-
Heliyon May 2024It is important to accurately determine the blood ethanol concentration (BEC) to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED)...
BACKGROUND
It is important to accurately determine the blood ethanol concentration (BEC) to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED) and protect their legal rights. This study aimed to determine whether sterilization of venipuncture site with ethanol, which is frequently used in practice in the ED would affect BEC.
METHODS
Venous blood samples were collected by two consecutive techniques from 94 individuals who were admitted to the ED, had an indication for BEC measurement, and volunteered to participate in the study. The reference technique involved applying 3 cc of 10 % povidone-iodine solution to a gauze pad, cleaning the right arm antecubital region, and performing phlebotomy. The index technique used 3 cc of alcohol-based antiseptic (89 % ethanol) on another gauze for cleaning the left arm antecubital region. Both techniques allowed the antiseptic to air-dry for 30 s before phlebotomy. Two blood sample tubes per patient were sent to the laboratory, and BEC were measured using the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymatic method.
RESULTS
94 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 37.8 years (±15.7), with 77 % (n = 72) of them were male. The median BEC levels measured by both the reference and index techniques were 2 mg/dL (IQR: 0.97-16.25) and 2 mg/dL (IQR: 0.90-15.22), respectively, with no significant statistical difference (p = 0.536). 72 (77 %) of the patients had a BEC level below the legal driving limit of 20 mg/dL. Bland-Altman analysis, performed on these patients, revealed a small negative bias, -0.116 mg/dL with a standard deviation of 1.13 mg/dL. The upper and lower limit of the agreement was 2.092 and -2.323 respectively.
CONCLUSION
In patients with a BEC level of less than 20 mg/dL, using ethanol-containing antiseptics before blood sampling does not lead to erroneously elevated BEC levels.
PubMed: 38813189
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31517 -
International Journal of Retina and... May 2024The use of povidone-iodine for ocular surface asepsis is widespread for intravitreal injections. They became frequent procedures, leading to serial exposure of patients'...
BACKGROUND
The use of povidone-iodine for ocular surface asepsis is widespread for intravitreal injections. They became frequent procedures, leading to serial exposure of patients' eyes to iodinated solutions. In this study, we investigate the changes in the ocular surface in patients submitted to repeated use of povidine for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF asepsis, analyzing Ocular Surface Disease Index, non-invasive break up time, blinking quality, lipid layer, meniscus height and osmolarity.
METHODS
This case-control study included 34 individuals (68 eyes), 14 males, 20 females aged 48 to 94. Inclusion criteria were individuals who received application of 2% povidone-iodine eyedrops for intravitreal injections treatment with the non-treated contralateral eye used as control. Ocular surface examinations were performed at a single occasion. A pre-intravitreal injection asepsis protocol with povidone-iodine was applied. All statistical analysis was performed using the STATA® 18.0 Software and a p-value = 0.05 was considered as the statistical significance value in all tests.
RESULTS
The median number of IVIs in treated eyes was 12 (range 6-20). The results in treated eyes compared with untreated eyes were respectively : median OSDI 16 (IQR 6-39) and 12.5 (IQR 8-39) (p = 0.380); mean NIBUT 10.30 (SD ± 2.62) and 10.78 (SD ± 2.92) ( s, p = 0.476); median blinking quality 100 (IQR 100) and 100 (IQR 100 ) (%, p = 0.188); median lipid layer 87 (IQR 77-90) and 86 (IQR 74-100) (nm, p = 0.451); median meniscus height 0.22 (IQR 0.19-0,31) and 0.24 (IQR 0.20-0.27) (mm, p = 0.862), median Meibomian gland atrophy 33 (IQR 24-45) and 31.5 (IQR 25-39) (%, p = 0.524); and mean osmolarity 306.6 (SD ± 21.13) and 313.8 (SD ± 29) (mOsm, p = 0.297). There was no statistically significant relationship between the repetitive use of 2% iodinated solution and signs or symptoms compatible with dry eye syndrome in this group of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that 2% povidone iodine is a safe and efficacious agent for ocular surface antisepsis during intravitreal injections, not leading to substantial ocular surface modifications. This conclusion supports the continued use of povidone iodine in routine ophthalmic procedures without increased risk of inducing dry eye syndrome.
