-
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2023Hepatocellular carcinoma is a malignant neoplasm of the liver and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The multimodal data combines several modalities,...
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma is a malignant neoplasm of the liver and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The multimodal data combines several modalities, such as medical images, clinical parameters, and electronic health record (EHR) reports, from diverse sources to accomplish the diagnosis of liver cancer. The introduction of deep learning models with multimodal data can enhance the diagnosis and improve physicians' decision-making for cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE
This scoping review explores the use of multimodal deep learning techniques (i.e., combining medical images and EHR data) in diagnosing and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).
METHODOLOGY
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in six databases along with forward and backward references list checking of the included studies. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping review guidelines were followed for the study selection process. The data was extracted and synthesized from the included studies through thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included in this review. These studies utilized multimodal deep learning to predict and diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no studies examined cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Four imaging modalities (CT, MRI, WSI, and DSA) and 51 unique EHR records (clinical parameters and biomarkers) were used in these studies. The most frequently used medical imaging modalities were CT scans followed by MRI, whereas the most common EHR parameters used were age, gender, alpha-fetoprotein AFP, albumin, coagulation factors, and bilirubin. Ten unique deep-learning techniques were applied to both EHR modalities and imaging modalities for two main purposes, prediction and diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
The use of multimodal data and deep learning techniques can help in the diagnosis and prediction of HCC. However, there is a limited number of works and available datasets for liver cancer, thus limiting the overall advancements of AI for liver cancer applications. Hence, more research should be undertaken to explore further the potential of multimodal deep learning in liver cancer applications.
PubMed: 37965284
DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1247195 -
BMC Gastroenterology Jul 2020Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been widely used for many years as a serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, AFP has been recognized as having poor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The role of circulating microRNAs for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma with low alpha-fetoprotein level: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been widely used for many years as a serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, AFP has been recognized as having poor sensitivity. More and more studies have concluded that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) might be a promising biomarker that could complement AFP. However, the diagnostic ability of circulating miRNAs has varied among the studies. Therefore, we performed the present meta-analysis to appraise the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs as a biomarker for hepatitis B virus-associated HCC (HBV-HCC) patients with low AFP levels.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to assess the diagnostic accuracy of circulating miRNAs in differentiating HBV-HCC patients with low AFP levels from non-HCC controls.
RESULTS
Circulating miRNAs showed promising potential in the diagnosis of HBV-HCC patients with low AFP levels. In the low-AFP HBV-HCC patients, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.90). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.88) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The detection of circulating miRNAs provides a valuable method for the diagnosis of HBV-HCC in patients with low AFP levels.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Circulating MicroRNA; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; MicroRNAs; ROC Curve; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 32736604
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01345-5 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Feb 2024Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 90% of cases worldwide and a significant contributor to cancer-related deaths.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with early and small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies.
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 90% of cases worldwide and a significant contributor to cancer-related deaths. This study comprehensively compares the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus laparoscopic or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (LRFA or PRFA) in patients with early and small HCC.
METHODS
We systematically searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to include studies comparing LLR versus LRFA or PRFA in patients with early HCC meets the Milan criteria (defined as solitary nodule < 5 cm or three nodules ≤ 3 cm with no extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion). Pooled results were examined for overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, local, intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence rates, and complications. We conducted subgroup analyses based on the type of RFA. Meta-regression analyzed the association between overall survival, local recurrence, and various factors. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We analyzed the data using the R (v.4.3.0) programming language and the "meta" package of RStudio software.
RESULTS
We included 19 observational studies, compromising 3756 patients. LLR showed higher 5-year overall survival compared to RFA (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.06, 1.3], P > 0.01). Our subgroup analysis showed that LLR had higher 5-year survival than PRFA (RR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.02, 1.31], P = 0.03); however, there was no significant difference between LLR and LRFA (RR = 1.26, 95% CI [0.98, 1.63], P = 0.07). LLR was associated with higher disease-free survival) RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.05, 1.35], P < 0.01; RR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.31, 1.98], P < 0.01(and recurrence-free survival) RR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.09, 1.35], P < 0.01; RR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.15, 1.84], P < 0.01(at 1 and 3 years. LLR was associated with lower local (RR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.16, 0.47], P < 0.01) and intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.7, 95% CI [0.5, 0.97], P = 0.03) than RFA. However, complications were significantly higher with LLR (RR = 2.01, 95% CI [1.51, 2.68], P < 0.01). Our meta-regression analysis showed that younger patients had higher risk for local recurrence (P = 0.008), while age wasn't significantly linked to overall survival (P = 0.25). Other covariates like total bilirubin, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and tumor size also showed no significant associations with either overall survival or local recurrence.
