-
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and... Aug 2024Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection without aortic involvement is an exceptionally rare event. Nonoperative management remains the first-line therapy....
Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection without aortic involvement is an exceptionally rare event. Nonoperative management remains the first-line therapy. However, surgical interventions can be indicated in the event of bowel ischemia. In the present report, we describe a case of complicated isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection treated with a hybrid approach.
PubMed: 38812730
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101512 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and... Aug 2024
PubMed: 38812727
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101501 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery May 2024To assess whether retrograde cerebral perfusion reduces neurological injury and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
To assess whether retrograde cerebral perfusion reduces neurological injury and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.
METHODS
Single-center, retrospective, observational study including all patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest between January 1998 and December 2022 with or without the adjunct of retrograde cerebral perfusion. 515 patients were included: 257 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest only and 258 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion. The primary endpoints were clinical neurological injury, embolic lesions, and watershed lesions. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcomes. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
RESULTS
Clinical neurological injury and embolic lesions were less frequent in patients with retrograde cerebral perfusion (20.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.041 and 13.7% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.010, respectively), but there was no significant difference in the occurrence of watershed lesions (3.0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.156). However, after multivariable logistic regression, retrograde cerebral perfusion was associated with a significant reduction of clinical neurological injury (OR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-0.995, p = 0.049), embolic lesions (OR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.041), and watershed lesions (OR: 0.25; 95%CI 0.07-0.80, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (12.8% vs. 11.7%, p = ns) or long-term survival between groups.
CONCLUSION
In this study, we showed that the addition of retrograde cerebral perfusion during hypothermic circulatory arrest in the setting of acute type A aortic dissection repair reduced the risk of clinical neurological injury, embolic lesions, and watershed lesions.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Dissection; Female; Male; Circulatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia Induced; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Perfusion; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Aged; Postoperative Complications; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
PubMed: 38811972
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02814-8 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders May 2024Acute coronary syndrome due to coronary artery embolism in the setting of ascending aortic thrombus is an uncommon condition, even rarer when there is no aortic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute coronary syndrome due to coronary artery embolism in the setting of ascending aortic thrombus is an uncommon condition, even rarer when there is no aortic pathology such as aneurysm, severe atherosclerosis, aortic dissection, or thrombophilia (whether inherited or acquired).
CASE PRESENTATION
We report a case of a 58-year-old male presented with acute chest pain, electrocardiogram showing non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. The computed tomography angiography of coronary artery revealed a mural thrombus in the proximal part of ascending aorta, located above the left coronary artery ostium, without any aortic pathologies. With the exception of hypertension and cigarette smoking, no other risk factors were identified in this patient that may increase the risk of thrombosis. Given the life-threatening risk of interventional therapy and surgery, the patient determinedly opted for anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy. Then he experienced the reoccurrence of chest pain after 6-day treatment, progressed to anterior and inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary artery embolism originating from the ascending aortic thrombus was suspected. Considering the hemodynamic instability of the patient, the medical treatment was continued and bridged to warfarin and aspirin after discharge. Follow-up computed tomography angiography at 6 months showed no obstruction in coronary artery and complete resolution of the thrombus. No thromboembolic events occurred henceforward.
CONCLUSIONS
Acute coronary syndrome could be a manifestation of secondary coronary embolism due to ascending aortic thrombus. Currently, there is no standardized guideline for the treatment of aortic mural thrombus, individualized treatment is recommended. When surgical therapy is not applicable for the patient, anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet treatment are alternative treatments that may successfully lead to the resolution of the aortic thrombus.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; Aortic Diseases; Recurrence; Thrombosis; Anticoagulants; Computed Tomography Angiography; Coronary Angiography; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Aortography
PubMed: 38811879
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-03956-2 -
Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de... 2024Trauma primarily affects the economically active population, causing social and economic impact. The non-operative management of solid organ injuries aims to preserve...
INTRODUCTION
Trauma primarily affects the economically active population, causing social and economic impact. The non-operative management of solid organ injuries aims to preserve organ function, reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical interventions. The aim of study was to demonstrate the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing non-operative management in a trauma hospital and to evaluate factors associated with mortality in these patients.
METHODS
This is a historical cohort of patients undergoing non-operative management for solid organ injuries at a Brazilian trauma reference hospital between 2018 and 2022. Included were patients with blunt and penetrating trauma, analyzing epidemiological characteristics, blood transfusion, and association with the need for surgical intervention.
