-
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2022To present scientific evidence, based on a systematic review of the literature, on the benefit of brainstem implants in auditory rehabilitation and language development... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To present scientific evidence, based on a systematic review of the literature, on the benefit of brainstem implants in auditory rehabilitation and language development in children.
METHODS
A systematic search was used to identify studies that contain information about the benefit of brainstem implants in the auditory rehabilitation and language development of children. The review was conducted based on a structured literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The search was carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, using the combination "Auditory brainstem implants" AND "Pediatric", without restriction of language, period, and location. The quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools.
RESULTS
Regarding hearing, children with brainstem implants showed sound detection, access to most speech sounds, basic auditory perception skills, recognition of ambient sounds, recognition of some frequently used words and phrases, in addition to some closed-set word discrimination capability. Expressive and comprehensive language were identified in children using auditory brainstem implants, increasing significantly in the short and long terms in most cases; however, in some of the children, such skills remained stable.
CONCLUSION
The auditory brainstem implant can be considered an effective alternative for children with cochlear malformation and/or auditory nerve deficiency and for those who cannot benefit from cochlear implant surgery.
Topics: Child; Humans; Deafness; Auditory Brain Stem Implants; Cochlear Implantation; Language Development; Cochlear Implants; Hearing; Brain Stem; Speech Perception
PubMed: 36088255
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.07.004 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Feb 2022As the population ages and implantation criteria are relaxed, more patients with complex comorbidities are becoming eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). These... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
As the population ages and implantation criteria are relaxed, more patients with complex comorbidities are becoming eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). These patients have higher risks associated with general anesthesia. This systematic review assesses outcomes and complications following CI under local anesthetic to examine utility for patients deemed not suitable or at high risk for general anesthesia.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no limitations on year of publication or language.
RESULTS
Then, 132 unique were identified. After screening abstracts and full texts for eligibility criteria a total of 18 articles were included. In the nine studies where audiological data were reported, all patients demonstrated improvement in audiological outcomes following implantation under local anesthetic (LA). Only minor complications of transient vertigo, wound infection, facial nerve paralysis, confusion, and tinnitus were reported but all were transient. Meta-analysis showed surgical time was significantly shorter under LA.
CONCLUSIONS
CI under LA is safe for patients with comorbidities which preclude them from general anesthesia, with minimal complications and an improved cost-effectiveness profile. However, larger scale, robust trials are required to assess this further.
PubMed: 35155802
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.720 -
Neuro-oncology Practice Aug 2021Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are tumors of the cerebellopontine angle with significant morbidity, causing hearing loss, tinnitus, and trigeminal and facial nerve... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are tumors of the cerebellopontine angle with significant morbidity, causing hearing loss, tinnitus, and trigeminal and facial nerve compromise. An effective alternative to microsurgical resection is stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which can be delivered in either single-fraction (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hSRT) (3-5 treatments) regimens. It remains unclear which fractionation regimen provides superior outcomes.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for studies either comparing hSRT with SRS or focusing on hSRT alone in treating VS. Primary endpoints included tumor control, serviceable hearing, tinnitus, and cranial nerve V and VII symptoms. A random-effects analysis was employed to compare pre- and post-treatment effects (hSRT alone) or SRS and hSRT outcomes (two-arm studies).
RESULTS
This analysis included 21 studies focusing on hSRT alone and 13 studies comparing SRS and hSRT. Significant heterogeneity was observed. Overall, when hSRT was analyzed alone, crude tumor control was achieved in 94% (95% CI: 88%, 99%) of 1571 patients. There was no difference between pre- and post-treatment odds ratios (OR) of tinnitus, facial, or trigeminal impairment. Serviceable hearing was diminished following hSRT (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.83). Comparison with SRS showed no difference with respect to tumor control, serviceable hearing, trigeminal or facial nerve impairment.
CONCLUSIONS
hSRT achieved excellent tumor control and, with the exception of serviceable hearing, did not result in worse post-treatment cranial nerve symptomatology. Analysis of comparative studies between hSRT and SRS did not reveal any significant difference in either tumor control or treatment morbidities.
PubMed: 34277018
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab009 -
Neurosurgery Jun 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.