CONCLUSION
LLR offers improved long-term outcomes and lower recurrence rates than PRFA. However, no significant distinctions were observed between LRFA and LLR in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and local recurrence. More robust well-designed RCTs are essential to validate our findings.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiofrequency Ablation; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38326841
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03292-3 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024It is unclear whether the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) can predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Consequently, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) can predict the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Consequently, the present study focused on systematically identifying the relationship between SIRI and the prognosis of patients with HCC through a meta-analysis.
METHODS
Systematic and comprehensive studies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to August 10, 2023. The role of SIRI in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in HCC was determined using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were pooled to analyze the correlations between SIRI and the clinicopathological features of HCC.
RESULTS
Ten articles involving 2,439 patients were included. An elevated SIRI was significantly associated with dismal OS (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.52-2.01, p<0.001) and inferior PFS (HR=1.66, 95% CI=1.34-2.05, p<0.001) in patients with HCC. Additionally, according to the combined results, the increased SIRI was significantly related to multiple tumor numbers (OR=1.42, 95% CI=1.09-1.85, p=0.009) and maximum tumor diameter >5 cm (OR=3.06, 95% CI=1.76-5.30, p<0.001). However, the SIRI did not show any significant relationship with sex, alpha-fetoprotein content, Child-Pugh class, or hepatitis B virus infection.
CONCLUSION
According to our results, elevated SIRI significantly predicted OS and PFS in patients with HCC. Moreover, the SIRI was significantly associated with tumor aggressiveness.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-9-0003/, identifier INPLASY202390003.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Prognosis; Liver Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Inflammation
PubMed: 38469315
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1291840 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Alpha-foetoprotein and liver ultrasonography are used to screen... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Alpha-foetoprotein and liver ultrasonography are used to screen patients with chronic hepatitis B for hepatocellular carcinoma. It is uncertain whether screening is worthwhile.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the beneficial and harmful effects of alpha-foetoprotein or ultrasound, or both, for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
SEARCH METHODS
Electronic searches were performed until December 2011 in the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (December 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 4) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1948 to 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 2011), Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to 2011), Chinese Medical Literature Electronic Database (WanFang Data 1998 to 2011), and Chinese Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (1994 to 2011).
SELECTION CRITERIA
All published reports of randomised trials on screening for liver cancer were eligible for inclusion, irrespective of language of publication. Studies were excluded when the hepatitis B status was uncertain, the screening tests were not sensitive or widely-used, or when the test was used for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma rather than screening.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We independently analysed all the trials considered for inclusion. We wrote to the authors of one of the trials to obtain further information.
MAIN RESULTS
Three randomised clinical trials were included in this review. All of them had a high risk of bias. One trial was conducted in Shanghai, China. There are several published reports on this trial, in which data were presented differently. According to the 2004 trial report, participants were randomised to screening every six months with alpha-foetoprotein and ultrasonography (n = 9373) versus no screening (n = 9443). We could not draw any definite conclusions from it. A second trial was conducted in Toronto, Canada. In this trial, there were 1069 participants with chronic hepatitis B. The trial compared screening every six months with alpha-foetoprotein alone (n = 532) versus alpha-foetoprotein and ultrasound (n = 538) over a period of five years. This trial was designed as a pilot trial; the small number of participants and the rare events did not allow an effective comparison between the two modes of screening that were studied. The remaining trial, conducted in Taiwan and published as an abstract, was designed as a cluster randomised trial to determine the optimal interval for screening using alpha foetoprotein and ultrasound. Screening intervals of four months and 12 months were compared in the two groups. Further details about the screening strategy were not available. The trial reported on cumulative four-year survival, cumulative three-year incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and mean tumour size. The cumulative four-year survival was not significantly different between the two screening intervals. The incidence of hepatocellular cancer was higher in the four-monthly screening group. The included trials did not report on adverse events. It appears that the sensitivity and specificity of the screening modes were poor, accounting for a substantial number of false-positive and false-negative screening results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is not enough evidence to support or refute the value of alpha-foetoprotein or ultrasound screening, or both, of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients for hepatocellular carcinoma. More and better designed randomised trials are required to compare screening against no screening.
