-
United European Gastroenterology Journal Feb 2024Several studies have reported large increases in the incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in the last 20 years. We aimed to systematically review the incidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several studies have reported large increases in the incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in the last 20 years. We aimed to systematically review the incidence and prevalence of EoE, focused on all European countries.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis up to 31 December 2022, based on PubMed, CINAHL and extensive hand searching of reference lists. Twenty-five eligible studies were identified and included.
RESULTS
For both adults and children, the highest EoE incidence and prevalence have been reported from regional studies in Spain. EoE incidence for both adults and children was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in nationwide studies (meta-analysis = 3.64 per 100,000 person-years overall) compared with regional or centre-based studies (7.16). EoE incidence and prevalence were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in adults than children. All studies that reported on longitudinal trends in EoE incidence showed increases over time, more markedly during more recent years. Larger increases in incidence tend to refer to regional rather than nationwide studies; from Spain, Switzerland and Denmark, both for paediatric and adult age groups. Increases in EoE incidence 100,000 person-years were larger than for incidence per number of diagnostic endoscopies. The most frequently reported co-morbidities in adults were rhinitis, followed by asthma, food allergy and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and in children, erosive oesophagitis, asthma, food allergy and rhinitis.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of EoE has increased in Europe over the last 30 years, exceeding increases in the volume of oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies performed. The patchy and low incidence and prevalence of EoE generally in Europe and compared with North America, may reflect a lack of clinical awareness and research focus rather than a genuinely low incidence of EoE. A co-ordinated Europe-wide study that uses standardised methodology is urgently needed to provide a comprehensive picture of EoE incidence and prevalence across Europe.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Prevalence; Incidence; Europe; Food Hypersensitivity; Asthma; Rhinitis; Enteritis; Eosinophilia; Gastritis
PubMed: 37921701
DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12465 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Dec 2016Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are often used to diagnose laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and monitor treatment outcomes in clinical and research settings. The... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are often used to diagnose laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and monitor treatment outcomes in clinical and research settings. The present systematic review was designed to identify currently available LPR-related PRO measures and to evaluate each measure's instrument development, validation, and applicability.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE via PubMed interface, CINAHL, and Health and Psychosocial Instrument databases were searched with relevant vocabulary and key terms related to PRO measures and LPR.
REVIEW METHODS
Three investigators independently performed abstract review and full text review, applying a previously developed checklist to critically assess measurement properties of each study meeting inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Of 4947 studies reviewed, 7 LPR-related PRO measures (publication years, 1991-2010) met criteria for extraction and analysis. Two focused on globus and throat symptoms. Remaining measures were designed to assess LPR symptoms and monitor treatment outcomes in patients. None met all checklist criteria. Only 2 of 7 used patient input to devise item content, and 2 of 7 assessed responsiveness to change. Thematic deficiencies in current LPR-related measures are inadequately demonstrated: content validity, construct validity, plan for interpretation, and literacy level assessment.
CONCLUSION
Laryngopharyngeal reflux is often diagnosed according to symptoms. Currently available LPR-related PRO measures used to symptomatically identify suspected LPR patients have disparate developmental rigor and important methodological deficiencies. Care should be exercised to understand the measurement characteristics and contextual relevance before applying these PRO measures for clinical, research, or quality initiatives.
Topics: Checklist; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 27554511
DOI: 10.1177/0194599816664330 -
The Laryngoscope Sep 2019To investigate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the development of benign lesions of the vocal folds (BLVF).
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in the development of benign lesions of the vocal folds (BLVF).
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched by three independent investigators for articles published between January 1990 and November 2018 providing substantial information about the role of LPR in the development of nodules, polyps, cysts, Reinke's edema, and sulcus vocalis. Inclusion, exclusion, diagnostic criteria and clinical outcome evaluation of included studies were analyzed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.
RESULTS
Of the 155 relevant publications, 42 studies were included. Thirty-five were clinical studies and seven were experimental research studying the impact of reflux on vocal fold tissue. Only seven clinical studies utilized objective LPR diagnoses (pH monitoring), suggesting an association between LPR and the development of nodules, polyps, and Reinke's edema. These studies were characterized by a substantial heterogeneity due to discrepancies in inclusion/exclusion criteria, diagnostic methods, and clinical outcome evaluation. The few basic science studies on this topic support that LPR creates an environment that may predispose to BLVF through changes in defense mechanisms of the vocal folds, cell-to-cell dehiscence, inflammatory reaction of the vocal folds, and reaction to phonotrauma.
CONCLUSIONS
Caustic mucosal injury from LPR could cause increased susceptibility of the vocal fold mucosa to injury and subsequent formation of nodules, polyps, or Reinke's edema. However, the heterogeneity and the low number of high-quality studies limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Future clinical and experimental studies are needed to better identify the role of reflux in development of BLVF. Laryngoscope, 129:E329-E341, 2019.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Laryngeal Diseases; Laryngeal Edema; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; Polyps; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Vocal Cords
PubMed: 30892725
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27932 -
BMC Gastroenterology Sep 2020Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which leads to acid reflux into the esophagus, is a common gastrointestinal disorder. Several studies have shown the prevalence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which leads to acid reflux into the esophagus, is a common gastrointestinal disorder. Several studies have shown the prevalence of GERD in Iranian population, but their evidence is contradictory. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the epidemiology of GERD in Iran.