RESULTS
A total of 365 patients were included in the study. Three hundred and forty-three patients were discharged (93.97%), and the success rate of non-operative treatment was 84.6%. There was an association between mortality and the following associated injuries: hemothorax, sternal fracture, aortic dissection, and traumatic brain injury. There was an association between the need for transfusion and surgical intervention. Thirty-eight patients required some form of surgical intervention.
CONCLUSION
The profile of patients undergoing non-operative treatment consists of young men who are victims of blunt trauma. Non-operative treatment is safe and has a high success rate.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Brazil; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Adolescent; Retrospective Studies; Blood Transfusion; Wounds, Penetrating; Aged; Trauma Centers
PubMed: 38808820
DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243734-en -
Heliyon May 2024[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18251.].
Corrigendum to "Extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy for preoperative cerebral malperfusion due to severe stenosis or occlusion of supra-aortic branch vessels in acute type A aortic dissection" <[Heliyon Volume 9, Issue 7, July 2023, Article e18251]>.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18251.].
PubMed: 38807608
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29872 -
Heliyon May 2024Distinguishing between large-vessel diseases such as acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and non-large-vessel diseases, such as acute coronary...
BACKGROUND
Distinguishing between large-vessel diseases such as acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and non-large-vessel diseases, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), and neurogenic diseases, in patients presenting with chest symptoms remains a challenge, which can result in a significant number of misdiagnoses. Simultaneously distinguishing both AAS and PE is essential because large-vessel diseases require angio-computed tomography (CT) during initial presentation whereas, non-large-vessel diseases do not. This study aimed to determine the optimal method for differentiating between large-vessel and non-large-vessel diseases using D-dimer, troponin I, and pretest probability scores.
METHODS
From the 11683 patients who presented with chest symptoms including chest pain, discomfort, or dyspnea, this retrospective observational study included 1817 patients who had complete data for essential biomarkers; 105 with AAS, 139 with PE, 1093 with ACS, 451 with HF, and 83 with neurogenic diseases.
RESULTS
D-dimer, D-dimer/troponin I ratio (DT ratio), and troponin I results distinguished the 2 groups: D-dimer (>2.38 μg/mL), AUC 0.935; DT ratio, AUC 0.827; and troponin I, AUC 0.653. For predicting AAS, the performances of D-dimer level and aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) were AUCs of 0.915 (p < 0.0001) and 0.67 (p = 0.0004), respectively; for predicting PE, the AUCs of D-dimer level and modified Wells score were 0.95 (p = 0.0001) and 0.857 (p < 0.0001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The D-dimer levels proved to be a crucial discriminator for identifying AAS and PE, even when compared with the ADD-RS and modified Wells scores. Moderately elevated D-dimer levels suggest the need to consider AAS and PE diagnoses via angio-CT for patients with chest symptoms.
PubMed: 38803915
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31210 -
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe Apr 2024Few studies have explored long-term trends and risk factors for peripheral arterial complications in type 2 diabetes compared to the general population. Our research...
BACKGROUND
Few studies have explored long-term trends and risk factors for peripheral arterial complications in type 2 diabetes compared to the general population. Our research focuses on identifying optimal risk factors, their significance, risk associated with multifactorial risk factor control, and trends for these complications in diabetic patients versus general controls.
METHODS
This study included persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus entered into the Swedish National Diabetes Register 2001-2019 and controls matched for age-, sex- and county of residence. Outcomes comprised of extracranial large artery disease, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, lower extremity arterial disease and diabetes foot disease. Standardized incidence rates and Cox regression were used for analyses.
FINDINGS
The study comprises 655,250 persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus; average age 64.2; 43.8% women. Among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the incidence rates per 100,000 person years for each non-coronary peripheral arterial complication event changed between 2001 and 2019 as follows: extracranial large artery disease 170.0-84.9; aortic aneurysm 40.6-69.2; aortic dissection 9.3 to 5.6; lower extremity artery disease from 338.8 to 190.8; and diabetic foot disease from 309.8 to 226.8. Baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), smoking status and lipid levels were independently associated with all outcomes in the type 2 diabetes mellitus cohort. Within the cohort with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the risk for extracranial large artery disease and lower extremity artery disease increased in a stepwise fashion for each risk factor not within target. Excess risk for non-coronary peripheral arterial complications in the entire cohort for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared to matched controls, were as follows: extracranial large artery disease adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-1.73), aortic aneurysm HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), aortic dissection HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57) and lower extremity artery disease HR 2.59 (95% CI, 2.55-2.64).