Topics: Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ultrasonography; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 22972059
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002799.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2015Down's syndrome occurs when a person has three copies of chromosome 21, or the specific area of chromosome 21 implicated in causing Down's syndrome, rather than two. It... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Down's syndrome occurs when a person has three copies of chromosome 21, or the specific area of chromosome 21 implicated in causing Down's syndrome, rather than two. It is the commonest congenital cause of mental disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. It can be life-threatening, or lead to considerable ill health, although some individuals have only mild problems and can lead relatively normal lives. Having a baby with Down's syndrome is likely to have a significant impact on family life. The risk of a Down's syndrome affected pregnancy increases with advancing maternal age.Noninvasive screening based on biochemical analysis of maternal serum or urine, or fetal ultrasound measurements, allows estimates of the risk of a pregnancy being affected and provides information to guide decisions about definitive testing. Before agreeing to screening tests, parents need to be fully informed about the risks, benefits and possible consequences of such a test. This includes subsequent choices for further tests they may face, and the implications of both false positive and false negative screening tests (i.e. invasive diagnostic testing, and the possibility that a miscarried fetus may be chromosomally normal). The decisions that may be faced by expectant parents inevitably engender a high level of anxiety at all stages of the screening process, and the outcomes of screening can be associated with considerable physical and psychological morbidity. No screening test can predict the severity of problems a person with Down's syndrome will have.
OBJECTIVES
To estimate and compare the accuracy of first and second trimester urine markers for the detection of Down's syndrome.
SEARCH METHODS
We carried out a sensitive and comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE (1980 to 25 August 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 25 August 2011), BIOSIS via EDINA (1985 to 25 August 2011), CINAHL via OVID (1982 to 25 August 2011), The Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 7), MEDION (25 August 2011), The Database of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Laboratory Medicine (25 August 2011), The National Research Register (archived 2007), Health Services Research Projects in Progress database (25 August 2011). We studied reference lists and published review articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies evaluating tests of maternal urine in women up to 24 weeks of gestation for Down's syndrome, compared with a reference standard, either chromosomal verification or macroscopic postnatal inspection.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data as test positive or test negative results for Down's and non-Down's pregnancies allowing estimation of detection rates (sensitivity) and false positive rates (1-specificity). We performed quality assessment according to QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria. We used hierarchical summary ROC (receiver operating characteristic) meta-analytical methods to analyse test performance and compare test accuracy. We performed analysis of studies allowing direct comparison between tests. We investigated the impact of maternal age on test performance in subgroup analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 19 studies involving 18,013 pregnancies (including 527 with Down's syndrome). Studies were generally of high quality, although differential verification was common with invasive testing of only high-risk pregnancies. Twenty-four test combinations were evaluated formed from combinations of the following seven different markers with and without maternal age: AFP (alpha-fetoprotein), ITA (invasive trophoblast antigen), ß-core fragment, free ßhCG (beta human chorionic gonadotrophin), total hCG, oestriol, gonadotropin peptide and various marker ratios. The strategies evaluated included three double tests and seven single tests in combination with maternal age, and one triple test, two double tests and 11 single tests without maternal age. Twelve of the 19 studies only evaluated the performance of a single test strategy while the remaining seven evaluated at least two test strategies. Two marker combinations were evaluated in more than four studies; second trimester ß-core fragment (six studies), and second trimester ß-core fragment with maternal age (five studies).In direct test comparisons, for a 5% false positive rate (FPR), the diagnostic accuracy of the double marker second trimester ß-core fragment and oestriol with maternal age test combination was significantly better (ratio of diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR): 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 4.5), P = 0.02) (summary sensitivity of 73% (CI 57 to 85) at a cut-point of 5% FPR) than that of the single marker test strategy of second trimester ß-core fragment and maternal age (summary sensitivity of 56% (CI 45 to 66) at a cut-point of 5% FPR), but was not significantly better (RDOR: 1.5 (0.8 to 2.8), P = 0.21) than that of the second trimester ß-core fragment to oestriol ratio and maternal age test strategy (summary sensitivity of 71% (CI 51 to 86) at a cut-point of 5% FPR).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Tests involving second trimester ß-core fragment and oestriol with maternal age are significantly more sensitive than the single marker second trimester ß-core fragment and maternal age, however, there were few studies. There is a paucity of evidence available to support the use of urine testing for Down's syndrome screening in clinical practice where alternatives are available.
Topics: Biomarkers; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Down Syndrome; Estriol; False Positive Reactions; Female; Gonadotropins; Humans; Maternal Age; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Sensitivity and Specificity; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 26662198
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011984 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2015Down's syndrome occurs when a person has three, rather than two copies of chromosome 21; or the specific area of chromosome 21 implicated in causing Down's syndrome. It... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Down's syndrome occurs when a person has three, rather than two copies of chromosome 21; or the specific area of chromosome 21 implicated in causing Down's syndrome. It is the commonest congenital cause of mental disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. It can be life-threatening, or lead to considerable ill health, although some individuals have only mild problems and can lead relatively normal lives. Having a baby with Down's syndrome is likely to have a significant impact on family life.Noninvasive screening based on biochemical analysis of maternal serum or urine, or fetal ultrasound measurements, allows estimates of the risk of a pregnancy being affected and provides information to guide decisions about definitive testing. However, no test can predict the severity of problems a person with Down's syndrome will have.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this review was to estimate and compare the accuracy of first trimester serum markers for the detection of Down's syndrome in the antenatal period, both as individual markers and as combinations of markers. Accuracy is described by the proportion of fetuses with Down's syndrome detected by screening before birth (sensitivity or detection rate) and the proportion of women with a low risk (normal) screening test result who subsequently had a baby unaffected by Down's syndrome (specificity).
SEARCH METHODS
We conducted a sensitive and comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE (1980 to 25 August 2011), Embase (1980 to 25 August 2011), BIOSIS via EDINA (1985 to 25 August 2011), CINAHL via OVID (1982 to 25 August 2011), The Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (The Cochrane Library 25 August 2011), MEDION (25 August 2011), The Database of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Laboratory Medicine (25 August 2011), The National Research Register (Archived 2007), Health Services Research Projects in Progress database (25 August 2011). We did forward citation searching ISI citation indices, Google Scholar and PubMed 'related articles'. We did not apply a diagnostic test search filter. We also searched reference lists and published review articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included studies in which all women from a given population had one or more index test(s) compared to a reference standard (either chromosomal verification or macroscopic postnatal inspection). Both consecutive series and diagnostic case-control study designs were included. Randomised trials where individuals were randomised to different screening strategies and all verified using a reference standard were also eligible for inclusion. Studies in which test strategies were compared head-to-head either in the same women, or between randomised groups were identified for inclusion in separate comparisons of test strategies. We excluded studies if they included less than five Down's syndrome cases, or more than 20% of participants were not followed up.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data as test positive or test negative results for Down's and non-Down's pregnancies allowing estimation of detection rates (sensitivity) and false positive rates (1-specificity). We performed quality assessment according to QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria. We used hierarchical summary ROC meta-analytical methods or random-effects logistic regression methods to analyse test performance and compare test accuracy as appropriate. Analyses of studies allowing direct and indirect comparisons between tests were undertaken.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 56 studies (reported in 68 publications) involving 204,759 pregnancies (including 2113 with Down's syndrome). Studies were generally of good quality, although differential verification was common with invasive testing of only high-risk pregnancies. We evaluated 78 test combinations formed from combinations of 18 different tests, with or without maternal age; ADAM12 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease), AFP (alpha-fetoprotein), inhibin, PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, ITA (invasive trophoblast antigen), free βhCG (beta human chorionic gonadotrophin), PlGF (placental growth factor), SP1 (Schwangerschafts protein 1), total hCG, progesterone, uE3 (unconjugated oestriol), GHBP (growth hormone binding protein), PGH (placental growth hormone), hyperglycosylated hCG, ProMBP (proform of eosinophil major basic protein), hPL (human placental lactogen), (free αhCG, and free ßhCG to AFP ratio. Direct comparisons between two or more tests were made in 27 studies.Meta-analysis of the nine best performing or frequently evaluated test combinations showed that a test strategy involving maternal age and a double marker combination of PAPP-A and free ßhCG significantly outperformed the individual markers (with or without maternal age) detecting about seven out of every 10 Down's syndrome pregnancies at a 5% false positive rate (FPR). Limited evidence suggested that marker combinations involving PAPP-A may be more sensitive than those without PAPP-A.