-
Scientific Reports May 2024To investigate neonatal injuries, morbidities and risk factors related to vaginal deliveries. This retrospective, descriptive study identified 3500 patients who...
To investigate neonatal injuries, morbidities and risk factors related to vaginal deliveries. This retrospective, descriptive study identified 3500 patients who underwent vaginal delivery between 2020 and 2022. Demographic data, neonatal injuries, complications arising from vaginal delivery and pertinent risk factors were documented. Neonatal injuries and morbidities were prevalent in cases of assisted vacuum delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus class A2 (GDMA2) and pre-eclampsia with severe features. Caput succedaneum and petechiae were observed in 291/3500 cases (8.31%) and 108/3500 cases (3.09%), respectively. Caput succedaneum was associated with multiparity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.57, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 5.18, 95% CI 2.60-10.3, P < 0.001). Cephalohaematoma was linked to GDMA2 (AOR 11.3, 95% CI 2.96-43.2, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 16.5, 95% CI 6.71-40.5, P < 0.001). Scalp lacerations correlated with assisted vacuum and forceps deliveries (AOR 6.94, 95% CI 1.85-26.1, P < 0.004; and AOR 10.5, 95% CI 1.08-102.2, P < 0.042, respectively). Neonatal morbidities were associated with preterm delivery (AOR 3.49, 95% CI 1.39-8.72, P = 0.008), night-time delivery (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63, P = 0.009) and low birth weight (AOR 7.52, 95% CI 3.79-14.9, P < 0.001). Neonatal injuries and morbidities were common in assisted vacuum delivery, maternal GDMA2, pre-eclampsia with severe features, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Cephalohaematoma and scalp lacerations were prevalent in assisted vaginal deliveries. Most morbidities occurred at night.Clinical trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry 20220126004.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Infant, Newborn; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical; Delivery, Obstetric; Birth Injuries; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Diabetes, Gestational; Pre-Eclampsia
PubMed: 38796580
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62703-x -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Apr 2024The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a...
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a simulated forceps birth, and then to study the association of the obstetricians' experience with the technique adopted.
METHOD
Fifty-seven volunteer obstetricians, 20 from the Limoges and 37 from the Poitiers University hospitals, were included in this multi-centric study. They were classified into 3 groups: beginners, intermediates, and experts, beginners having performed fewer than 10 forceps deliveries in real conditions, intermediates between 10 and 100, and experts more than 100. The posture and movements of the obstetricians were recorded between December 2020 and March 2021 using an optoelectronic motion capture system during simulated forceps births. Joint angles qualifying these postures and movements were analysed between the three phases of the foetal traction. These phases were defined by the passage of a virtual point associated with the forceps blade through two anatomical planes: the mid-pelvis and the pelvic outlet. Then, a consolidated ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) was applied to these data in order to objectify the existence of groups of similar behaviours.
RESULTS
The AHC distinguished four different postures adopted when crossing the first plane and three different traction techniques. 48% of the beginners adopted one of the two raised posture, 22% being raised without trunk flexion and 26% raised with trunk flexion. Conversely, 58% of the experts positioned themselves in a "chevalier servant" posture (going down on one knee) and 25% in a "squatting" posture before initiating traction. The results also show that the joint movement amplitude tends to reduce with the level of expertise.
CONCLUSION
Forceps delivery was performed in different ways, with the experienced obstetricians favouring postures that enabled observation at the level of the maternal perineum and techniques reducing movement amplitude. The first perspective of this work is to relate these different techniques to the traction force generated. The results of these studies have the potential to contribute to the training of obstetricians in forceps delivery, and to improve the safety of women and newborns.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Infant, Newborn; Extraction, Obstetrical; Obstetricians; Delivery, Obstetric; Obstetrical Forceps; Posture
PubMed: 38589802
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06457-4 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Apr 2024Poor outcomes from operative vaginal birth have been associated with failure to recognize malposition, breakdown in interdisciplinary communication, and deviation from...
BACKGROUND
Poor outcomes from operative vaginal birth have been associated with failure to recognize malposition, breakdown in interdisciplinary communication, and deviation from accepted guidelines. We recently implemented a safety bundle including routine intrapartum ultrasound and a structured time-out and procedural checklist aiming to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity from operative vaginal birth.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare births where intrapartum ultrasound was used and those where it was not used during a safety bundle implementation period at Monash Health.
