-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2021Cholangiocarcinoma (cancer in the bile duct) is an aggressive tumour for which surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment. Despite complete resection, recurrences of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cholangiocarcinoma (cancer in the bile duct) is an aggressive tumour for which surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment. Despite complete resection, recurrences of the cancer are common and lead to poor prognosis in patients. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy given after surgical resection may reduce the risk of cancer recurrence by eradicating residual cancer and micrometastatic lesions. The benefits and harms of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus placebo, no intervention, or other adjuvant chemotherapies are unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus placebo, no intervention, or other adjuvant chemotherapies for people with cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed electronic searches in the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science for trials that met the inclusion criteria up to 28 April 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised clinical trials irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus placebo, no intervention, or a different postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for participants with curative-intent resection for cholangiocarcinoma.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods to develop and conduct the review. We conducted meta-analyses and presented results, where feasible, using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed risk of bias according to predefined domains suggested by Cochrane. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach and presented outcome results in a summary of findings table.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five published randomised clinical trials. The trials included 931 adults (18 to 83 years old) who underwent curative-intent resection for cholangiocarcinoma. Four trials compared postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); gemcitabine; gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin; or capecitabine) versus no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (surgery alone) in 867 participants with cholangiocarcinoma only. A fifth trial compared postoperative adjuvant S-1 (a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative) chemotherapy versus gemcitabine in 70 participants with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (64 participants), and gallbladder carcinoma (6 participants). We assessed all of the included trials at overall high risk of bias. One trial was conducted in France, three in Japan, and one in the United Kingdom. We could not perform all planned comparison analyses due to lack of data. Three trials used intention-to-treat analyses. Another trial used per-protocol analysis. In the remaining trial one participant in the intervention group and one in the control group were lost to follow-up. However, the outcomes of these two participants were not described. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy We are very uncertain as to whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has little to no effect on all-cause mortality versus no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.01; 4 trials, 867 participants, very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain of the effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on serious adverse events (RR 17.82, 95% CI 2.43 to 130.82; 1 trial, 219 participants, very low-certainty evidence). The trial indicated that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could increase serious adverse events, as 19/113 (20.5%) of participants developed an adverse event, compared to 1/106 (1.1%) of participants in the no-postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy group. None of the included trials reported data on health-related quality of life, cancer-related mortality, time to recurrence of the tumour, and non-serious adverse events in participants with only cholangiocarcinoma. Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine derivative) versus adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy The only available trial analysed all participants with intrahepatic, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma together, with data on participants with cholangiocarcinoma not provided separately. The authors reported that one-year overall mortality after adjuvant S-1 therapy was lower than with adjuvant gemcitabine-based therapy following major hepatectomy for biliary tract cancer. There were no differences in two-year overall mortality.
FUNDING
two trials received support from drug companies; one trial received funding from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology; one trial received support from "Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC2009) and Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer"; and one trial did not provide information on support or sponsorship. We identified six ongoing randomised clinical trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on the very low-certainty evidence found in four trials in people with curative-intent resection for cholangiocarcinoma, we are very uncertain of the effects of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (mitomycin-C and 5-FU; gemcitabine; gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin; or capecitabine) versus no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on mortality. The effects of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy compared with no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on serious adverse events are also very uncertain, but the result of the single trial showed 20% higher occurrences of haematologic adverse events. We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low due to overall high risk of bias, and imprecision. Due to insufficient power of the only identified trial, the best postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in people with only cholangiocarcinoma could not be established. We also lack randomised clinical trials with outcome data on adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy versus adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in people with cholangiocarcinoma alone. There is a need for further randomised clinical trials designed to be at low risk of bias and with adequate sample size exploring the best adjuvant chemotherapy treatment after surgery in people with cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cholangiocarcinoma; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Quality of Life; Young Adult
PubMed: 34515993
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012814.pub2 -
Hepatology Communications May 2023Given the complexity of managing HCC, professional society guidelines advocate multidisciplinary care (MDC) for patients with HCC. However, implementation of MDC... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Given the complexity of managing HCC, professional society guidelines advocate multidisciplinary care (MDC) for patients with HCC. However, implementation of MDC programs requires a significant investment of time and resources. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to enumerate potential benefits of MDC for patients with HCC.
