-
Cadernos de Saude Publica 2024This study is a systematic literature review of the association between lists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) in clinical practice and health outcomes of...
This study is a systematic literature review of the association between lists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) in clinical practice and health outcomes of older adults followed up in primary health care. For this purpose, the PRISMA protocol was used to systematize the search for articles in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, LIVIVO and LILACS databases, in addition to the gray literature. Studies with randomized clinical trials were selected, using explicit criteria (lists) for the identification and management of PIM in prescriptions of older patients in primary care. Of the 2,400 articles found, six were used for data extraction. The interventions resulted in significant reductions in the number of PIM and adverse drug events and, consequently, in potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) in polymedicated older adults. However, there were no significant effects of the interventions on negative clinical outcomes, such as emergency room visits, hospitalizations and death, or on improving the health status of the older adults. The use of PIM lists promotes adequate medication prescriptions for older adults in primary health care, but further studies are needed to determine the impact of reducing PIM on primary clinical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Primary Health Care; Potentially Inappropriate Medication List; Aged; Inappropriate Prescribing; Polypharmacy
PubMed: 38775606
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XEN016423 -
Exploratory Research in Clinical and... Jun 2024Use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) is increasing in hospital settings. ADCs bring various potential benefits, among which are improvements to patient safety and...
Use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) is increasing in hospital settings. ADCs bring various potential benefits, among which are improvements to patient safety and reduction of medication errors. A core function of ADCs is to prevent medication stock outs by triggering an order when stock is reaching low levels. A quantifiable patient safety measure is the occurrence of omitted or delayed doses, which can range in severity from being negligible, to potentially fatal. The purpose of this review is to identify and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the impact of ADCs situated in secondary and tertiary care inpatient settings, on the rate of omitted and delayed doses as a specific subsection of medication errors. In April 2024 searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed and CINAHL, with additional articles discovered through citation searching and from colleagues. A total of 375 articles were returned from the search. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was due to lack of relevance. The included papers were focused on centres which had implemented six or fewer ADCs. The studies mostly presented findings which suggest ADCs have a positive impact on the rate of omitted or delayed doses, although crucially only two papers correlated missed doses due to unavailability of medications The studies highlighted other factors which should be considered prior to the implementation of ADCs. Factors included staffing requirement, type of stock held in the cabinets, and interoperability with other systems. Studies only reported omitted or missed doses, none reported results on delayed doses. It is widely accepted that ADCs can prevent medication unavailability but there is a paucity of evidence linking the improved availability of medications through the utilisation of ADCs with the perceived impact on missed or delayed doses. Further multi-centre studies are needed to determine this causality.
PubMed: 38774122
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100451 -
BMC Health Services Research May 2024The inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics during the coronavirus pandemic has become an important issue.
BACKGROUND
The inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics during the coronavirus pandemic has become an important issue.
OBJECTIVE
Our primary aim is to ascertain the attitudes of physicians toward the antibiotics prescribing for the treatment of COVID-19 in Turkey. Our secondary aim was to identify factors affecting to physicians' decisions regarding antibiotic therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 and risk factors associated with antibiotic overprescribing.
METHODS
It was a multicenter cross-sectional survey. Physicians from 63 different cities were invited to survey through social media (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp). Data were collected from respondents through an online questionnaires during November-December 2021.
RESULTS
The survey was completed by 571 participants from 63 cities. Pulmonologists comprised the majority (35.20%), followed by internal medical specialists (27.85%) and general practitioners (23.29%). The rates of participants who started empirical antibiotics in the outpatient, ward, and ICU (intensive care unit) were 70.2%, 85.5%, and 74.6%, respectively. When the practice of prescribing antibiotics by physicians for the treatment of COVID-19 in outpatients was compared according to the healthcare setting (primary, secondary, tertiary care hospitals) no significant difference was found. Sputum purulence (68.2%) was recognized as the most important factor for the decision of antibiotic therapy, followed by procalcitonin levels (64.9%) and abnormal radiological findings (50.3%). The most prescribed antibiotics were respiratory quinolones. (48%, 65.9%, 62.7% outpatient, ward, ICU respectively) CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that physicians frequently had irrational attitudes toward antibiotic prescription to COVID-19 patients, including those with minor diseases. Our findings underline that the necessity of particular, workable interventions to guarantee the prudent use of antibiotics in COVID-19.