STUDY DESIGN
We performed a retrospective cohort study at Monash Health during the transitional phase of implementing an operative vaginal birth safety bundle. We studied all women with operative vaginal birth and fully dilated cesarean delivery with a singleton cephalic term fetus. We compared births for which intrapartum ultrasound was used and those for which it was not. The primary outcome was neonates delivered in an unexpected position. Neonatal and maternal morbidity were also assessed, including a neonatal composite of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, cord lactate >8 mmol/L, need for resuscitation, significant birth trauma, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. To control for confounding by indication, we estimated propensity scores for the probability of using intrapartum ultrasound for each case based on maternal and labor characteristics, and adjusted the effect estimates for the propensity scores using multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS
From August 2022 to July 2023, there were 1205 operative vaginal births or fully dilated cesarean deliveries at Monash Health, including 743 (61.7%) forceps, 346 (28.7%) vacuum, and 116 (9.6%) fully dilated cesarean deliveries. Over this time, we observed increased uptake of intrapartum ultrasound from 26% in August 2022 to 60% (P<.001) in July 2023, of the time-out from 21% to 58% (P<.001), and the checklist from 33% to 80% (P<.001) of operative second-stage births. Among the births where intrapartum ultrasound was used (n=509), compared with those where it was not (n=696), there were significantly more forceps births (67% vs 58%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.74; P=.021) and a reduction in vacuum births (24% vs 32%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.01; P=.059). There were no significant differences in fully dilated cesarean delivery or maternal morbidity. Intrapartum ultrasound use was associated with significantly fewer infants being delivered in an unexpected position (0.2% vs 2.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.44; P=.019) and a significant reduction in composite neonatal morbidity (22% vs 25%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.97; P=.031).
CONCLUSION
During the implementation of a safety bundle, the use of ultrasound before operative vaginal birth was associated with fewer infants delivered in an unexpected position and reduced neonatal morbidity.
Topics: Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Pregnancy; Adult; Infant, Newborn; Cesarean Section; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Apgar Score; Extraction, Obstetrical; Cohort Studies; Propensity Score; Checklist; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical
PubMed: 38479490
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101345 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2024Decreasing rates of assisted vaginal birth have been paralleled with increasing rates of cesarean deliveries over the last 40 years. The OdonAssist is a novel device for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Decreasing rates of assisted vaginal birth have been paralleled with increasing rates of cesarean deliveries over the last 40 years. The OdonAssist is a novel device for assisted vaginal birth. Iterative changes to clinical parameters, device design, and technique have been made to improve device efficacy and usability.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine if the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the OdonAssist device were sufficient to justify conducting a future randomized controlled trial.
STUDY DESIGN
An open-label nonrandomized study of 104 participants having a clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth using the OdonAssist was undertaken at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom. Data were also collected from participants who consented to participate in the study but for whom trained OdonAssist operators were not available, providing a nested cohort. The primary clinical outcome was the proportion of births successfully expedited with the OdonAssist. Secondary outcomes included clinical, patient-reported, operator-reported, device and health care utilization. Neonatal outcome data were reviewed at day 28, and maternal outcomes were investigated up to day 90. Given that the number of successful OdonAssist births was ≥61 out of 104, the hypothesis of a poor rate of 50% was rejected in favor of a good rate of ≥65%.
RESULTS
Between August 2019 and June 2021, 941 (64%) of the 1471 approached, eligible participants consented to participate. Of these, 104 received the OdonAssist intervention. Birth was assisted in all cephalic vertex fetal positions, at all stations ≥1 cm below the ischial spines (with or without regional analgesia). The OdonAssist was effective in 69 of the 104 (66%) cases, consistent with the hypothesis of a good efficacy rate. There were no serious device-related maternal or neonatal adverse reactions, and there were no serious adverse device effects. Only 4% of neonatal soft tissue bruising in the successful OdonAssist group was considered device-related, as opposed to 20% and 23% in the unsuccessful OdonAssist group and the nested cohort, respectively. Participants reported high birth perception scores. All practitioners found the device use to be straightforward.
CONCLUSION
Recruitment to an interventional study of a new device for assisted vaginal birth is feasible; 64% of eligible participants were willing to participate. The success rate of the OdonAssist was comparable to that of the Kiwi OmniCup when introduced in the same unit in 2002, meeting the threshold for a randomized controlled trial to compare the OdonAssist with current standard practice. There were no disadvantages of study participation in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes. There were potential advantages of using the OdonAssist, particularly reduced neonatal soft tissue injury. The same application technique is used for all fetal positions, with all operators deeming the device straightforward to use. This study provides important data to inform future study design.
Topics: Female; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Humans; Cesarean Section; Head; United Kingdom; Vagina
PubMed: 38462264
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.018 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... May 2024To assess the utility of Art & Craft - a new, hands-on course on Advanced Rotational Techniques and safe Caesarean biRth at Advanced/Full dilation Training aimed at...
OBJECTIVES
To assess the utility of Art & Craft - a new, hands-on course on Advanced Rotational Techniques and safe Caesarean biRth at Advanced/Full dilation Training aimed at senior Obstetrics trainees. The aims were to assess whether it improved confidence and skills in rotational vaginal birth, impacted fetal head at caesarean, and ultrasound for fetal position.
