-
International Journal of Molecular... Apr 2023Despite several antidepressant treatments being available in clinics, they are not effective in all patients. In recent years, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been explored... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Chronic N-Acetyl-Cysteine Treatment Enhances the Expression of the Immediate Early Gene in Response to an Acute Challenge in Male Rats: Comparison with the Antidepressant Venlafaxine.
Despite several antidepressant treatments being available in clinics, they are not effective in all patients. In recent years, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been explored as adjunctive therapy for many psychiatric disorders, including depression, for its antioxidant properties. Given the promising efficacy of this compound for the treatment of such pathologies, it is fundamental to investigate, at the preclinical level, the ability of the drug to act in the modulation of neuroplastic mechanisms in basal conditions and during challenging events in order to highlight the potential features of the drug useful for clinical efficacy. To this aim, adult male Wistar rats were treated with the antidepressant venlafaxine (VLX) (10 mg/kg) or NAC (300 mg/kg) for 21 days and then subjected to 1 h of acute restraint stress (ARS). We found that NAC enhanced the expression of several immediate early genes, markers of neuronal plasticity in the ventral and dorsal hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and amygdala, and in particular it mediated the acute-stress-induced upregulation of expression more than VLX. These data suggested the ability of NAC to induce coping strategies to face external challenges, highlighting its potential for the improvement of neuroplastic mechanisms for the promotion of resilience, in particular via the modulation of .
Topics: Animals; Male; Rats; Acetylcysteine; Antidepressive Agents; Genes, Immediate-Early; Rats, Wistar; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 37108481
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087321 -
Behavioural Brain Research Jun 2023Second-generation antidepressants (SGADs) often cause neurological side effects (SEs). This meta-analysis seeks to quantify the short-term rates of neurological SEs... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Second-generation antidepressants (SGADs) often cause neurological side effects (SEs). This meta-analysis seeks to quantify the short-term rates of neurological SEs related to routinely used second-generation antidepressants used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). A search of the PubMed, EMBASE,Cochrane Library databases and Web of Science was done to uncover double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of frequently used SGADs medicines in people with MDD. Qualifying studies were required to concentrate on the use of SGADs routinely used in MDD and to uncover data on treatment-emergent neurological SEs occurring within 12 weeks of therapy. Overall, 143 RCT studies containing 188 treatment arms were included in the meta-analyses. Most SGADs increased the risk of neurological SEs compared to placebo. The least tolerated antidepressants on the neurological tract were desvenlafaxine (OR=1.98; CI 0.85-4.65; p-value=0.12) and venlafaxine (OR=1.15; CI 0.96-1.38; p-value=0.13). Agomelatine, bupropion and vortioxetine exhibited reduced neurological SEs, showing diminished risk in insomnia (OR=0.56; CI 0.36-0.88; p-value=0.01), somnolence (OR=0.46; CI 0.27-0.79; p-value=0.01), vision blurred (OR=0.43; CI 0.19-0.96; p-value=0.04), respectively. Most SGADs did not or just marginally increased the risk of headache compared to placebo. In conclusion, frequently used SGADs demonstrated distinct patterns of neurological SEs, which physicians should consider when prescribing antidepressants to promote treatment adherence and favorable outcomes in patients with MDD.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Bupropion; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37044221
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114431 -
Systematic Reviews Mar 2023Major depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with...
The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine and mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for two separate systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with major depressive disorder worldwide. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that venlafaxine and mirtazapine reduce depressive symptoms, but the effects seem small and may not be important to the average patient. Moreover, previous reviews have not systematically assessed the occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, we aim to investigate the risks of adverse events with venlafaxine or mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder in two separate systematic reviews.
METHODS
This is a protocol for two systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. The assessments of the effects of venlafaxine or mirtazapine will be reported in two separate reviews. The protocol is reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols, risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, clinical significance will be assessed using our eight-step procedure, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We will search for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases and trial registers. Two review authors will independently screen the results from the literature searches, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We will include published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing venlafaxine or mirtazapine with 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes will be suicides or suicide attempts, serious adverse events, and non-serious adverse events. Exploratory outcomes will include depressive symptoms, quality of life, and individual adverse events. If feasible, we will assess the intervention effects using random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses.
DISCUSSION
Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are frequently used as second-line treatment of major depressive disorder worldwide. There is a need for a thorough systematic review to provide the necessary background for weighing the benefits against the harms. This review will ultimately inform best practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022315395.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Mirtazapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Quality of Life; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Review Literature as Topic
PubMed: 36991504
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02221-5 -
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology &... Jul 2023Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder that can emerge after an individual experiences a traumatic event such as physical abuse, sexual/relationship... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder that can emerge after an individual experiences a traumatic event such as physical abuse, sexual/relationship violence, combat exposure, witnessing death, or serious injury. This study aimed to identify the most suitable drugs for the management of PTSD based on a network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
Six databases (Ovid Medline, EMBase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Ovid Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 6, 2022.
