-
EFORT Open Reviews May 2024The best treatment of unicameral bone cyst and aneurismatic bone cyst (ABC) is debated in the literature. For simple bone cysts, multiple treatments were proposed from... (Review)
Review
The best treatment of unicameral bone cyst and aneurismatic bone cyst (ABC) is debated in the literature. For simple bone cysts, multiple treatments were proposed from observation only to open curettage. The historical treatment with intraosseous injection of methylprednisolone acetate into the bone cysts nowadays is reduced due to the morbidity of multiple injections and the risk of multiple pathologic fractures until the healing. Different types of treatments for ABC are reported, including surgery, percutaneous treatments, and medical treatments; however, there is currently no consensus on the best approach. The association of curettage, bone graft, and elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) had a success rate of over 85%. Decompressing the cyst wall is more critical for increasing the healing rate than the type of graft used to fill the cavity. In ABC, sclerotherapy offers the advantages of lower invasiveness and morbidity, associated with better functional scores and faster return to full weight-bearing. Moreover, they can be used in challenging locations. Selective arterial embolization is a complex procedure and often requires association with other treatments. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of denosumab and its side effects on skeletally immature patients. Curettage with adjuvants and autogenous bone grafting still shows promising results and can be used in larger, aggressive defects or superficial lesions. For simple bone cysts, the combination of curettage, bone graft, and ESIN showed the best results. Sclerotherapy for ABC also shows promising results.
PubMed: 38726993
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0027 -
Archives of Osteoporosis May 2024This study demonstrated a large treatment gap in elderly subjects experiencing fragility fracture in Spanish primary care, a low treatment persistence among subjects who... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
UNLABELLED
This study demonstrated a large treatment gap in elderly subjects experiencing fragility fracture in Spanish primary care, a low treatment persistence among subjects who do receive treatment, and more than one-quarter having no follow-up visits post-fracture. These data highlight the need to improve secondary fracture prevention in primary care.
PURPOSE
To describe osteoporosis (OP) treatment patterns and follow-up in subjects with fragility fracture seen in Spanish primary care (PC).
METHODS
This observational, retrospective chart review included subjects aged ≥ 70 years listed in the centers' records (November 2018 to March 2020), with ≥ 1 fragility fracture and prior consultation for any reason; subjects who had participated in another study were excluded. Outcomes included OP treatments and follow-up visits post-fragility fracture.
RESULTS
Of 665 subjects included, most (87%) were women; overall mean (SD) age, 82 years. Fewer than two thirds (61%) had received any prior OP treatment (women, 65%; men, 38%); of these, 38% had received > 1 treatment (women, 25%; men, 13%). Among treated subjects, the most frequent first-line treatments were alendronate (43%) and RANKL inhibitor denosumab (22%), with a higher discontinuation rate and shorter treatment duration observed for alendronate (discontinuation, 42% vs 16%; median treatment duration, 2.5 vs 2.1 years). Over one-quarter (26%) of subjects had no follow-up visits post-fragility fracture, with this gap higher in women than men (35% versus 25%). The most common schedule of follow-up visits was yearly (43% of subjects with a fragility fracture), followed by half-yearly (17%) and biennial (10%), with a similar trend in men and women. Most OP treatments were prescribed by PC physicians, other than teriparatide and zoledronate.
CONCLUSIONS
Across Spanish PC, we observed a large gap in the treatment and follow-up of elderly subjects experiencing a fragility fracture. Our data highlights the urgent need to improve secondary fracture prevention in PC.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Aged; Spain; Aged, 80 and over; Secondary Prevention; Retrospective Studies; Primary Health Care; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Osteoporotic Fractures; Osteoporosis; Alendronate; Denosumab
PubMed: 38722400
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01394-3 -
Cureus May 2024Purpose Bone quality is an important issue in elderly osteoporotic patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) because periprosthetic fracture or aseptic loosening...
Preventing Loss of Femoral Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered Wedge Stem: A Retrospective, Cohort Study in Osteoporotic Patients Treated with Denosumab.
