in suitable condition for surgical indications, it is considered that SRHP can still be chosen as a potential surgical treatment method in current clinical practice.
PubMed: 37088881
DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.00990 -
Shoulder & Elbow Apr 2023There is limited evidence examining glenoid osteotomy as a treatment for posterior shoulder instability. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence examining glenoid osteotomy as a treatment for posterior shoulder instability.
METHODS
A search of Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from the date of origin to 28th November 2019. Nine out of 3,408 retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria and quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool.
RESULTS
In 356 shoulders, the main indication for osteotomy was excessive glenoid retroversion (greater than or equal to approximately -10°). The mean preoperative glenoid version was -15° (range, -35° to -5°). Post-operatively, the mean glenoid version was -6° (range, -28° to 13°) and an average correction of 10° (range, -1° to 30°) was observed. Range of motion increased significantly in most studies and all standardized outcome scores (Rowe, Constant-Murley, Oxford instability, Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Scoring and mean shoulder value) improved significantly with high rates of patient satisfaction (85%). A high complication rate (34%, = 120) was reported post-surgery, with frequent cases of persistent instability (20%, = 68) and fractures (e.g., glenoid neck and acromion) (4%, = 12). However, the revision rate was low (0.6%, = 2).
CONCLUSION
Glenoid osteotomy is an appropriate treatment for posterior shoulder instability secondary to excessive glenoid retroversion. However, the high rate of persistent instability should be considered when making treatment decisions. Systematic review; Level 4.
PubMed: 37035619
DOI: 10.1177/17585732211056053 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Aug 2023Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become an increasingly popular treatment option for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. There is however contradictory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
HYPOTHESIS
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become an increasingly popular treatment option for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. There is however contradictory evidence on the impact of timing of RSA on patient outcomes. It remains unclear if poor results after initial nonsurgical or surgical management can be improved with delayed RSA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes of acute RSA and delayed RSA for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed on 4 databases for studies that compared acute RSA with RSA used after prior nonoperative or operative treatment. Studies with a mean cohort age of <65 years were excluded. Demographical data, clinical outcome scores, range of motion measurements, and postoperative complications were collected from the included studies.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included for data analysis. Compared with delayed RSA cohorts, acute RSA cohorts had higher forward flexion (124.3° vs. 114.9°; P = .019), external rotation (24.7° vs. 20.2°; P = .041), and abduction (113.2° vs. 99.8°; P = .03). Compared with RSA after conservative management, acute RSA had greater external rotation (29.9° vs. 21.4°; P = .043). The acute RSA cohort had significantly higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (76.4 vs. 68.2; P = .025) and Constant-Murley scores (65.6 vs. 57.3; P = .002) compared with the delayed RSA cohort. Subgroup analyses showed significantly greater Constant-Murley (64.9 vs. 56.9; P = .020) and Simple Shoulder Test scores (8.8 vs. 6.8; P = .031) with acute RSA compared with RSA after conservative treatment. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was higher in the acute RSA cohort compared with RSA after open reduction internal fixation (77.9 vs. 63.5; P = .008). The overall complication rate per 100 patient-years was 11.7 for the acute RSA cohort and 18.5 for the delayed RSA cohort (risk ratio: 0.55; P = .015).
CONCLUSION
Based on the current evidence, acute RSA presents better clinical outcome measures and range of motion measurements, with decreased complication rates than RSA performed after prior nonoperative or operative treatment.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Shoulder Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Range of Motion, Articular; Humeral Fractures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37024039
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.006 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow... 2023Parkinson's disease is a degenerative neurological disorder that can cause both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Motor symptoms are associated with increasing the patient's... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's disease is a degenerative neurological disorder that can cause both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Motor symptoms are associated with increasing the patient's falls risk. Shoulder arthroplasty surgery in this patient cohort is associated with more complications than non-Parkinsonian patients. We sought to identify any increase in complications associated with this patient cohort and any surgical considerations that ought to be taken in light of their disease process.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of articles using PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar. All studies which included any shoulder arthroplasty surgery for patients with Parkinson's disease were included.
RESULTS
Complication rates were higher in patients with Parkinson's disease than in the normal arthroplasty cohort in all studies. There was significant heterogeneity between all 8 studies included in the systematic review. Complication rates ranged from 26% to 100%. Complications included subluxation, loosening, malunion, nonunion, scapular notching, stiffness, fracture, baseplate failure, dislocation, and infection. Reoperation rates ranged from 5% to 29%.
