-
Nature Communications Jun 2024Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) approaches have changed the therapeutic landscape for many tumor types. However, half of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC)...
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) approaches have changed the therapeutic landscape for many tumor types. However, half of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients remain unresponsive or develop resistance. Here, we show that, during cSCC progression in male mice, cancer cells acquire epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity and change their immune checkpoint (IC) ligand profile according to their features, dictating the IC pathways involved in immune evasion. Epithelial cancer cells, through the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, and mesenchymal cancer cells, through the CTLA-4/CD80 and TIGIT/CD155 pathways, differentially block antitumor immune responses and determine the response to ICB therapies. Accordingly, the anti-PD-L1/TIGIT combination is the most effective strategy for blocking the growth of cSCCs that contain both epithelial and mesenchymal cancer cells. The expression of E-cadherin/Vimentin/CD80/CD155 proteins in cSCC, HNSCC and melanoma patient samples predicts response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Collectively, our findings indicate that the selection of ICB therapies should take into account the epithelial/mesenchymal features of cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Skin Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Mice; Humans; B7-H1 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Male; Immunotherapy; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Cell Plasticity; Cell Line, Tumor; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; CTLA-4 Antigen; Receptors, Virus; B7-1 Antigen; Receptors, Immunologic
PubMed: 38914547
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49718-8 -
The Canadian Journal of Urology Jun 2024Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men across the world. Prior to PSA testing, men usually presented with locally advanced disease detected on digital...
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men across the world. Prior to PSA testing, men usually presented with locally advanced disease detected on digital rectal exam or with metastatic disease. PSA ushered in the era of serum biomarkers for prostate cancer. It has taken over three decades to refine the role of PSA in prostate cancer detection. The lack of specificity has spurred research into finding better, readily obtainable biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity. The trick is to find the prostate cancers that are a threat, not the ones that aren't. Over the last decade and more, many biomarkers have been proposed and tested (HK-2, Pro-PSA, PCA3, TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcripts, miRNA, just to name a few) but we still await that magical combination of a readily available, reproducible, and hopefully inexpensive biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity. The authors describe the use of a peptide labeled fluorophore for the VPAC1 receptors that are expressed on malignant prostate cancer cells shed in the urine. After initial feasibility work, the authors collected urine from 318 men with lower urinary tract symptoms and a PSA > 4. The patients underwent prostate biopsy yielding Grade Group 2 or higher prostate cancer in 158 patients. One hundred fifty-four or those patients with cancer had a positive result for the biomarker. The sensitivity of the test was 100%, the specificity was 97.56%, positive predictive value was 97.47%, and negative predictive value was 100%.1 These are impressive numbers for a urine biomarker (or any biomarker). This work is certainly promising, BUT, we have seen promising early data on many biomarkers. In this study, the mean PSA in the cancer group was 34.53 ng/mL versus 9.41 in the control (negative) group. Since patients with infection were excluded, the significantly different PSA levels seemed to be selecting the cancers as well. Time and follow up will determine if the "negative biopsy" controls were truly negative. Can the technique and these results be reproduced? The true test will be how this biomarker consistently performs across a broader population of men with a lower, more homogenous PSA elevation. I will eagerly await results of continued study of this promising biomarker for prostate cancer.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Sensitivity and Specificity; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Aged; Middle Aged
PubMed: 38912943
DOI: No ID Found -
Molecular Therapy. Oncology Jun 2024Cell surface molecules transiently upregulated on activated T cells can play a counter-regulatory role by inhibiting T cell function. Deletion or blockade of such...
Cell surface molecules transiently upregulated on activated T cells can play a counter-regulatory role by inhibiting T cell function. Deletion or blockade of such immune checkpoint receptors has been investigated to improve the function of engineered immune effector cells. CD38 is upregulated on activated T cells, and although there have been studies showing that CD38 can play an inhibitory role in T cells, how it does so has not fully been elucidated. In comparison with molecules such as PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, and TIM3, we found that CD38 displays more sustained and intense expression following acute activation. After deleting CD38 from human chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, we showed relative resistance to exhaustion and improved anti-tumor function . CD38 is a multifunctional ectoenzyme with hydrolase and cyclase activities. Reintroduction of CD38 mutants into T cells lacking CD38 provided further evidence supporting the understanding that CD38 plays a crucial role in producing the immunosuppressive metabolite adenosine and utilizing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) in human T cells. Taken together, these results highlight a role for CD38 as an immunometabolic checkpoint in T cells and lead us to propose CD38 deletion as an additional avenue for boosting CAR T cell function.
