-
International Immunopharmacology Dec 2023Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used...
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study.
BACKGROUND
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated promising benefits in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In China, the most frequently used HAIC regimen is oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). However, arterial infusion of fluorouracil over 46 h was not convenient. Raltitrexed, another antimetabolic agent with a long plasma half-life, allows for shorter infusion durations. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with HAIC with raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX) or FOLFOX in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.
METHODS
This retrospective study enrolled 82 eligible patients from February 2019 to December 2021. Forty patients were treated with FOLFOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, leucovorin 400 mg/m, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m administered on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m infusion for 46 h, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. Forty-two patients received RALOX HAIC (oxaliplatin 100 mg/m and raltitrexed 3 mg/m on day 1, every 3 weeks) combined with TKIs and ICIs. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.
RESULTS
ORR was similar between the FOLFOX HAIC and RALOX HAIC groups (42.5% vs 42.5%, P = 0.974). DCR also showed no significant difference between the two groups (87.5% vs 85.7%, P = 0.813). Median PFS was 10.7 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group versus 10.2 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.41). Median OS was 20.3 months in the FOLFOX HAIC group, compared to 17.7 months in the RALOX HAIC group (P = 0.50). Both groups had similar profiles of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, and leukocytopenia.
CONCLUSION
The effectiveness and safety of HAIC with RALOX were comparable to HAIC with FOLFOX in intermediate and advanced HCC patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Fluorouracil; Oxaliplatin; Leucovorin; Retrospective Studies; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors; Liver Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37879230
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111019 -
BMJ Open Oct 2023Organ preservation is now considered an acceptable alternative option in distal rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant...
INTRODUCTION
Organ preservation is now considered an acceptable alternative option in distal rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). But the cCR rate is low and about one-third of tumour will regrow, which requires more effective local treatment. CRT combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) might be a promising approach. Additionally, total neoadjuvant therapy using FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy improved survival while consolidation chemotherapy improved organ preservation. We assess whether IAC plus CRT and FOLFIRINOX consolidation chemotherapy can improve the chance of organ preservation and survival in distal rectal cancer.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This prospective, monocentric, open-label, single-arm phase II study will include 32 patients with cT3-4NanyM0 distal rectal adenocarcinoma. All patients will receive one cycle of IAC (irinotecan, raltitrexed and oxaliplatin), followed by CRT (50 Gy/25 fractions with concomitant capecitabine) and then with six cycles of FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan). After final evaluation, patients with cCR will receive non-operative management or surgery at their own discretion and others are mandatorily referred to surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of mFOLFOX6 (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) will be used for patients with adverse pathological features. The primary endpoint is the rate of complete response (CR; pathological CR or sustained cCR≥2 years). The main secondary endpoints are toxicity, compliance, short-term and long-term oncological outcomes, surgical morbidity and quality of life. This protocol has been designed in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 guidelines.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
This study was approved by the Academic and Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities in March 2023. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and on the ChiCTR website.
PROTOCOL VERSION
Registered on 18 April 2023; version #1.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
ChiCTR2300070620.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Irinotecan; Oxaliplatin; Leucovorin; Quality of Life; Prospective Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Chemoradiotherapy; Neoplasm Staging; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
PubMed: 37798027
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075023 -
Cancer Biology & Medicine Aug 2023Paclitaxel (P) is a standard second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This study compared the clinical outcome of a paclitaxel plus... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparing effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed paclitaxel alone in second-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase II clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE
Paclitaxel (P) is a standard second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. This study compared the clinical outcome of a paclitaxel plus raltitrexed (RP) regimen as second-line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients.
METHODS
An open, randomized, multi-center phase II clinical trial was conducted involving 148 patients who were randomly assigned and treated with RP [raltitrexed (3 mg/m on day 1) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m on day 1 every 3 weeks)] or P [paclitaxel (135 mg/m on day 1 every 3 weeks)] as 2-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
RESULTS
PFS had a tendency to be prolonged with RP compared to P (2.7 months 1.7 months; = 0.148). OS was also prolonged with RP compared to P (10.2 months 6.1 months; = 0.140). The ORR was equal in the RP and P groups (6.8% and 4.0%; = 0.72). The disease control rate (DCR) in the RP and P groups was 56.2% and 36.0%, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36.2% (RP) and 28.2% (P) of patients. Frequent grade 3-4 toxicities for RP and P were neutropenia (11.0% and 4.0%), anemia (1.4% and 4.0%), and thrombocytopenia (1.4% and 5.3%), and all grades of peripheral neurotoxicity (12.3% 17.3%). All grades of hepatic toxicity were demonstrated for the RP and P groups based on elevated aminotransferase levels (27.4% and 14.1%). Subgroup analysis shows if MGC was combined with ascites or peritoneal involvement, the OS of the RP regimen was longer ( = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Second-line palliative chemotherapy with RP was shown to prolong the PFS and OS, especially among patients with ascites or peritoneal involvement, which warrants confirmation using larger sample studies.
