-
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental... 2024Lipids, the primary constituents of the cell membrane, play essential roles in nearly all cellular functions, such as cell-cell recognition, signaling transduction, and... (Review)
Review
Lipids, the primary constituents of the cell membrane, play essential roles in nearly all cellular functions, such as cell-cell recognition, signaling transduction, and energy provision. Lipid metabolism is necessary for the maintenance of life since it regulates the balance between the processes of synthesis and breakdown. Increasing evidence suggests that cancer cells exhibit abnormal lipid metabolism, significantly affecting their malignant characteristics, including self-renewal, differentiation, invasion, metastasis, and drug sensitivity and resistance. Prominent oncogenic signaling pathways that modulate metabolic gene expression and elevate metabolic enzyme activity include phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, MAPK, NF-kB, Wnt, Notch, and Hippo pathway. Conversely, when metabolic processes are not regulated, they can lead to malfunctions in cellular signal transduction pathways. This, in turn, enables uncontrolled cancer cell growth by providing the necessary energy, building blocks, and redox potentials. Therefore, targeting lipid metabolism-associated oncogenic signaling pathways could be an effective therapeutic approach to decrease cancer incidence and promote survival. This review sheds light on the interactions between lipid reprogramming and signaling pathways in cancer. Exploring lipid metabolism as a target could provide a promising approach for creating anticancer treatments by identifying metabolic inhibitors. Additionally, we have also provided an overview of the drugs targeting lipid metabolism in cancer in this review.
PubMed: 38933330
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1399065 -
Fundamental Research Sep 2023Tumorigenesis is a complicated process in which numerous modulators are involved in different ways. Previous studies have focused primarily on tumor-associated... (Review)
Review
Tumorigenesis is a complicated process in which numerous modulators are involved in different ways. Previous studies have focused primarily on tumor-associated protein-coding genes such as oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, as well as their associated oncogenic pathways. However, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), rising stars in diverse physiological and pathological processes, have recently emerged as additional modulators in tumorigenesis. In this review, we focus on two typical kinds of ncRNAs: long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs). We describe the molecular patterns of ncRNAs and focus on the roles of ncRNAs in cancer stem cells (CSCs), tumor cells, and tumor environmental cells. CSCs are a small subset of tumor cells and are generally considered to be cells that initiate tumorigenesis, and dozens of ncRNAs have been defined as critical modulators in CSC maintenance and oncogenesis. Moreover, ncRNAs are widely involved in oncogenetic processes, including sustaining proliferation, resisting cell death, genome instability, metabolic disorders, immune escape and metastasis. We also discuss the potential applications of ncRNAs in tumor diagnosis and therapy. The progress in ncRNA research greatly improves our understanding of ncRNAs in oncogenesis and provides new potential targets for future tumor therapy.
PubMed: 38933287
DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.05.014 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Targeted therapy for Sjögren's syndrome (SS) has become an important focus for clinicians. Multi-omics-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses have provided new...
BACKGROUND
Targeted therapy for Sjögren's syndrome (SS) has become an important focus for clinicians. Multi-omics-wide Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses have provided new ideas for identifying potential drug targets.
METHODS
We conducted summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) analysis to evaluate therapeutic targets associated with SS by integrating DNA methylation, gene expression and protein quantitative trait loci (mQTL, eQTL, and pQTL, respectively). Genetic associations with SS were derived from the FinnGen study (discovery) and the GWAS catalog (replication). Colocalization analyses were employed to determine whether two potentially relevant phenotypes share the same genetic factors in a given region. Moreover, to delve deeper into potential regulation among DNA methylation, gene expression, and protein abundance, we conducted MR analysis to explore the causal relationship between candidate gene methylation and expression, as well as between gene expression and protein abundance. Drug prediction and molecular docking were further employed to validate the pharmacological activity of the candidate drug targets.