Purpose Bone quality is an important issue in elderly osteoporotic patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) because periprosthetic fracture or aseptic loosening of implant caused by periprosthetic bone loss is a serious concern. Denosumab has been approved for osteoporosis patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether denosumab prevents loss of proximal femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) in cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem in patients with osteoporosis. Methods Seventy consecutive patients who had undergone primary THA were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients who received denosumab for osteoporosis formed the denosumab group, and 43 patients without denosumab formed the control group. Bone turnover markers and femoral periprosthetic BMD were measured at two weeks, six months, and 12 months after THA. BMD was evaluated in seven regions of interest according to the zones of Gruen. Results BMD in zone 1 was significantly increased from baseline at both six and 12 months after THA in the denosumab group (10.0±10.2%, p<0.001 and 13.1±12.7%, p<0.001, respectively) and significantly decreased in the control group (-3.6±9.7%, p<0.05, and -5.9±9.4%, p<0.001, respectively). BMD in zone 7 was significantly decreased compared to baseline at both six and 12 months after THA in the control group (-19.2±20.2%, p<0.001 and -22.3±16.8%, p<0.001, respectively) but not in the denosumab group (-0.7±18.5% and -1.1±16.6%, respectively). The use of denosumab for THA patients with osteoporosis was independently related to preventing loss of periprosthetic BMD of the femur at 12 months after surgery in zones 1 (p<0.001) and 7 (p<0.001) on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Denosumab significantly increased proximal femoral periprosthetic BMD in zone 1 and prevented loss of BMD in zone 7 in patients with osteoporosis after cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem at both seven and 12 months. Future studies of denosumab treatment following THA in patients with osteoporosis should focus on clinical outcomes such as the risk of periprosthetic fracture and revision THA.
PubMed: 38721477
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59908 -
JBMR Plus Jun 2024Low back pain derived from intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a debilitating spinal condition that, despite its prevalence, does not have any intermediary...
Low back pain derived from intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a debilitating spinal condition that, despite its prevalence, does not have any intermediary guidelines for pharmacological treatment between palliative care and invasive surgery. The development of treatments for the IVD is complicated by the variety of resident cell types needed to maintain the regionally distinct structural properties of the IVD that permit the safe, complex motions of the spine. Osteoporosis of the spine increases the risk of vertebral bone fracture that can increase the incidence of back pain. Fortunately, there are a variety of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis that target osteoblasts, osteoclasts and/or osteocytes to build bone and prevent vertebral fracture. Of particular note, clinical and preclinical studies suggest that commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs like bisphosphonates, intermittent parathyroid hormone, anti-sclerostin antibody, selective estrogen receptor modulators and anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand inhibitor denosumab may also relieve back pain. Here, we cite clinical and preclinical studies and include unpublished data to support the argument that a subset of these therapeutics for osteoporosis may alleviate low back pain by also targeting the IVD.
PubMed: 38706880
DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae048 -
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and... Jun 2024We have previously developed an in vitro instrument, termed subcutaneous injection site simulator (SCISSOR), that can be used to monitor release properties of an active...
We have previously developed an in vitro instrument, termed subcutaneous injection site simulator (SCISSOR), that can be used to monitor release properties of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and formulation components of a medicine designed for SC injection. Initial studies to validate the SCISSOR instrument applications used a simple hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel to monitor early release events. We now report a type of cross-linked HA that can, when combined with HA, provide a hydrogel (HA-XR) with optical clarity and rheological properties that remain stable for at least 6 days. Incorporation of 0.05-0.1 mg/mL of collagens isolated from human fibroblasts (Col F), bovine type I collagen (Col I), chicken collagen type II (Col II), or chondroitin sulphate (CS) produced HA or HA-XR hydrogel formats with optical clarity and rheological properties comparable to HA or HA-XR alone. HA + Col F hydrogel had a much greater effect on release rates of 70 kDa compared to 4 kDa dextran, while Col F incorporated into the HA-XR hydrogel accentuated differences in release rates of prandial and basal forms of insulin as well as decreased the release rate of denosumab. A hydrogel format of HA + Col I was used to examine the complex events for bevacizumab release under conditions where a target ligand (vascular endothelial growth factor) can interact with extracellular matrix (ECM). Together, these data have demonstrated the feasibility of using a cross-linked HA format to examine API release over multiple days and incorporation of specific ECM elements to prepare more biomimetic hydrogels that allow for tractable examination of their potential impact of API release.
Topics: Injections, Subcutaneous; Hyaluronic Acid; Hydrogels; Humans; Animals; Drug Interactions; Cattle; Rheology; Chondroitin Sulfates; Insulin; Bevacizumab; Collagen
PubMed: 38688439
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114308 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Mar 2024: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer has greatly improved treatment outcomes. As patient survival rates have increased, reports of decreased bone...
: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer has greatly improved treatment outcomes. As patient survival rates have increased, reports of decreased bone density and increased bone fractures as side effects of ADT have emerged. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Japanese men was 4.6%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of osteoporosis treatment in prostate cancer patients who underwent ADT in Japan. : The subjects were 33 male patients who had undergone ADT for prostate cancer, who were noted to have decreased bone density. Mean age was 76.2 ± 7.7 years (64-87). Medications included vitamin D in one case, bisphosphonates (BP) in 27 cases, and denosumab in five cases. The evaluation method examined the rate of change in bone mineral density (BMD) before osteoporosis treatment and 1 year after. For comparison, a group without osteoporosis treatment intervention ( = 33) was selected, and matched for prostate cancer treatment and age. The rate of change in trabecular bone score (TBS) was also calculated. : The percentage changes in BMD before and 1 year after treatment were as follows: lumbar spine, 7.1 ± 5.8% in the treatment group versus -3.9 ± 4.1% in the no treatment group; femoral neck, 5.5 ± 6.2% in the treatment group versus -0.9 ± 3.9% in the no treatment group; total femur, 6.6 ± 6.4% in the treatment group versus the no treatment group which was -1.7 ± 3.2%. In all cases, there was a clear significant difference ( < 0.01). The percent change in TBS was further calculated in the same manner. There was no significant difference between the two groups: +1.7 ± 3.8% in the treated group versus +0.3 ± 4.1% in the untreated group. : Osteoporosis treatment in Japanese patients with prostate cancer on ADT therapy was found to significantly increase BMD compared to the untreated group. BP and denosumab were found to be very effective in increasing BMD.
