-
Food Science & Nutrition Nov 2023Dietary creatine has been recently put forward as a possible intervention strategy to reduce post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome yet no clinical study so far evaluated its...
Dietary creatine has been recently put forward as a possible intervention strategy to reduce post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome yet no clinical study so far evaluated its efficacy and safety for this perplexing condition. In this parallel-group, randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial, we analyzed the effects of 6-month creatine supplementation (4 g of creatine monohydrate per day) on various patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, and tissue creatine levels in 12 patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Creatine intake induced a significant increase in tissue creatine levels in vastus medialis muscle and right parietal white matter compared to the baseline values at both 3-month and 6-month follow-ups ( < .05). Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed a significant difference (treatment vs. time interaction) between interventions in tissue creatine levels ( < .05), with the creatine group was superior to placebo to augment creatine levels at vastus medialis muscle, left frontal white matter, and right parietal white matter. Creatine supplementation induced a significant reduction in general fatigue after 3 months of intake compared to baseline values ( = .04), and significantly improved scores for several post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome-related symptoms (e.g., ageusia, breathing difficulties, body aches, headache, and difficulties concentrating) at 6-month follow-up ( < .05). Taking creatine for 6 months appears to improve tissue bioenergetics and attenuate clinical features of post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome; additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings in various post-COVID-19 cohorts.
PubMed: 37970399
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3597 -
Journal of Korean Medical Science Nov 2023Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to have a high incidence of loss of smell and taste. However, studies in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic have...
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to have a high incidence of loss of smell and taste. However, studies in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic have evaluated these symptoms using subjective surveys and simple olfactory tests only. Hence, we compared the olfactory and gustatory characteristics of patient groups with COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (C19OD) and non-COVID-19 postinfectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) using an objective olfactory test and evaluated the significance of olfactory training in both patient groups.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 14 patients with a decreased sense of smell after having positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction results, and 56 patients with PIOD with no history of confirmed COVID-19. Participants were evaluated using the Korean version of the Sniffin' stick (KVSS) II, and chemical gustometry and olfactory training was assessed during their first visit. Olfactory training was then re-evaluated after an average of 8 (± 6) weeks.
RESULTS
The average age of participants in the C19OD group was lower than in those in the non-COVID-19 PIOD group. The proportion of men in the C19OD group was higher than in the non-COVID-19 PIOD group. At baseline assessment, the C19OD group had better olfactory and gustatory functions. After olfactory training, the non-COVID-19 PIOD patient group showed a significant increase in all KVSS II Total, T, D, and I scores, but there was a non-significant increase in all scores in the C19OD group.
CONCLUSION
The C19OD group had better olfactory and gustatory function than the non-COVID-19 PIOD group at the initial assessment. After olfactory training, there was an increase in olfactory function test scores in both groups. Olfactory training may be helpful in C19OD, as in non-COVID-19 PIOD.
Topics: Male; Humans; Smell; COVID-19; Olfaction Disorders; Pandemics; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37935167
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e352 -
Cureus Sep 2023Introduction COVID-19 involvement in the nervous system has been reported in many cases. Viral neuroinvasion has multiple routes of entry. Neurological manifestations...