RESULTS
Upon integrating the multi-omics data, we identified three genes associated with SS risk: TNFAIP3, BTN3A1, and PLAU. The methylation of cg22068371 in BTN3A1 was positively associated with protein levels, consistent with the negative effect of cg22068371 methylation on the risk of SS. Additionally, positive correlations were observed between the gene methylation of PLAU (cg04939496) and expression, as well as between expression and protein levels. This consistency elucidates the promotional effects of PLAU on SS risk at the DNA methylation, gene expression, and protein levels. At the protein level, genetically predicted TNFAIP3 (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.56-3.92) was positively associated with SS risk, while BTN3A1 (OR 2.96E-03, 95% CI 2.63E-04-3.33E-02) was negatively associated with SS risk. Molecular docking showed stable binding for candidate drugs and target proteins.
CONCLUSION
Our study reveals promising therapeutic targets for the treatment of SS, providing valuable insights into targeted therapy for SS. However, further validation through future experiments is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Sjogren's Syndrome; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Quantitative Trait Loci; DNA Methylation; Genome-Wide Association Study; Molecular Docking Simulation; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Multiomics
PubMed: 38933282
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1419363 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that presents significant therapeutic challenges due to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER),... (Review)
Review
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that presents significant therapeutic challenges due to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. As a result, conventional hormonal and targeted therapies are largely ineffective, underscoring the urgent need for novel treatment strategies. γδT cells, known for their robust anti-tumor properties, show considerable potential in TNBC treatment as they can identify and eliminate tumor cells without reliance on MHC restrictions. These cells demonstrate extensive proliferation both and , and can directly target tumors through cytotoxic effects or indirectly by promoting other immune responses. Studies suggest that expansion and adoptive transfer strategies targeting Vδ2 and Vδ1 γδT cell subtypes have shown promise in preclinical TNBC models. This review compiles and discusses the existing literature on the primary subgroups of γδT cells, their roles in cancer therapy, their contributions to tumor cell cytotoxicity and immune modulation, and proposes potential strategies for future γδT cell-based immunotherapies in TNBC.
Topics: Humans; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Animals; Female; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta; Intraepithelial Lymphocytes; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 38933280
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1420107 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Extracellular particles (EPs), particularly extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in regulating various pathological mechanisms, including immune dysregulations...
BACKGROUND
Extracellular particles (EPs), particularly extracellular vesicles, play a crucial role in regulating various pathological mechanisms, including immune dysregulations post-trauma. Their distinctive expression of cell-specific markers and regulatory cargo such as cytokines or micro-ribonucleic acid suggests their potential as early biomarkers for organ-specific damage and for identifying patients at risk for complications and mortality. Given the critical need for reliable and easily assessable makers to identify at-risk patients and guide therapeutic decisions, we evaluated the early diagnostic value of circulating EPs regarding outcomes in severely injured multiple-trauma patients.
METHODS
Plasma samples were collected from 133 severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16) immediately upon arrival at the emergency department (ED). Patients were categorized into survivors and non-survivors. Injury characteristics and outcomes related to sepsis, pneumonia, or early (<1 day after admission) and late mortality were assessed. Circulating EPs, cytokine profiles, and blood counts of platelets and leukocytes were determined. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted.
RESULTS
Despite no significant differences in injury pattern or severity, non-survivors exhibited significantly elevated counts of circulating EPs compared to survivors. The optimal cut-off for EPs <200 nm indicating non-survivors was 17380/µl plasma, with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 61% in predicting in-hospital mortality. Later non-survivors received significantly higher numbers of units of packed red blood cells [8.54 ± 5.45 vs. 1.29 ± 0.36 units], had higher serum lactate [38.00 ± 7.51 vs. 26.98 ± 1.58 mg/dL], significantly lower platelet counts [181.30 ± 18.06 vs. 213.60 ± 5.85 *10³/µL] and lower heart rates [74.50 ± 4.93 vs. 90.18 ± 2.06 beats/minute] upon arrival at the ED compared to survivors.