RESULTS
Thirty articles with a total of 5170 participants were included. Compared with placebo, active drugs including olanzapine (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.13), risperidone (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.03), quetiapine (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.04), venlafaxine (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.16), sertraline (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.11), paroxetine (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.36) and fluoxetine (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.12), significantly reduced the total clinician-administered PTSD scale score.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study support the use of paroxetine, venlafaxine, and quetiapine as first-line treatment for PTSD. In addition, quetiapine is recommended for patients with PTSD affected by symptoms of hyperarousal and re-experience disorder. Clinicians should prescribe medications based on the severity of PTSD symptoms and other conditions to develop the best treatment strategy for this patient population.
Topics: Humans; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Paroxetine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 36934999
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110754 -
Neuropsychobiology 2023Currently, major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment plans are based on trial-and-error, and remission rates remain low. A strategy to replace trial-and-error and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
Currently, major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment plans are based on trial-and-error, and remission rates remain low. A strategy to replace trial-and-error and increase remission rates could be treatment stratification. We explored the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) as a biomarker for treatment stratification to either antidepressant medication or rTMS treatment.
METHODS
Two datasets were analyzed: (1) the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D; n = 1,008 MDD patients, randomized to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine, and n = 336 healthy controls) and (2) a multi-site, open-label rTMS study (n = 196). The primary outcome measure was remission. Cardiac field artifacts were removed from the baseline EEG using independent component analysis (ICA). The HEP-peak was detected in a bandwidth of 20 ms around 8 ms and 270 ms (N8, N270) after the R-peak of the electrocardiogram signal. Differences between remitters and non-remitters were statistically assessed by repeated-measures ANOVAs for electrodes Fp1, Cz, and Oz.
RESULTS
In the venlafaxine subgroup, remitters showed a lower HEP around the N8 peak than non-remitters on electrode site Cz (p = 0.004; d = 0.497). The rTMS group showed a non-significant difference in the opposite direction (d = -0.051). Retrospective stratification to one of the treatments based on the HEP resulted in enhanced treatment outcome prediction for venlafaxine (+22.98%) and rTMS (+10.66%).
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that the HEP could be used as a stratification biomarker between venlafaxine and rTMS; however, future out-of-sample replication is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Depressive Disorder, Major; Citalopram; Heart Rate; Retrospective Studies; Evoked Potentials; Treatment Outcome; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36927872
DOI: 10.1159/000529308 -
Journal of Hazardous Materials Apr 2023Pharmaceutical compounds and their metabolites are found in natural and wastewater. However, investigation of their toxic effects on aquatic animals has been neglected,...
Pharmaceutical compounds and their metabolites are found in natural and wastewater. However, investigation of their toxic effects on aquatic animals has been neglected, especially for metabolites. This work investigated the effects of the main metabolites of carbamazepine, venlafaxine and tramadol. Zebrafish embryos were exposed (0.1-100 µg/L) for 168hpf exposures to each metabolite (carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, 10,11-dihydrocarbamazepine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, N-desmethylvenlafaxine, O-desmethyltramadol, N-desmethyltramadol) or the parental compound. A concentration-response relationship was found for the effects of some embryonic malformations. Carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, O-desmethylvenlafaxine and tramadol elicited the highest malformation rates. All compounds significantly decreased larvae responses on a sensorimotor assay compared to controls. Altered expression was found for most of the 32 tested genes. In particular, abcc1, abcc2, abcg2a, nrf2, pparg and raraa were found to be affected by all three drug groups. For each group, the modelled expression patterns showed differences in expression between parental compounds and metabolites. Potential biomarkers of exposure were identified for the venlafaxine and carbamazepine groups. These results are worrying, indicating that such contamination in aquatic systems may put natural populations at significant risk. Furthermore, metabolites represent a real risk that needs more scrutinising by the scientific community.
Topics: Animals; Carbamazepine; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Epoxy Compounds; Larva; Tramadol; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Zebrafish
PubMed: 36860067
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130909 -
Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford,... Apr 2023Dyslipidaemia is an important cardiovascular risk factor for people with severe mental illness, contributing to premature mortality. The link between antipsychotics and...
BACKGROUND
Dyslipidaemia is an important cardiovascular risk factor for people with severe mental illness, contributing to premature mortality. The link between antipsychotics and dyslipidaemia is well established, while evidence on antidepressants is mixed.
AIMS
To investigate if antidepressant/antipsychotic use was associated with lipid parameters in UK Biobank participants and if and genetic variation plays a role.
METHODS
Review of self-reported prescription medications identified participants taking antidepressants/antipsychotics. Total, low-, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (L/HDL-C) and triglycerides derived from blood samples. and metabolic phenotypes were assigned from genetic data. Linear regression investigated aims, adjusted for key covariates.
RESULTS
Of 469,739 participants, 36,043 took antidepressants (53% female, median age 58, 17% taking cholesterol-lowering medications) and 3255 took antipsychotics (58% female, median age 57, 27% taking cholesterol-lowering medications). Significant associations were found between use of each amitriptyline, fluoxetine, citalopram/escitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine and venlafaxine with higher total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides and lower HDL-C, compared to participants not taking each medication. Venlafaxine was associated with the worst lipid profile (total cholesterol, adjusted mean difference: 0.21 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17 to 0.26, < 0.001). Antipsychotic use was significantly associated with lower HDL-C and higher triglycerides. In participants taking sertraline, intermediate metabolisers had higher HDL-C (0.05 mmol/L, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.09, = 0.007) and lower triglycerides (-0.17 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.05, = 0.007), compared to normal metabolisers.