Topics: Humans; Turkey; Cross-Sectional Studies; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Male; Female; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Middle Aged; COVID-19; Surveys and Questionnaires; Inappropriate Prescribing; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; SARS-CoV-2; Physicians; Pandemics
PubMed: 38773553
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11110-z -
Research in Social & Administrative... Jun 2024Prescribing cascades can lead to unnecessary medication use, healthcare costs, and patient harm. Pharmacists oversee prescriptions from multiple prescribers and are well...
BACKGROUND
Prescribing cascades can lead to unnecessary medication use, healthcare costs, and patient harm. Pharmacists oversee prescriptions from multiple prescribers and are well positioned to identify such cascades, making pharmacists key stakeholders to address them.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate community pharmacists' awareness, identification, and management of prescribing cascades and to assess behavioural determinants that may be targeted in future strategies to minimise inappropriate prescribing cascades.
METHODS
An online survey was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and emailed to all registered community pharmacists in Ireland (n = 3775) in November 2021. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Free-text sections were given to capture reasons for non-resolution of identified prescribing cascades and suggestions to aid prescribing cascade identification and management; this text underwent content analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 220 respondents, 51% were aware of the term 'prescribing cascade' before the survey, whilst 69% had identified a potentially inappropriate prescribing cascade in practice. Over one third were either slightly confident (26.4%) or not confident at all (10%) in their ability to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades in patients' prescriptions before the survey, whilst 55.2% were concerned that patients were receiving prescribing cascades they had not identified. Most respondents wanted further information/training to help prescribing cascade identification (88.3%) and management (86.1%). Four predominant TDF domains identified were common to both i) influencing non-resolution of identified prescribing cascades and ii) in the suggestions to help identify and manage prescribing cascades: 'Environmental Context and Resources', 'Social/Professional Role and Identity', 'Social Influences' and 'Memory, Attention and Decision Processes'.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a clear need to provide additional resources to help community pharmacists identify and manage prescribing cascades. These findings will support the development of theory-informed behaviour change strategies to aid the minimisation of inappropriate prescribing cascades and decrease the risk of medication-related harm for patients.
Topics: Humans; Pharmacists; Community Pharmacy Services; Male; Inappropriate Prescribing; Female; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Middle Aged; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ireland; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Professional Role; Practice Patterns, Pharmacists'; Attitude of Health Personnel
PubMed: 38768989
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.02.013 -
The European Journal of General Practice Dec 2024Factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care have been poorly explored. In particular, the impact of computerised...
BACKGROUND
Factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care have been poorly explored. In particular, the impact of computerised decision-support systems (CDSS) remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES
We aim at investigating the uptake of CDSS and its association with physician characteristics and professional activity.
METHODS
Since May 2022, users of a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in primary care in France have been invited, when registering, to complete three case vignettes assessing clinical situations frequently encountered in general practice and identified as at risk of antibiotic misuse. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined as the rate of answers in line with the current guidelines, computed by individuals and by specific questions. Physician's characteristics associated with individual appropriate antibiotic prescribing (< 50%, 50-75% and > 75% appropriateness) were identified by multivariate ordinal logistic regression.
RESULTS
In June 2023, 60,067 physicians had registered on the CDSS. Among the 13,851 physicians who answered all case vignettes, the median individual appropriateness level of antibiotic prescribing was 77.8% [Interquartile range, 66.7%-88.9%], and was < 50% for 1,353 physicians (10%). In the multivariate analysis, physicians' characteristics associated with appropriateness were prior use of the CDSS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87), being a general practitioner vs. other specialist (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49), working in primary care (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), mentoring students (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21) age (OR = 0.69 per 10 years increase, 95% CI 0.67-0.71).
CONCLUSION
Individual appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing was high among CDSS users, with a higher rate in young general practitioners, previously using the system. CDSS could improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Primary Health Care; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Inappropriate Prescribing; France; Adult; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Logistic Models; Multivariate Analysis
PubMed: 38766775
DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2351811 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Cardiometabolic risk prediction models that incorporate metabolic syndrome traits to predict cardiovascular outcomes may help identify high-risk populations early in the...