METHODS
Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Hearing; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36735500
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002354 -
Cureus Nov 2023The facial nerve is the seventh of 12 cranial nerves found in the head and neck region that facilitates several nerve fibers and pathways to perform various functions.... (Review)
Review
The facial nerve is the seventh of 12 cranial nerves found in the head and neck region that facilitates several nerve fibers and pathways to perform various functions. Iatrogenic facial nerve injury during surgeries of the head and neck is common, ranging from 4-6%, particularly in procedures that involve mobilization or resection of associated anatomical structures. Any injury to the facial nerve or its branches impacts the quality of life and patient satisfaction as the degree of iatrogenic injury may result in partial or complete facial nerve paralysis. Of the various implementable techniques available to avoid injury, electromyography (EMG) has recently been widely used to monitor facial nerve function intraoperatively to determine the degree of injury and predict postoperative weakness. The purpose of this study was to analyze and review existing scientific literature in determining the role of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) with EMG in decreasing the incidence and degree of intraoperative facial nerve injury among commonly performed surgeries involving the facial nerve. A systematic review was conducted from articles published between September 2006 and December 2022. Suitable articles were identified from the MEDLINE/PubMed databases using relevant terms to meet the inclusion criteria. Articles were subsequently coded based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria as well as the type of surgery performed with concurrent use of EMG and the results from intraoperative monitoring. A total of 47 articles were found in relation to the use of IFNM, including studies to reduce the incidence and determine preventative measures to decrease nerve injury. Eleven articles were used to evaluate the use of EMG during various head and neck surgeries in decreasing the incidence of intraoperative facial nerve injury. Sources found were primarily divided based on the type of surgery performed when determining the use of EMG. Four sources tested the efficacy of EMG during parotidectomy, four sources during vestibular schwannoma resection, two sources during cochlear implant surgeries, and one during a lymphatic malformation surgery. IFNM also decreased the duration of surgery, the severity of facial nerve palsy, and the average time of facial nerve paralysis recovery. IFNM was found to not significantly predict facial nerve injury in the setting of intraoperative nerve injury but tended to preserve potential facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma cases. The surgical setting determined the efficacy and use of IFNM in decreasing the incidence of facial nerve weakness and paralysis. IFNM had the best preventative and prognostic value when used in vestibular schwannoma resection, and the least in cochlear implants, with mixed evidence seen in the setting of parotidectomy. Overall, IFNM using EMG as an adjunct during surgery may reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury; however, additional studies must be performed to determine the degree of long-term patient satisfaction and quality of life achieved in the setting of IFNM.
PubMed: 38060739
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48367 -
Neurosurgical Review Jul 2023Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.
METHODS
We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.
RESULTS
Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high asĀ 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Proton Therapy; Hearing; Cranial Nerves; Facial Nerve; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37402894
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02060-x -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery May 2023Secondary trigeminal neuralgia is a facial pain in trigeminal nerve dermatome caused by an underlying disease, such as cerebellopontine angle tumours. Treatment options... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Secondary trigeminal neuralgia is a facial pain in trigeminal nerve dermatome caused by an underlying disease, such as cerebellopontine angle tumours. Treatment options to relieve the pains were surgical tumour resection and stereotactic radiosurgery of the tumour or trigeminal nerve. This study aims to review the efficacy of open surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery and recommend the treatment of choice for secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to cerebellopontine angle tumours.
METHOD
The inclusion criteria were studies covering patients with trigeminal neuralgia associated with cerebellopontine angle tumours that were treated with either open surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and reported pain outcomes after treatment. Non-English articles or studies with a population of less than five were excluded. We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Ebscohost, and Cochrane Library from inception until December 20, 2021. Several works of literature from manual search were also added. Selected articles were appraised using a critical appraisal tool for prognostic studies.
RESULT
Included articles were 26 retrospective studies and one prospective study comprising 517 patients. Of 127 schwannomas, 226 epidermoids, 154 meningiomas, and ten other tumours, 320 cases received surgical tumour excision with or without MVD, 196 had tumour-targeted radiosurgery, and 22 underwent nerve-targeted radiosurgery. In surgical series, 92.2 % gained pain improvement, 2.8 % were unchanged, and 4.5 % had recurrence; none of the patients had worsened outcomes. In cases treated with tumour-targeted radiosurgery, the improvement rate was 79.1 %, unchanged at 14.3 %, recurrence at 26.5 %, and worse symptoms rate after the intervention was 6.6 %. Six patients with recurrent pain after tumour-targeted radiosurgery received secondary nerve-targeted radiosurgery with improved outcomes. Only one patient in our review underwent primary nerve-targeted radiosurgery, and the result was satisfactory. One study treated 15 patients with a single session of tumour-targeted and nerve-targeted radiosurgery, with an improvement rate of 93.3 % and a recurrence rate of 21.4 %.
CONCLUSION
Open surgery releasing the nerve root from compressive lesions is advocated to be the first-line treatment to gain satisfactory outcomes. Total removal surgery is recommended if possible. Nerve-targeted radiosurgery should be reserved as a secondary treatment for recurrent cases.
Topics: Humans; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Facial Pain; Meningeal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37001475
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107683 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Oct 2023To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different management strategies used for reducing and resolving FNS.