Neurological Manifestations in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients With COVID-19 at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Western Region, Saudi Arabia From 2020 to 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Introduction COVID-19 involvement in the nervous system has been reported in many cases. Viral neuroinvasion has multiple routes of entry. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 can be divided into ones of the central nervous system (CNS), such as headache, dizziness, altered mental status, ataxia, and seizure, and of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), including ageusia, anosmia, acute illness demyelinating polyneuropathy, and neuralgia. Aim and objectives This study aims to observe and report the neurological manifestations in geriatric patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 at KAMC-J and report the duration of admission to the in-patient and ICU wards. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted on admitted geriatric patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from April 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 at KAMC-J. Using Raosoft®, the sample size was estimated with a CI of 95% and a 36.4% prevalence of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 patients to be 289. Convenience sampling was used, and the data were collected from BESTCare EMRs. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011) was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Results In this study, a total of 290 patients' data were collected, 161 (55.5%) of which were males. In addition, the median age was 71 (Q1-Q3: 65-78) years; furthermore, the median body mass index (BMI) was 30(Q1-Q3: 25-34) kg/m. In descending order, the most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (HTN) (70.3%), diabetes mellitus (DM) (68.6%), cardiac disease (42.1%), chronic kidney disease (26.6%), neurological disease (23.6%), cancer malignancy (13.1%), and finally chronic respiratory disease (11.4%). Regarding typical COVID-19 manifestations, 181 patients claimed to have experienced cough (62.4%), dyspnea by 164 (56.7%), fever by 154 (53.5%), fatigue by 93 (32.3%), a reading of anoxia by 68 (23.4%), abdominal pain by 58 (20.0%), diarrhea by 56 (19.4%), and finally throat pain by 19 (6.6%). Manifestations and pathologies of the CNS included headache (25.4%), dizziness (21.5%), impaired consciousness (17.2%), delirium (6.6%), ischemic stroke (4.1%), focal cranial nerve dysfunction (2.8%), seizure (2.8%), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (0.3%), and ataxia (0.3%). Moreover, pathologies of the PNS manifested as taste impairment in 46 patients (15.9%), smell impairment in 33 (11.4%), nerve pain in 7 (24%), visual impairment in 5 (1.7%), Bell's palsy in 2 (0.7%), and Guillain-Barre syndrome in 1 (0.3%). Moreover, the majority of patients who developed an ischemic stroke or ICH, or required admission to the ICU had either DM or HTN. In addition, 17 (25.4%) of the 67 patients admitted to the ICU developed impaired consciousness. All-cause mortality in our study was 31 (10.71%) cases. Conclusion Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are common and can result in serious complications if not detected and managed early, especially in the elderly. These complications are mostly seen in severely ill patients and may be the only symptoms in COVID-19 patients. In addition, patients' clinical conditions could deteriorate rapidly and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required among healthcare providers when dealing with such cases. Moreover, we recommend systematically collecting data on the short- and long-term neurological complications of COVID-19 globally and documenting the functional long-term outcomes after these complications.
PubMed: 37876390
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45759 -
The European Journal of General Practice Dec 2023Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, GPs had to distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from other aetiologies in patients presenting with respiratory tract infection (RTI) symptoms on... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, GPs had to distinguish SARS-CoV-2 from other aetiologies in patients presenting with respiratory tract infection (RTI) symptoms on clinical grounds and adapt management accordingly.
OBJECTIVES
To test the diagnostic accuracy of GPs' clinical diagnosis of a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a period when COVID-19 was a new disease. To describe GPs' management of patients presenting with RTI for whom no confirmed diagnosis was available. To investigate associations between patient and clinical features with a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS
In April 2020-March 2021, 876 patients (9 countries) were recruited when they contacted their GP with symptoms of an RTI of unknown aetiology. A swab was taken at baseline for later analysis. Aetiology (PCR), diagnostic accuracy of GPs' clinical SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, and patient management were explored. Factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection were determined by logistic regression modelling.
RESULTS
GPs suspected SARS-CoV-2 in 53% of patients whereas 27% of patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. True-positive patients (23%) were more intensively managed for follow-up, antiviral prescribing and advice than true-negatives (42%). False negatives (5%) were under-advised, particularly for social distancing and isolation. Older age (OR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)), male sex (OR: 1.68 (1.16-2.41)), loss of taste/smell (OR: 5.8 (3.7-9)), fever (OR: 1.9 (1.3-2.8)), muscle aches (OR: 2.1 (1.5-3)), and a known risk factor for COVID-19 (travel, health care worker, contact with proven case; OR: 2.7 (1.8-4)) were predictive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Absence of loss of taste/smell, fever, muscle aches and a known risk factor for COVID-19 correctly excluded SARS-CoV-2 in 92.3% of patients, whereas presence of 3, or 4 of these variables correctly classified SARS-CoV-2 in 57.7% and 87.1%.
CONCLUSION
Correct clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, without POC-testing available, appeared to be complicated.
Topics: Humans; Male; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Pandemics; COVID-19 Testing; Ageusia; Primary Health Care; Pain
PubMed: 37870070
DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2270707 -
BMJ Open Oct 2023After COVID-19, many continue to experience persistent debilitating symptoms, that is, long COVID. Its most prevalent symptoms are chest pain, difficulties with...