Topics: Humans; Paclitaxel; Stomach Neoplasms; Ascites; Adenocarcinoma
PubMed: 37653589
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0112 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Breast and vulvar metastases from rectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) represent a rare and obscure clinical entity associated with poor survival. Managing patients...
BACKGROUND
Breast and vulvar metastases from rectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) represent a rare and obscure clinical entity associated with poor survival. Managing patients with metastatic rectal SRCC is extremely challenging due to the absence of high-quality evidence.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 26-year-old woman presented with progressively worsening anal pain, constipation, and hematochezia for approximately two years. Following the diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (TNM), she received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOX6 regimen and underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Metastases to the breast and vulva developed during postoperative chemotherapy. Genetic testing revealed RAS/BRAF wild-type and microsatellite instability (MSI)-low status. Though sequential administration of irinotecan plus tegafur and tegafur plus raltitrexed-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, the disease progressed rapidly. Sadly, the patient passed away 15 months after initial diagnosis due to rapidly progressive disease.
CONCLUSION
Rectal SRCC is associated with younger on-set, aggressive behaviors, and worse survival outcomes. Due to poor cohesiveness, SRCC tends to develop metastases. A patient's medical history and immunohistochemical staining (such as CK20, CK7, and CDX-2) can aid in identifying the tumor origin of breast and vulvar metastases. Mutations and signaling pathways predominant in the tumorigenesis of SRCC remains unveiled. There is poor effect of conventional chemotherapies, targeted and immunotherapies for colorectal adenocarcinoma on SRCC, so novel therapies are needed to treat this patient population.
PubMed: 37483522
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1213888 -
Cancer Medicine Aug 2023Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) accounts for approximately 90% of esophageal cancer cases in China. There are no standard regimens for second or third-line... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A prospective, open label, randomized phase II study.
BACKGROUND
Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) accounts for approximately 90% of esophageal cancer cases in China. There are no standard regimens for second or third-line chemotherapy of metastatic squamous esophageal cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the security and effectiveness of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of ESCC.
METHODS
One hundred and twenty-eight patients with metastatic ESCC confirmed by histopathology were enrolled into this study. These patients had failure of the first-line chemotherapy combination of fluorouracil or platinum or paclitaxel and had not undergone chemotherapy with irinotecan or raltitrexed previously. Patients were randomly divided into irinotecan combined with raltitrexed group (experiment group) and irinotecan monotherapy group (control group). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoint.
RESULTS
In the control group, the median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) of patients were 3.37 and 5.3 months. In the experiment group, mPFS and mOS were 3.91 and 7.0 months. There was statistical significance of PFS and OS between two groups (PFS P = 0.002, OS P = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, in the second-line treatment, the mPFS of control and experiment group, was 3.90 and 4.60 months, mOS was 6.95 and 8.5 months, which was statistically significant differences between the two groups. (PFS P = 0.001, OS P = 0.005), In the third-line and beyond treatment, mPFS of control and experiment group was 2.80 and 3.19 months, mOS were 4.5 and 4.8 months. But there was no significant difference of PFS or OS between the two groups (PFS P = 0.19, OS P = 0.31). There was no statistical significance of toxicity side effects between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The PFS and OS of irinotecan plus raltitrexed may be better than that of irinotecan monotherapy, especially in second line treatment, which should be confirmed with a phase III study including much more patients.
Topics: Humans; Irinotecan; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Prospective Studies; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37325938
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6264 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract that is usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), and/or...
BACKGROUND
Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract that is usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), and/or surgery, according to disease status. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic strategies, local recurrence is frequently observed. However, there is no standard treatment or promising therapeutic approach for local recurrence or metastatic esophageal carcinoma after the RT. This study tended to investigate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for local/regional recurrent esophageal squamous carcinoma.