STUDY DESIGN
With ethical approval, pre- and post- course questionnaires and post- course interviews of attendees were conducted. A pre course questionnaire was emailed 1 week before the course. Attendees were asked to rate their confidence levels in performing vaginal examination and ultrasound assessment of fetal position, rotational ventouse, manual rotation, Kielland's rotational forceps, and disimpaction of the fetal head during second stage caesarean on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 = not confident at all and 5 = very confident. A post-course questionnaire with the same questions was emailed 3 days after. p values for differences in scores were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test using Stata/MP 18 software.
RESULTS
32 trainees attended the course. 28 questionnaires were available for analysis. The majority 39 % were middle grade (ST3-ST5) level. Initial confidence was very low for rotational forceps (median 1/5). After attending the course and practical stations, respondents' confidence levels increased significantly (p < 0.05) across all domains; vaginal examination from 4 to 5, ultrasound for fetal position, rotational ventouse, and manual rotation from 3 to 5, disimpaction from 4 to 4.5, and Kielland's rotational forceps from 1 to 4. Nine participated in post course interviews, which were thematically analysed. Participants expressed that the course gave them the opportunity to ask specific questions from experts to improve their confidence. A barrier to learning new methods was highlighted in that it is difficult to receive practical training in Kielland's, resulting in low confidence.
CONCLUSION
A practical, hands-on course on complex operative birth significantly increases trainee confidence levels in vaginal examination, ultrasound for fetal position, disimpaction, and techniques for rotational vaginal birth. The evaluation highlights that continued education and practise is required, even when trainees are senior. Evaluation of clinical outcomes after training is needed; and planned.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Cesarean Section; Extraction, Obstetrical; Obstetrical Forceps; Obstetrics
PubMed: 38432018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.046 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology... May 2024To quantify variation in the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) by maternity care provider in spontaneous and operative vaginal...
OBJECTIVES
To quantify variation in the association between episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) by maternity care provider in spontaneous and operative vaginal deliveries (SVDs and OVDs).
METHODS
Population-based retrospective cohort study of vaginal, term deliveries among nullipara in Canada (2004-2015). Adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-binomial regression to quantify the associations between episiotomy and OASI, stratified by care provider (obstetrician [OB], family physician [FP], or registered midwife [RM]) while adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS
The study included 631 642 deliveries. Episiotomy use varied by provider: among SVDs, the episiotomy rate was 19.6%, 14.4%, and 8.4% in the OB, FP, and RM groups, respectively. The rate of OASI was higher among SVDs with versus without episiotomy (5.8% vs 4.6%). Conversely, OASI occurred less frequently in operative vaginal deliveries with episiotomy (15.3%) compared with those without (16.7%). In all provider groups, the ARR for OASI was increased with episiotomy in SVD and decreased with episiotomy with forceps delivery. No differences in these associations were observed by provider except among vacuum delivery (ARR with episiotomy vs. without, OB: 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92; FP: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, RM: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.48).
CONCLUSIONS
In nullipara, irrespective of maternity care provider, there is a positive association between episiotomy and OASI among SVDs and an inverse association between episiotomy and deliveries with forceps. The relationship between episiotomy and OASI is modified by maternity care providers among vacuum deliveries.
Topics: Humans; Episiotomy; Female; Anal Canal; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Parity; Canada; Obstetrics; Obstetric Labor Complications; Young Adult; Midwifery; Physicians, Family; Delivery, Obstetric
PubMed: 38387834
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102415 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Feb 2024The trends of increasing use of cesarean section (CS) with a decrease in assisted vaginal birth (vacuum extraction or forceps) is a major concern in health care systems...
INTRODUCTION
The trends of increasing use of cesarean section (CS) with a decrease in assisted vaginal birth (vacuum extraction or forceps) is a major concern in health care systems all over the world, particularly in low-resource settings. Studies show that a first birth by CS is associated with an increased risk of repeat CS in subsequent births. In addition, CS compared to assisted vaginal birth (AVB), attracts higher health service costs. Resource-constrained countries have low rates of AVB compared to high-income countries. The aim of this study was to compare mode of birth in the subsequent pregnancy among women who previously gave birth by vacuum extraction or second stage CS in their first pregnancy at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study that involved interviews of 81 mothers who had a vacuum extraction or second stage CS in their first pregnancy at Mulago hospital between November 2014 to July 2015. Mode of birth in the subsequent pregnancy was compared using Chi-2 square test and a Fisher's exact test with a 0.05 level of statistical significance.