BACKGROUND
Cardiometabolic risk prediction models that incorporate metabolic syndrome traits to predict cardiovascular outcomes may help identify high-risk populations early in the progression of cardiometabolic disease.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to examine whether a modified cardiometabolic disease staging (CMDS) system, a validated diabetes prediction model, predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
METHODS
We developed a predictive model using data accessible in clinical practice [fasting glucose, blood pressure, body mass index, cholesterol, triglycerides, smoking status, diabetes status, hypertension medication use] from the REGARDS (REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke) study to predict MACE [cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and/or nonfatal stroke]. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, mean squared errors, misclassification, and area under the curve (AUC) statistics.
RESULTS
Among 20,234 REGARDS participants with no history of stroke or myocardial infarction (mean age 64 ± 9.3 years, 58% female, 41% non-Hispanic Black, and 18% diabetes), 2,695 developed incident MACE (13.3%) during a median 10-year follow-up. The CMDS development model in REGARDS for MACE had an AUC of 0.721. Our CMDS model performed similarly to both the ACC/AHA 10-year risk estimate (AUC 0.721 vs 0.716) and the Framingham risk score (AUC 0.673).
CONCLUSIONS
The CMDS predicted the onset of MACE with good predictive ability and performed similarly or better than 2 commonly known cardiovascular disease prediction risk tools. These data underscore the importance of insulin resistance as a cardiovascular disease risk factor and that CMDS can be used to identify individuals at high risk for progression to cardiovascular disease.
PubMed: 38765187
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100868 -
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia May 2024Intravenous (IV) medication administration error remains a major concern during the perioperative period. This review examines inadvertent IV anaesthesia induction agent... (Review)
Review
Intravenous (IV) medication administration error remains a major concern during the perioperative period. This review examines inadvertent IV anaesthesia induction agent administration via high-risk routes. Using Medline and Google Scholar, the author searched published reports of inadvertent administration via neuraxial (intrathecal, epidural), peripheral nerve or plexus or intracerebroventricular (ICV) route. The author applied the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework to identify systemic and human factors. Among 14 patients involved, thiopentone was administered via the epidural route in six patients. Four errors involved the routes of ICV (propofol and etomidate one each) or lumbar intrathecal (propofol infusion and etomidate bolus). Intrathecal thiopentone was associated with cauda equina syndrome in one patient. HFACS identified suboptimal handling of external ventricular and lumbar drains and deficiencies in the transition of care. Organisational policy to improve the handling of neuraxial devices, use of technological tools and improvements in identified deficiencies in preconditions before drug preparation and administration may minimise future risks of inadvertent IV induction agent administration.
PubMed: 38764957
DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1276_23 -
Atencion Primaria May 2024To describe the Drug-Related Problems (DRP) and their resolution after pharmacological review in institutionalised elderly patients under polypharmacy.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the Drug-Related Problems (DRP) and their resolution after pharmacological review in institutionalised elderly patients under polypharmacy.
DESIGN
Descriptive, retrospective cohort study from January to October of 2022.
LOCATION
Twelve nursing homes at the Community of Madrid.
PARTICIPANTS
295 patients aged 65 or older taking at least 5 chronic medications prescribed prior to the treatment review.
INTERVENTIONS
Medication reviews carried out by the pharmacist and agreed upon in face-to-face meetings between the primary care doctor, the nursing home doctor and the pharmacist.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS
Detected DRP, types and resolution. A age, sex, and number of medications before and after the intervention. Pharmacological subgroups according to anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC) and active pharmaceutical ingredients involved in the detected DRPs.
RESULTS
1425 DRP were detected, with a mean of 4.85 (SD 3.33) DRPs/patient. The most frequent DRP was reconciliation error (32.52%), followed by pharmaceutical regimen and dosaje. Among the 1425 improvement proposals, 86.73% of them were accepted.Significant statistically differences were observed between the number of medications per patient prior to the pharmacotherapy review (12.29) and after it (10.20), obtaining an average difference of 2.09 (95%CI: 1.98-2.21; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
It is found that the intervention of multidisciplinary team in which the pharmacist performs a revision of the medication decreased the number of prescribed medications. Therefore, it reduces polymedication and its associated risks.