Topics: Humans; Male; Osteoporosis; Aged; Japan; Androgen Antagonists; Prostatic Neoplasms; Bone Density; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Denosumab; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Vitamin D
PubMed: 38674197
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040551 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Apr 2024Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is characterized by uncertain biological behavior due to its local aggressiveness and metastasizing potential. In this study, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is characterized by uncertain biological behavior due to its local aggressiveness and metastasizing potential. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the contemporary literature to evaluate all management strategies for GCTB metastases. A combination of the terms "lung metastases", "giant cell tumor", "bone", "treatment", and "oncologic outcomes" returned 133 patients meeting our inclusion criteria: 64 males and 69 females, with a median age of 28 years (7-63), at the onset of primary GCTB. Lung metastases typically occur at a mean interval of 26 months (range: 0-143 months) after treatment of the primary site, commonly presenting as multiple and bilateral lesions. Various treatment approaches, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and drug administration, were employed, while 35 patients underwent routine monitoring only. Upon a mean follow-up of about 7 years (range: 1-32 years), 90% of patients were found to be alive, while 10% had died. Death occurred in 25% of patients who had chemotherapy, whereas 96% of those not treated or treated with Denosumab alone were alive at a mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 1-19 years). Given the typically favorable prognosis of lung metastases in patients with GCTB, additional interventions beyond a histological diagnosis confirmation may not be needed. Denosumab, by reducing the progression of the disease, can play a pivotal role in averting or delaying lung failure.
Topics: Humans; Denosumab; Lung Neoplasms; Giant Cell Tumor of Bone; Male; Female; Bone Neoplasms; Adult; Middle Aged; Young Adult; Adolescent; Child
PubMed: 38668063
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040160 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Apr 2024Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative... (Review)
Review
Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.
Topics: Humans; Giant Cell Tumor of Bone; Bone Neoplasms; Denosumab; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 38668060
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040157 -
Cureus Mar 2024Bone giant cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, non-cancerous tumors that mostly affect the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones in the legs and arms. We are reporting a case of...
Bone giant cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, non-cancerous tumors that mostly affect the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones in the legs and arms. We are reporting a case of GCT of bone of a 14-year-old male; it usually occurs in the age group of 20-40 years. The presence of multinucleated giant cells and stromal cells in the proximal diaphysis of the left tibia serves as a distinguishing characteristic. The majority of GCTs are benign; they have the potential to induce bone loss and can be locally aggressive. Treatment options often include surgery, and in some cases, medications like denosumab may be used to help shrink the tumor or manage recurrent cases.
PubMed: 38665730
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56929 -
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal... 2024Subjects with a fragility fracture have an increased risk of a new fracture and should receive effective strategies to prevent new events. The medium-term to long-term...
BACKGROUND
Subjects with a fragility fracture have an increased risk of a new fracture and should receive effective strategies to prevent new events. The medium-term to long-term strategy should be scheduled by considering the mechanisms of action in therapy and the estimated fracture risk.
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the sequential strategy in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were investigated up to February 2021 to update the search of a recent systematic review. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the sequential therapy of antiresorptive, anabolic treatment, or placebo in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture were eligible. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias in the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using fixed-effects models. The primary outcome was the risk of refracture, while the secondary outcome was the bone mineral density (BMD) change.
RESULTS
In all, 17 RCTs, ranging from low to high quality, met our inclusion criteria. A significantly reduced risk of fracture was detected at (i) 12 or 24 months after the switch from romosozumab to denosumab placebo to denosumab; (ii) 30 months from teriparatide to bisphosphonates placebo to bisphosphonates; and (iii) 12 months from romosozumab to alendronate the only alendronate therapy (specifically for vertebral fractures). In general, at 2 years after the switch from anabolic to antiresorptive drugs, a weighted BMD was increased at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck site.
CONCLUSION
The Task Force formulated recommendations on sequential therapy, which is the first treatment with anabolic drugs or 'bone builders' in patients with very high or imminent risk of fracture.
PubMed: 38654732
DOI: 10.1177/1759720X241234584