-
Frontiers in Public Health 2022Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a common type of extrapulmonary TB with an insidious onset and non-specific symptoms. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels increase rapidly in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) is a common type of extrapulmonary TB with an insidious onset and non-specific symptoms. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels increase rapidly in the early stages of abdominal TB. However, it remains unclear whether ADA serves as a diagnostic marker for abdominal TB.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search for relevant articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to April 2022. First, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool-2 (QUADAS-2), to evaluate the quality of the included articles. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models were then utilized to analyze pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In addition, we explored a subgroup analysis for potential heterogeneity and publication bias among the included literature.
RESULTS
Twenty-four articles (3,044 participants, 3,044 samples) which met the eligibility criteria were included in this study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ADA for abdominal TB detection were 93% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 95% (95% CI: 0.93-0.96), respectively. PLR and NLR were 18.6 (95% CI: 14.0-24.6) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12), respectively. DOR and AUROC were 236 (95% CI: 134-415) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), respectively. Furthermore, no heterogeneity or publication bias was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis found ADA to be of excellent diagnostic value for abdominal TB and could be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022297931.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Humans; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 36211645
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.938544 -
International Journal of Clinical and... 2014This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine accuracy and usefulness of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in diagnosis of tuberculosis pleurisy. Medline,... (Review)
Review
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine accuracy and usefulness of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in diagnosis of tuberculosis pleurisy. Medline, Google scholar and Web of Science databases were searched to identify related studies until 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed quality of studies included according to standard Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and other parameters of ADA in diagnosis of tuberculosis pleurisy were analyzed with Meta-DiSC1.4 software, and pooled using the random effects model. Twelve studies including 865 tuberculosis pleurisy patients and 1379 non-tuberculosis pleurisy subjects were identified from 110 studies for this meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnosis odds ratio (DOR) of ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleurisy were 45.25 (95% CI 27.63-74.08), 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88), 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.90), 6.32 (95% CI 4.83-8.26) and 0.15 (95% 0.11-0.22), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was 0.9340. Our results demonstrate that the sensitivity and specificity of ADA are high in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleurisy especially when ADA≥50 (U/L). Thus, ADA is a relatively sensitive and specific marker for tuberculosis pleurisy diagnosis. However, it is cautious to apply these results due to the heterogeneity in study design of these studies. Further studies are required to confirm the optimal cut-off value of ADA.
PubMed: 25419343
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of the American Heart... Apr 2021Acquired tuberculosis continues to be a challenge worldwide. Although tuberculosis has been considered a global public health emergency, it remains poorly controlled in...
Acquired tuberculosis continues to be a challenge worldwide. Although tuberculosis has been considered a global public health emergency, it remains poorly controlled in many countries. Despite being primarily a pulmonary disease, tuberculosis could involve the heart. This systematic review is part of the "Neglected Tropical Diseases and Other Infectious Diseases Involving the Heart" (the NET-Heart Project) initiative from the Interamerican Society of Cardiology. This project aims to review the cardiovascular involvement of these heterogeneous diseases, advancing original algorithms to help healthcare providers diagnose and manage cardiovascular complications. In tuberculosis, pericardium involvement is relatively common, especially in AIDS, and tuberculosis is the most common cause of constrictive pericarditis in endemic countries. Myocarditis and aortitis by tuberculosis are rare. Clinical manifestations of cardiovascular involvement by tuberculosis differ from those typically found for bacteria or viruses. Prevailing systemic symptoms and the pericarditis diagnostic index should be taken into account. An echocardiogram is the first step for diagnosing cardiovascular involvement; however, several image modalities can be used, depending on the suspected site of infection. Adenosine deaminase levels, gamma interferon, or polymerase chain reaction testing could be used to confirm tuberculosis infection; each has a high diagnostic performance. Antituberculosis chemotherapy and corticosteroids are treatment mainstays that significantly reduce mortality, constriction, and hospitalizations, especially in patients with HIV. In conclusion, tuberculosis cardiac involvement is frequent and could lead to heart failure, constrictive pericarditis, or death. Early detection of complications should be a cornerstone of overall management.