PubMed: 38912091
DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200819 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable promise in treating B-cell malignancies, which has sparked optimism about its potential to treat other types of cancer as well.... (Review)
Review
CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable promise in treating B-cell malignancies, which has sparked optimism about its potential to treat other types of cancer as well. Nevertheless, the Expectations of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors and non-B cell hematologic malignancies have not been met. Furthermore, safety concerns regarding the use of viral vectors and the current personalized production process are other bottlenecks that limit its widespread use. In recent years the use of gene editing technology in CAR-T cell therapy has opened a new way to unleash the latent potentials of CAR-T cell therapy and lessen its associated challenges. Moreover, gene editing tools have paved the way to manufacturing CAR-T cells in a fully non-viral approach as well as providing a universal, off-the-shelf product. Despite all the advantages of gene editing strategies, the off-target activity of classical gene editing tools (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9) remains a major concern. Accordingly, several efforts have been made in recent years to reduce their off-target activity and genotoxicity, leading to the introduction of advanced gene editing tools with an improved safety profile. In this review, we begin by examining advanced gene editing tools, providing an overview of how these technologies are currently being applied in clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapies. Following this, we explore various gene editing strategies aimed at enhancing the safety and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy.
PubMed: 38912057
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388475 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The majority of patients with thyroid cancer can attain a favorable prognosis with a comprehensive treatment program based on surgical treatment. However, the current... (Review)
Review
The majority of patients with thyroid cancer can attain a favorable prognosis with a comprehensive treatment program based on surgical treatment. However, the current treatment options for advanced thyroid cancer are still limited. In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has received widespread attention in the field of oncology treatment. It has achieved remarkable results in the treatment of hematologic tumors. However, due to the constraints of multiple factors, the therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T therapy for solid tumors, including thyroid cancer, has not yet met expectations. This review outlines the fundamental structure and treatment strategies of CAR-T cells, provides an overview of the advancements in both preclinical investigations and clinical trials focusing on targets associated with CAR-T cell therapy in treating thyroid cancer, and discusses the challenges and solutions to CAR-T cell therapy for thyroid cancer. In conclusion, CAR-T cell therapy is a promising therapeutic approach for thyroid cancer, and we hope that our review will provide a timely and updated study of CAR-T cell therapy for thyroid cancer to advance the field.
Topics: Humans; Thyroid Neoplasms; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Animals; T-Lymphocytes; Clinical Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38911868
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411300 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Although fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonist, has shown to be an effective treatment reducing relapse rate and also slowing down the disability...
BACKGROUND
Although fingolimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonist, has shown to be an effective treatment reducing relapse rate and also slowing down the disability progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients, it is important to quickly identify those suboptimal responders.
OBJECTIVE
The main objective was to assess different clinical, radiological, genetic and environmental factors as possible early predictors of response in MS patients treated with fingolimod for 24 months. The secondary objective was to analyze the possible contribution of the environmental factors analyzed to the progression and activity of the disease along the 2-years of follow-up.
METHODS
A retrospective study with 151 patients diagnosed with MS, under fingolimod treatment for 24 months, with serum samples at initiation and six months later, and with clinical and radiological data at initiation and 24 months later, were included in the study. Clinical and radiological variables were collected to establish NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity: patients without relapses, disability progression and new T2 lesions or Gd+ lesions) and EDA (evidence of disease activity: patients with relapses and/or progression and/or new T2 lesions or gadolinium-positive [Gd+] lesions) conditions. Human leukocyte antigen II (HLA-II), EBNA-1 IgG and VCA IgG from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and antibody titers against Human herpesvirus 6A/B (HHV-6A/B) were also analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 151 MS patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 27.8% was NEDA-3 (37.5% among those previously treated with high efficacy therapies >24 months). The following early predictors were statistically significantly associated with NEDA-3 condition: sex (male; p=0.002), age at baseline (older; p=0.009), relapses 2-years before fingolimod initiation ≤1 (p=0.010), and absence of Gd+ lesions at baseline (p=0.006). Regarding the possible contribution of the environmental factors included in the study to the activity or the progression of the disease, we only found that EBNA-1 IgG titers decreased in 20.0% of PIRA (progression independent from relapse activity) patients vs. 73.3% of RAW (relapse-associated worsening) patients (p=0.006; O.R. = 11.0).
CONCLUSION
MS patients that are male, older, and with a low clinical and radiological activity at fingolimod initiation have a greater probability to reach NEDA-3 condition after two years with this therapy. An intriguing association of EBV with the progression of the disease has also been described, but it should be further study in a larger cohort to confirm these results.
Topics: Humans; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Female; Male; Disease Progression; Adult; Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens; Retrospective Studies; Immunoglobulin G; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Treatment Outcome; Immunosuppressive Agents; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 38911861
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384411 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Infections are common in plasma cell cancer multiple myeloma (MM) due to disease-related immune deficiencies and cancer treatment. Myeloma cells express Toll-like...
Toll-like receptor signaling in multiple myeloma cells promotes the expression of pro-survival genes B-cell lymphoma 2 and MYC and modulates the expression of B-cell maturation antigen.