METHODS
We conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and national conference abstracts to identify studies published after January 2005 that reported early-stage presentation, treatment receipt, or overall survival among patients with HCC, stratified by MDC status. We calculated pooled risk ratios and HRs for clinical outcomes according to MDC receipt using the DerSimonian and Laird method for random effects models.
RESULTS
We identified 12 studies (n = 15,365 patients with HCC) with outcomes stratified by MDC status. MDC was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88); however, its association with curative treatment receipt was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.89-2.89) and pooled estimates were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 90% for both). Studies (n = 3) were discordant regarding an association between MDC and time-to-treatment initiation. MDC was associated with early-stage HCC (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.12-2.29), suggesting possible referral bias contributing to improved outcomes. Limitations of studies also included risk of residual confounding, loss to follow-up, and data preceding the availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
CONCLUSION
MDC for patients with HCC is associated with improved overall survival, underscoring the likely benefit of managing patients with HCC in a multidisciplinary care setting.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 37102768
DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000143 -
PloS One 2021Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly lethal disease with increasing incidence. Due to high resistance, chemo/radiotherapy has limited success in pancreatic...
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly lethal disease with increasing incidence. Due to high resistance, chemo/radiotherapy has limited success in pancreatic cancer and only marginally prolongs patient survival. Therefore, novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets are needed. In the present review, we performed a comprehensive summary of therapeutic approaches targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the PubMed and Embase databases for preclinical and clinical studies, from inception to October 4, 2020, on drugs targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Bias assessments and qualitative analyses were performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-five preclinical and nine clinical trials were included in the review. All preclinical studies reported a favorable outcome in terms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression. Futhermore, drugs targeting the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway were shown to be efficient chemosensitizers. However, high publication bias was assumed. In the clinical setting, bazedoxifene and itacitinib improved patient outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Preclinical studies strongly suggest significant efficacy of drugs targeting GP130/JAK/STAT3 in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and that these molecules are effective chemosensitizers. Though only a few trials have shown the efficacy in a clinical setting, the STAT3 pathway remains a promising drug target for future treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and may help overcome chemotherapy resistance.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Humans; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; STAT3 Transcription Factor
PubMed: 34138876
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252397 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Feb 2021The clinical relevance of subdivision of non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into locally advanced borderline resectable (LA-BR) and locally advanced... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Survival equivalence in patients treated for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The clinical relevance of subdivision of non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into locally advanced borderline resectable (LA-BR) and locally advanced unresectable (LA-UR) has been questioned. We assessed equivalence of overall survival (OS) in patients with LA-BR and LA-UR PDAC.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed of studies published January 1, 2009 to August 21, 2019, reporting OS for LA-BR and LA-UR patients treated with or without neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), with or without surgical resection. A frequentist network meta-analysis was used to assess the primary outcome (hazard ratio for OS) and secondary outcomes (OS in LA-BR, LA-UR, and upfront resectable (UFR) PDAC).
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies, comprising 14,065 patients in a network of eight unique treatment subgroups were analysed. Overall survival was better for LA-BR than LA-UR patients following surgery both with and without NAT. Neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery was associated with longer OS for UFR, LA-BR, and LA-UR tumours, compared to upfront surgery.