DATA SOURCE
Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) of the World Health Organization (WHO).
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) on studies that reported FNS as a complication after CI. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was used to identify the relevant articles. We extracted the data on the prevalence of FNS after CI activation, the reported grades, and the management strategies. The number of associated electrodes; cause of deafness; co-anomalies; and duration of hearing loss and their relationships with FNS were also studied.
RESULTS
Twenty-one relevant articles were included in this review. The prevalence of FNS among the CI populations was 5.29% (175/3306 patients). Among those whose ages were reported, 58.3% (95/163) were adults, and 41.7% (68/163) were pediatrics. Modifying the different fitting parameters was the most used strategy, as it successfully resolved FNS in 85.5% of the patients (142/166). The second commonly used management strategy was surgical intervention (reimplantation or explantation), which was reported in seven studies for 23 patients.
CONCLUSION
FNS after CI activation could be controlled and resolved with many advances that range from readjusting the fitting parameters to surgical intervention. However, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of each management strategy and its impact on patients' performance. Our findings demonstrate that CI recipients with FNS could still benefit from the CI devices and their FNS could be controlled.
PubMed: 37899846
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1121 -
Chinese Medicine Sep 2023Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is one of the main illnesses afflicting the aged population and has a significant negative impact on society, economy, and health.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is one of the main illnesses afflicting the aged population and has a significant negative impact on society, economy, and health. However, there is presently no appropriate therapeutic treatment of ARHL due to the absence of comprehensive trials.
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this review is to systematically evaluate and analyze recent statistics on the pathologic classifications, risk factors, treatment strategies, and drug candidates of ARHL, including that from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), to provide potential new approaches for preventing and treating ARHL.
METHODS
Literature related to ARHL was conducted in databases such as PubMed, WOS, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang from the establishment of the database to Jan, 2023. The pathology, causal factor, pathophysiological mechanism, treatment strategy, and the drug candidate of ARHL were extracted and pooled for synthesis.
RESULTS
Many hypotheses about the etiology of ARHL are based on genetic and environmental elements. Most of the current research on the pathology of ARHL focuses on oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, cochlear blood flow, ion homeostasis, etc. In TCM, herbs belonging to the kidney, lung, and liver meridians exhibit good hearing protection. Seven herbs belonging to the kidney meridian, 9 belonging to the lung meridian, and 4 belonging to the liver meridian were ultimately retrieved in this review, such as Polygonum multiflorum Thunb., Panax ginseng C.A. Mey, and Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi. Their active compounds, 2,3,4',5-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-D-glucoside, ginsenoside Rb1, and puerarin, may act as the molecular substance for their anti-ARHL efficacy, and show anti-oxidative, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, or mitochondrial protective effects.
CONCLUSION
Anti-oxidants, modulators of mitochondrial function, anti-inflammation agents, vasodilators, K channel openers, Ca channel blockers, JNK inhibitors, and nerve growth factors/neurotrophic factors all contribute to hearing protection, and herbs are an important source of potential anti-ARHL drugs.
PubMed: 37730634
DOI: 10.1186/s13020-023-00825-6 -
Neuro-oncology Practice Aug 2021Large vestibular schwannomas (VS) pose a treatment challenge for both microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Technical developments have allowed for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Large vestibular schwannomas (VS) pose a treatment challenge for both microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Technical developments have allowed for safer irradiation of large tumors. It remains unclear if SRS can achieve appropriate tumor control and acceptable cranial nerve toxicities. In this study, we assess outcomes of irradiation for large VS.
METHODS
PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for all the studies assessing SRS outcome in large VS. Primary endpoints included clinical and radiographic tumor control, need for salvage surgery, serviceable hearing, cranial nerve V and VII impairment, presence of hydrocephalus requiring shunting, and presence of vertigo/dizziness.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were identified that met selection criteria for analysis from an initial pool of 1272 reports. They were evaluated according to treatment protocol: 1) single-dose SRS (13 studies, 483 patients), 2) combination of MS and SRS (7 studies, 182 patients), and 3) fractionated SRS (3 studies, 82 patients). Tumor control was achieved in 89%, 94%, and 91% of patients, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) of post- over pretreatment serviceable hearing were 0.42 ( < .01), 0.47 ( = .05), and 0.60 ( = .22); for facial nerve impairment, these ORs were 1.08 ( = .69), 3.45 ( = .28), and 0.87 ( = .71), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The management of large VS remains challenging. All treatment modalities resulted in high tumor control rates and worsening of pretreatment hearing. None, however, caused significant facial nerve impairment, suggesting that management strategies incorporating focal irradiation can be successful.
PubMed: 34277019
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab011