-
American Journal of Surgery Feb 2024To evaluate whether a single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device can reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in at-risk patients with closed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Single-use negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for the reduction of surgical site infections in closed surgical incisions: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate whether a single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device can reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in at-risk patients with closed surgical incisions across a range of surgical specialties, compared with standard care.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from the period January 2011 to April 2021.
RESULTS
Out of 15,283 articles identified, 19 were included. A statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the composite SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.49), superficial SSI (OR: 0.30; 95 % CI: 0.17-0.53), and deep SSI (OR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.46-0.96) outcomes was observed with the sNPWT device compared with standard care in a pooled analysis of all surgical specialties.
CONCLUSION
A -80 mmHg sNPWT device reduces the incidence of composite, superficial, and deep SSIs when compared with standard care across a heterogenous at-risk surgical population containing a variety of surgical specialties.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Surgical Wound; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Bandages
PubMed: 37903665
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.031 -
The British Journal of Surgery Jan 2024Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, with remarkable advances in early diagnosis, systemic treatments, and surgical techniques. Robotic nipple-sparing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, with remarkable advances in early diagnosis, systemic treatments, and surgical techniques. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy has been trialled; however, the complication rates, surgical outcomes, and oncological safety of this approach remain obscure.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was conducted from conception until September 2022. Studies examining complications and operative variables where robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy was compared with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy were included. Primary study outcomes were complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, skin or nipple necrosis, seroma, haematoma, infection, implant loss, and wound dehiscence) and oncological safety (recurrence and positive margins). The secondary outcomes included operative variables, length of stay, cost-effectiveness, learning curve, and aesthetic outcome.
RESULTS
A total of seven studies of overall fair quality, involving 1674 patients, were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Grade 3 complications were reduced in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy without statistical significance (OR 0.60 (95 per cent c.i. 0.35 to 1.05)). Nipple necrosis was significantly reduced in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (OR 0.54 (95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.96); P = 0.03; I2 = 15 per cent). Operating time (mean difference +58.81 min (95 per cent c.i. +28.19 to +89.44 min); P = 0.0002) and length of stay (mean difference +1.23 days (95 per cent c.i. +0.64 to +1.81 days); P < 0.0001) were significantly increased in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, whereas the opposite was true for blood loss (mean difference -53.18 ml (95 per cent c.i. -71.78 to -34.58 ml); P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Whilst still in its infancy, robotic breast surgery may become a viable option in breast surgery. Nonetheless, the oncological safety of this approach requires robust assessment.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Nipples; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Necrosis; Mammaplasty; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37890072
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad336 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Oct 2023Breast-conserving therapy with oncoplastic reduction is a useful strategy for partial mastectomy defect reconstruction. The most recently published systematic review of...
BACKGROUND
Breast-conserving therapy with oncoplastic reduction is a useful strategy for partial mastectomy defect reconstruction. The most recently published systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction outcomes from 2015 showed wound dehiscence in 4.3%, hematoma in 0.9%, infection in 2.8%, and nipple necrosis in 0.9% of patients. We performed a systematic review of oncoplastic breast reduction literature, comparing outcomes and complication rates reported over the past 8 years.
METHODS
Studies describing the use of oncoplastic breast reduction and discussion of postoperative complications were included. The primary outcome assessed was the postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes analyzed were rates of margin expansion, completion mastectomy, and delays in adjuvant therapy due to complications.
RESULTS
Nine articles met inclusion criteria, resulting in 1715 oncoplastic breast reduction patients. The mean rate of hematoma was 3%, nipple necrosis was 2%, dehiscence was 4%, infection was 3%, and seroma was 2%. The need for re-excision of margins occurred in 8% of patients, and completion mastectomy in 2%. Finally, delay in adjuvant treatment due to a postoperative complication occurred in 4% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Oncoplastic breast reduction is an excellent option for many patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy; however, postoperative complications can delay adjuvant radiation therapy. Results of this systematic literature review over the past 8 years showed a slight increase in complication rate compared to the most recent systematic review from 2015. With increased popularity and surgeon familiarity, oncoplastic breast reduction remains a viable option for reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects despite a slight increase in complication rate.
PubMed: 37850204
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005355 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Sep 2023Higher rates of postoperative complications have been found in preoperative chronic steroid users. However, the effects of preoperative chronic steroid use on outcomes... (Review)
Review
Higher rates of postoperative complications have been found in preoperative chronic steroid users. However, the effects of preoperative chronic steroid use on outcomes in orthopedic surgery were unclear. We performed a systematic review of cohort studies examining the effects of chronic steroid use on postoperative outcomes following orthopedic surgery and searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL through 29 April 2023. We included 17 studies with 1,546,562 patients. No increase in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-3.09) and composite thromboembolic events (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 0.99-2.63) but increases in 30-day overall complications (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75), wound dehiscence (aOR 2.91, 95% CI 1.49-5.66), infectious complications (any infection (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.44-1.80), sepsis (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.34-3.21), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.03-2.89) and deep SSI (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.05)), re-admission (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48-1.77), both 30-day (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.59) and 1-year re-operation (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.92), pulmonary embolism (aOR 5.94, 95% CI 1.52-23.29), and deep vein thrombosis (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.46) were detected in preoperative steroid users. An increased risk of adverse outcomes following orthopedic surgery in chronic steroid users was found.