METHODS
The entire steps of this systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the MOOSE protocol, and the results were reported accordance with the PRISMA guideline. This review is registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020142861). To find potentially relevant published articles, comprehensive search was done on international online databases Scopus, Science Direct, EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Iranian online databases and the Google Scholar search engine in June 2019. Cochran test and I index were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software ver. 2. The significance level of the test was considered to be P < 0.05.
RESULTS
The daily, weekly, monthly, and overall prevalence of GERD symptoms in Iranian population was 5.64% (95%CI [confidence interval]: 3.77-8.35%; N = 66,398), 12.50% (95%CI: 9.63-16.08%; N = 110,388), 18.62% (95%CI: 12.90-26.12%; N = 70,749) and 43.07% (95%CI: 35.00-51.53%; N = 73,189), respectively. The daily, weekly, monthly, and overall prevalence of heartburn in Iranian population was 2.46% (95%CI: 0.93-6.39%; N = 18,774), 9.52% (95%CI: 6.16-14.41%; N = 54,125), 8.19% (95%CI: 2.42-24.30%; N = 19,363) and 23.20% (95%CI: 13.56-36.79%; N = 26,543), respectively. The daily, weekly, monthly, and overall prevalence of regurgitation in Iranian population was 4.00% (95%CI: 1.88-8.32%; N = 18,774), 9.79% (95%CI: 5.99-15.60%; N = 41,140), 13.76% (95%CI: 6.18-44.31%; N = 19,363) and 36.53% (95%CI: 19.30-58.08%; N = 21,174), respectively. The sensitivity analysis for prevalence of all types GERD, heartburn and regurgitation symptoms by removing a study showed that the overall estimate is still robust.
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis provides comprehensive and useful information on the epidemiology of GERD in Iran for policy-makers and health care providers. This study showed a high prevalence of GERD in Iran. Therefore, effective measures on GERD-related factors such as lifestyle can be among the health policies of Iran.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Heartburn; Humans; Iran; Prevalence
PubMed: 32928126
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01417-6 -
Jornal de Pediatria 2020Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux....
OBJECTIVE
Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.
METHODS
Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility.
RESULTS
Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Electric Impedance; Esophageal pH Monitoring; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 32119822
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.01.005 -
Clujul Medical (1957) Oct 2018The growing interest reflected in the studies on dental erosion is justified by the severe health problems it entails, i.e. esthetic, phonetic, masticatory disturbances... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
The growing interest reflected in the studies on dental erosion is justified by the severe health problems it entails, i.e. esthetic, phonetic, masticatory disturbances and pulp complications. Most studies investigate the prevalence of dental erosion in adults and children, the severity of lesions and etiopathogenetic factors.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Dental erosions (DE) are one of the extraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An increasing amount of papers shed light on this topic. We carried out a systematic review on the association between GERD and DE.
METHODS
We studied the association between DE and GERD in adults and children. The search for published studies was performed in PubMed using search terms "dental erosion" and "gastro-esophageal reflux disease". References published since 2007 were included and a systematic review was carried out. Articles not assessing DE in GERD patients were excluded, and also case presentations and articles in languages of limited circulation. The prevalence of DE in patients with GERD, extrinsic and intrinsic etiological factors of DE and the severity of dental erosion lesions were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 273 articles were found, 10 studies being retained for analysis. Correlations between DE and GERD, namely the prevalence and severity of dental erosion in GERD patients, were investigated. DE prevalence was between 10.6% - 42%, median 25.5%. Mean values of DE prevalence were 48.81% in GERD patients, compared to 20.48% in non-GERD controls. Comparative values of DE frequency in adults with GERD was 38.96%, compared to 98.1% in children with GERD.
CONCLUSIONS
DE is a condition associated with GERD. DE prevalence is higher in GERD patients. Intrinsic pathogenetic factors with direct action on the hard dental tissues are GERD, while extrinsic factors are represented by diet. Among the patients diagnosed with GERD, youth under the age of 18 had a higher frequency compared to adults.
PubMed: 30564013
DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-1017 -
The Laryngoscope May 2019To investigate the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the epidemiological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the epidemiological factors of heterogeneity in the literature.
METHODS
An electronic literature search was conducted to identify articles published between 1990 and 2018 about clinical trials describing the efficiency of medical treatment(s) on LPR. First, a meta-analysis of placebo randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PPIs versus placebo was conducted according to diet. The heterogeneity, response to PPIs, and evolution of clinical scores were analyzed for aggregate results. Second, a systematic review of diagnosis methods, clinical outcome of treatment, and therapeutic regimens was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
RESULTS
The search identified 1,140 relevant publications, of which 72 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 5,781 patients. Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The combined relative risk was 1.31 in favor of PPIs and increased to 1.42 when patients did not receive diet recommendations. Randomized controlled trials were characterized by a significant heterogeneity due to discrepancies in clinical therapeutic outcomes, diagnosis methods (lack of gold standard diagnostic tools), and therapeutic scheme. The epidemiological analysis of all articles supports the existence of these discrepancies in the entire literature. In particular, many symptoms and signs commonly encountered in LPR are not assessed in the treatment effectiveness. The lack of diagnosis precision and variability of inclusion criteria particularly create bias in all reported and included articles.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis supports a mild superiority of PPIs over placebo and the importance of diet as additional treatment but demonstrates the heterogeneity between studies, limiting the elaboration of clear conclusions. International recommendations are proposed for the development of future trials. Laryngoscope, 129:1174-1187, 2019.