PubMed: 38763097
DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102959 -
BMC Health Services Research May 2024Despite efforts to enhance the quality of medication prescribing in outpatient settings, potentially inappropriate prescribing remains common, particularly in...
BACKGROUND
Despite efforts to enhance the quality of medication prescribing in outpatient settings, potentially inappropriate prescribing remains common, particularly in unscheduled settings where patients can present with infectious and pain-related complaints. Two of the most commonly prescribed medication classes in outpatient settings with frequent rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing include antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of persistent inappropriate prescribing, we sought to understand a diverse set of perspectives on the determinants of inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs in the Veterans Health Administration.
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theory of Planned Behavior. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, stakeholders, and Veterans from March 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 within the Veteran Affairs Health System in unscheduled outpatient settings at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Stakeholders included clinical operations leadership and methodological experts. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and de-identified. Data coding and analysis were conducted by experienced qualitative methodologists adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guidelines. Analysis was conducted using an iterative inductive/deductive process.
RESULTS
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 66 participants: clinicians (N = 25), stakeholders (N = 24), and Veterans (N = 17). We identified six themes contributing to potentially inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs: 1) Perceived versus actual Veterans expectations about prescribing; 2) the influence of a time-pressured clinical environment on prescribing stewardship; 3) Limited clinician knowledge, awareness, and willingness to use evidence-based care; 4) Prescriber uncertainties about the Veteran condition at the time of the clinical encounter; 5) Limited communication; and 6) Technology barriers of the electronic health record and patient portal.
CONCLUSIONS
The diverse perspectives on prescribing underscore the need for interventions that recognize the detrimental impact of high workload on prescribing stewardship and the need to design interventions with the end-user in mind. This study revealed actionable themes that could be addressed to improve guideline concordant prescribing to enhance the quality of prescribing and to reduce patient harm.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Inappropriate Prescribing; Qualitative Research; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Male; Female; Interviews as Topic; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Tennessee
PubMed: 38760660
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11082-0 -
PloS One 2024Globally, a shift is occurring to recognize the importance of young peoples' health and well-being, their unique health challenges, and the potential they hold as key...
Tande nou gwonde! (Hear us roar!)- Youth perspectives of maternal near-misses: Protocol for a photovoice study of young childbearing people's perspectives of maternal near-misses in northwest Haiti.
INTRODUCTION
Globally, a shift is occurring to recognize the importance of young peoples' health and well-being, their unique health challenges, and the potential they hold as key drivers of change in their communities. In Haiti, one of the four leading causes of death for those 20-24 years old is pregnancy, childbirth, and the weeks after birth or at the end of a pregnancy. Important gaps remain in existing knowledge about youth perspectives of maternal health and well-being within their communities. Youth with lived experiences of maternal near-misses are well-positioned to contribute to the understanding of maternal health in their communities and their potential role in bringing about change.
OBJECTIVES
To explore and understand youth perspectives of maternal near-miss experiences that occurred in a local healthcare facility or at home in rural Haiti.
METHODS
We will conduct a qualitative, community-based participatory research study regarding maternal near-miss experiences to understand current challenges and identify solutions to improve community maternal health, specifically focused on youth maternal health. We will use Photovoice to seek an understanding of the lived experiences of youth maternal near-miss survivors. Participants will be from La Pointe, a Haitian community served by their local healthcare facility. We will undertake purposeful sampling to recruit approximately 20 female youth, aged 15-24 years. Data will be generated through photos, individual interviews and small group discussions (grouped by setting of near-miss experience). Data generation and analysis are expected to occur over a three-month period.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
Ethics approval will be sought from Centre Médical Béraca in La Pointe, Haiti, and from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton ON, Canada. We will involve community stakeholders, especially youth, in developing dissemination and knowledge mobilisation strategies. Our findings will be disseminated as an open access publication, be presented publicly, at conferences, and defended as part of a doctoral thesis.
Topics: Humans; Female; Haiti; Pregnancy; Adolescent; Young Adult; Maternal Health; Near Miss, Healthcare; Community-Based Participatory Research; Rural Population; Photography; Qualitative Research; Adult
PubMed: 38758960
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303168