CONCLUSION
Survival between the LA-BR and LA-UR subgroups was not equivalent. This subdivision is useful for prognostication, but likely unhelpful in treatment decision making. Our data supports NAT regardless of initial disease extent. Individual patient data assessment is needed to accurately estimate the benefit of NAT.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 33268268
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.022 -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Jan 2016Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common and important precursor lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). A third of patients with BE are asymptomatic, and our ability to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common and important precursor lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). A third of patients with BE are asymptomatic, and our ability to predict the risk of progression of metaplasia to dysplasia and EAC (and therefore guide management) is limited. There is an urgent need for clinically useful biomarkers of susceptibility to both BE and risk of subsequent progression. This study aims to systematically identify, review, and meta-analyze genetic biomarkers reported to predict both. A systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed in May 2014. Study and evidence quality were appraised using the revised American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, and modified Recommendations for Tumor Marker Scores. Meta-analysis was performed for all markers assessed by more than one study. A total of 251 full-text articles were reviewed; 52 were included. A total of 33 germline markers of susceptibility were identified (level of evidence II-III); 17 were included. Five somatic markers of progression were identified; meta-analysis demonstrated significant associations for chromosomal instability (level of evidence II). One somatic marker of progression/relapse following photodynamic therapy was identified. However, a number of failings of methodology and reporting were identified. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate genetic biomarkers of BE susceptibility and risk of progression. While a number of limitations of study quality temper the utility of those markers identified, some-in particular, those identified by genome-wide association studies, and chromosomal instability for progression-appear plausible, although robust validation is required.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Barrett Esophagus; Disease Progression; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagus; Genetic Markers; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genetic Variation; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Phenotype; Precancerous Conditions; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26445852
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3884-5 -
International Journal of Surgery... Nov 2019Previous studies have indicated that there may be a difference in tumor biology between intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) and pancreatic ductal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have indicated that there may be a difference in tumor biology between intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the data are still controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and compare the outcome of IPMC and PDAC after surgical resection.
METHODS
Studies comparing IPMC and PDAC were identified using Medline and Embase search engines. Primary outcomes of interest were survival and recurrence. Secondary outcomes were clinicopathological characteristics. Meta-analysis of data was conducted using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included. Pooled analysis revealed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) for IPMC compared to PDAC (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.56). Both colloid and tubular IPMC showed improved 5-year OS compared to PDAC (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.25 and OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.54, respectively). Median survival time ranged from 21 to 58 months in the IPMC group compared to 12-23 months in the PDAC group. No meta-analysis could be performed on recurrence or on time-to-event data. Descriptive data showed no survival difference for higher TNM stages. IPMC was more often found at a TNM-stage of 1 (OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.71-7.15) and had lower rates of lymph node spread (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.57).
CONCLUSION
Available data suggest that IPMC has a more indolent course with a better 5-year OS compared to PDAC. The histopathological features are less aggressive in IPMC. The reason may be earlier detection. However, for IPMC with higher TNM stages the survival seems to be similar to that of PDAC.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Adenocarcinoma, Papillary; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31546033
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.014 -
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2019For early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, determining the extent of surgical resection and lymphadenectomy according to the invasion status of the tumour may be more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
For early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, determining the extent of surgical resection and lymphadenectomy according to the invasion status of the tumour may be more reliable. Intraoperative frozen section (FS) is a potentially effective method to identify the invasion status while its accuracy is still unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of FS for the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to October 26, 2018) to identify studies investigating the accuracy of FS for the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma. The accuracy of FS was evaluated by calculating the pooled concordance rates (CCR) between FS and final pathology and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and other parameters of FS for discriminating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The negative predictive value (NPV) of FS for diagnosing IAC was also calculated to evaluate the chance of underestimation.
RESULTS
Six eligible studies were included. The pooled CCR for differentiating pre-invasive adenocarcinoma, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and IAC was 88% (95% CI, 84%-93%). When pre-invasive adenocarcinoma and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma were classified as a group, the pooled CCR, sensitivity, specificity of FS for differentiating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from IAC were 95% (95% CI, 94%-97%), 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%), 95% (95% CI, 80%-99%), respectively. The pooled NPV of FS for diagnosing IAC was 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%).
CONCLUSIONS
Intraoperative FS is reliable for identifying the invasion status of lung adenocarcinoma, with high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating pre-/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from IAC.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Frozen Sections; Humans; Intraoperative Period; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Invasiveness
PubMed: 31715310
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.047 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Sep 2021Locoregional treatments (LRT) including radioembolisation (SIRT), transarterial chemo-embolisation (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, external beam... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Locoregional treatments (LRT) including radioembolisation (SIRT), transarterial chemo-embolisation (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and ablation have been studied for the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). The aim of this systematic review was to provide outcome benchmarks for clinical trial design.
METHODS
Identification of studies reporting outcomes of patients treated with LRT for iCC was performed using PubMed and Embase. Pooled weighted means were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); meta-analysis of proportions was used for estimation of pooled response rate.