Infections are common in plasma cell cancer multiple myeloma (MM) due to disease-related immune deficiencies and cancer treatment. Myeloma cells express Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and TLR activation has been shown to induce proliferative and pro-survival signals in cancer cells. MM is a complex and heterogeneous disease, and expression levels of TLRs as well as downstream signaling components are likely to differ between patients. Here, we show that in a large cohort of patients, TLR1, TLR4, TLR6, TLR9, and TLR10 are the most highly expressed in primary CD138 cells. Using an MM cell line expressing TLR4 and TLR9 as a model, we demonstrate that TLR4 and TLR9 activation promoted the expression of well-established pro-survival and oncogenes in MM such as , , , and . TLR4 and TLR9 activation inhibited the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib, drugs used in the treatment of MM. Inhibiting the autophagosome-lysosome protein degradation pathway by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) diminished the protective effect of TLR activation on proteasome inhibitor-induced cytotoxicity. We also found that TLR signaling downregulated the expression of , the gene encoding for B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). , , and were upregulated in approximately 50% of primary cells, while the response to TLR signaling in terms of expression was dichotomous, as an equal fraction of patients showed upregulation and downregulation of the gene. While proteasome inhibitors are part of first-line MM treatment, several of the new anti-MM immune therapeutic drugs target BCMA. Thus, TLR activation may render MM cells less responsive to commonly used anti-myeloma drugs.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Signal Transduction; B-Cell Maturation Antigen; Cell Line, Tumor; Toll-Like Receptors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Bortezomib; Male
PubMed: 38911853
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393906 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Jun 2024Immunotherapy has transformed breast cancer management. However, it can be challenging to remain familiar with the adverse events, contraindications, and perioperative...
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy has transformed breast cancer management. However, it can be challenging to remain familiar with the adverse events, contraindications, and perioperative recommendations for each agent.
METHODS
We used FDALabel to identify all Food and Drug Administration-approved immunotherapies indicated for the treatment of breast cancer. We extracted details regarding warnings and precautions, indications, and adverse events from each package insert.
RESULTS
We identified nine immunotherapies belonging to three classes: anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) agents, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) agents, and anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) agents. Cardiotoxicity, including heart failure and cardiomyopathy, was common among those receiving anti-HER2 agents, and hypothyroidism was common among patients receiving the anti-PD-1 agent. The anti-TROP-2 agent was associated with diarrhea and neutropenia. Given the adverse event profile for each drug, we recommend preoperative evaluation components, including transthoracic echocardiography, liver function tests, and thyroid panels. We also indicate here which immunotherapies raise concern for venous thromboembolism, hematoma, and infection.
CONCLUSIONS
Using data from clinical trials, we recommend a preoperative evaluation tailored to the immunotherapeutic regimen of individual patients.
PubMed: 38911573
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005915 -
Cureus May 2024A small number of drugs have been the sole stay of conventional treatment for autoimmune illnesses for the past 10 years. These medications have a number of side effects... (Review)
Review
A small number of drugs have been the sole stay of conventional treatment for autoimmune illnesses for the past 10 years. These medications have a number of side effects that restrict their usage and necessitate continuous administration to keep a patient in a state of remission. While many new treatments are being researched to address this problem, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy currently shows the greatest potential. Current medical guidelines do not currently advocate the use of this medicine because it is still in its early stages of development due to continuing clinical research. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to determine what new findings have been reported in recent studies about the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cells. From the nine studies collected in total, it was found that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was the most often researched autoimmune disease. The CAR T-cell therapy had noticeable results after one to two months on average. The most frequent adverse effect was cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was treated cautiously and infrequently necessitated extensive intervention. All serological tests showed improvement, and clinical remission was always achieved. This review concludes that, due to the one-time infusion and low adverse reaction rate, the therapy not only outperforms conventional drugs but is also more practical. There is even more cause to look forward to the full deployment of this innovative therapeutic alternative, as variations of the therapy are currently being explored.
PubMed: 38910762
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60924 -
Cureus May 2024Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a well-known side effect of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy but has occasionally been...
Glofitamab-Associated Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) Presenting as Serial Seizures and Responding Positively to Antiseizure Drugs and Anakinra: A Case Report.
Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a well-known side effect of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy but has occasionally been described with immune checkpoint inhibitors as well. Glofitamab-associated ICANS with a bispecific monoclonal antibody has rarely been reported. The patient is a 63-year-old male with a history of mantle cell lymphoma, diagnosed at age 37, and aggressive large-cell B-cell lymphoma, diagnosed at age 50. Despite adequate chemotherapy, immunotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, and CAR T-cell therapy, there were several relapses, including meningeal carcinomatosis at age 61 and intracerebral lymphoma at age 62. For this reason, glofitamab was started. One week after the ninth cycle, the patient developed drowsiness, behavioral changes, word-finding difficulties, aphasia, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and focal onset seizures, which resolved after 16 days with levetiracetam, valproic acid, lorazepam, and midazolam. Since there was no infectious disease, electrolyte disturbance, metabolic disorder, cardiovascular disease, or relapse of lymphoma, glofitamab-associated ICANS was suspected, and anakinra was administered. The case shows that ICANS with drowsiness, behavioral changes, aphasia, and seizures can develop with glofitamab and that patients with structural brain abnormalities may be prone to this.
PubMed: 38910651
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60833