METHODS
This study was a single-arm, phase Ib/II trial conducted in a single site in China. Patients previously radically treated (surgery or CCRT), histologically confirmed, local or regional recurrence esophageal squamous carcinoma, qualified for the study design, were treated with 25-28 times radiotherapy plus raltitrexed once every 3 weeks for up to two cycles. Patients who have not progressed after CCRT received sintilimab as maintenance once every 3 weeks up to 1 year. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR).
RESULTS
Between September 2019 and March 2022, in a total of 36 enrolled patients, 34 pts completed CCRT. Three patients excluded due to violation of the exclusion criteria (1 pt) and consent withdrawal (2 pts). Finally, 33 pts were included in the final analysis, in which 3 pts had disease progression, and the remaining 30 entered maintenance therapy with sintilimab. The median follow-up time was 12.3 months. Median OS was 20.6 months (95%CI 10.5-NA) and the 1-year OS rate was 64%. Median PFS was 11.5 months (95%CI 5.29-21.3) and the 1-year PFS rate was 43.6%. The ORR was 63.6% (95%CI 44.6-77.8), including 2 cases of CR and 19 cases of PR. The DCR was 19.9%, the median DOR was 19.5 months, and the median TTR was 2.4 months. The rate of any grade TRAEs was 96.7%; ≥Grade 3 TRAE was 23.4%. The incidence of immune-related AE was 60%, most of which were grade 1-2, and only one case of thyroid-stimulating hormone increased was irAE with grade 3 or above.
CONCLUSION
Sintilimab has shown promising clinical efficacy and a manageable safety profile as maintenance therapy after CCRT for local/regional recurrent esophageal squamous carcinoma. In addition, further confirmation from a large-scale real-world study is still needed.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
PubMed: 37325650
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193394 -
PloS One 2023Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors, and their activation has been proven to treat mild liver fibrosis, reduce steatosis,... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors, and their activation has been proven to treat mild liver fibrosis, reduce steatosis, inflammation, and the extrahepatic effects of chronic liver disease. Considering the significance of the PPARs, it is targeted for the treatment of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH), for which currently there is no FDA-approved drug. Lanifibranor is a next-generation highly potential indole sulfonamide derivative that is presently in clinical trial phase III as an anti-NASH drug which fully activates PPARα and PPARδ and partially activates PPARγ. In the current study, a comprehensive computational investigation including 3D-QSAR pharmacophore modeling, MD simulations and binding free energy calculations is performed to get insights into the activation mechanism of the Lanifibranor. Furthermore, FDA-approved drugs were explored for repurposing through virtual screening against each PPAR pharmacophore to identify potential drug candidates. Forasartan, Raltitrexed, and Lifitegrast stood out as potential agonists for PPARα (full agonist), PPARγ (partial agonist), and PPARδ (full agonist), respectively. The findings of the study highlighted a lack of hydrogen bond acceptor feature in Raltitrexed and Lanifibranor which is responsible for partial activation of PPARγ that plays a critical role in preventing lipid accumulation. In addition to this, the significant role of AF2 domain in full and partial activation of PPARs through electrostatic interactions was also revealed, that facilitates the anchoring of ligand within the binding cavity. Moreover, common chemical scaffolds (methyl sulfonyl benzene, butyric acid, and chlorobenzene) identified using Fingerprinting technique were presented in this study which hold the potential to aid in the design and development of target specific novel Pan PPAR medications in future.
Topics: Humans; Drug Repositioning; Furylfuramide; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; PPAR alpha; PPAR delta; PPAR gamma
PubMed: 37000796
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283743 -
Cancer Management and Research 2023Treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are scarce. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed...
PURPOSE
Treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are scarce. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combined with S-1 and bevacizumab in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic CRC in a clinical real-world setting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Records of patients with metastatic CRC refractory to standard therapies who initiated raltitrexed plus S-1 and bevacizumab from October 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed at our institution. The study endpoints included median overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
Forty-four patients with metastatic CRC, who had previously undergone standard chemotherapy received the regimen comprising raltitrexed plus S-1 and bevacizumab. As of March 2022, the median follow-up was 23.2 months (95% confidence interval 15.8-30.6). The median OS and median PFS were 13.5 (95% CI 9.9-17.1) and 4.7 months (95% CI 3.6-5.8), respectively, with a 16-week PFS rate of 60.9%. Among 43 patients with measurable lesions, the ORR and DCR were 7.0% (3/43) and 65.1% (28/43), respectively. Patients without peritoneal metastases (P = 0.003, hazard ratio 0.160, 95% CI 0.048-0.531), lower carcinoembryonic antigen level (≤42.8 ng/mL) (P = 0.039, HR 0.382, 95% CI 0.153-0.952), and no previous treatment with both vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGF) and S-1 (P = 0.020, HR 0.215, 95% CI 0.059-0.785) had better OS. The incidence of any grade of treatment-related AEs was 88.6%, most of which were mild to moderate, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.
CONCLUSION
Raltitrexed combined with S-1 and bevacizumab shows promising antitumor activity and safety and could be an alternative for patients with metastatic CRC who are refractory or intolerant to standard therapy.
PubMed: 36969545
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S398539 -
American Journal of Translational... 2023To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by propensity score matching...
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by propensity score matching (PSM) technique.
METHODS
The clinical data of HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2017 to June 2020 as well as their 36-month-follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were matched in pairs based on baseline data and laboratory indicators using the PSM method and divided into a pirarubicin group (n = 34), raltitrexed group (n = 34), and arsenic trioxide group (n = 34). Clinical efficacy was evaluated according to mRECIST criteria. The levels of alpha fetal protein (AFP), carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA125) in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded by outpatient, inpatient, and telephone follow-up. Adverse reactions were counted.
RESULTS
After PSM, no significant differences were seen in gender, age, tumor burden, Child-Pugh grade, portal vein tumor thrombus or TACE frequency among the three groups (all >0.05). The ORR rate of the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group at both 3 and 6 month post-operation was significantly higher than that of the raltitrexed group (all P<0.05). Before and 1 month after treatment, there were no significant differences in the aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin (TBIL) levels between the three groups (all P>0.05). Before treatment, no significant differences were observed in AFP, CEA, or CA125 levels among the three groups (all P>0.05). After treatment, the levels of AFP in the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group were lower than those in the raltitrexed group (both P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in CEA and CA125 levels (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS and OS among the three groups (all P>0.05), and the incidence of fever, abdominal pain, and myelosuppression showed no significant differences among the three groups (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
The efficacies of DEB-TACE loaded with pirarubicin, raltitrexed, or arsenic trioxide in treating HCC were generally comparable, and the survival benefit of patients was similar. The short-term efficacy of the pirarubicin group and arsenic trioxide group was slightly better than that of the raltitrexed group.
PubMed: 36915718
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Feb 2023Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line treatment have a poor prognosis. Fruquintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102),...
BACKGROUND
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line treatment have a poor prognosis. Fruquintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), panitumumab and cetuximab combined with single-agent chemotherapy regimens are currently recommended as third-line therapies for patients exhibiting disease progression. Effective late-line therapies for mCRC are urgently needed. The FRESCO randomized clinical trial (RCT) prompts fruquintinib as a third-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). A phase II study in our center reported the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus raltitrexed for the treatment of chemo-refractory mCRC. The combination of the fruquintinib, raltitrexed, and S-1 has not been reported in mCRC.
CASE DESCRIPTION
This case report presents a patient with mCRC who received third-line treatment with fruquintinib, raltitrexed, and S-1. A 54-year-old male presenting with hematochezia was admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University in June 2017 and underwent surgery for a tumor between the rectum and sigmoid colon. Postoperative pathology identified adenocarcinoma (wild-type RAS/RAF, no PIK3CA mutation), and the patient was diagnosed with mCRC (pathological stage, pT3pN1apM0). The mFOLFOX6 regimen was administered. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma in May 2018 and treated with the ABVD regimen after multidisciplinary discussions. Liver metastases (intestinal-type adenocarcinoma) were detected in November 2018, and second-line therapy with the FOLFIRI regimen was initiated in January 2019. Lung metastases were identified in September 2019, so the patient was treated with a combination of raltitrexed, S-1, and fruquintinib. A partial response (PR) was detected in November 2019, and the patient underwent resection of the hepatic lesion on November 5, 2020. Computed tomography (CT) images in November 2021 revealed a stable disease; thus, raltitrexed was discontinued, and S-1 and fruquintinib were maintained. The treatment is still responding until the last follow-up (December 2022).
CONCLUSIONS
The case was characterized by the simultaneous existence of mCRC and Hodgkin lymphoma, which required management by a multidisciplinary team. Third-line therapy with fruquintinib, raltitrexed, and S-1 achieved a PR that permitted surgical resection and enabled a relatively long progression-free survival. The findings suggest that the three agents regimen might be clinically effective as late-line therapy for mCRC.
PubMed: 36915460
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-39