RESULTS
6325 entries were reviewed; 93 studies were eligible, representing 101 cohorts and 3990 patients: 15 cohorts (645 patients) for ablation, 18 cohorts (541 patients) for EBRT, 27 cohorts (1232 patients) for SIRT, 22 cohorts (1145 patients) for TACE, 16 cohorts (331 patients) for HAI and 3 cohorts (96 patients) not pooled. 74% of the studies were retrospective, 99% non-randomised. The pooled mean weighted OS was 30.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.8-38.6) for ablation, 18.9 (14.2-23.5) for EBRT, 14.1 (12.1-16.0) for SIRT, 15.9 (12.9-19.0) for TACE and 21.3 (15.4-27.1) for HAI. The pooled complete response rate was 93.9% for ablation. When analysed together, SIRT, TACE and HAI had a pooled mean weighted OS of 15.7 months, and 25.2 months for patients treated in first-line with concomitant systemic chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Available literature on LRT for iCC was heterogeneous and of insufficient quality to make strong recommendations. Ablation achieved satisfactory outcomes, and may be recommended when surgery is not feasible.
Topics: Ablation Techniques; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cohort Studies; Embolization, Therapeutic; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Yttrium Radioisotopes
PubMed: 34252720
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102258 -
Advances in Therapy Jun 2024Gastric cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in Eastern Asia. The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel (PTX)... (Review)
Review
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ramucirumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in Japan and South Korea: A Systematic Literature Review.
INTRODUCTION
Gastric cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in Eastern Asia. The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA) have been established in clinical trials. To assess the effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy as a second-line treatment in real-world clinical practice in Eastern Asia and to pave the way for future research, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted.
METHODS
Studies published between January 2014 and December 2021 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases.
RESULTS
This SLR included 23 studies from Japan and South Korea, of which 22 were retrospective and 11 were full-text articles. Most studies investigated RAM + PTX (range of median overall survival [mOS] 7.4-12.2 months; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 3.35-7.0 months). Data were limited for RAM, RAM + albumin-bound paclitaxel, and RAM + taxane. RAM + PTX was associated with longer survival (mOS 9.3-12.2 months vs. 5.2-9.7 months; mPFS 4.1-5.1 months vs. 3.0-4.1 months) than PTX. Patients with prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) exposure experienced longer mPFS (4.8 vs. 3.4 months) from RAM + taxane than those without prior anti-PD-1 exposure. Few patients (3.3-6.3%) discontinued RAM or RAM-based therapy because of adverse events (AEs). Hematological toxicities were most frequently occurring AEs and no new safety signals were identified compared to clinical trials.
CONCLUSION
RAM + PTX as a second-line treatment is effective and associated with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEA in real-world settings of Japan and South Korea. More studies are recommended to further evaluate effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy, especially after anti-PD-1 therapy, in a wider Eastern Asian population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
INPLASY registration number INPLASY2022120023.
Topics: Ramucirumab; Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Adenocarcinoma; Esophagogastric Junction; Republic of Korea; Esophageal Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Japan; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38619719
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02838-5 -
Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2022An increase in the incidence of duodenal adenocarcinoma has been recently reported. However, little is known about the risk factors for duodenal adenocarcinoma, which...
INTRODUCTION
An increase in the incidence of duodenal adenocarcinoma has been recently reported. However, little is known about the risk factors for duodenal adenocarcinoma, which are important for screening purposes. We, therefore, aimed to conduct a systematic review to identify risk factors for non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
A medical literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Japan Medical Abstracts Society, and Web of Science. Studies that assessed the association between dietary habits, lifestyle behaviors, comorbidities, and non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma were extracted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in individual studies, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to assess the quality of evidence across studies included in this review.
RESULTS
Out of 1,244 screened articles, 10 were finally selected for qualitative synthesis. In the general population, no consistent risk factors were identified except for Helicobacter pylori positivity, which was considered a risk factor in 2 studies, but the quality of evidence was considered very low because of the high risk of bias. In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Spigelman stage IV at initial endoscopy was considered a consistent risk factor in 3 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
There are currently limited data regarding risk factors for non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma, and no conclusive risk factors were identified in the general population. However, in patients with FAP, Spigelman stage IV was identified as a consistent risk factor. Further studies are needed to improve diagnosis and support effective clinical management of this malignancy.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Duodenal Neoplasms; Duodenum; Humans; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34000722
DOI: 10.1159/000516561