PubMed: 38812063
DOI: 10.1186/s40942-024-00557-1 -
Dentistry Journal May 2024In severe stages of periodontitis, conventional periodontal therapy and maintenance care are usually insufficient due to the viral and bacterial etiology; thus, a...
A Low-Cost Protocol Using the Adjunctive Action of Povidone-Iodine Irrigations and Sodium Hypochlorite Rinsing Solution in Step 2 of Periodontal Therapy for Patients with Stage III-IV Periodontitis: A Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
In severe stages of periodontitis, conventional periodontal therapy and maintenance care are usually insufficient due to the viral and bacterial etiology; thus, a mechanical approach alone may not be sufficient to eliminate a substantial portion of subgingival pathogens, especially in deep periodontal sites. : This single-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of a low-cost protocol using povidone-iodine and sodium hypochlorite formulations as adjuncts to non-surgical therapy for patients with stage IV periodontitis when compared with chlorhexidine, the most commonly employed substance to date for antimicrobial regimens in periodontal therapy. : Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups: control (subgingival instrumentation, chlorhexidine-assisted) and test (antiviral medication, subgingival instrumentation with povidone-iodine, sodium hypochlorite rinsing solution, and antibiotics). Clinical measurements and microbiological analyses were performed at baseline and after three months. : After three months, notable differences were found in the bacterial detection scores for (a significant reduction in detection frequency was observed in the test compared to the control ( = 0.021)), and there were significant reductions in detection in the test group for and , showing undetectable levels ( < 0.0001 for both). In the test group, the pocket probing depth median value was reduced significantly ( = 0.0005); similarly, bleeding on probing showed a marked decrease ( < 0.0001). However, changes in clinical attachment loss and full-mouth plaque score were not statistically significant. : Using the proposed protocol, substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters were obtained when compared with the current antimicrobial recommendations.
PubMed: 38786542
DOI: 10.3390/dj12050144 -
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and... May 2024Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially...
BACKGROUND
Intravitreal injections are a common ophthalmologic procedure. While infections following these injections are rare, they can lead to endophthalmitis, with potentially serious consequences. Various methods have been proposed to prevent endophthalmitis, including the use of antisepsis and antibiotics in patient preparation.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the antiseptic efficacy of aqueous chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) when used alone and in combination with lidocaine gel (LG) in vitro.
METHODS
Two independent experimental trials were conducted. The first trial determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and the minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of CHX and PI against six bacterial strains. The second trial evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of the antiseptic agents (CHX 0.1% and PI 5%) and their combination with LG against the same bacterial strains.
RESULTS
CHX was more effective than PI in reducing the number of colonies forming units (cfus) of the tested bacteria. The order in which the antiseptic and LG were administered affected their effectiveness, with CHX administered before LG resulting in greater reduction of bacterial growth.
CONCLUSIONS
CHX 0.1% is more effective than PI 5% as an antiseptic agent. Application of CHX and PI prior to the use of lidocaine gel results in a more effective reduction of microorganisms.
PubMed: 38782819
DOI: 10.1186/s12348-024-00404-2 -
JAR Life 2024Ageing of the global population has led to an increase in the demand for the treatment of wounds, especially considering the challenges of managing wounds in the...
INTRODUCTION
Ageing of the global population has led to an increase in the demand for the treatment of wounds, especially considering the challenges of managing wounds in the elderly. Therefore, more effective treatment strategies need to be explored. In this article, we aimed to compare medical-grade honey (MGH) products with other wound care products and to provide guidelines on using MGH in wounds commonly found in the elderly.
METHODS
Based on literature research and expert opinion, an overview of commonly used wound care products and their wound healing characteristics is provided. In addition, literature-based classification of wounds in the elderly and the recommendations for treatments are provided.
RESULTS
Frequently used wound care products include povidone-iodine, enzymatic products, absorbing dressings, larvae, silver dressings, and MGH dressings. Supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses, MGH dressings were identified as the most potent and all-round wound care product compared to the others. Next, we provided basic guidelines for managing the most common wounds in the elderly, both acute and chronic, and specified how and which MGH products can be used in these wounds.
CONCLUSION
MGH is a widely applicable, safe, easy-to-use, and cost-effective product to manage wounds in the elderly. In case of doubt, refer to a trained wound care specialist who can support the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds.
PubMed: 38774269
DOI: 10.14283/jarlife.2024.7 -
Infection and Drug Resistance 2024Polyhexanide is a safe and effective wound care antiseptic commonly used in clinics as wound rinsing solution and gel. However, the efficacy of Polyhexanide in treatment...
PURPOSE
Polyhexanide is a safe and effective wound care antiseptic commonly used in clinics as wound rinsing solution and gel. However, the efficacy of Polyhexanide in treatment of wound infected with MRSA () is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of polyhexanide with povidone iodine in treating wound infected with MRSA.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A prospective analysis of 62 patients with wound infections, who were admitted to our department from 2016 to 2020, was conducted in order to assess the efficacy of different treatment approaches. The patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. In the experimental group, 30 patients underwent treatment with a combination of diluted povidone iodine and polyhexanide immersion. Conversely, in the control group, 32 patients received treatment with diluted povidone iodine along with systemic antibiotic therapy. The time required for dressing changes, bacterial clearance rates, and the Bates-Jasen wound assessment tool (BWAT) scores were utilized as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments.
RESULTS
In our study, the findings indicated that the experimental group exhibited a lesser number of days for the bacteria culture to turn negative compared to the control group, with statistical significance (p<0.05). Furthermore, the decline in the BWAT score was significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in terms of dressing times and wound coverage between the two groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Polyhexanide combined with povidone iodine can effectively remove MRSA infection in wounds and reduce antibiotic dosages.
PubMed: 38766679
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S438380 -
International Medical Case Reports... 2024To determine whether 0.025% povidone-iodine (0.025% PI) in the irrigation solution during vitrectomy for endophthalmitis is safe.
PURPOSE
To determine whether 0.025% povidone-iodine (0.025% PI) in the irrigation solution during vitrectomy for endophthalmitis is safe.
METHODS
Two cases of bleb-associated endophthalmitis were treated with vitrectomy using 0.025% PI in the irrigation solution. The RETevel electroretinographic (ERG) system with skin electrodes was used to assess the physiology of the retina pre- and postoperatively.
CASE
Case 1 was a 46-year-old man who had atopic keratoconjunctivitis and underwent trabeculectomy with the creation of a bleb after there was a rise in the intraocular pressure. One month postoperatively, a mild filtering bleb-associated endophthalmitis developed, and the eye was treated with intravitreal and subconjunctival injections of vancomycin (VCM) and ceftazidime (CAZ). After three days, the fundus was not visible and B-mode echography showed an area of high brightness in the retina. Vitrectomy with irrigation with VCM and CAZ, and 0.025% PI was performed successfully. Pre- and postoperative ERGs showed an improvement in both the a- and b-wave amplitudes and the b/a ratio was stable at 2.0. Case 2 was a 63-year-old man who had undergone trabeculectomy for glaucoma. Five years later, the eye developed blebitis which was treated with topical and subconjunctival injections of VCM and CAZ. Three days later, vitreous opacities appeared and a high brightness area was seen in the B-mode echographic images. Vitrectomy with VCM and CAZ, and 0.025% PI irrigation was successfully performed. Comparisons of the pre- and postoperative ERGs found that the a- and b- wave amplitudes of the ERGs increased and the b/a ratio was stable at approximately 1.5.
CONCLUSION
Vitrectomy with 0.025% PI irrigation is safe and ERG recordings with skin electrodes can be used to evaluate the pre- and postoperative retinal physiology safely.
PubMed: 38765868
DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S464026 -
Critical Care (London, England) May 2024The effect of the periurethral cleansing range on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) occurrence remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The effect of the periurethral cleansing range on catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) occurrence remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of expanded periurethral cleansing for reducing CAUTI in comatose patients.
METHODS
In this randomized controlled trial, eligible patients in our hospital were enrolled and allocated randomly to the experimental group (expanded periurethral cleansing protocol; n = 225) or the control group (usual periurethral cleansing protocol; n = 221). The incidence of CAUTI on days 3, 7, and 10 after catheter insertion were compared, and the pathogen results and influencing factors were analyzed.
RESULTS
The incidences of CAUTI in the experimental and control groups on days 3, 7, and 10 were (5/225, 2.22% vs. 7/221, 3.17%, P = 0.54), (12/225, 5.33% vs. 18/221, 8.14%, P = 0.24), and (23/225, 10.22% vs. 47/221, 21.27%, P = 0.001), respectively; Escherichia coli and Candida albicans were the most common species in the two groups. The incidences of bacterial CAUTI and fungal CAUTI in the two groups were 11/225, 4.89% vs. 24/221, 10.86%, P = 0.02) and (10/225, 4.44% vs. 14/221, 6.33%, P = 0.38), respectively. The incidences of polymicrobial CAUTI in the two groups were 2/225 (0.89%) and 9/221 (4.07%), respectively (P = 0.03). The percentages of CAUTI-positive females in the two groups were 9.85% (13/132) and 29.52% (31/105), respectively (P < 0.05). The proportion of CAUTI-positive patients with diabetes in the experimental and control groups was 17.72% (14/79), which was lower than the 40.85% (29/71) in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Expanded periurethral cleansing could reduce the incidence of CAUTI, especially those caused by bacteria and multiple pathogens, in comatose patients with short-term catheterization (≤ 10 days). Female patients and patients with diabetes benefit more from the expanded periurethral cleansing protocol for reducing CAUTI.
Topics: Humans; Female; Urinary Tract Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Coma; Catheter-Related Infections; Adult; Aged; Urinary Catheterization; Urethra
PubMed: 38741134
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04947-7 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Apr 2024Nosocomial Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia results in a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We aimed...
Nosocomial Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia results in a significant increase in morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. We aimed to analyze the impact of applying 10% povidone iodine (PI) twice daily to both nares in addition to chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing on nosocomial (MRSA) bacteremia in critically ill patients. A quality improvement study was completed with pre and post-design. The study period was from January 2018 until February 2020 and February 2021 and June 2021. The control period (from January 2018 to May 2019) consisted of CHG bathing alone, and in the intervention period, we added 10% PI to the nares of critically ill patients. Our primary outcome is rates of nosocomial MRSA bacteremia, and our secondary outcome is central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and potential cost savings. There were no significant differences in rates of MRSA bacteremia in critically ill patients. Nosocomial MRSA bacteremia was significantly lower during the intervention period on medical/surgical areas (MSA). CLABSIs were significantly lower during the intervention period in critically ill patients. There were no Staphylococcus aureus CLABSIs in critical care area (CCA)during the intervention period. The intervention showed potential significant cost savings. The application of 10% povidone iodine twice a day in addition to CHG bathing resulted in a significant decrease in CLABSIs in critically ill patients and a reduction in nosocomial MRSA in the non-intervention areas. Further trials are needed to tease out individual patients who will benefit from the intervention.
PubMed: 38731176
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092647 -
Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine Dec 2023The role of skin antisepsis after skin closure in abdominal surgery for sepsis is not well reported. This study assessed the effect of skin antisepsis following primary...
THE EFFECT OF SKIN ANTISEPSIS AFTER PRIMARY SKIN CLOSURE ON THE INCIDENCE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER ABDOMINAL SURGERY FOR SEPSIS: A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
BACKGROUND
The role of skin antisepsis after skin closure in abdominal surgery for sepsis is not well reported. This study assessed the effect of skin antisepsis following primary skin closure on surgical site infection (SSI) after contaminated and dirty abdominal surgery.
METHODS
This was a randomised controlled trial involving adult patients undergoing laparotomy for sepsis. Patients were randomised into a Control (C) group where the wound edge was cleaned once with 70% isopropyl alcohol before being covered with a dry sterile gauze dressing and a Povidone-iodine (PI) group in whom the wound edge was cleaned once with 70% isopropyl alcohol, then covered with a 10% povidone iodine-soaked gauze dressing. Both groups were compared for the presence of SSI. Statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven patients (C group = 18; PI group = 19) were recruited. The median age was 36 years (Interquartile range, IQR = 72) with a male-to-female ratio of 2.7:1. The overall incidence of SSI was 48.6% (n = 18), comparable between the C group (n=10, 55.6%) and PI group (n = 8; 42.1%) (p = 0.413). In-hospital mortality rate was 10.8 % (n = 4), equally distributed between the groups (p = 1.000). The length of hospital stay was 8 days (IQR = 15) in the C group and 7 days in the PI group (IQR =9) (p = 0.169).
CONCLUSION
In laparotomy for sepsis, skin antisepsis after primary skin closure had no effect on the incidence of surgical site infection.
PubMed: 38706616
DOI: No ID Found