Topics: Disease Management; Global Health; Humans; Morbidity; Myocarditis; Tuberculosis, Cardiovascular
PubMed: 33733808
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019435 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2022Paediatric pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a paucibacillary disease, which increases the difficulty of examination. We aimed to assess the performance of pleural fluid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Paediatric pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a paucibacillary disease, which increases the difficulty of examination. We aimed to assess the performance of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) in the detection of paediatric pleural TB.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 20 December 2021. We used the bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models to compute pooled estimates for the overall diagnostic accuracy parameters of ADA for diagnosing paediatric pleural TB.
RESULTS
Eight studies, including 290 pleural fluid samples, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of ADA was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90, I: 55.63% < 75%) for detecting patients with paediatric pleural TB. A total of 262 pleural fluid samples from four studies were included to differentiate patients with paediatric pleural TB from controls. At a unified cut-off value of 40 U/L, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of ADA were 0.89, 0.58, 2.09, 0.20, 10.48 and 0.89, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
At a cut-off value of 40 U/L, the overall performance of ADA was good for detecting paediatric pleural TB, with relatively high sensitivity and low specificity. Key messageAccurate identification of paediatric pleural TB will help eliminate TB in children. At a cut-off value of 40 U/L, the overall performance of ADA was good for detecting paediatric pleural TB, with relatively high sensitivity and low specificity.
Topics: Humans; Child; Tuberculosis, Pleural; Adenosine Deaminase; Pleural Effusion; Sensitivity and Specificity; ROC Curve
PubMed: 36345981
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2140452 -
PloS One 2019Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a useful diagnostic test for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), but its exact threshold and accuracy in clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a useful diagnostic test for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), but its exact threshold and accuracy in clinical decision-making is unclear. We aimed to assess diagnostic performance of ADA in TPE and to clarify its optimal diagnostic threshold.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles indexed up to October 2018. We included English language studies that provided both sensitivity and specificity of ADA in TPE diagnosis. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity were obtained through bivariate random effects model, both overall and at prespecified threshold ranges of <36, 40±4, 45-65 and >65 IU/L.
RESULTS
We retrieved 2162 citations, and included 174 publications with 27009 patients. All studies showed high risk of bias. Summary sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio estimates were 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 97.42 (95% CI 74.90-126.72) respectively. 65 studies with ADA threshold of 40±4 IU/L showed summary sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.91) respectively. Four studies with ADA threshold >65 IU/L showed summary sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.61-0.96) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.80-0.99) respectively.
CONCLUSION
ADA levels in pleural fluid show good diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of TPE; however, all included studies showed high risk of bias. It was not possible to derive any firm inference on relative clinical utility of different diagnostic thresholds.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Animals; Female; Humans; Male; Pleural Effusion; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 30913213
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213728 -
Cureus Jun 2023Tuberculous meningitis is the most serious complication of tuberculosis. Early diagnosis is crucial to start relevant treatment to prevent death and disability.... (Review)
Review
Tuberculous meningitis is the most serious complication of tuberculosis. Early diagnosis is crucial to start relevant treatment to prevent death and disability. Electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were used to find relevant articles from January 1980 to June 2022. The random-effect model in terms of pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval was adopted to derive the diagnostic efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase (ADA) for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in adult patients. A total of 22 studies (20 prospective and two retrospective data) have been included in this meta-analysis, having 1927 participants. We perceived acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROCs), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96) and 48 (95% CI: 26-86), respectively, for CSF-ADA for differentiating TBM from non-TBM in adult patients. To ascertain the certainty of evidence for CSF-ADA as a diagnostic marker for TBM, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis was used. CSF-ADA is an auspicious diagnostic test with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis, however, with very low certainty of evidence.
PubMed: 37404432
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39896 -
Canadian Respiratory Journal 2022Adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA) is reported as a novel diagnostic biomarker for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) in many studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA) is reported as a novel diagnostic biomarker for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) in many studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the general diagnostic performance of pleural ADA in TPE. After searching for relevant studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of pleural ADA in TPE in several databases, we assessed and selected eligible studies to calculate pooled parameters by STATA 16.0 software. A final set of thirteen studies entirely met the inclusion standards and were used to calculate pooled parameters in our meta-analysis. Among them, there were nine English studies and four Chinese studies. The pooled parameters of pleural ADA in diagnosing TPE were summarized as follows: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95); positive likelihood ratio, 13.9 (95% CI: 10.6-18.3); negative likelihood ratio, 0.09 (95% CI:0.06-0.16); diagnostic odds ratio, 147 (95% CI: 76-284); and the area under the curve, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Pleural ADA is a reliable indicator with excellent accuracy in TPE diagnosis. However, we need to combine pleural ADA with diverse examinations to diagnose TPE in clinical practice.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Biomarkers; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pleural Effusion; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 36124285
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7078652 -
Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jul 2022Tuberculous infection of T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) have a high diagnostic value in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tuberculous infection of T cell spot test (T-SPOT.TB) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) have a high diagnostic value in pleural effusion for tuberculous pleurisy. However, there were major differences in existing research in regard to the clinical application of the two trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and ADA.
METHODS
Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched to compare diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy by T-SPOT.TB and ADA. The search period was from inception to August 31, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-disc 1.4, Revman 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize overall diagnostic performance.
RESULTS
10 qualified original research studies were included, with a total of 2075 patients, of which were 1391 tuberculous pleurisy and 684 non-tuberculous pleurisy. The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of T-SPOT.TB were as follows: sensitivity, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.90; I = 92.7%); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82; I = 93.7%); PLR, 4.49 (95% CI: 2.29-8.80; I = 94.9%); NLR, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.30; I = 94.3%), DOR, 35.72 (95% CI: 11.15-114.47; I = 91.5%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9283 (95% CI: 0.8912-0.9654). The pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy of ADA were as follows: sensitivity, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.62-0.67; I = 98.2%); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.92; I = 69.4%); PLR, 6.12 (95% CI: 4.71-7.96; I = 11.9%); NLR, 0.33 (95% CI: 0.12-0.89; I = 99.5%), DOR, 23.18 (95% CI: 12.75-42.14; I = 66.7%). The AUC for SROC was 0.9208 (95% CI: 0.9029-0.9387).
CONCLUSION
Both T-SPOT.TB and ADA had high value in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. The sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB was higher than ADA, but the specificity of ADA was higher than T-SPOT.TB. On the whole, T-SPOT. TB had similar diagnostic accuracy to ADA.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Pleural Effusion; Pleurisy; Sensitivity and Specificity; T-Lymphocytes; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 35777322
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102223 -
Tropical Medicine & International... Mar 2023To comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for tuberculous meningitis (TBM), and the potential influence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for tuberculous meningitis (TBM), and the potential influence of patients' age groups and cutoffs of measured adenosine deaminase.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a random-effect model.
RESULTS
Overall, 43 studies with 1653 patients with TBM and 3417 controls without were included. Pooled results showed that adenosine deaminase in CSF is associated with satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for TBM, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.90), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), positive likelihood ratio of 7.70 (95% CI: 6.16-9.63), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.15 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20). The pooled receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), suggesting good performance. Subgroup analyses showed good diagnostic efficacies of adenosine deaminase in CSF for both adults (AUC 0.95) and children (AUC 0.96) with TBM. AUCs indicating the diagnostic accuracies of adenosine deaminase in CSF for TBM were 0.93 for studies with cutoffs <10 U/L and and 0.94 for a cutoff =10 U/L, but only 0.90 for studies with cutoffs >10 U/L.
CONCLUSIONS
Measuring adenosine deaminase of CSF shows satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for TBM in children and adults, particularly if using a cutoff ≤10 U/L.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Adenosine Deaminase; Cerebrospinal Fluid; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Meningeal
PubMed: 36591905
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13849 -
PloS One 2021We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) through... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
We compared diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) through systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.
METHODS
We queried PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies providing paired data for sensitivity and specificity of both pleural fluid ADA and IFN-γ for diagnosing TPE. We used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) plots and HSROC meta-regression to model individual and comparative diagnostic performance of the two tests.
RESULTS
We retrieved 376 citations and included 45 datasets from 44 publications (4974 patients) in our review. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity for ADA were 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.92), while for IFN-γ they were 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), respectively. HSROC plots showed consistently greater diagnostic accuracy for IFN-γ over ADA across the entire range of observations. HSROC meta-regression using test-type as covariate yielded a relative diagnostic odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.68-2.94) in favour of IFN-γ, along with better summary sensitivity and specificity figures. No prespecified subgroup variable significantly influenced the summary diagnostic accuracy estimates.
CONCLUSION
Pleural fluid IFN-γ estimation has better diagnostic accuracy than ADA estimation for diagnosis of TPE.
Topics: Adenosine Deaminase; Biomarkers; Humans; Interferon-gamma; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 34166463
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253525