-
Psychopharmacology Sep 2021Intravenous (IV) misuse of the µ opioid analgesic oxymorphone has caused significant public health harms; however, no controlled data on its IV abuse potential are... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
AIMS
Intravenous (IV) misuse of the µ opioid analgesic oxymorphone has caused significant public health harms; however, no controlled data on its IV abuse potential are available. The primary aims of this pilot study were to directly compare IV oxymorphone to IV oxycodone, morphine, and hydromorphone on a subjective measure of drug liking and to assess relative potency.
METHODS
Participants (n = 6) with opioid use disorder, physical dependence, and current IV use completed this two-site, within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient pilot study. During each session, one IV dose (mg/70 kg) was administered: oxymorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18, 32), hydromorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18), oxycodone (18, 32, 56), morphine (18, 32), and placebo. Data were collected before and for 6 h after dosing. Primary outcomes included safety/physiological effects, subjective reports of drug liking, and relative potency estimates.
RESULTS
All active test drugs produced prototypical, dose-related µ opioid agonist effects (e.g., miosis). Oxymorphone was more potent than the comparator opioids on several measures, including drug liking and respiratory depression (p < 0.05). Across abuse-related subjective outcomes, oxymorphone was 2.3-2.8-fold more potent than hydromorphone and 12.5-14-fold more potent than oxycodone (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the relatively small sample size, this pilot study detected robust oxymorphone effects. Oxymorphone was far more potent than the comparator opioids, particularly on abuse potential outcomes. Overall, these findings may help explain surveillance reports that demonstrate, after adjusting for prescription availability, oxymorphone is injected at the highest frequency, relative to other prescription opioids.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pilot Projects
PubMed: 34106317
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05872-1 -
Forensic Science International. Genetics Jul 2021Genetic disposition can cause variation in oxycodone pharmacokinetic characteristics and decrease or increase the expected clinical response. In forensic medicine,...
Genetic disposition can cause variation in oxycodone pharmacokinetic characteristics and decrease or increase the expected clinical response. In forensic medicine, determination of cause of death or assessing time between drug intake and death can be facilitated by knowledge of parent and metabolite concentrations. In this study, the aim was to investigate if CYP2D6 genotyping can facilitate interpretation by investigating the frequency of the four CYP2D6 phenotypes, poor metabolizer, intermediate metabolizer, extensive metabolizer, and ultra-rapid metabolizer in postmortem cases, and to study if the CYP2D6 activity was associated with a certain cause of death, concentration, or metabolic ratio. Cases positive for oxycodone in femoral blood (n = 174) were genotyped by pyrosequencing for CYP2D6*3, *4, and *6 and concentrations of oxycodone, noroxycodone, oxymorphone, and noroxymorphone were determined by LC-MS/MS (LLOQ 0.005 µg/g). Digital droplet PCR was used to determine the copy number variation for CYP2D6*5. Cases were categorized by cause of death. It was found that poor and intermediate CYP2D6 metabolizers had significantly higher oxycodone and noroxycodone concentrations compared to extensive and ultra-rapid metabolizers. CYP2D6 phenotype were equally distributed between cause of death groups, showing that no phenotype was overrepresented in any of the cause of death groups. We also found that the concentration ratio between oxymorphone and oxycodone depended on the CYP2D6 activity when death was unrelated to intoxication. In general, a low metabolite to parent ratio indicate an acute intake. By using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we conclude that an oxymorphone/oxycodone ratio lower than 0.075 has a high sensitivity for separating intoxications with oxycodone from other intoxications and non-intoxications. However, the phenotype needs to be known to reach a high specificity. Therefore, the ratio should not be used as a biomarker on its own to distinguish between different causes of death but needs to be complemented by genotyping.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; DNA Copy Number Variations; Female; Forensic Genetics; Genotype; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Oxycodone; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Young Adult
PubMed: 33799050
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102510 -
Journal of Chromatography. B,... May 2021The objective of this study was to develop and validate a highly sensitive method for the detection of oxycodone, noroxycodone, 6β-oxycodol, 6α-oxycodol, oxymorphone,...