Topics: Humans; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30597577
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27591 -
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology 2022Endoscopic treatments are increasingly being offered for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Three procedures have similar concepts and techniques:... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic treatments are increasingly being offered for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Three procedures have similar concepts and techniques: antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS), antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA), and antireflux band ligation (ARBL); we have collectively termed them antireflux mucosal intervention (ARMI). Here, we systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes and technical aspects.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to October 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate. The secondary outcomes were acid exposure time, DeMeester score, need for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), endoscopic findings, and adverse events.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies were included. The pooled clinical success rate was 73.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 69%-78%) overall, 68.6% (95% CI = 62.2%-74.4%) with ARMS, 86.7% (95% CI = 78.7%-91.9%) with ARMA, and 76.5% (95% CI = 65%-85.1%) with ARBL. ARMI resulted in significantly improved acid exposure time, DeMeester score, and degree of hiatal hernia. Furthermore, 10% of patients had dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation after ARMS or ARMA, and ARMS was associated with a 2.2% perforation rate. By contrast, no bleeding, perforation, or severe dysphagia was noted with ARBL. Severe hiatal hernia (Hill grade III) may predict treatment failure with ARMA.
CONCLUSIONS
The three ARMI procedures were efficacious and safe for PPI-refractory GERD. ARMA and ARBL may be preferred over ARMS because of fewer adverse events and similar efficacy. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal technique and patient selection.
PubMed: 35509424
DOI: 10.1177/17562848221094959 -
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia... 2019Several oral problems may be perceived in individuals who were submitted to bariatric surgery, due to metabolic and behavioral changes relative to diet and oral hygiene....
INTRODUCTION
Several oral problems may be perceived in individuals who were submitted to bariatric surgery, due to metabolic and behavioral changes relative to diet and oral hygiene. Tooth wear appears to suffer impact after bariatric surgery, because there may be an increase in gastroesophageal reflux.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the literature regarding the impact of bariatric surgery on gastroesophageal reflux and tooth wear.
METHOD
The following databases were accessed by two independent, calibrated examiners: PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, Scielo and Cochrane using the following descriptors: "bariatric surgery" AND "dental erosion" OR "bariatric surgery" AND "dental erosion" AND "gastroesophageal reflux disease". After excluding duplicate studies, 12 studies were initially evaluated by the title and abstract. The excluded studies were those without relevance to the present research, literature review studies and case reports. Thus, four articles were included in this study. All the articles evaluated indicated high association between gastroesophageal reflux and tooth wear in patients submitted to bariatric surgery. Association of these outcomes was more evident six months after the surgical procedure.
CONCLUSION
Patients submitted to bariatric surgery showed higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and tooth wear.
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Tooth Wear
PubMed: 31859919
DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1466 -
Cureus Sep 2023Achalasia, a neurodegenerative disease caused by the progressive destruction of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus, is accompanied by incomplete relaxation of the... (Review)
Review
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Postoperative Outcomes Between Peroral Esophageal Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy With Fundoplication: A Systematic Review.
Achalasia, a neurodegenerative disease caused by the progressive destruction of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus, is accompanied by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) coupled with fundoplication has been the gold standard procedure for achalasia. Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) has recently gained popularity as it is minimally invasive, has fewer adverse events, and has excellent short-term outcomes. So, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, and postoperative outcomes between LHM and POEM. We did a systematic review by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for 2020 and exploring research databases such as PUBMED and PMC Central, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. After appropriate screenings, articles relevant to the review were scrutinized based on the eligibility criteria. Quality assessment tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) were used to finalize the articles. A total of 11 articles (seven observational studies, two RCTs, and two systematic reviews) were included in the review after a quality check. The study included 2127 patients, classified into 981 for POEM and 1146 for LHM, who had undergone treatment for achalasia. Most of the studies had a follow-up of ≤ two years. Comparing efficacy, POEM had similar results to LHM in terms of Eckardt scores. However, abnormal DeMeester scores were found in POEM. Adverse events were significantly higher in LHM when compared to POEM in terms of safety. Peroral esophageal myotomy also stood out as having a shorter procedure time, a shorter hospital stay, and lesser odds of being a clinical failure. As for postoperative outcomes, despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors, LHM was more effective in preventing the development of esophagitis compared to POEM due to partial fundoplication.Postoperative reflux and the development of esophagitis remain certain with POEM and need to be followed up with more studies with longer follow-ups. However, POEM still stands as a better choice compared to LHM in terms of efficacy and safety.
PubMed: 37818506
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44877