-
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety 2019Sugammadex is used for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade caused by rocuronium bromide and vecuronium bromide. As part of the post licensing phase of drug...
INTRODUCTION
Sugammadex is used for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade caused by rocuronium bromide and vecuronium bromide. As part of the post licensing phase of drug development, adverse events related to the use of sugammadex are still being uncovered and being reported. The potential association between sugammadex and adverse events bronchospasm and coronary arteriospasm using a retrospective pharmacovigilance signal analysis was carried out.
METHODS
Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database was used to run disproportionality analyses to investigate the potential association of sugammadex with bronchospasm or coronary arteriospasm. In this analysis we report the adverse event signal using frequentist methods of Relative reporting ratio (RRR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the Bayesian based Information Component metric.
RESULTS
A statistically significant disproportionality signal is found between sugammadex and bronchospasm ( = 44; chi-squared = 2993.87; PRR = 71.95 [95% CI: 54.00-95.85]) and sugammadex and coronary arteriospasm ( = 6; chi-squared = 209.39; PRR = 43.82 [95% CI: 19.73-97.33]) as per Evans criteria. Both statistically significant disproportionality signals persisted when stratified by gender. Based upon dynamic cumulative PRR graph, the PRR value has steadily increased and the 95% CI narrowed since December 2012.
CONCLUSION
The results of the pharmacovigilance analysis highlight a statistically significant disproportionality signal between sugammadex usage and bronchospasm and coronary arteriospasm adverse events. Physicians need to be aware of these adverse events when using sugammadex. The results of the pharmacovigilance signal analysis highlight a statistically significant disproportionality signal between sugammadex usage and bronchospasm and coronary arteriospasm adverse events. Physicians need to be aware of these adverse events when using sugammadex.
PubMed: 31452867
DOI: 10.1177/2042098619869077 -
Medicinski Glasnik : Official... Feb 2020Aim To compare the quality of the conditions for endotracheal intubation and muscle relaxation between rocuronium bromide and vecuronium bromide using the ''timing... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Aim To compare the quality of the conditions for endotracheal intubation and muscle relaxation between rocuronium bromide and vecuronium bromide using the ''timing principle'' method for induction in anaesthesia. The "timing principle" includes the administration of muscle relaxants before the hypnotic agent during induction in anaesthesia. Method Sixty patients who had undergone elective surgery were randomly allocated into two equal groups using muscle relaxants: rocuronium (group R) and vecuronium (group V). The intubation conditions were assessed using Cooper's scoring system, based on jaw relaxation, vocal cords position and response to intubation. The quality of muscle relaxation was evaluated by recording the time of clinical weakness, a count of ''train of four'' (TOF) twitches at intubation, the time of loss TOF response and duration of direct laryngoscopy. Results The intubation conditions were excellent in 100% of patients in the group R versus excellent in 80% and good in 20% of patients in the group V (p<0.05). The time of clinical weakness was statistically significantly shorter in the group R than in the group V (p<0.000). The time of loss of TOF response was statistically significantly shorter in the group R (p<0.000). The absence of TOF twitches (the level of muscle relaxation of 100%) at intubation recorded in 25 (83.3%) patients in the group R versus five (16.7%) patients in the group V (p<0.000). Duration of direct laryngoscopy did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Rocuronium bromide provides better intubation conditions and greater quality of muscle relaxation than vecuronium bromide using ''timing principle'' technique.
Topics: Androstanols; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Muscle Relaxation; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents; Rocuronium; Time Factors; Vecuronium Bromide
PubMed: 31402637
DOI: 10.17392/1045-20 -
BMC Anesthesiology Nov 2018Sugammadex, a γ-cyclodextrin derivative, belongs to a new class of selective relaxant binding agents. Sugammadex was approved 10-years ago by the European medicines... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Sugammadex, a γ-cyclodextrin derivative, belongs to a new class of selective relaxant binding agents. Sugammadex was approved 10-years ago by the European medicines agency and today is used in clinical anesthesia and emergency medicine globally. In this review, indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring and the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy are discussed.