PubMed: 37765136
DOI: 10.3390/ph16091328 -
The Journal of Hospital Infection Apr 2024The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of fascial closure using antimicrobial-sutures specifically for the prevention... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effectiveness of fascial closure with antimicrobial-coated sutures in preventing incisional surgical site infections in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of fascial closure using antimicrobial-sutures specifically for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in gastrointestinal surgery, as part of the revision of the SSI prevention guidelines of the Japanese Society of Surgical Infectious Diseases (JSSI). We searched CENTRAL, PubMed and ICHUSHI-Web in May 2023, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antimicrobial-coated and non-coated sutures for fascial closure in gastrointestinal surgery (PROSPERO No. CRD42023430377). Three authors independently screened the RCTs. We assessed the risk of bias and the GRADE criteria for the extracted data. The primary outcome was incisional SSI and the secondary outcomes were abdominal wall dehiscence and the length of postoperative hospital stay. This study was supported partially by the JSSI. A total of 10 RCTs and 5396 patients were included. The use of antimicrobial-coated sutures significantly lowered the risk of incisional SSIs compared with non-coated suture (risk ratio: 0.79, 95% confidence intervals: 0.64-0.98). In subgroup analyses, antimicrobial-coated sutures reduced the risk of SSIs for open surgeries, and when monofilament sutures were used. Antimicrobial-coated sutures did not reduce the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence and the length of hospital stay compared with non-coated sutures. The certainty of the evidence was rated as moderate according to the GRADE criteria, because of risk of bias. In conclusion, the use of antimicrobial-coated sutures for fascial closure in gastrointestinal surgery is associated with a significantly lower risk of SSI than non-coated sutures.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Anti-Infective Agents; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Surgical Wound; Sutures
PubMed: 37734678
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.09.006 -
American Journal of Perinatology May 2024This paper aims to evaluate whether there is a device-dependent effect on the reduction of surgical site complications in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This paper aims to evaluate whether there is a device-dependent effect on the reduction of surgical site complications in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m) undergoing cesarean section (C-section). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for the period, January 2011 to September 2021. English language articles describing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared either a -80 or -125 mm Hg single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device to standard dressings in obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m) patients undergoing C-section were included. Conference abstracts and "terminated" RCTs with published results were deemed eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was surgical site infection (SSI), classified as composite, superficial, or deep. Secondary outcomes assessed included seroma, dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, reoperation, readmission, blistering, and (composite) wound complications. A total of 223 titles were identified, of which 129 were screened by full-text review. Eleven RCTs encompassing 5,847 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered eligible for further analysis (-80 mm Hg: six studies; -125 mm Hg: five studies). A statistically significant improvement in the composite SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.89) and superficial SSI (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50-0.86) outcomes was observed with the -80 mm Hg device, compared with standard dressings. The same effect on SSI outcomes was not observed with the -125 mm Hg device (composite SSI-OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.64-1.28; superficial SSI-OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.70-1.78). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the other assessed outcomes. sNPWT devices may differ in their ability to reduce composite or superficial SSI after C-section. KEY POINTS: · Negative pressure benefits obese patients undergoing C-section.. · Negative pressure devices may differ in performance.. · A head-to-head clinical trial is needed..
Topics: Humans; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Cesarean Section; Surgical Wound Infection; Female; Pregnancy; Obesity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Bandages
PubMed: 37726017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775562 -
BJS Open Jul 2023Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Incisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the prophylactic mesh augmentation technique.
METHODS
The Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened without time restrictions up to 21 June 2022 using the keywords 'laparotomy closure', 'mesh', 'mesh positioning', and 'prophylactic mesh', and including medical subject headings terms. Only RCTs reporting the incidence of incisional hernia and other wound complications after elective or emergency midline laparotomy, where patients were treated with prophylactic mesh augmentation or without mesh positioning, were included. The primary endpoint was to explore the risk of incisional hernia at different follow-up time points. The secondary endpoint was the risk of wound complications. The risk of bias for individual studies was assessed according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized trials.
RESULTS
Eighteen RCTs, including 2659 patients, were retrieved. A reduction in the risk of incisional hernia at every time point was highlighted in the prophylactic mesh augmentation group (1 year, risk ratio 0.31, P = 0.0011; 2 years, risk ratio 0.44, P < 0.0001; 3 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0026; 4 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0257). An increased risk of wound complications was highlighted for patients undergoing mesh augmentation, although this was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Midline laparotomy closure with prophylactic mesh augmentation can be considered safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Further trials are needed to identify the ideal type of mesh and technique for mesh positioning, but surgeons should consider prophylactic mesh augmentation to decrease incisional hernia rate, especially in high-risk patients for fascial dehiscence and even in emergency settings.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID
CRD42022336242 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_email.php).