RESULTS
Higher rates of vaginal birth were achieved among women who had a vacuum extraction (78.4%) compared to those who had a second stage CS in their first pregnancy (38.6%), p < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Vacuum extraction increases a woman's chance of having a subsequent spontaneous vaginal birth compared to second stage CS. Health professionals need to continue to offer choice of vacuum extraction in the second stage of labor among laboring women that fulfill its indication. This will help curb the up-surging rates of CS.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cesarean Section; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical; Tertiary Care Centers; Retrospective Studies; Birth Order; Uganda; Labor, Obstetric
PubMed: 38302920
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06282-9 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Apr 2024Exploring the perinatal outcomes of forceps delivery and the risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage, laying a certain foundation for early identification of indications...
OBJECTIVE
Exploring the perinatal outcomes of forceps delivery and the risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage, laying a certain foundation for early identification of indications for forceps assisted delivery and suppressing the risk of bleeding during forceps assisted delivery, and improving delivery quality.
METHOD
Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical information of 1520 parturients delivered by vagina in hospitals from December 2019 to December 2021. They were divided into normal vaginal delivery group (sample size=1454) and forceps assisted delivery group (sample size 66) according to whether forceps-assisted delivery occurred during the second stage of labor. They were divided into a postpartum hemorrhage group (sample size 9) and non-postpartum hemorrhage group (sample size 47) according to whether forceps-assisted delivery occurred, the risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage were analyzed by logistic regression.
RESULT
The incidence of perinatal infants in the forceps assisted delivery group compared to those in the normal vaginal delivery group who were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (25.76% vs 9.97%), neonatal asphyxia (4.55% vs 1.03%), shoulder dystocia (1.52% vs 0.69%), and facial scratches (40.91% vs 0.14%) was statistically significant (P < .05), except for shoulder dystocia. Univariate analysis showed that abnormal coagulation function, fetal orientation during midwifery, soft birth canal laceration, perineum lateral incision, and neonatal birth weight were the single factors related to postpartum hemorrhage during forceps delivery (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that abnormal coagulation function, laceration of the soft birth canal, and lateral episiotomy were independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage during forceps-assisted delivery. The rate of postpartum hemorrhage under forceps-assisted delivery was relatively low when the fetal orientation was occipital transverse (P < .05).
CONCLUSION
The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage in the forceps assisted delivery group is higher, with occipital posterior position, abnormal coagulation function, soft birth canal tear, and lateral perineal incision being high-risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in forceps assisted delivery. We need to strengthen prevention and control measures to improve the quality of the perinatal period. This study has guiding significance for early identification of high-risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage, strengthening pre pregnancy knowledge education, strengthening labor process monitoring, actively correcting fetal orientation, and improving midwifery techniques.
Topics: Humans; Female; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Obstetrical Forceps; Risk Factors; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Delivery, Obstetric; Extraction, Obstetrical; Infant, Newborn
PubMed: 38064601
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Mother and Child Jun 2023Nowadays, we are witnessing a decrease of vaginal instrumental deliveries and continuous increase of caesarean section rate. However, proper identification of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Nowadays, we are witnessing a decrease of vaginal instrumental deliveries and continuous increase of caesarean section rate. However, proper identification of possibility of execution, indications for instrumental delivery and their skilful use may improve the broadly understood maternal and neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study is to present prevalence, risk factors, indications and outcomes of forceps deliveries among the patients at Department of Perinatology, Lodz.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Perinatology, Medical University of Lodz. The study included forceps deliveries carried out between January 2019 and December 2022. Total number of 147 cases were analysed in terms of indications for forceps delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes such as vaginal - or cervical - laceration, postpartum haemorrhage, perineal tear, newborn injuries, Apgar score, umbilical cord blood gas analysis, NICU admission and cranial ultrasound scans.
RESULTS
The prevalence of forceps delivery was 2.2%. The most common indication for forceps delivery was foetal distress (81.6%). Among mothers, the most frequent complication was vaginal laceration (40.1%). Third-and fourth-degree perineal tears were not noted. Regarding neonatal outcomes, Apgar score ≥ 8 after 1st and 5th minute of life received accordingly 91.2% and 98% of newborns. Only 8.8% experienced severe birth injuries (subperiosteal haematoma, clavicle fracture).
CONCLUSIONS
Although foetal distress is the most common indication for forceps delivery, the vast majority of newborns were born in good condition and did not require admission to NICU. Taking into consideration high efficacy and low risk of neonatal and maternal complications, forceps should remain in modern obstetrics.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Cesarean Section; Fetal Distress; Retrospective Studies; Lacerations; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical; Obstetrical Forceps
PubMed: 37920112
DOI: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.20232701.d-23-00057 -
AJOG Global Reports Nov 2023The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing...
BACKGROUND
The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery.
STUDY DESIGN
The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model.
RESULTS
In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17-19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71-4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29-2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time ( trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, trend<.05).
CONCLUSION
This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices.
PubMed: 37885968
DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100272