CONCLUSION
Our results demonstrate the high diagnostic potential of elevated concentrations of circulating EPs <200 nm for identifying patients at risk of mortality after severe trauma. This parameter shows comparable sensitivity to established clinical predictors. Early evaluation of EPs concentration could complement assessment markers in guiding early therapeutic decisions.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Adult; Hospital Mortality; Biomarkers; Extracellular Vesicles; Injury Severity Score; Aged; Wounds and Injuries; Prognosis; Cytokines; Multiple Trauma; ROC Curve
PubMed: 38933277
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1390380 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Air pollution is an urgent concern linked to numerous health problems in low- and middle-income countries, where 92% of air pollution-related deaths occur. Particulate... (Review)
Review
Air pollution is an urgent concern linked to numerous health problems in low- and middle-income countries, where 92% of air pollution-related deaths occur. Particulate matter 2.5 (PM) is the most harmful component of air pollutants, increasing inflammation and changing gut microbiota, favoring obesity, type 2 diabetes, and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). PM contains lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which can activate the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway. This pathway can lead to the release of pro-inflammatory markers, including interleukins, and suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS3), which inhibits leptin action, a hormone that keeps the energy homeostasis. Leptin plays a role in preventing amyloid plaque deposition and hyperphosphorylation of tau-protein (p-tau), mechanisms involved in the neurodegeneration in AD. Approximately 50 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, with a significant proportion living in low-and middle-income countries. This number is expected to triple by 2050. This mini-review focuses on the potential impact of PM exposure on the TLR4 signaling pathway, its contribution to leptin resistance, and dysbiosis that exacerbates the link between obesity and AD.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Obesity; Leptin; Air Pollution; Particulate Matter; Toll-Like Receptor 4; Inflammation; Animals; Signal Transduction; Air Pollutants
PubMed: 38933275
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1401800 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) disease and TB infection (TBI) remains a challenge, and there is a need for non-invasive and blood-based methods to differentiate TB...
INTRODUCTION
The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) disease and TB infection (TBI) remains a challenge, and there is a need for non-invasive and blood-based methods to differentiate TB from conditions mimicking TB (CMTB), TBI, and healthy controls (HC). We aimed to determine whether combination of cytokines and established biomarkers could discriminate between 1) TB and CMTB 2) TB and TBI 3) TBI and HC.
METHODS
We used hemoglobin, total white blood cell count, neutrophils, monocytes, C-reactive protein, and ten Meso Scale Discovery analyzed cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, interferon (IFN)-ɣ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) in TruCulture whole blood tubes stimulated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), zymosan (ZYM), anti-CD3/28 (CD3), and unstimulated (Null) to develop three index tests able to differentiate TB from CMTB and TBI, and TBI from HC.
RESULTS
In 52 persons with CMTB (n=9), TB (n=23), TBI (n=10), and HC (n=10), a combination of cytokines (LPS-IFN-ɣ, ZYM-IFN-ɣ, ZYM-TNF-α, ZYM-IL-1β, LPS-IL-4, and ZYM-IL-6) and neutrophil count could differentiate TB from CMTB with a sensitivity of 52.2% (95% CI: 30.9%-73.4%) and a specificity of 100 % (66.4%-100%). Null- IFN-ɣ, Null-IL-8, CD3-IL-6, CD3-IL-8, CD3-IL-13, and ZYM IL-1b discriminated TB from TBI with a sensitivity of 73.9% (56.5% - 91.3%) and a specificity of 100% (69.2-100). Cytokines and established biomarkers failed to differentiate TBI from HC with ≥ 98% specificity.
DISCUSSION
Selected cytokines may serve as blood-based add-on tests to detect TB in a low-endemic setting, although these results need to be validated.
Topics: Humans; Cytokines; Male; Female; Adult; Biomarkers; Tuberculosis; Middle Aged; Blood Culture; Diagnosis, Differential; Young Adult; Aged; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 38933274
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1397941 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Succinate, traditionally viewed as a mere intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, has emerged as a critical mediator in inflammation. Disruptions within the... (Review)
Review
Succinate, traditionally viewed as a mere intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, has emerged as a critical mediator in inflammation. Disruptions within the TCA cycle lead to an accumulation of succinate in the mitochondrial matrix. This excess succinate subsequently diffuses into the cytosol and is released into the extracellular space. Elevated cytosolic succinate levels stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylases, which enhances inflammatory responses. Notably, succinate also acts extracellularly as a signaling molecule by engaging succinate receptor 1 on immune cells, thus modulating their pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory activities. Alterations in succinate levels have been associated with various inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and atherosclerosis. These associations are primarily due to exaggerated immune cell responses. Given its central role in inflammation, targeting succinate pathways offers promising therapeutic avenues for these diseases. This paper provides an extensive review of succinate's involvement in inflammatory processes and highlights potential targets for future research and therapeutic possibilities development.
