-
Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives... Jun 2024
PubMed: 38911630
DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000413 -
Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition Jun 2024The establishment of preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) with FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in recent years has enabled resectability in many patients with...
BACKGROUND
The establishment of preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) with FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in recent years has enabled resectability in many patients with initially locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Nevertheless, information about the impact of PCT on surgical results is scarce.
METHODS
All patients with initial LAPC who received surgery after chemotherapy at the high-volume centre for pancreatic surgery of St. Josef-Hospital Bochum between 2015 and 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 139 patients underwent surgery after pre-treatment with FOLFIRINOX (76.3%), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (11.5%), both (5.8%) and other regimens (6.5%). Eighty-five tumors (61.2%) were resectable after PCT. R0 resection was achieved in 92.9%, R1 in 7.1% and R2 in 0% of cases. Fifty-four tumors were still not resectable at the time of surgery. Surgical results of the patients did not show increased postoperative mortality and morbidity compared to the literature data. Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1.4%. Rates for pancreas-specific complications [postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and others] were not increased. POPF occurred in 10.5% and DGE in 26.3% after pancreaticoduodenectomy. After distal pancreatectomy, POPF was detected in 37.5% and DGE in 12.5%. Median postoperative survival (31 13 months) and overall survival after initial diagnosis (40 20 months) were significantly longer in resected patients (P<0.001). Postoperative recurrence-free survival in resected patients amounted to 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
This study underlines that PCT allows resectability of primarily unresectable patients with LAPC without increasing perioperative mortality and morbidity. It may lead to a significant prolongation of recurrence-free and overall survival in resected patients after PCT.
PubMed: 38911210
DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-426 -
Cancer Research and Treatment Jun 2024Clinical outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been investigated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), despite well-established outcomes...
PURPOSE
Clinical outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been investigated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), despite well-established outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with LAPC who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 2017 and December 2020.
RESULTS
Among 1,358 patients, 260 underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among 356 LAPC patients, 98 (27.5%) and 147 (35.1%) of 418 BRPC patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Compared to resectable pancreatic cancer (resectable PC) with upfront surgery, both LAPC and BRPC exhibited higher rates of venous resection (28.6% vs. 49.0% vs. 4.0%), arterial resection (30.6% vs. 6.8% vs. 0.5%) and greater estimated blood loss (260.5 vs. 213.1 vs. 70.4 mL). However, hospital stay, readmission rates and postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (Grade B or C) did not differ significantly between LAPC, BRPC, and resectable PC. Overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between LAPC and BRPC patients. The median overall survival was 37.3 months for LAPC and 37.0 months for BRPC. The median relapse-free survival was 22.7 months for LAPC and 26.0 months for BRPC.
CONCLUSION
Overall survival time and postoperative complications in LAPC patients who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed similar results to those of BRPC patients. Further research is needed to identify specific sub-populations of LAPC patients who benefit most from conversion surgery and to minimize postoperative complications.
PubMed: 38901824
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.977 -
Biomedical Journal Jun 2024This issue of the Biomedical Journal features a special section exploring mycobiota. Three articles examine the role of fungi in common metabolic disorders in,...
This issue of the Biomedical Journal features a special section exploring mycobiota. Three articles examine the role of fungi in common metabolic disorders in, Clostridium difficile infection, and in immunocompromised patients. Additionally, the potential and challenges of the metaverse in healthcare are reviewed, alongside a holistic approach to improve patient outcomes in pancreatic cancer. In this issue also possible mechanism contributing to long COVID are discussed, as well as biomarkers that effectively predict sepsis outcomes, and key targets in osteosarcoma progression. Moreover, factors leading to peri-intubation cardiac arrest are analyzed, healthcare strategies from various regions are employed to predict cardiovascular events in Asian populations, two approaches to cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula are compared, and a combination therapy against soft tissue sarcoma is presented.
PubMed: 38901797
DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100755 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2024: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with major postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several scoring systems have...
: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with major postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several scoring systems have been described to stratify patients into risk groups according to the risk of POPF. The aim of this study was to compare scoring systems in patients who underwent a PD. : A total of 196 patients undergoing PD from July 2019 to June 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database of the University Hospital Ghent. After performing a literature search, four validated, solely preoperative risk scores and the intraoperative Fistula Risk Score (FRS) were included in our analysis. Furthermore, we eliminated the variable blood loss (BL) from the FRS and created an additional score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all risk factors, followed by a ROC analysis for the six scoring systems. : All scores showed strong prognostic stratification for developing POPF ( < 0.001). FRS showed the best predictive accuracy in general (AUC 0.862). FRS without BL presented the best prognostic value of the scores that included solely preoperative variables (AUC 0.783). Soft pancreatic texture, male gender, and diameter of the Wirsung duct were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. : Although all predictive scoring systems stratify patients accurately by risk of POPF, preoperative risk stratification could improve clinical decision-making and implement preventive strategies for high-risk patients. Therefore, the preoperative use of the FRS without BL is a potential alternative.
PubMed: 38892998
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113286 -
VideoGIE : An Official Video Journal of... Jun 2024Video 1A novel method of bilateral biliary decompression by EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging stenting using the partial stent-in-stent method for...
A novel method of bilateral biliary decompression by EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging stenting using the partial stent-in-stent method for reintervention of multiple metal stent failure.
