-
Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark... May 2024The Warburg effect, also called aerobic glycolysis, refers to tumor cells that metabolize glucose through glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen. This rapid breakdown... (Review)
Review
The Warburg effect, also called aerobic glycolysis, refers to tumor cells that metabolize glucose through glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen. This rapid breakdown of glucose fuels the fast development, growth, and migration of tumor cells. Lactate, the final product of aerobic glycolysis, contributes to an acidic environment within the tumor, promoting the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment and accelerating tumor progression by impeding anti-tumor immunity. Numerous studies have confirmed the critical role of aerobic glycolysis in the occurrence and development of hepatocellular carcinoma by influencing tumor cells proliferation, invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, immune escape, angiogenesis, and more. Clinical trials have shown that inhibitors of rate-limiting enzymes in the glycolysis pathway can enhance the effectiveness of sorafenib, a targeted drug for hepatocellular carcinoma, by reducing drug resistance. Additionally, active components of traditional Chinese medicine and specific compound prescriptions are gaining attention for their potential to target and regulate aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, inhibiting the aerobic glycolysis pathway holds promise as a therapeutic strategy for treating liver tumors. This manuscript aims to review the role, research directions, and clinical studies of aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Warburg Effect, Oncologic; Glycolysis; Antineoplastic Agents; Animals
PubMed: 38812302
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2905178 -
Journal of Nanobiotechnology May 2024Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated with sorafenib, which is the primary choice for targeted therapy. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of sorafenib is...
BACKGROUND
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated with sorafenib, which is the primary choice for targeted therapy. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of sorafenib is greatly restricted due to resistance. Research has shown that exosomes and circular RNAs play a vital role in the cancer's malignant advancement. However, the significance of exosomal circular RNAs in the development of resistance to sorafenib in HCC remains uncertain.
METHODS
Ultracentrifugation was utilized to isolate exosomes (Exo-SR) from the sorafenib-resistant HCC cells' culture medium. Transcriptome sequencing and differential expression gene analysis were used to identify the targets of Exo-SR action in HCC cells. To identify the targets of Exo-SR action in HCC cells, transcriptome sequencing and analysis of differential expression genes were employed. To evaluate the impact of exosomal circUPF2 on resistance to sorafenib in HCC, experiments involving gain-of-function and loss-of-function were conducted. RNA pull-down assays and mass spectrometry analysis were performed to identify the RNA-binding proteins interacting with circUPF2. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), RNA pull-down, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), immunofluorescence (IF) -fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and rescue assays were used to validate the interactions among circUPF2, IGF2BP2 and SLC7A11. Finally, a tumor xenograft assay was used to examine the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of Exo-SR and circUPF2 in vivo.
RESULTS
A novel exosomal circRNA, circUPF2, was identified and revealed to be significantly enriched in Exo-SR. Exosomes with enriched circUPF2 enhanced sorafenib resistance by promoting SLC7A11 expression and suppressing ferroptosis in HCC cells. Mechanistically, circUPF2 acts as a framework to enhance the creation of the circUPF2-IGF2BP2-SLC7A11 ternary complex contributing to the stabilization of SLC7A11 mRNA. Consequently, exosomal circUPF2 promotes SLC7A11 expression and enhances the function of system Xc- in HCC cells, leading to decreased sensitivity to ferroptosis and resistance to sorafenib.
CONCLUSIONS
The resistance to sorafenib in HCC is facilitated by the exosomal circUPF2, which promotes the formation of the circUPF2-IGF2BP2-SLC7A11 ternary complex and increases the stability of SLC7A11 mRNA. Focusing on exosomal circUPF2 could potentially be an innovative approach for HCC treatment.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Exosomes; Liver Neoplasms; Sorafenib; RNA, Circular; Ferroptosis; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Cell Line, Tumor; Animals; Mice; RNA-Binding Proteins; Mice, Nude; Amino Acid Transport System y+; Antineoplastic Agents; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Mice, Inbred BALB C
PubMed: 38811968
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02582-6 -
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) May 2024In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST.
PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS
MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST comprise 14 cohorts with different targeted agents and immunotherapies.
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
PROFILER has recruited 5,991 patients in 10 years, MOST and MOST Plus 875 patients since 2014 and MEGAMOST 172 patients since 2020, and are still ongoing. We provide a description of the local, national and international implications of these initiatives, and we review the results of the sorafenib and olaparib cohorts.