The objective of this study was to develop and validate a highly sensitive method for the detection of oxycodone, noroxycodone, 6β-oxycodol, 6α-oxycodol, oxymorphone, and noroxymorphone in blood by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The analytes were extracted from blood (0.5 mL) using Bond Elut Certify Solid Phase Extraction columns, evaporated to dryness and reconstituted before analysis was performed on an Acquity UPLC® I-class coupled to a Waters Xevo TQD. Academy Standards Board Standard Practices for Method Development in Forensic Toxicology were used for the validation of this method. The limit of quantitation for all analytes was established at 0.5 ng/mL. Calibration range for noroxymorphone, oxymorphone, 6α-oxycodol and 6β-oxycodol was 0.5-25 ng/mL and 0.5-100 ng/mL for noroxycodone and oxycodone. Precision (2.90-17.3%) and bias studies resulted in a ±15% deviation. There were no interferences observed from internal standard, matrix, or common drugs of abuse. Stability of all analytes at two concentrations at 24, 48, and 72 h in the autosampler did not exceed ±20% difference from the initial T. Dilution integrity at a ten-fold dilution was acceptable as analyte concentrations ranged between (±18%) of the target concentration. Once validated, the method was used in a pilot dosing study of one male subject after taking a 10 mg immediate release tablet of oxycodone. Blood samples were collected at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 24 h after ingestion. Oxycodone and noroxycodone both reached T at 1.5 h and had C values of 25.9 and 12.8 ng/mL, respectively. Oxycodone, 6α-oxycodol, and 6β-oxycodol were detectable up to 9 h, while noroxymorphone and noroxycodone were still detected at 24 h.
Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Humans; Limit of Detection; Linear Models; Male; Morphinans; Reproducibility of Results; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 33744597
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122625 -
Data in Brief Apr 2021Here we describe the dataset of the first report of pharmacogenomics profiling in an outpatient spine setting with the primary aims to catalog: 1) the genes, alleles,...
Here we describe the dataset of the first report of pharmacogenomics profiling in an outpatient spine setting with the primary aims to catalog: 1) the genes, alleles, and associated rs Numbers (accession numbers for specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms) analysed and 2) the genotypes and corresponding phenotypes of the genes involved in metabolizing 37 commonly used analgesic medications. The present description applies to analgesic medication-metabolizing enzymes and may be especially valuable to investigators who are exploring strategies to optimize pharmacologic pain management (e.g., by tailoring analgesic regimens to the genetically identified sensitivities of the patient). Buccal swabs were used to acquire tissue samples of 30 adult patients who presented to an outpatient spine clinic with the chief concern of axial neck and/or back pain. Array-based assays were then used to detect the alleles of genes involved in the metabolism of pain medications, including all common (wild type) and most rare variant alleles with known clinical significance. Both CYP450 isozymes - including CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 - and the phase II enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-2B7 (UGT2B7) were examined. Genotypes/phenotypes were then used to evaluate each patient's relative ability to metabolize 37 commonly used analgesic medications. These medications included both non-opioid analgesics (i.e., aspirin, diclofenac, nabumetone, indomethacin, meloxicam, piroxicam, tenoxicam, lornoxicam, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, fenoprofen, naproxen, and mefenamic acid) and opioid analgesics (i.e., morphine, codeine, dihydrocodeine, ethylmorphine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxymorphone, alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, meperidine, ketobemidone, dextropropoxyphene, levacetylmethadol, loperamide, methadone, buprenorphine, dextromethorphan, tramadol, tapentadol, and tilidine). The genes, alleles, and associated rs Numbers that were analysed are provided. Also provided are: 1) the genotypes and corresponding phenotypes of the genes involved in metabolizing 37 commonly used analgesic medications and 2) the mechanisms of metabolism of the analgesic medications by primary and ancillary pathways. In supplemental spreadsheets, the raw and analysed pharmacogenomics data for all 30 patients evaluated in the primary research article are additionally provided. Collectively, the presented data offer significant reuse potential in future investigations of pharmacogenomics for pain management.