INTRODUCTION
After COVID-19, many continue to experience persistent debilitating symptoms, that is, long COVID. Its most prevalent symptoms are chest pain, difficulties with breathing, painful muscles, ageusia or anosmia, tingling extremities and general tiredness. This paper describes the protocol of the Long COVID Cohort Study to assess the prognosis and prognostic determinants of patients with long COVID by implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and clinical examinations during a 1-year follow-up.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This is a prospective, single-site cohort study consisting of administering questionnaires and clinical examinations to adult patients referred to the Clinic for Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 at Helsinki University Hospital (Hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa). The referrals are from all healthcare units within HUS and other hospital districts during years 2021-2023. All admitted patients have had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The targeted study sample size is 500 participants. The questionnaires are administered at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months. The main outcome variables are the changes in self-reported functional abilities and quality of life. In addition, we will evaluate functional abilities at baseline using neurocognitive evaluation, a 6MWT and a measurement of hand grip strength. The Long COVID Cohort Study will form a quality register for the clinic and characterise the first systematic collection of PROMs, PREMs, questionnaire and clinical examinations related to long COVID in Finland. The Study belongs to a study consortium Long COVID-HORIZON-HLTH-2021-DISEASE-04 that aims to reveal the biomechanisms of long COVID.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
This study has been approved by the Helsinki University Hospital research ethics committee board, ID HUS/1493/2021 on 6 March 2021. All study participants sign written informed consent for participation. The study findings will be reported for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT05699512; Pre-results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; COVID-19; Cohort Studies; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; SARS-CoV-2; Longitudinal Studies; Prospective Studies; Finland; Quality of Life; Hand Strength; Prognosis; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Primary Health Care; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37848295
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072935 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023While the short-term symptoms of post-COVID syndromes (PCS) are well-known, the long-term clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of PCS remain unclear.... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
While the short-term symptoms of post-COVID syndromes (PCS) are well-known, the long-term clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of PCS remain unclear. Moreover, there is ongoing discussion about the effectiveness of post-infection vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to aid in PCS recovery.
METHODS
In this longitudinal and observational case-control study we aimed at identifying long-term PCS courses and evaluating the effects of post-infection vaccinations on PCS recovery. Individuals with initial mild COVID-19 were followed for a period of 15 months after primary infection. We assessed PCS outcomes, distinct symptom clusters (SC), and SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, as well as those who did not. To identify potential associating factors with PCS, we used binomial regression models and reported the results as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
RESULTS
Out of 958 patients, follow-up data at 15 month after infection was obtained for 222 (23.2%) outpatients. Of those individuals, 36.5% (81/222) and 31.1% (69/222) were identified to have PCS at month 10 and 15, respectively. Fatigue and dyspnea (SC2) rather than anosmia and ageusia (SC1) constituted PCS at month 15. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were equally distributed over time among age groups, sex, and absence/presence of PCS. Of the 222 patients, 77.0% (171/222) were vaccinated between 10- and 15-months post-infection, but vaccination did not affect PCS recovery at month 15. 26.3% of unvaccinated and 25.8% of vaccinated outpatients improved from PCS (p= .9646). Baseline headache (SC4) and diarrhoea (SC5) were risk factors for PCS at months 10 and 15 (SC4: OR 1.85 (95%CI 1.04-3.26), p=.0390; SC5: OR 3.27(95%CI 1.54-6.64), p=.0009).
CONCLUSION
Based on the specific symptoms of PCS our findings show a shift in the pattern of recovery. We found no effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on PCS recovery and recommend further studies to identify predicting biomarkers and targeted PCS therapeutics.
Topics: Humans; Case-Control Studies; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Immunoglobulin G; Outpatients; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; Longitudinal Studies
PubMed: 37781408
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1226622 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Aug 2023: Hypo/anosmia is a characteristic symptom of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the time of smell recovery and to identify a possible order of... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
: Hypo/anosmia is a characteristic symptom of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the time of smell recovery and to identify a possible order of perception recovery of different odors in COVID-19 patients. : A prospective observational study was conducted on not hospitalized COVID-19 patients, selected according to eligible criteria. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee. A questionnaire formulated by our team was submitted to patients in order to know the duration of the hypo/anosmia and hypo/ageusia and the order of odor recovery: vanillin (mixed olfactory/gustatory substances), phenyl ethyl alcohol (rosewater) (pure olfactory substances), eucalyptol (mixed olfactory/trigeminal substances), and eugenol (mixed olfactory/trigeminal/gustatory substances). : 181 patients were included. Hypo/ageusia and hypo/anosmia lasted on average 10.25 (±8.26) and 12.8 (±8.80) days, respectively. The most frequent odor recovery sequence was: (1) phenyl ethyl alcohol; (2) eucalyptol; (3) vanillin; and (4) eugenol. In COVID-19 patients, hypo/anosmia occurs more often in women and at a young age. : This preliminary investigation highlighted novel data: there is a chronological order in perception recovery of different olfactory substances and, therefore, in the restoration of the various sensitive nerve pathways involved in the sense of smell.
Topics: Humans; Female; Smell; Anosmia; Ageusia; Eucalyptol; Eugenol; COVID-19; Phenylethyl Alcohol
PubMed: 37763630
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091511 -
BMC Oral Health Sep 2023Early studies have highlighted the possible development of dysgeusia and anosmia in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and these...
BACKGROUND
Early studies have highlighted the possible development of dysgeusia and anosmia in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and these manifestations should be considered a potential indication of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). As potential contributors to these symptoms, dentists should perform careful oral and oropharyngeal examinations and document suspicious oral lesions in patients with COVID-19, especially in those who complain of loss of taste and smell. The study's objective was to assess the prevalence of oral manifestations among ambulatory unvaccinated symptomatic patients with suspected COVID-19 during the acute phase of the disease.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study evaluated oral manifestations in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with suspected and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare data between the groups (rRT-PCR-positive and rRT-PCR-negative patients).
RESULTS
One hundred thirty-six participants were included. Most were female (n = 79; 58.1%), with a mean age of 39.53 (± 14.17) years. Of these, 54 (39.7%) had a positive rRT-PCR test, and 82 (60.3%) had negative rRT-PCR results. Oral manifestations were observed in 40 participants (74.1%) in the rRT-PCR-positive group and 67 participants (81.7%) in the rRT-PCR-negative group. The most common oral manifestations were xerostomia (n = 85; 62.5%) and dysgeusia/ageusia (n = 57; 41.9%). Different rates of gingivitis (n = 12; 22.2% vs. n = 5; 6.1%; p = 0.005) and halitosis (n = 7; 13.0% vs. n = 1; 1.2%; p = 0.007) were observed between the rRT-PCR-positive and -negative groups, respectively. Mouth ulcers, glossitis, tongue coating, and petechiae were reported in both groups without significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS
A high prevalence of oral manifestations was observed in symptomatic patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This study highlights the importance of routine oral examinations by dentists as part of the multidisciplinary care of COVID-19 patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Male; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dysgeusia; Polymerase Chain Reaction
PubMed: 37759210
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03325-z -
Asian Journal of Surgery Nov 2023
Topics: Humans; Ageusia; Propofol; Anosmia; Anesthesia, General
PubMed: 37734983
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.07.001 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Aug 2023Vaccine hesitancy, spurred by misinterpretation of Adverse Events (AEs), threatens public health. Despite sporadic reports of oral AEs post-COVID-19 vaccination,...
Vaccine hesitancy, spurred by misinterpretation of Adverse Events (AEs), threatens public health. Despite sporadic reports of oral AEs post-COVID-19 vaccination, systematic analysis is scarce. This study evaluates these AEs using the Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). A secondary analysis of DAEN data was conducted, with the analysis period commencing from the start of the COVID-19 vaccination rollout in February 2021 and the inception of the influenza vaccine database in 1971, both through until December 2022. The focus of the analysis was on oral AEs related to COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. Reports were extracted according to a predefined schema and then stratified by vaccine type, sex, and age. Oral paresthesia was the most common oral AE after COVID-19 vaccination (75.28 per 10,000 reports), followed by dysgeusia (73.96), swollen tongue (51.55), lip swelling (49.43), taste disorder (27.32), ageusia (25.85), dry mouth (24.75), mouth ulceration (18.97), oral hypoaesthesia (15.60), and oral herpes (12.74). While COVID-19 and influenza vaccines shared most oral AEs, taste-related AEs, dry mouth, and oral herpes were significantly more common after COVID-19 vaccination. mRNA vaccines yielded more oral AEs than other types. Females had higher oral AE incidence. Most oral AEs did not differ significantly between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination. However, specific oral AEs, particularly taste-related, dry mouth, and oral herpes, were more prevalent after COVID-19 vaccination compared with seasonal influenza, especially in females and mRNA vaccine recipients.
Topics: Female; Humans; Australia; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Vaccination; Xerostomia
PubMed: 37734344
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2253589