Topics: Humans; Precision Medicine; France; Neoplasms; Sorafenib; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Immunotherapy; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 38807312
DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.32745 -
IScience Jun 2024Non-apoptotic regulated cell death (RCD) of tumor cells profoundly affects tumor progression and plays critical roles in determining response to immune checkpoint...
Non-apoptotic regulated cell death (RCD) of tumor cells profoundly affects tumor progression and plays critical roles in determining response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Prognosis-distinctive HCC subtypes were identified by consensus cluster analysis based on the expressions of 507 non-apoptotic RCD genes obtained from databases and literature. Meanwhile, a set of bioinformatic tools was integrated to analyze the differences of the tumor immune microenvironment infiltration, genetic mutation, copy number variation, and epigenetics alternations within two subtypes. Finally, a non-apoptotic RCDRS signature was constructed and its reliability was evaluated in HCC patients' tissues. The high-RCDRS HCC subgroup showed a significantly lower overall survival and less sensitivity to ICIs compared to low-RCDRS subgroup, but higher sensitivity to cisplatin, paclitaxel, and sorafenib. Overall, we established an RCDRS panel consisting of four non-apoptotic RCD genes, which might be a promising predictor for evaluating HCC prognosis, guiding therapeutic decision-making, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38799554
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109901 -
JHEP Reports : Innovation in Hepatology Jun 2024Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo/bev) and lenvatinib have demonstrated efficacy as first-line therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, vascular endothelial...
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo/bev) and lenvatinib have demonstrated efficacy as first-line therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition with these therapies may be associated with the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety with focus on the bleeding and thromboembolic events of atezo/bev . lenvatinib in a large, multicenter real-world population.
METHODS
This study is based on HCC cohorts from seven centers in Germany and Austria. Incidences of bleeding or thromboembolic events and efficacy outcomes were assessed and compared.
RESULTS
In total, 464 patients treated with atezo/bev (n = 325) or lenvatinib (n = 139) were analyzed. Both groups were balanced with respect to demographics, presence of liver cirrhosis, and variceal status. Duration of therapy did not differ between groups. Within 3 months of therapy, bleeding episodes were described in 57 (18%) patients receiving atezo/bev compared with 15 (11%) patients receiving lenvatinib ( = 0.07). Variceal hemorrhage occurred in 11 (3%) patients treated with atezo/bev compared with 4 (3%) patients treated with lenvatinib ( = 0.99). Thromboembolic events were reported in 19 (6%) of patients in the atezo/bev cohort compared with 5 (4%) patients in the lenvatinib cohort ( = 0.37). In addition, incidence of overall bleeding, variceal hemorrhage, and thromboembolic events did not differ significantly in patients who received either atezo/bev or lenvantinib for 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Safety considerations related to bleeding and thromboembolic events may not be helpful in guiding clinical decision-making when choosing between atezo/bev and lenvatinib.
IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
The inhibition of VEGF by current first-line therapies for HCC, such as atezolizumab/bevacizumab or lenvatinib, may be associated with the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Studies comparing the incidence of these side effects between atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib, which are preferred treatments over sorafenib for HCC, are needed. Differences in this side effect profile may influence the choice of first-line therapy by treating physicians. Because no significant differences were observed regarding bleeding or thromboembolic events between both therapies in the present study, we conclude that safety considerations related to these events may not be helpful in guiding clinical decision-making when choosing between atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib.
PubMed: 38798717
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101065 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... May 2024Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) was developed as a multi-kinase inhibitor to treat advanced renal cell, hepatocellular, and thyroid cancers. The cytotoxic effect of sorafenib on...
Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) was developed as a multi-kinase inhibitor to treat advanced renal cell, hepatocellular, and thyroid cancers. The cytotoxic effect of sorafenib on cancer cells results from not only inhibiting the MEK/ERK signaling pathway (the on-target effect) but also inducing oxidative damage (the off-target effect). The inhibitory effect of sorafenib on system Xc (xCT), a cystine/glutamate antiporter, promotes ferroptosis induction and accounts for oxidative damage. While emerging studies on ferroptosis in cancers have garnered increasing attention, the lack of consideration for ferroptosis inducers (FINs) with favorable pharmacokinetics could be problematic. Herein, we remodeled the chemical structure of sorafenib, of which pharmacokinetics and safety are already assured, to customize the off-target effect (i.e., ferroptosis induction) to on-target by disrupting the adenine-binding motif. JB3, a sorafenib derivative (i.e., JB compounds), with a tenfold higher IC toward RAF1 because of chemical remodeling, induced strong cytotoxicity in the elastin-sensitive lung cancer cells, while it was markedly reduced by ferrostatin-1. The 24% oral bioavailability of JB3 in rats accounted for a significant anti-tumor effect of orally administrated JB3 in xenograft models. These results indicate that JB3 could be further developed as an orally bioavailable FIN in novel anti-cancer therapeutics.
PubMed: 38796972
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116758 -
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences :... May 2024BRAF represents a constitutively active onco-kinase and stands as the most prevalent genetic alteration in thyroid cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of...
BRAF represents a constitutively active onco-kinase and stands as the most prevalent genetic alteration in thyroid cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of small-molecule inhibitors targeting BRAF is often limited by acquired resistance. Here, we find that nerve/glial antigen 2 (NG2), also known as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4), is up-regulated in thyroid cancers, and its expression is increased with tumor progression in a BRAF-driven thyroid cancer mouse model. Functional studies show that NG2 knockout almost does not affect tumor growth, but significantly improves the response of BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cells to BRAF inhibitor PLX4720. Mechanistically, the blockade of ERK-dependent feedback by BRAF inhibitor can activate receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling, causing the resistance to this inhibitor. NG2 knockout attenuates the PLX4720-mediated feedback activation of several RTKs, improving the sensitivity of BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cells to this inhibitor. Based on this finding, we propose and demonstrate an alternative strategy for targeting NG2 to effectively treat BRAF-mutant thyroid cancers by combining multiple kinase inhibitor (MKI) Sorafenib or Lenvatinib with PLX4720. Thus, this study uncovers a new mechanism in which NG2 contributes to the resistance of BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cells to BRAF inhibitor, and provides a promising therapeutic option for BRAF-mutant thyroid cancers.
Topics: Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Humans; Animals; Thyroid Neoplasms; Indoles; Mice; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Sulfonamides; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Cell Line, Tumor; Phenylurea Compounds; Sorafenib; Quinolines; Mutation; Antigens; Proteoglycans; Membrane Proteins; Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans
PubMed: 38795180
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05280-6 -
Cancers May 2024We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active... (Review)
Review
We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active recruiting clinical trials on targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Combinations of different agents and medical therapy along with radiological interventions were analyzed for the setting of advanced HCC. Those settings were also analyzed in combination with adjuvant situations after resection or radiological treatments. We summarized the current knowledge for each therapeutic setting and combination that currently is or has been under clinical evaluation. We further discuss the results in the background of current treatment guidelines. In addition, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways for each of these investigated targets and drugs to further elucidate the molecular background and underlying mechanisms of action. Established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for patients are considered for systemic treatment: atezolizumab/bevacizumab, durvalumab/tremelimumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Combination treatment for systemic treatment and local ablative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies are under clinical investigation.
PubMed: 38791911
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101831 -
BMC Medical Genomics May 2024Therapy with anti-cancer drugs remain the cornerstone of treating cancer. The effectiveness and safety of anti-cancer drugs vary significantly among individuals due to...
BACKGROUND
Therapy with anti-cancer drugs remain the cornerstone of treating cancer. The effectiveness and safety of anti-cancer drugs vary significantly among individuals due to genetic factors influencing the drug response and metabolism. Data on the pharmacogenomic variations in Sri Lankans related to anti-cancer therapy is sparse. As current treatment guidelines in Sri Lanka often do not consider local pharmacogenomic variants, this study aimed to explore the diversity of pharmacogenomic variants in the Sri Lankan population to pave the way for personalized treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes.