CONCLUSIONS
Antidepressants were significantly associated with adverse lipid profiles, potentially warranting baseline and regular monitoring. Further research should investigate the mechanistic pathways underlying the protective effects of the intermediate metaboliser phenotype on HDL-C and triglycerides in people taking sertraline.
Topics: Female; Male; Animals; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Sertraline; Antipsychotic Agents; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Antidepressive Agents; Triglycerides; Cholesterol; United Kingdom
PubMed: 36772859
DOI: 10.1177/02698811231152748 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2023The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of a solar photocatalytic process using g-CN as photocatalyst on the degradation of pharmaceutical compounds...
The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of a solar photocatalytic process using g-CN as photocatalyst on the degradation of pharmaceutical compounds detected in hospital wastewater treatment plant secondary effluents. A compound parabolic collector pilot plant, established in the secondary effluent stream of the Ioannina city hospital wastewater treatment plant, was used for the photocatalytic experiments. The analysis of the samples before and after the photocatalytic treatment was accomplished using solid phase extraction (SPE), followed by UHPLC-LTQ/Orbitrap HRMS. Initial effluent characterization revealed the presence of ten pharmaceutical compounds. Among these, amisulpride, O-desmethyl venlafaxine, venlafaxine and carbamazepine were detected in all experiments. Initial concentrations ranged from 73 ng L for citalopram to 2924.53 ng L for O-desmethyl venlafaxine. The evolution of BOD and COD values were determined before and after the photocatalytic treatment. All detected pharmaceuticals were removed in percentages higher than 54% at an optimum catalyst loading ranging between 200 and 300 mg L. The potential of the catalyst to be reused without any treatment for two consecutive cycles was studied, showing a significant efficiency decrease.
Topics: Waste Disposal, Fluid; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Hospitals; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Pharmaceutical Preparations
PubMed: 36770837
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031170 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is challenging for clinicians, and many clinical trials and meta-analyses on CIPN are controversial....
Treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is challenging for clinicians, and many clinical trials and meta-analyses on CIPN are controversial. There are also few comparisons of the efficacy among drugs used to treat CIPN. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to study the efficacy of drugs in treating CIPN using existing randomized controlled trials. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving any pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination therapy of treating CIPN. Seventeen RCTs investigating 16 drug categories, duloxetine, pregabalin, crocin, tetrodotoxin, venlafaxine, monosialotetrahexosyl ganglioside (GM1), lamotrigine, KA (ketamine and amitriptyline) cream, nortriptyline, amitriptyline, topical (bitter apple) oil, BAK (baclofen, amitriptyline hydrochloride, and ketamine) pluronic lecithin organogel, gabapentin, and acetyl l-carnitine (ALC), in the treatment of CIPN were retrieved. Many of the included RCTs consisted of small sample sizes and short follow-up periods. It was difficult to quantify due to the highly variable nature of outcome indicators. Duloxetine, venlafaxine, pregabalin, crocin, tetrodotoxin, and monosialotetrahexosyl ganglioside exhibited some beneficial effects in treating CIPN. Duloxetine, GM1, and crocin showed moderate benefits based on the evidence review, while lamotrigine, KA cream, nortriptyline, amitriptyline, and topical (bitter apple) oil were not beneficial. Further studies were necessary to confirm the efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of CIPN because of the controversy of efficacy of gabapentin. Furthermore, BAK topicalcompound analgesic gel only had a tendency to improve the CIPN symptoms, but the difference was not statistically significant. ALC might result in worsening CIPN. Most studies were not of good quality because of small sample sizes. Therefore, standardized randomized controlled trials with large samples were needed to critically assess the effectiveness of these drugs in treating CIPN in the future.
PubMed: 36618919
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1080888 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023Antidepressant medications are used by increasing numbers of pregnant women. The evidence on the relationship between antidepressant use during pregnancy and the risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Antidepressant medications are used by increasing numbers of pregnant women. The evidence on the relationship between antidepressant use during pregnancy and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is inconsistent. We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the GDM risk associated with antidepressant exposure during pregnancy.
METHODS
We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases until December 2021. We sought observational studies assessing the association between gestational antidepressant use and GDM.
RESULTS
Five observational studies were included in the analysis. Mothers exposed to antidepressants during pregnancy were at a significantly increased risk for GDM (relative risk [RR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.30; < .001). However, after considering confounding by indication, we observed no significant effect of antidepressant use during pregnancy on the risk of GDM (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1-1.28; = .054; = 0%). Independent of clinical indication, subgroup analysis based on individual antidepressants suggested that the risk was increased by venlafaxine or amitriptyline use, but not by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS
The significant association between antidepressant exposure during pregnancy and GDM may be overestimated due to confounding by indication. However, the evidence remains insufficient, particularly for specific drug classes.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Diabetes, Gestational; Antidepressive Agents; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Amitriptyline
PubMed: 36599445
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2162817