Video 1A novel method of bilateral biliary decompression by EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging stenting using the partial stent-in-stent method for reintervention of multiple metal stent failure.We report a case in which anterior and posterior drainage was performed using the partial stent-in-stent method via the transpapillary approach. The patient had a bismuth type IV biliary obstruction, but only the right hepatic lobe was drained due to obstruction of the left portal vein. For the recurrent stent dysfunction, the patient underwent placement of a plastic stent within an uncovered self-expanding metal stent to correct stent dysfunction. A 7F plastic stent inside a metal stent is shown.The patient later experienced stent failure and jaundice due to tumor progression and was admitted for plastic stent replacement. Neither imaging results nor symptoms suggested duodenal stenosis. The transpapillary approach was attempted first but was unsuccessful. Duodenoscopy was challenging to perform because of duodenal stenosis. Fluoroscopy confirmed the duodenal stenosis. The plastic stent was extracted using an upper endoscope. Multiple uncovered metal stents are shown (1 stent in the anterior bile duct and 2 stents in the posterior bile duct). Jaundice did not resolve despite plastic stent removal.The patient refused to undergo percutaneous biliary drainage, so a decision was made to perform an EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) instead. The left bile duct was observed in the stomach. The left bile duct was punctured with a 19-gauge FNA needle. A 0.025-inch hydrophilic guidewire was directed into the left bile duct. Enhancement of the bile duct showing malignant hilar biliary obstruction (bismuth IV) is seen. Insertion of the guide wire into the posterior bile duct is shown.The stent mesh was then dilated using a balloon dilator. However, there was difficulty inserting the catheter. Additional dilation was performed using a spiral dilator. This instrument is a tapered tip dilator that fits into 0.025-inch guidewires and is expandable to 7F. Insertion of a second guidewire with a larger caliber was done to straighten the bile duct and help stabilize stent insertion. A 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire into the posterior bile duct using a double-lumen cannula and insertion of a 0.025-inch hydrophilic guidewire into the anterior bile duct are shown.The stent mesh was then dilated using a spiral dilator. A metal stent was placed through the anterior bile duct at a steep angle. Insertion and deployment of the first uncovered self-expanding metal stent (8 × 60 mm) from the anterior bile duct into the left bile duct is shown. Multiple metal stents were implanted into the hilar area, and the new stent was placed using the partial stent-in-stent method to prevent overexpansion. Guidewire seeking the posterior bile duct from inside the deployed stent through the stent mesh is shown.The stent mesh was then dilated using a balloon dilator. Insertion and deployment of an uncovered self-expanding metal stent (8 × 60 mm) from the posterior bile duct to the left bile duct using the partial stent-in-stent method is shown. Enhancement of the bile duct shows drainage from the right bile duct. The fistula of the HGS was only dilated with the spiral dilator. The risk of bile leakage was low, so we decided to implant a plastic stent. A 7F × 15-cm plastic stent was placed from the posterior bile duct into the stomach. Anterior and posterior segment drainage by EUS-HGS with bridging stenting using the partial stent-in-stent method is shown, with left segment drainage by EUS-HGS with the plastic stent.We performed EUS-HGS on a patient with multiple metal stents in place. There were no adverse events, and total bilirubin levels were reduced by more than half within 2 weeks. Six months have passed without stent dysfunction.
PubMed: 38887729
DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.02.015 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Jun 2024Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a devastating complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Minimally invasive PD (MIPD), including laparoscopic (LPD) and...
PURPOSE
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a devastating complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Minimally invasive PD (MIPD), including laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD) approaches, have comparable POPF rates to open PD (OPD). However, we hypothesize that the likelihood of having a more severe POPF, as defined as clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), would be higher in an MIPD relative to OPD.
METHODS
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) targeted pancreatectomy dataset (2014-2020) was reviewed for any POPF after OPD. Propensity score matching (PSM) compared MIPD to OPD, and then RPD to LPD.
RESULTS
Among 3,083 patients who developed a POPF, 2,843 (92.2%) underwent OPD and 240 (7.8%) MIPD; of these, 25.0% were LPD (n = 60) and 75.0% RPD (n = 180). Grade B POPF was observed in 45.4% (n = 1,400), and grade C in 6.0% (n = 185). After PSM, MIPD patients had higher rates of CR-POPF (47.3% OPD vs. 54.4% MIPD, = 0.037), as well as higher reoperation (9.1% vs. 15.3%, = 0.006), delayed gastric emptying (29.2% vs. 35.8%, = 0.041), and readmission rates (28.2% vs. 35.1%, = 0.032). However, CR-POPF rates were comparable between LPD and RPD (56.8% vs. 49.3%, = 0.408).
CONCLUSION
The impact of POPF is more clinically pronounced after MIPD than OPD with a more complex postoperative course. The difference appears to be attributed to the minimally invasive environment itself as no difference was noted between LPD and RPD. A clear biological explanation of this clinical observation remains missing. Further studies are warranted.
PubMed: 38887001
DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.95 -
Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives... Mar 2024
PubMed: 38883965
DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000392 -
Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives... Mar 2024
Comment on article "A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery".
PubMed: 38883956
DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000378 -
Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives... Mar 2024
PubMed: 38883937
DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000373