METHODS
Pharmacogenomic data regarding variant-drug pairs of genes CYP2D6, DPYD, NUDT15, EPAS1, and XRCC1 with clinical annotations labelled as evidence levels 1A-2B were obtained from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase database. Their frequencies in Sri Lankans were obtained from an anonymized database that was derived from 541 Sri Lankans who underwent exome sequencing at the Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo. Variations in DPYD, NUDT15, and EPAS1 genes are related to increased toxicity to fluoropyrimidines, mercaptopurines, and sorafenib respectively. Variations in CYP2D6 and XRCC1 genes are related to changes in efficacy of tamoxifen and platinum compounds, respectively. Minor allele frequencies of these variants were calculated and compared with other populations.
RESULTS
MAFs of rs1065852 c.100 C > T (CYP2D6), rs3918290 c.1905 + 1G > A (DPYD), rs56038477 c.1236G > A (DPYD), rs7557402 c.1035-7 C > G (EPAS1), rs116855232 c.415 C > T (NUDT15*3), and rs25487 c.1196 A > G (XRCC1) were: 12.9% [95%CI:10.9-14.9], 1.5% [95%CI:0.8-2.2], 1.2% [95%CI:0.5-1.8], 37.7% [95%CI:34.8-40.6], 8.3% [95%CI:6.7-10.0], and 64.0% [95%CI:61.1-66.8], respectively. Frequencies of rs1065852 c.100 C > T (CYP2D6), rs7557402 c.1035-7 C > G (EPAS1), and rs25487 (XRCC1) were significantly lower in Sri Lankans, while frequencies of rs116855232 c.415 C > T (NUDT15*3) and rs56038477 c.1236G > A (DPYD) were significantly higher in Sri Lankans when compared to some Western and Asian populations.
CONCLUSION
Sri Lankans are likely to show lower toxicity risk with sorafenib (rs7557402 c.84,131 C > G) and, higher toxicity risk with fluoropyrimidines (rs56038477 c.1236G > A) and mercaptopurine (rs116855232 c.415 C > T), and reduced effectiveness with tamoxifen (rs1065852 c.100 C > T) and platinum compounds (rs25487). These findings highlight the potential contribution of these genetic variations to the individual variability in anti-cancer dosage requirements among Sri Lankans.
Topics: Humans; Sri Lanka; Antineoplastic Agents; Pharmacogenomic Variants; X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1; Pyrophosphatases; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Neoplasms; Asian People; Pharmacogenetics; Gene Frequency; Nudix Hydrolases
PubMed: 38789983
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-024-01919-2 -
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2024Proteasomes are multi-subunit protein complexes responsible for protein degradation in cells. Immunoproteasomes and intermediate proteasomes (together non-constitutive...
Proteasomes are multi-subunit protein complexes responsible for protein degradation in cells. Immunoproteasomes and intermediate proteasomes (together non-constitutive proteasomes) are specific forms of proteasomes frequently associated with immune response, antigen presentation, inflammation and stress. Expression of non-constitutive proteasome subunits has a prognostic value in several types of cancer. Thus, factors that modulate non-constitutive proteasome expression in tumors are of particular interest. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) demonstrate promising results in treatment of cancer. At the same time, their immunomodulatory properties and effects on non-constitutive proteasome expression in colorectal cancer cells are poorly investigated. Proteasome subunit expression in colorectal cancer was evaluated by bioinformatic analysis of available datasets. Two colorectal cancer cell lines, expressing fluorescent non-constitutive proteasomes were treated with multikinase inhibitors: regorafenib and sorafenib. The proteasome subunit expression was assessed by real-time PCR, Western blotting and flow cytometry. The proteasome activity was studied using proteasome activity-based probe and fluorescent substrates. Intracellular proteasome localization was revealed by confocal microscopy. Reactive oxygen species levels following treatment were determined in cells. Combined effect of proteasome inhibition and treatment with MKIs on viability of cells was estimated. Expression of non-constitutive proteasomes is increased in BRAF-mutant colorectal tumors. Regorafenib and sorafenib stimulated the activity and synthesis of non-constitutive proteasomes in examined cell lines. MKIs induced oxidative stress and redistribution of proteasomes within cells. Sorafenib stimulated formation of cytoplasmic aggregates, containing proteolyticaly active non-constitutive proteasomes, while regorafenib had no such effect. MKIs caused no synergistic action when were combined with the proteasome inhibitor. Obtained results indicate that MKIs might affect the crosstalk between cancer cells and immune cells via modulation of intracellular proteasome pool. Observed phenomenon should be considered when MKI-based therapy is applied.
PubMed: 38774235
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1351641