PubMed: 33644270
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106832 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Apr 2021Prescription drug misuse in the USA increased during the 1990s to 2010. The epidemic stimulated the need new analytical strategies and techniques to understand the...
AIMS
Prescription drug misuse in the USA increased during the 1990s to 2010. The epidemic stimulated the need new analytical strategies and techniques to understand the medications involved, user characteristics and other factors needed to address the epidemic.
METHODS
A strategy of mosaic surveillance has evolved. Using real world evidence, the goal is to paint a more complete profile of a drug's real world misuse using triangulation-integrating results from multiple sources, where each approach has unrelated sources of bias.
RESULTS
Research findings have been remarkably consistent across multiple data sources. The most commonly misused opioid medications: hydrocodone = oxycodone > methadone = buprenorphine = tramadol = fentanyl (prescription form) > morphine > hydromorphone = oxymorphone > tapentadol. This rank order is similar to the number of prescriptions dispensed for each product in the USA. In the USA, prescription opioid misuse started to decrease about 2011. Typically, multiple drugs are misused together, particularly in lethal cases. Immediate release formulations are more commonly misused than extended release formulations. The introduction of tamper resistant formulations to resist crushing were followed by a decrease in misuse of those products.
CONCLUSIONS
The rapid expansion of opioid prescribing was accompanied by increasing misuse and mortality. Interventions such as prescription drug monitoring programmes, increased law enforcement and abuse deterrent formulations have been followed by decreases in misuse of most opioid analgesics.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxycodone; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prescription Drug Misuse
PubMed: 33606888
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14791 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Mar 2021Cancer patients often require feeding or venting gastrostomy-tubes (G-tubes) for enteral nutrition or symptom palliation. The administration of most extended-release...
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients often require feeding or venting gastrostomy-tubes (G-tubes) for enteral nutrition or symptom palliation. The administration of most extended-release (ER) opioids via the G-tube or orally followed by clamping of the venting G-tube is contraindicated. Oxymorphone immediate release (IR) may be useful because of its longer half-life compared to other IR opioids. We examined the use of oxymorphone IR administered every 8 hours in patients with G-tubes.
METHODS
This was a retrospective chart review of 40 consecutive cancer patients with G-tubes who underwent opioid rotation (OR) to oxymorphone. Demographics, symptoms, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and oxymorphone dose were collected. Successful OR was defined as a 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score and continued use of oxymorphone at follow-up in outpatient setting, or discharge in inpatient setting. Opioid rotation ration (ORR) between MEDD and oxymorphone in patients with successful OR was calculated as MEDD before the OR divided by total oxymorphone dose/day at follow-up or discharge.
RESULTS
The median age was 56 years, 57.5% were white, 68% male, 47.5% (n=19) had head and neck cancer, 90% had advanced disease, 67.5% (n=27) were inpatient, and 15% (n=6) had venting G-tubes. 25/40 (62.5%) patients had successful OR to oxymorphone. The median ORR from MEDD to oxymorphone was 3.5 (IQR, 3.1-4). There were no independent predictors for successful OR, and ORR did not significantly differ among various groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Oxymorphone IR can be used successfully in cancer patients with G-tubes using an ORR of 3.5 to calculate dose from MEDD.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Gastrostomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33549000
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-969 -
Pain Physician Jan 2021Chronic low back pain (CLBP) incurs huge costs owing to increased healthcare expenditure, disability, insurance, and work absenteeism. Opioid analgesics are commonly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) incurs huge costs owing to increased healthcare expenditure, disability, insurance, and work absenteeism. Opioid analgesics are commonly used for the management of CLBP.
OBJECTIVE
To compare and rank the opioids used in the management of CLBP, in terms of efficacy and safety.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA).