Topics: Humans; Succinic Acid; Inflammation; Signal Transduction; Animals; Citric Acid Cycle; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
PubMed: 38933270
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404441 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024B cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (aCD20 mAbs) are highly effective in treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) but fail to halt the formation of meningeal...
Single-cell profiling indicates a high similarity between immune cells in the cerebrospinal fluid and in meningeal ectopic lymphoid tissue in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
B cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (aCD20 mAbs) are highly effective in treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) but fail to halt the formation of meningeal ectopic lymphoid tissue (mELT) in the murine model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). While mELT can be examined in EAE, it is not accessible in MS patients. Our key objectives were to compare the immune cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is accessible in patients, with those in mELT, and to study the effects of aCD20 mAbs on CSF and mELT in EAE.
METHODS
Applying single cell RNA sequencing, we compared gene expression profiles in immune cells from (1) CSF with mELT and (2) aCD20 mAbs treated with control treated mice in a spontaneous 2D2xTh EAE model.
RESULTS
The immune cell composition in CSF and mELT was very similar. Gene expression profiles and pathway enrichment analysis revealed no striking differences between the two compartments. aCD20 mAbs led not only to a virtually complete depletion of B cells in the CSF but also to a reduction of naïve CD4+ T cells and marked increase of macrophages. No remarkable differences in regulated genes or pathways were observed.
DISCUSSION
Our results suggest that immune cells in the CSF may serve as a surrogate for mELT in EAE. Future studies are required to confirm this in MS patients. The observed increase of macrophages in B cell depleted CSF is a novel finding and requires verification in CSF of aCD20 mAbs treated MS patients. Due to unresolved technical challenges, we were unable to study the effects of aCD20 mAbs on mELT. This should be addressed in future studies.
Topics: Animals; Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental; Mice; Single-Cell Analysis; Meninges; B-Lymphocytes; Female; Tertiary Lymphoid Structures; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Transcriptome; Gene Expression Profiling; Antigens, CD20; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Disease Models, Animal; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 38933267
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1400641 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The classical pathway of the complement system is activated by the binding of C1q in the C1 complex to the target activator, including immune complexes. Factor H is...
The classical pathway of the complement system is activated by the binding of C1q in the C1 complex to the target activator, including immune complexes. Factor H is regarded as the key downregulatory protein of the complement alternative pathway. However, both C1q and factor H bind to target surfaces via charge distribution patterns. For a few targets, C1q and factor H compete for binding to common or overlapping sites. Factor H, therefore, can effectively regulate the classical pathway activation through such targets, in addition to its previously characterized role in the alternative pathway. Both C1q and factor H are known to recognize foreign or altered-self materials, e.g., bacteria, viruses, and apoptotic/necrotic cells. Clots, formed by the coagulation system, are an example of altered self. Factor H is present abundantly in platelets and is a well-known substrate for FXIIIa. Here, we investigated whether clots activate the complement classical pathway and whether this is regulated by factor H. We show here that both C1q and factor H bind to the fibrin formed in microtiter plates and the fibrin clots formed under physiological conditions. Both C1q and factor H become covalently bound to fibrin clots, and this is mediated via FXIIIa. We also show that fibrin clots activate the classical pathway of complement, as demonstrated by C4 consumption and membrane attack complex detection assays. Thus, factor H downregulates the activation of the classical pathway induced by fibrin clots. These results elucidate the intricate molecular mechanisms through which the complement and coagulation pathways intersect and have regulatory consequences.
Topics: Humans; Complement Factor H; Fibrin; Blood Coagulation; Complement C1q; Complement Pathway, Classical; Protein Binding; Complement Activation; Blood Platelets
PubMed: 38933264
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368852