MAIN BODY
Reversal of neuromuscular block is important to accelerate the spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function. Sugammadex is able to reverse a rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block rapidly and efficiently from every depth of neuromuscular block. However, since sugammadex was introduced in clinical anesthesia, several studies have reported administration of a lower-than-recommended dose of sugammadex. The decision to under-dose sugammadex is often motivated by cost reduction concerns, as the price of sugammadex is much higher than that of neostigmine outside the United States. However, under-dosing of sugammadex leads to an increased risk of recurrence of neuromuscular block after an initial successful (but transient) reversal. Similarly, when not using objective neuromuscular monitoring, under-dosing of sugammadex may result in residual neuromuscular block in the postoperative care unit, with its attendant negative pulmonary outcomes. Therefore, an appropriate dose of sugammadex, based on objective determination of the depth of neuromuscular block, should be administered to avoid residual or recurrent neuromuscular block and attendant postoperative complications. Whether the reduction in perioperative recovery time of the patient can be translated into additional procedural cases performed, faster operative turnover times, or improved organizational resource utilization, has yet to be determined in actual clinical practice that includes verification of neuromuscular recovery prior to tracheal extubation.
CONCLUSIONS
The current review addresses the indications for neuromuscular block, the challenge of neuromuscular monitoring, the practice of under-dosing of sugammadex as a potential cost-saving strategy in reversal of deep neuromuscular block, the economics of sugammadex administration and the potential healthcare cost-saving strategies.
Topics: Cost Savings; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Neostigmine; Neuromuscular Blockade; Neuromuscular Monitoring; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents; Rocuronium; Sugammadex; Vecuronium Bromide
PubMed: 30400850
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-018-0605-6 -
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Oct 2017Previous studies suggest that administration of vecuronium based on total body weight rather than ideal body weight (IBW) in obesity results in overdosing with prolonged...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Previous studies suggest that administration of vecuronium based on total body weight rather than ideal body weight (IBW) in obesity results in overdosing with prolonged recovery times. We hypothesised that larger doses of neostigmine could result in faster recovery in obese patients administered vecuronium based on total body weight.
METHODS
Forty-five obese American Society of Anesthesiologists' II patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised into 3 groups to receive neostigmine 30, 40 and 50 μg/kg. Following induction, patients were paralysed with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg based on total body weight. Reversal was achieved with neostigmine based on the patient's group, and time to train-of-four (TOF) ratios of 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9 measured. The primary outcome variable was time to achieve TOF ratio >0.9.
RESULTS
Neostigmine 50 μg/kg achieved faster recovery to TOF 0.7 than neostigmine 30 and 40 μg/kg. There was no significant difference in recovery times to TOF 0.7 in patients receiving either 30 or 40 μg/kg of neostigmine. However, neostigmine 40 μg/kg attained TOF ratio 0.9 faster than 30 μg/kg. We did not note a significant difference between the 40 and 50 μg/kg dose with regard to recovery of TOF to 0.9.
CONCLUSION
Facilitated recovery from neuromuscular blockade to TOF of 0.7 was faster with neostigmine 50 μg/kg compared to 40 or 30 μg/kg. Recovery to TOF ratio of 0.9 was not significantly different with 40 or 50 μg/kg doses although such time was faster as compared to 30 μg/kg dose.
PubMed: 29242649
DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_297_17 -
American Journal of Respiratory and... Apr 2018The neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium may improve mortality for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Other neuromuscular... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Observational Study
RATIONALE
The neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium may improve mortality for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Other neuromuscular blocking agents, such as vecuronium, are commonly used and have different mechanisms of action, side effects, cost, and availability in the setting of drug shortages.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether cisatracurium is associated with improved outcomes when compared with vecuronium in patients at risk for and with ARDS.
METHODS
Using a nationally representative database, patients who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of ARDS or an ARDS risk factor, received mechanical ventilation, and were treated with a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agent for at least 2 days within 2 days of hospital admission were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received cisatracurium or vecuronium. Propensity matching was used to balance both patient- and hospital-specific factors. Outcomes included hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital duration, and discharge location.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Propensity matching successfully balanced all covariates for 3,802 patients (1,901 per group). There was no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.932; P = 0.40) or hospital days (-0.66 d; P = 0.411) between groups. However, patients treated with cisatracurium had fewer ventilator days (-1.01 d; P = 0.005) and ICU days (-0.98 d; P = 0.028) but were equally likely to be discharged home (odds ratio, 1.19; P = 0.056).
CONCLUSIONS
When compared with vecuronium, cisatracurium was not associated with a difference in mortality but was associated with improvements in other clinically important outcomes. These data suggest that cisatracurium may be the preferred neuromuscular blocking agent for patients at risk for and with ARDS.