CONCLUSION
Compared to patients without Parkinson's disease undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, patients with Parkinson's disease achieved similar reductions in pain but inferior clinical function. The range of movement was less predictable, and complication rates were significantly higher in Parkinson's disease patients. This study will aid the surgeon and patient regarding surgical intervention, informed consent, and allow the surgeon to anticipate potential complications of shoulder arthroplasty in this patient cohort.
PubMed: 36937106
DOI: 10.1177/24715492231162302 -
JSES International Mar 2023Acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations with a concomitant fracture of the coracoid process (CP) are rare and there is ambiguity on treatment options. This systematic review... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations with a concomitant fracture of the coracoid process (CP) are rare and there is ambiguity on treatment options. This systematic review was performed to address the clinically relevant question: what are the shoulder functions, union rates, and expected time until return to daily life in patients with a dislocation of the AC joint with a concomitant CP fracture after (1) nonsurgical treatment, (2) sole fixation of the AC joint, and (3) fixation of both the AC joint and the coracoid process?
METHODS
Studies were identified by conducting an online. Thirty records met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for data extraction.
RESULTS
A total of 37 shoulders from 37 patients were included. Surgical treatment was provided to 22 out of 37 patients, and 15 patients had nonsurgical treatment. Out of the surgically treated patients, 12 patients were treated with a fixation of both the AC joint and the CP, 9 patients with a sole fixation of the AC joint, and 1 patient with a sole fixation of the CP.
CONCLUSION
Existing literature does not indicate that one treatment option is superior, and more data are needed to guide evidence-based decisions on this rare injury.
PubMed: 36911766
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.014 -
Shoulder & Elbow Feb 2023Advances have been made to the traditional inlay Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) design such as the onlay humeral component prosthesis. Currently, there is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Advances have been made to the traditional inlay Grammont Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) design such as the onlay humeral component prosthesis. Currently, there is no agreement in the literature regarding the best option for the humeral component when comparing inlay and onlay designs. This review compares the outcomes and complications between onlay versus inlay humeral components for RSA.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase. Only studies reporting outcomes comparing onlay versus inlay RSA humeral components were included.
RESULTS
Four studies with 298 patients (306 shoulders) were included. Onlay humeral components were associated with better external rotation (ER) ( < 0.0001). No significant difference in forward flexion (FF) or abduction was found. Constant scores (CS) and VAS scores did not differ. Increased scapular notching was found in the inlay group (23.18%) versus the onlay group (7.74%) ( = 0.02). Postoperative scapular fractures and acromial fractures did not differ.
CONCLUSION
Onlay and inlay RSA designs are associated with improved postoperative range of motion (ROM). Onlay humeral designs may be associated with greater ER and lower rate of scapular notching; however, no difference was found in Constant and VAS scores, so further studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.
PubMed: 36895614
DOI: 10.1177/17585732211067171 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2023Women with a suspected large-for-dates fetus or a fetus with suspected macrosomia (birthweight greater than 4000 g) are at risk of operative birth or caesarean section.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Women with a suspected large-for-dates fetus or a fetus with suspected macrosomia (birthweight greater than 4000 g) are at risk of operative birth or caesarean section. The baby is also at increased risk of shoulder dystocia and trauma, in particular fractures and brachial plexus injury. Induction of labour may reduce these risks by decreasing the birthweight, but may also lead to longer labours and an increased risk of caesarean section.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of a policy of labour induction at or shortly before term (37 to 40 weeks) for suspected fetal macrosomia on the way of giving birth and maternal or perinatal morbidity.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 January 2016), contacted trial authors and searched reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We contacted study authors for additional information. For key outcomes the quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four trials, involving 1190 women. It was not possible to blind women and staff to the intervention, but for other 'Risk of bias' domains these studies were assessed as being at low or unclear risk of bias. Compared to expectant management, there was no clear effect of induction of labour for suspected macrosomia on the risk of caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.09; 1190 women; four trials, moderate-quality evidence) or instrumental delivery (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.13; 1190 women; four trials, low-quality evidence). Shoulder dystocia (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.98; 1190 women; four trials, moderate-quality evidence), and fracture (any) (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.79; 1190 women; four