INTERPRETATION
The incidence of non-coronary peripheral arterial complications has declined significantly among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the exception of aortic aneurysm. HbA1c, smoking and blood pressure demonstrated greatest relative contribution for outcomes and lower levels of cardiometabolic risk factors are associated with reduced relative risk of outcomes.
FUNDING
Swedish Governmental and the County support of research and education of doctors, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and Åke-Wibergs grant.
PubMed: 38803635
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100888 -
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe Apr 2024Observational studies on long-term trends, risk factor association and importance are scarce for type 1 diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial outcomes. We set out to...
BACKGROUND
Observational studies on long-term trends, risk factor association and importance are scarce for type 1 diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial outcomes. We set out to investigate trends in non-coronary complications and their relationships with cardiovascular risk factors in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared to matched controls.
METHODS
34,263 persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus from the Swedish National Diabetes Register and 164,063 matched controls were included. Incidence rates of extracranial large artery disease, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, lower extremity artery disease, and diabetic foot syndrome were analyzed using standardized incidence rates and Cox regression.
FINDINGS
Between 2001 and 2019, type 1 diabetes mellitus incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were as follows: extracranial large artery disease 296.5-84.3, aortic aneurysm 0-9.2, aortic dissection remained at 0, lower extremity artery disease 456.6-311.1, and diabetic foot disease 814.7-77.6. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus with cardiometabolic risk factors at target range did not exhibit excess risk of extracranial large artery disease [HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.20-3.36)] or lower extremity artery disease [HR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.30-2.93)], compared to controls. Persons with type 1 diabetes with all risk factors at baseline, had substantially elevated risk for diabetic foot disease [HR 29.44 (95% CI, 3.83-226.04)], compared to persons with type 1 diabetes with no risk factors. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus continued to display a lower risk for aortic aneurysm, even with three cardiovascular risk factors at baseline [HR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.15-0.67)]. Relative importance analyses demonstrated that education, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), duration of diabetes and lipids explained 54% of extracranial large artery disease, while HbA1c, smoking and systolic blood pressure explained 50% of lower extremity artery disease and HbA1c alone contributed to 41% of diabetic foot disease. Income, duration of diabetes and body mass index explained 66% of the contribution to aortic aneurysm.
INTERPRETATION
Peripheral arterial complications decreased in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus, except for aortic aneurysm which remained low. Besides glycemic control, traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with incident outcomes. Risk of these outcomes increased with additional risk factors present. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus exhibited a lower risk of aortic aneurysm compared to controls, despite presence of cardiovascular risk factors.
FUNDING
Swedish Governmental and the county support of research and education of doctors, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, Sweden and Åke-Wibergs grant.
PubMed: 38803631
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100852 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024Some evidence suggests a reduced prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with aortic dissection (AD), a catastrophic cardiovascular illness, compared...
OBJECTIVE
Some evidence suggests a reduced prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with aortic dissection (AD), a catastrophic cardiovascular illness, compared to general population. However, the conclusions were inconsistent, and the causal relationship between T2DM and AD remains unclear.
METHODS
In this study, we aimed to explore the causal relationship between T2DM and AD using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Mediation MR analysis was conducted to explore and quantify the possible mediation effects of 1400 metabolites in T2DM and AD.
RESULTS
The results of 26 datasets showed no causal relationship between T2DM and AD (>0.05). Only one dataset (ebi-a-GCST90006934) showed that T2DM was a protective factor for AD (I9-AORTDIS) (OR=0.815, 95%CI: 0.692-0.960, =0.014), and did not show horizontal pleiotropy (=0.808) and heterogeneity (=0.525). Vanillic acid glycine plays a mediator in the causal relationship between T2DM and AD. The mediator effect for vanillic acid glycine levels was -0.023 (95%CI: -0.066-0.021).
CONCLUSION
From the perspective of MR analysis, there might not be a causal relationship between T2DM and AD, and T2DM might not be a protective factor for AD. If a causal relationship does exist between T2DM and AD, with T2DM serving as a protective factor, vanillic acid glycine may act as a mediator and enhance such a protective effect.
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Aortic Dissection; Mediation Analysis
PubMed: 38803481
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1405517