METHOD
The search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had evaluated the efficacy and safety of opioids in CLBP. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. The proportion of patients reporting either 30% or 50% reduction in pain from baseline to follow-up on the numeric rating scale, was measured as efficacy outcome. Pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian NMA, within the random-effects model, were used to synthesize data. Effect estimates from Bayesian NMA were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Heterogeneity and convergence were assessed by using I 2 and deviation information criteria.
RESULTS
Twenty-three RCTs with a total of 8,420 patients, evaluating 13 different opioids were included in this NMA. For 30% pain reduction, oxymorphone (OR: 5.36; 95% CrI: 1.02-30.3), tramadol with acetaminophen (OR: 2.37; 95% CrI: 1.08-5.17), and buprenorphine (OR: 2.29; 95% CrI: 1.05-5.07) shown statistically significant more effective than placebo. For 50% pain reduction, the statistically significant difference is observed with buprenorphine (OR: 2.38 95% CrI: 1.08-5.24), oxymorphone (OR: 5.10; 95% CrI: 1.31-20.41), and tramadol with acetaminophen (OR: 2.11; 95% CrI: 1.07-4.21). Hydrocodone (OR: 0.33; 95% CrI: 0.14-0.77) was found statistically safer compared to the other opioids.
LIMITATIONS
Only 5 trials had more than a 12-week study duration. We need clinical trials with longer follow-up as CLBP management requires a longer duration, and long-term prescribing of opioids associated with severe adverse event profile, development of tolerance, and dependence.
CONCLUSIONS
Oxymorphone has an advantage over other opioids to reduce pain by 30% and 50% in patients with CLBP.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Bayes Theorem; Chronic Pain; Humans; Low Back Pain; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 33400430
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Analytical Toxicology Feb 2022The purpose of this research was to develop and validate an analytical method for the detection and quantification of noroxymorphone-3β-D-glucuronide (NOMG),...
The purpose of this research was to develop and validate an analytical method for the detection and quantification of noroxymorphone-3β-D-glucuronide (NOMG), oxymorphone-3β-D-glucuronide (NOMG), noroxymorphone (NOM), oxymorphone (OM), 6α-oxycodol (αOCL), 6β-oxycodol (βOCL), noroxycodone (NOC) and oxycodone (OC) in urine by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to be used in a human study. The method was validated according to the Academy Standards Board Standard Practices for Method Development in Forensic Toxicology. The method was then applied to a single-dose pilot study of a subject. Urine samples were collected from the subject after ingesting 10-mg OC as an immediate-release tablet. Additionally, urine specimens (n = 15) that had previously been confirmed positive for OC were analyzed using the validated method. The calibration range for NOMG and OMG was 0.05-10 μg/mL; for all other analytes, it was 0.015-10 μg/mL. Validation parameters such as bias, precision, carryover and dilution integrity, all met the validation criteria. After the method was validated, urine samples from the first subject in the controlled dose study were analyzed. It was observed that OC, NOC and OMG contained the highest concentrations and were present in either the 0.5 or 1 h void. NOC and OMG were detected until the 48 h collection, while OC was detectable till the 24 h collection. Time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) in the urine was achieved within 1.5 h for OC and within 3 h for NOC and OMG. Maximum concentration (Cmax) in the urine for OC, NOC and OMG was 3.15, 2.0 and 1.56 μg/mg, respectively. OC concentrations in authentic urines ranged from 0.015 to 12 μg/mL. Ranges for NOMG and OMG were 0.054-9.7 μg/mL and 0.14-67 μg/mL, respectively. A comprehensive method for the quantification of NOMG, OMG, NOM, OM, αOCL, βOCL, NOC and OC in urine was optimized and met the validation criteria. The concentrations of NOMG and OMG presented in this study provide the details needed in the forensic community to better comprehend OC pharmacokinetics.
Topics: Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Oxycodone; Oxymorphone; Pilot Projects; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 33270113
DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkaa186