-
Kidney360 May 2024Cisplatin is an effective first line therapy for a variety of cancers. Cisplatin is highly emetogenic and resulting volume depletion can contribute to acute kidney...
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin is an effective first line therapy for a variety of cancers. Cisplatin is highly emetogenic and resulting volume depletion can contribute to acute kidney injury (AKI). Anti-emetic drugs such as 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3RAs) are commonly prescribed to prevent this complication. Preclinical studies suggest first generation 5-HT3RAs may alter the renal clearance and increase cisplatin toxicity. This retrospective study evaluated whether different 5-HT3RAs modify the risk of AKI in patients receiving cisplatin.
METHODS
Patients with cancer who received cisplatin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016 were included. Patients over 18 years old with available data for baseline and post-treatment serum creatinine, cisplatin cumulative dose, and administration of 5-HT3RAs including first generation (ondansetron, granisetron, and ramosetron) and second generation (palonosetron) were analyzed. AKI defined as 1.5x increase in serum creatinine. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess univariable associations between baseline covariates and AKI, and logistic regression for multivariable associations with AKI.
RESULTS
Of 8703 patients identified with cisplatin exposure, 6889 were included. A total of 3881 (56.3%) patients received at least one 5-HT3RA, including palonosetron (3750, 54.4%), ondansetron (1399, 20.3%) and granisetron (11, 0.2%). AKI developed in 1666 (24.2%) patients following cisplatin. Patients who received any 5-HT3RAs were less likely to experience AKI as compared to patients that did not (22.6% vs 26.2%, p=0.001). Older age, male gender, African ethnicity, and cumulative cisplatin dose were univariately associated with higher risk for AKI (P<0.001). After adjusting for these variables, use of any of these antiemetic drugs was protective for AKI (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.94; P= 0.003) with no difference detected between type of 5-HT3RA.
CONCLUSION
Nephrotoxicity continues to be a concern following cisplatin therapy. Given its emetogenic nature, use of antiemetic drugs such as 5-HT3RAs can lessen emesis and lower risk of kidney injury. This retrospective analysis supports use of any 5-HT3RAs to lower risk of AKI.
PubMed: 38814726
DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000464 -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... May 2024
Topics: Humans; Ondansetron; Long QT Syndrome; Antiemetics
PubMed: 38783462
DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.10825 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients suffer high risks of mortality. Ondansetron has been verified to be effective in improving the prognosis of some kinds of...
BACKGROUND
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients suffer high risks of mortality. Ondansetron has been verified to be effective in improving the prognosis of some kinds of critically ill patients. We design this study to explore whether ondansetron use is associated with lower risks of mortality among TBI patients.
METHODS
TBI patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III were collected. The usage of ondansetron, including intravenous injection and oral tablet, since admission to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2012 was identified. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to analyze the relationship between the ondansetron use and mortality of TBI patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to generate balanced cohorts of the non-ondansetron use group and ondansetron use group. Sub-group analysis was performed to verify the association between the ondansetron use and mortality of TBI patients in different TBI severity levels after PSM.
RESULTS
In TBI cohorts before PSM, the usage incidence of ondansetron was 37.2%. The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the ondansetron group ( < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression showed that ondansetron was associated with the lower mortality of TBI patients ( = 0.008). In TBI cohorts after PSM, the 30-day mortality of the ondansetron group was lower than that of the non-ondansetron group, although without statistical significance ( = 0.079). Logistic regression indicated ondansetron use was significantly associated with the lower mortality of moderate-to-severe TBI ( < 0.001) but not mild TBI ( = 0.051). In addition, Cox regression also presented that ondansetron use was significantly associated with the lower mortality of moderate-to-severe TBI ( < 0.001) but not mild TBI ( = 0.052).
CONCLUSION
Ondansetron usage is associated with a lower mortality risk of moderate-to-severe TBI but not mild TBI patients. Ondansetron may be a novel adjunctive therapeutic strategy to improve the prognosis of moderate-to-severe TBI patients.
PubMed: 38756371
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1362309 -
Heliyon May 2024- Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a complex disease. Several studies have shown the efficacy of multitarget drugs used to treat CUD. Here we compare the efficacy of...
PURPOSE
- Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a complex disease. Several studies have shown the efficacy of multitarget drugs used to treat CUD. Here we compare the efficacy of mirtazapine (MIR), pindolol (PIN), fluoxetine (FLX), risperidone (RIS), trazodone (TRZ), ziprasidone (ZPR), ondansetron (OND), yohimbine (YOH), or prazosin (PRZ), to reduce long-term cocaine-induced locomotor activity and the expression of cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in rats.
METHODS
- The study consists of four experiments, which were divided into four experimental phases. Induction (10 days), cocaine withdrawal (30 days), expression (10 days), and post-expression phase (10 days). Male Wistar rats were daily dosed with cocaine (10 mg/kg; i.p.) during the induction and post-expression phases. During drug withdrawal, the MIR, PIN, FLX, RIS, TRZ, ZPR, OND, YOH, or PRZ were administered 30 min before saline. In the expression, the multitarget drugs were administered 30 min before cocaine. After each administration, locomotor activity for each animal was recorded for 30 min.During the agonism phase, in experiment four, 8-OH-DPAT, DOI, CP-809-101, SR-57227A, or clonidine (CLO) was administered 30 min before MIR and 60 min before cocaine. After each administration, locomotor activity for each animal was recorded for 30 min.
RESULTS
-MIR, FLX, RIS, ZPR, OND, or PRZ attenuated the cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine locomotor sensitization. PIN, TRZ, and YOH failed to decrease cocaine locomotor sensitization. At the optimal doses used, PIN, FLX, RIS, TRZ, ZPR, OND, YOH, or PRZ failed to attenuate long-term cocaine locomotor activation. MIR generated a decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity of greater magnitude and duration than the other multitarget drugs evaluated.
CONCLUSION
- At the optimal doses of multitarget drugs evaluated, MIR was the multitarget drug that showed the greatest long-term cocaine-induced behavior effects compared to other multitarget drugs.
PubMed: 38726128
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29979 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2024Ondansetron reduces the median effective dose (ED50) of prophylactic phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) during cesarean delivery. However, the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Dose-Response Study of Phenylephrine for Preventing Spinal-Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery with Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Under the Effect of Prophylactic Intravenous Ondansetron.
BACKGROUND
Ondansetron reduces the median effective dose (ED50) of prophylactic phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) during cesarean delivery. However, the exact dose response of phenylephrine in combination with prophylactic ondansetron for preventing SIH is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the dose-response of phenylephrine to prevent SIH in cesarean delivery when 4 mg of ondansetron was used as a preventive method.
METHODS
A total of 80 parturients were enrolled and divided randomly into four groups (n = 20 in each group) who received either 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 μg/kg/min of prophylactic phenylephrine. Ten minutes before the initiation of spinal induction, 4 mg prophylactic ondansetron was administered. The effective dose of prophylactic phenylephrine was defined as the dose required to prevent hypotension after the period of intrathecal injection and up to neonatal delivery. The ED50 and ED90 of prophylactic phenylephrine and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using probit analysis.
RESULTS
The ED50 and ED90 for prophylactic phenylephrine to prevent SIH were 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.30), and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.59) μg/kg/min, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the side effects and neonatal outcomes between the four groups.
CONCLUSION
The administration of 4 mg of prophylactic ondansetron was associated with an ED50 of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15~0.30) and ED90 of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.39~0.59) μg/kg/min for phenylephrine to prevent SIH.
Topics: Phenylephrine; Ondansetron; Humans; Cesarean Section; Hypotension; Female; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Anesthesia, Spinal; Adult; Pregnancy; Anesthesia, Epidural
PubMed: 38707613
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S452983 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2024The present study was to investigate three different single-drug regimens to show which was more effective to reduce radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) associated nausea... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
The prophylactic antiemetic therapies in management of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with radioactive iodine therapy: a single-center, non-randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE
The present study was to investigate three different single-drug regimens to show which was more effective to reduce radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) associated nausea and vomiting, and to compare the occurrence of long-term gastrointestinal diseases after RAI therapy.
METHOD
We performed a single-center, non-randomized clinical trial among patients who underwent RAI therapy from March 2016 to July 2022. Enrolled patients were divided into four cohorts based on the date of the treatment. cohort 1, with no preventive antiemetics; cohort 2, received 20 mg of pantoprazole per day for 3 days; cohort 3, received a 10 mg metoclopramide tablet two times daily for 3 days; cohort 4, oral ondansetron, 8 mg, twice daily for 3 days. The primary endpoints were proportion of patients who experience vomiting episodes and nausea during the 7-day hospital period. Secondary end points included Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) quality-of life questionnaires and the occurrence of gastrointestinal diseases.
RESULTS
A total of 1755 patients were analyzed, comprised of 1299 (74.0%) women and 456 (26.0%) men, with a median age of 44 years (range 18-78 years). The characteristics of patient were similar within the four groups. 465 (26.4%) patients developed RAI-associated nausea, and 186 (14.4%) patients developed RAI-associated vomiting. The rate of nausea was significantly decreased in the patients who were taking ondansetron when compared with the other cohorts (<0.05), while the rate of vomiting (≥6 episodes) was slightly lower. As secondary endpoint, FLIE measures ondansetron scored highly compared to other cohorts, from baseline (mean score of 110.53 ± 17.54) to day 7 (mean score of 105.56 ± 12.48). In addition, 48 (2.7%) patients were found to be with gastrointestinal diseases at the end of one year follow up. Multiple RAI therapy and higher dose of I-131 per body weight revealed a significantly independent risk factors of developing gastrointestinal disorders.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that short-term ondansetron could be an effective prophylactic agent in controlling RAI-associated nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, the risk of developing gastrointestinal disorders was significantly higher for patients with multiple RAI therapy and higher dose of I-131 per body weight.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Antiemetics; Adult; Iodine Radioisotopes; Aged; Vomiting; Nausea; Young Adult; Adolescent; Thyroid Neoplasms; Ondansetron; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38706697
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1310223 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Apr 2024Evidence suggests that available antiemetics are equal to intravenous fluid treatment against acute nausea of other causes than motion sickness, pregnancy, anaesthesia,... (Review)
Review
Evidence suggests that available antiemetics are equal to intravenous fluid treatment against acute nausea of other causes than motion sickness, pregnancy, anaesthesia, chemo- or radiation therapy. Each antiemetic is associated with adverse effects, which include movement disorders, sedation, and QT prolongation. Intravenous fluid and treatment directed against underlying pathology is recommended as a first-line treatment against nausea in these patients. If an antiemetic is clinically warranted, ondansetron has the most favourable ratio between side effects and price, as argued in this review.
Topics: Humans; Antiemetics; Nausea; Acute Disease; Ondansetron; Fluid Therapy; Hospitalization; Female; Pregnancy
PubMed: 38704720
DOI: 10.61409/V11230735 -
Scientific Reports Apr 2024Lung cancer, a global mortality leader, often necessitates Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery. However, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Lung cancer, a global mortality leader, often necessitates Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery. However, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, highlighting a need for effective management and prevention strategies in this context. A retrospective case-control study at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital evaluated patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer between May and September 2022. Patients were categorized based on PONV prevention methods, and data encompassing demographics, surgical history, and postoperative adverse events s were analyzed to assess the association between prophylactic protocols and PONV incidence. The Netupitant and Palonosetron Hydrochloride (NEPA) group showed a significant reduction in PONV occurrences post-surgery compared to Ondansetron (ONDA) and Control groups, emphasizing NEPA's efficacy in alleviating PONV symptoms (P < 0.05). Furthermore, following VATS radical resection of lung cancer, NEPA markedly reduced the intensity of PONV symptoms in patients. Both univariate and multivariate logistic analyses corroborated that NEPA independently reduces PONV risk, with its protective effect also apparent in susceptible populations like females and non-smokers. NEPA utilization markedly reduced both the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer, serving as an independent protective factor in mitigating PONV risk post-surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Male; Lung Neoplasms; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Antiemetics; Ondansetron; Palonosetron
PubMed: 38684769
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59687-z -
Cirugia Pediatrica : Organo Oficial de... Apr 2024Literature comparing different alternatives for pain control in the immediate postoperative period of pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) is scarce.
Prospective evaluation of the emetogenic profile and analgesic efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen and metamizole in the immediate postoperative period of pediatric acute appendicitis.
BACKGROUND
Literature comparing different alternatives for pain control in the immediate postoperative period of pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) is scarce.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We prospectively compared the analgesic and emetogenic profile of intravenous ibuprofen and metamizole in the immediate postoperative period of PAA. For this purpose, we used a sample of patients operated on in 2021 in our center. Participants were recruited on arrival at the Emergency Department and histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis was obtained in all of them. Pain was evaluated every 8 hours after the surgery with validated visual analog scales ranging from 0 to 10 points. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the evolution of pain in the 48 hours after surgery between the two groups.
RESULTS
The sample included 95 patients (65% males) with a mean age of 9.7 years (sd: 3.14). 41 patients were treated with Ibuprofen (group 1) and 54 with metamizole (group 2). No significant differences were found in the level of pain either in the comparisons of point measurements or in its evolution in the 48 hours after surgery (p= 0.58). After adjusting for the received fluid therapy, children in the metamizole group had significantly more emetic episodes and needed significantly more doses of ondansetron.
CONCLUSIONS
In our cohort, ibuprofen had a similar analgesic efficacy and a better emetogenic profile than metamizole in the immediate postoperative period of PAA. Future prospective, adequately controlled studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child; Female; Ibuprofen; Dipyrone; Appendicitis; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesics; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 38623799
DOI: 10.54847/cp.2024.02.15 -
International Journal of Emergency... Apr 2024Ondansetron is one of the most commonly used drugs in the emergency department (ED) for treating nausea and vomiting, particularly in intravenous (IV) form....
BACKGROUND
Ondansetron is one of the most commonly used drugs in the emergency department (ED) for treating nausea and vomiting, particularly in intravenous (IV) form. Nevertheless, it has been shown to prolong QT interval and increase the risk of ventricular dysrhythmias. This study evaluated the associations between single IV ondansetron dosage and subsequent QTc prolongation in the ED.
METHODS
In this prospective observational study, a total number of 106 patients presenting to the ED in a 3-month period with nausea and vomiting treated with IV ondansetron were enrolled. QT and QTc intervals were measured at baseline (QT0 and QTc0), and 60 min (QT60 and QTc60) following a single-dose administration of ondansetron at 4 or 8 mg doses. To evaluate the predictive ability of these variables, we employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
RESULTS
The predictive models for QTc prolongation 1-hour post-ondansetron administration showed the following: at baseline, the area under curve of 0.70 for QT, 0.71 for QTc, and 0.64 for dosage. Conversely, a QTc0 = 375 msec indicated a QTc60 > 480 msec with a specificity of 97%. Additionally, a QTc0 of 400 msec had a sensitivity of 100% in predicting a QTc60 < 480 msec, while a QTc0 > 460 msec predicted a QTc60 > 480 msec with a specificity of 98%. Moreover, 8 mg doses were associated with higher rates of QTc60 prolongation, while 4 mg doses favored maintaining QTc60 within normal limits.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates the predictive capacity of QT0, QTc0, and ondansetron dosage in forecasting QTc60 prolongation (> 480 msec) post-ondansetron administration. These findings advocate for their incorporation into clinical protocols to enhance safety monitoring in adult ED patients.
PubMed: 38566008
DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00621-5