Topics: Humans; Incisional Hernia; Laparotomy; Surgical Mesh; Incidence; Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
PubMed: 37504969
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad060 -
Journal of Wound Care Jun 2023Most surgical wounds heal by primary or secondary intention. Surgical wounds can present specific and unique challenges including wound dehiscence and surgical site... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Most surgical wounds heal by primary or secondary intention. Surgical wounds can present specific and unique challenges including wound dehiscence and surgical site infection (SSI), either of which can increase risk of morbidity and mortality. The use of antimicrobials to treat infection in these wounds is prevalent, but there is now an imperative to align treatment with reducing antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The aim of this review was to explore the published evidence identifying general considerations/criteria for an ideal post-surgical wound dressing in terms of overcoming potential wound healing challenges (including infection) while supporting AMS objectives.
METHOD
A scoping review examining evidence published from 1954-2021, conducted by two authors acting independently. Results were synthesised narratively and have been reported in line with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews.
RESULTS
A total of 819 articles were initially identified and subsequently filtered to 178 for inclusion in the assessment. The search highlighted six key outcomes of interest associated with post-surgical wound dressings: wound infection; wound healing; physical attributes related to comfort, conformability and flexibility; fluid handling (e.g., blood and exudate); pain; and skin damage.
CONCLUSION
There are several challenges that can be overcome when treating a post-surgical wound with a dressing, not least the prevention and treatment of SSIs. However, it is imperative that the use of antimicrobial wound dressings is aligned with AMS programmes and alternatives to active antimicrobials investigated.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound; Antimicrobial Stewardship; Bandages; Surgical Wound Infection; Surgical Wound Dehiscence
PubMed: 37300859
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.6.334 -
Eplasty 2023Surgical site complications (SSCs) are not uncommon in plastic surgery procedures due to characteristics of the incisions and the patients undergoing such procedures....
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Plastic Surgery Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
BACKGROUND
Surgical site complications (SSCs) are not uncommon in plastic surgery procedures due to characteristics of the incisions and the patients undergoing such procedures. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been used to manage surgical incisions across surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of ciNPT on risk of SSCs following plastic surgery.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted to identify studies published between January 2005 and July 2021 comparing ciNPT versus traditional standard of care (SOC) dressings for patients undergoing plastic surgery. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. A cost analysis was conducted using inputs from the meta-analysis and cost estimates from a national hospital database.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In the 11 studies that evaluated the effect of ciNPT on of SSCs, ciNPT use was associated with a significant reduction in risk of SSC ( < .001). ciNPT use was also associated with reduced risk of dehiscence ( = .001) and skin necrosis ( =.002) and improved scar quality ( = .014). Hospital length of stay was decreased by an average of 0.61 days for patients receiving ciNPT ( .001). There were no differences in observed risk of SSIs ( = .113) and seromas ( = .143). While not statistically significant, a decrease in rate of reoperations ( = .074), fluid volume removed from the drains ( = .069) and drain days (-1.97 days, = .093) was observed with ciNPT use. The estimated cost savings attributed to ciNPT use was $904 (USD) per patient.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that ciNPT may reduce the incidence of SSCs and related health care utilization and costs in plastic surgery procedures.
PubMed: 37187870
DOI: No ID Found -
Arthroplasty Today Jun 2023Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common surgical procedures but carry a risk of harmful and costly surgical site complications (SSCs)....
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Over Closed Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.
BACKGROUND
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common surgical procedures but carry a risk of harmful and costly surgical site complications (SSCs). This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) on the risk of SSCs following THA and TKA.
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified studies published between January 2005 and July 2021 comparing ciNPT (Prevena Incision Management System) to traditional standard-of-care dressings for patients undergoing THA and TKA. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. A cost analysis was conducted using inputs from the meta-analysis and cost estimates from a national database.
RESULTS
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies evaluated SSCs, where a significant difference was seen in favor of ciNPT (relative risk [RR]: 0.332, < .001). Significant benefits in favor of ciNPT were also observed for surgical site infection (RR: 0.401, = .016), seroma (RR: 0.473, = .008), dehiscence (RR: 0.380, = .014), prolonged incisional drainage (RR: 0.399, = .003), and rate of return to the operating room (RR: 0.418, = .001). The estimated cost savings attributed to ciNPT use was $932 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of ciNPT after TKA and THA was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of SSCs, including surgical site infections, seroma, dehiscence, and prolonged incisional drainage. The risk of reoperation was reduced as were the costs of care in the modeled cost analysis, suggesting a potential for both economic and clinical advantages for ciNPT over standard-of-care dressings, particularly in high-risk patients.
PubMed: 37096179
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101120