studies, high-quality evidence) were reduced in the induction of labour group. There were no clear differences between groups for brachial plexus injury (two events were reported in the control group in one trial, low-quality evidence). There was no strong evidence of any difference between groups for measures of neonatal asphyxia; low five-minute infant Apgar scores (less than seven) or low arterial cord blood pH (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 9.02; 858 infants; two trials, low-quality evidence; and, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.22; 818 infants; one trial, moderate-quality evidence, respectively). Mean birthweight was lower in the induction group, but there was considerable heterogeneity between studies for this outcome (mean difference (MD) -178.03 g, 95% CI -315.26 to -40.81; 1190 infants; four studies; I = 89%). For outcomes assessed using GRADE, we based our downgrading decisions on high risk of bias from lack of blinding and imprecision of effect estimates.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia has not been shown to alter the risk of brachial plexus injury, but the power of the included studies to show a difference for such a rare event is limited. Also antenatal estimates of fetal weight are often inaccurate so many women may be worried unnecessarily, and many inductions may not be needed. Nevertheless, induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia results in a lower mean birthweight, and fewer birth fractures and shoulder dystocia. The observation of increased use of phototherapy in the largest trial, should also be kept in mind. Findings from trials included in the review suggest that to prevent one fracture it would be necessary to induce labour in 60 women. Since induction of labour does not appear to alter the rate of caesarean delivery or instrumental delivery, it is likely to be popular with many women. In settings where obstetricians can be reasonably confident about their scan assessment of fetal weight, the advantages and disadvantages of induction at or near term for fetuses suspected of being macrosomic should be discussed with parents. Although some parents and doctors may feel the evidence already justifies induction, others may justifiably disagree. Further trials of induction shortly before term for suspected fetal macrosomia are needed. Such trials should concentrate on refining the optimum gestation of induction, and improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of macrosomia.
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cesarean Section; Fetal Macrosomia; Birth Weight; Shoulder Dystocia; Fetal Weight; Labor, Induced
PubMed: 36884238
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.pub3 -
Chinese Journal of Traumatology =... Jul 2023The aim of this study was to analyze if any difference exists on the type of immobilisation (above elbow vs. below elbow) in the conservative treatment of distal end... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of above elbow and below elbow immobilisation for conservative treatment of distal end radius fracture in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to analyze if any difference exists on the type of immobilisation (above elbow vs. below elbow) in the conservative treatment of distal end radius fractures in adults.
METHODS
The study was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. An electronic literature search was performed up to 1st October 2021 in Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane database using the search terms, "distal end radius fractures OR fracture of distal radius", "conservative treatment OR non-surgical treatment", "above elbow immobilisation" and "below elbow immobilisation". Randomized clinical trials written in English, describing outcome of distal end radius fractures in adults by conservative or non-surgical means using above elbow immobilisation or below elbow immobilisation were included and assessed according to the risk of bias assessment (RoB2) tool by Cochrane collaboration. Non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, review articles, commentaries, editorials, conference presentations, operative techniques and articles without availability of full text were excluded from this review. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
RESULTS
Six randomized clinical trials were included for quantitative review. High heterogeneity (I > 75%) was noted among all the studies. The standard mean difference (MD) between the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand scores in both the groups was 0.52 (95% CI: -0.28 to 1.32) which was statistically non-significant. There was no statistical difference in the radial height (MD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.91 to 1.12), radial inclination (MD = 0.5, 95% CI: -1.88 to 2.87, palmar tilt (MD =1.06, 95% CI: -0.31 to 2.43) and ulnar variance (MD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.64). It was observed that shoulder pain occurred more commonly as a complication in above elbow immobilisation and the values were statistically significant (above elbow: 38/92, 41.3%; below elbow: 19/94, 20.2%).
CONCLUSION
This two-armed systematic review on the above elbow or below elbow immobilisation to be used for conservative treatment of the distal end radius fracture in adults resulted in non-significant differences in terms of functional and radiological scores among the 2 groups but significant increase in the complication rates in the above elbow group.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Elbow; Fracture Fixation; Conservative Treatment; Retrospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Wrist Fractures; Radius Fractures
PubMed: 36737394
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.12.005