Topics: Atracurium; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Risk; Treatment Outcome; Vecuronium Bromide
PubMed: 29241014
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1132OC -
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Nov 2017Background/aim: Myocardial protection is an important factor of open heart surgery and biological biomarkers (lactate, CKMB, cardiac troponin I, and pyruvate) are used...
Background/aim: Myocardial protection is an important factor of open heart surgery and biological biomarkers (lactate, CKMB, cardiac troponin I, and pyruvate) are used to assess myocardial damage. This study compares the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Materials and methods: Patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery (n = 60) were included in this study. Anesthesia induction was introduced with propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium bromide. Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil infusion and sevoflurane in the remifentanil group (Group R) and with dexmedetomidine infusion and sevoflurane in the dexmedetomidine group (Group D). Blood samples for biochemical markers were taken from the coronary sinus catheter before cardiopulmonary bypass (T1), 20 min after aortic cross-clamping (T2), 20 min after removal of the aortic cross-clamping (T3), and 10 min after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (T4).Results: Demographic data were similar between the groups. Lactate level at the T2 period and CKMB levels during the study period were lower in Group D than in Group R. In both groups, all values except pyruvate significantly increased over time. Conclusion: The dexmedetomidine-sevoflurane combination may improve the cardioprotective effect in comparison with remifentanil-sevoflurane in CABG surgery.
PubMed: 29151310
DOI: 10.3906/sag-1612-130 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2017Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as neostigmine, have traditionally been used for reversal of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. However, these drugs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as neostigmine, have traditionally been used for reversal of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. However, these drugs have significant limitations, such as indirect mechanisms of reversal, limited and unpredictable efficacy, and undesirable autonomic responses. Sugammadex is a selective relaxant-binding agent specifically developed for rapid reversal of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. Its potential clinical benefits include fast and predictable reversal of any degree of block, increased patient safety, reduced incidence of residual block on recovery, and more efficient use of healthcare resources.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade caused by non-depolarizing neuromuscular agents in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases on 2 May 2016: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE (WebSPIRS Ovid SP), Embase (WebSPIRS Ovid SP), and the clinical trials registries www.controlled-trials.com, clinicaltrials.gov, and www.centerwatch.com. We re-ran the search on 10 May 2017.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published, or language. We included adults, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to IV, who received non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents for an elective in-patient or day-case surgical procedure. We included all trials comparing sugammadex versus neostigmine that reported recovery times or adverse events. We included any dose of sugammadex and neostigmine and any time point of study drug administration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts to identify trials for eligibility, examined articles for eligibility, abstracted data, assessed the articles, and excluded obviously irrelevant reports. We resolved disagreements by discussion between review authors and further disagreements through consultation with the last review author. We assessed risk of bias in 10 methodological domains using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and examined risk of random error through trial sequential analysis. We used the principles of the GRADE approach to prepare an overall assessment of the quality of evidence. For our primary outcomes (recovery times to train-of-four ratio (TOFR) > 0.9), we presented data as mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), and for our secondary outcomes (risk of adverse events and risk of serious adverse events), we calculated risk ratios (RRs) with CIs.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 41 studies (4206 participants) in this updated review, 38 of which were new studies. Twelve trials were eligible for meta-analysis of primary outcomes (n = 949), 28 trials were eligible for meta-analysis of secondary outcomes (n = 2298), and 10 trials (n = 1647) were ineligible for meta-analysis.We compared sugammadex 2 mg/kg and neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg for reversal of rocuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Sugammadex 2 mg/kg was 10.22 minutes (6.6 times) faster then neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg (1.96 vs 12.87 minutes) in reversing NMB from the second twitch (T2) to TOFR > 0.9 (MD 10.22 minutes, 95% CI 8.48 to 11.96; I = 84%; 10 studies, n = 835; GRADE: moderate quality).We compared sugammadex 4 mg/kg and neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg for reversal of rocuronium-induced deep NMB. Sugammadex 4 mg/kg was 45.78 minutes (16.8 times) faster then neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg (2.9 vs 48.8 minutes) in reversing NMB from post-tetanic count (PTC) 1 to 5 to TOFR > 0.9 (MD 45.78 minutes, 95% CI 39.41 to 52.15; I = 0%; two studies, n = 114; GRADE: low quality).For our secondary outcomes, we compared sugammadex, any dose, and neostigmine, any dose, looking at risk of adverse and serious adverse events. We found significantly fewer composite adverse events in the sugammadex group compared with the neostigmine group (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.74; I = 40%; 28 studies, n = 2298; GRADE: moderate quality). Risk of adverse events was 28% in the neostigmine group and 16% in the sugammadex group, resulting in a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 8. When looking at specific adverse events, we noted significantly less risk of bradycardia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; I= 0%; 11 studies, n = 1218; NNTB 14; GRADE: moderate quality), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.97; I = 0%; six studies, n = 389; NNTB 16; GRADE: low quality) and overall signs of postoperative residual paralysis (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.57; I = 0%; 15 studies, n = 1474; NNTB 13; GRADE: moderate quality) in the sugammadex group when compared with the neostigmine group. Finally, we found no significant differences between sugammadex and neostigmine regarding risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.25; I= 0%; 10 studies, n = 959; GRADE: low quality).Application of trial sequential analysis (TSA) indicates superiority of sugammadex for outcomes such as recovery time from T2 to TOFR > 0.9, adverse events, and overall signs of postoperative residual paralysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Review results suggest that in comparison with neostigmine, sugammadex can more rapidly reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block regardless of the depth of the block. Sugammadex 2 mg/kg is 10.22 minutes (˜ 6.6 times) faster in reversing moderate neuromuscular blockade (T2) than neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg (GRADE: moderate quality), and sugammadex 4 mg/kg is 45.78 minutes (˜ 16.8 times) faster in reversing deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 1 to 5) than neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg (GRADE: low quality). With an NNTB of 8 to avoid an adverse event, sugammadex appears to have a better safety profile than neostigmine. Patients receiving sugammadex had 40% fewer adverse events compared with those given neostigmine. Specifically, risks of bradycardia (RR 0.16, NNTB 14; GRADE: moderate quality), PONV (RR 0.52, NNTB 16; GRADE: low quality), and overall signs of postoperative residual paralysis (RR 0.40, NNTB 13; GRADE: moderate quality) were reduced. Both sugammadex and neostigmine were associated with serious adverse events in less than 1% of patients, and data showed no differences in risk of serious adverse events between groups (RR 0.54; GRADE: low quality).
Topics: Adult; Androstanols; Atracurium; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Humans; Neostigmine; Neuromuscular Blockade; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rocuronium; Sugammadex; Time Factors; Vecuronium Bromide; gamma-Cyclodextrins
PubMed: 28806470
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012763 -
Anesthesiology Sep 2017Rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block that spontaneously recovered to a train-of-four count of four can be reversed with sugammadex 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg. We investigated... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block that spontaneously recovered to a train-of-four count of four can be reversed with sugammadex 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg. We investigated whether these doses of sugammadex can also reverse vecuronium at a similar level of block.
METHODS
Sixty-five patients were randomly assigned, and 64 were analyzed in this controlled, superiority study. Participants received general anesthesia with propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, and vecuronium. Measurement of neuromuscular function was performed with acceleromyography (TOF-Watch-SX, Organon Teknika B.V., The Netherlands ). Once the block recovered spontaneously to four twitches in response to train-of-four stimulation, patients were randomly assigned to receive sugammadex 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg; neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg; or placebo. Time from study drug injection to normalized train-of-four ratio 0.9 and the incidence of incomplete reversal within 30 min were the primary outcome variables. Secondary outcome was the incidence of reparalysis (normalized train-of-four ratio less than 0.9).
RESULTS
Sugammadex, in doses of 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg, reversed a threshold train-of-four count of four to normalized train-of-four ratio of 0.9 or higher in all patients in 4.4 ± 2.3 min (mean ± SD) and 2.6 ± 1.6 min, respectively. Sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg reversed the block in 6.8 ± 4.1 min in 70% of patients (P < 0.0001 vs. 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg), whereas neostigmine produced reversal in 11.3 ± 9.7 min in 77% of patients (P > 0.05 vs. sugammadex 0.5 mg/kg). The overall frequency of reparalysis was 18.7%, but this incidence varied from group to group.
CONCLUSIONS
Sugammadex 1.0 mg/kg, unlike 0.5 mg/kg, properly reversed a threshold train-of-four count of four vecuronium-induced block but did not prevent reparalysis.
Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Blockade; Neuromuscular Junction; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents; Sugammadex; Vecuronium Bromide; gamma-Cyclodextrins
PubMed: 28640017
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001744 -
European Review For Medical and... Apr 2017To observe the influences of atracurium besylate and vecuronium bromide on muscle relaxant effects and electromyography of patients with tracheal intubation under... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To observe the influences of atracurium besylate and vecuronium bromide on muscle relaxant effects and electromyography of patients with tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in thyroid surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
120 patients treated with thyroid surgery were randomly divided into group A and group V. Patients in group A were administered with cisatracurium besylate combined with propofol and fentanyl for induction of tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Patients in group V were administered with 0.10 mg/kg vecuronium bromide combined with propofol and fentanyl for induction of tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Then, the amplitude in electromyography was observed 30-70 min after I.V. muscle relaxant medicine to record the time for patients to reach 0% TW convulsion in abductor pollicis muscle and to observe the muscle relaxant effects.
RESULTS
There was no statistical difference in the time to reach 0% TW in two groups (p>0.05). After 30 min of injection of muscle relaxants, EMG positive rate and TW value in group A were significantly higher than those in group V (p<0.05). After 50-70 min of injection of muscle relaxants, EMG positive rate of patients in two groups was up to 100%, and EMG amplitude in group A was significantly higher than that in group V (p<0.05). The time of taking muscle relaxant effects in group A was significantly faster than that in group V (p<0.05), while the recovery time of autonomous respiration and the time of autonomous body activity in group A were slightly lower than those in group V (p>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the time of eye-opening of both groups (p>0.05). MAP and HR of patients in both groups showed no statistical difference before and after injection (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Average EMG amplitude and the positive rate of effective EMG amplitude of cisatracurium besylate are all higher than those of vecuronium bromide. With faster effects and shorter action time, cisatracurium besylate is more suitable in thyroid surgery IONM (intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring).
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, General; Atracurium; Electromyography; Female; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Male; Middle Aged; Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; Vecuronium Bromide
PubMed: 28485777
DOI: No ID Found -
Experimental and Clinical... Aug 2017Organ transplant in humans is an established therapy for a variety of end-stage organ diseases. However, due to organ shortages and lack of donors, the need for...
OBJECTIVES
Organ transplant in humans is an established therapy for a variety of end-stage organ diseases. However, due to organ shortages and lack of donors, the need for xenotransplant has gradually increased. Xenotransplantation has great potential to solve many of the problems facing organ transplantation. Pigs are being developed as xenogeneic organ donors for use in humans. In this study, we propose a novel and simple method for tracheal intubation in a swine model using neuromuscular blocking agents and laryngeal mask airway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eight Yorkshire pigs were used for the 2 separate experiments, which were conducted 1 week apart. In the first experiment, an anesthesiologist with no previous comparable experience performed endotracheal intubation of pigs. One week later, using the same pig, a second experiment was performed by an experienced anesthesiologist. Anesthesia was induced with intramuscular injection of a mixture of 1 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun, Bayer Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and 7 mg/kg Zoletil (a mixture of tiletamine hydrochloride and zolazepam hydro-chloride, Virbac Laboratory, Carros, France). The laryngeal mask was then placed, and 0.15 mg/kg vecuronium bromide was injected intravenously. Tracheal intubation was attempted after mask removal. The duration and number of intubation attempts were recorded, and the degree of intubation difficulty was scored.
RESULTS
In all cases, the laryngeal mask was easily inserted, and endotracheal intubation was successfully completed. Oxygen saturation did not fall below 95%, and there were no hypoxemia episodes. Degree of intubation difficulty and duration were not significantly different between the 2 anesthesiologists.
CONCLUSIONS
Tracheal intubation in our swine model was successfully performed using neuromuscular blocking agents and laryngeal masks without resulting in hypoxemia, with even anesthesiologists who are unfamiliar with endotracheal intubation of pigs easily able to do so using our protocol. Therefore, our protocol will enable all investigators to perform successful tracheal intubation in swine models.
Topics: Anesthesia, General; Animals; Female; Injections, Intravenous; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngeal Masks; Learning Curve; Male; Models, Animal; Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; Sus scrofa; Time Factors; Transplantation, Heterologous; Vecuronium Bromide
PubMed: 28447930
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2016.0123