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Tests involving two markers in combination with maternal age, specifically PAPP-A, free βhCG and maternal age are significantly better than those involving single markers with and without age. They detect seven out of 10 Down's affected pregnancies for a fixed 5% FPR. The addition of further markers (triple tests) has not been shown to be statistically superior; the studies included are small with limited power to detect a difference.The screening blood tests themselves have no adverse effects for the woman, over and above the risks of a routine blood test. However some women who have a 'high risk' screening test result, and are given amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) have a risk of miscarrying a baby unaffected by Down's. Parents will need to weigh up this risk when deciding whether or not to have an amniocentesis or CVS following a 'high risk' screening test result.
Topics: ADAM Proteins; ADAM12 Protein; Biomarkers; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human; Down Syndrome; Female; Humans; Maternal Age; Membrane Proteins; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A; Prenatal Diagnosis; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 26617074
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011975 -
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Sep 2020The incidence of children developing recurrent sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is 2-35%. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is often used as a tumor marker for (malignant)...
BACKGROUND
The incidence of children developing recurrent sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is 2-35%. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is often used as a tumor marker for (malignant) recurrences of SCT and could potentially be used during routine follow-up after SCT resection. However, the diagnostic accuracy of serum AFP levels during follow-up has not been well established. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of serum AFP levels in recurrent SCT.
METHODS
We queried Search Premier, COCHRANE Library, EMCARE, EMBASE, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases to identify studies regarding patients with SCT with follow-up using serum AFP levels postoperative. We estimated sensitivity and specificity of serum AFP levels.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies (613 patients, 121 recurrences) were included and these mainly described serum AFP levels in patients with recurrent SCT (n = 111); 83 (75%) patients with recurrent SCT had elevated serum AFP levels. A subgroup analysis of articles that measured serum AFP levels in all patients (n = 6, 136 patients, 14 recurrences) showed a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 95%, respectively. The sensitivity of AFP levels to detect malignant recurrence was 96%.
CONCLUSION
Diagnostic accuracy of serum AFP levels to detect recurrent SCT seems promising, though sensitivity could be overestimated since serum AFP levels are mainly described in patients with elevated AFP levels or at recurrent SCT. Furthermore, serum AFP levels could be helpful to detect malignant recurrences.
TYPE OF STUDY
Systematic review of level 2-4 studies.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 2-4 (mostly level 2).
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Child; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pelvic Neoplasms; Sacrococcygeal Region; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spinal Neoplasms; Teratoma; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 32376010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.03.014 -
Frontiers in Genetics 2021The lack of an accurate biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has hindered early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), which can be used...
The lack of an accurate biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has hindered early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), which can be used as novel biomarkers in liquid biopsies, have been brought to light as a result of the advances in research on molecular biomarkers and the progression of genomic medicine. We conducted a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of serum/plasma circRNAs or the combination of circRNAs and α-fetoprotein (AFP) in HCC. We identified eight studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The data were pooled, and the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The areas under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves (AUCs) were also calculated. The sensitivity of circRNAs was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), and the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.86). The sensitivity of AFP was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68), and the specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93). The AUC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91) for circRNAs and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81) for AFP. The sensitivity of the combination of circRNAs and AFP was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted based on the control groups used; the diagnostic accuracy was particularly high in the comparison of HCC vs. healthy controls. In summary, serum/plasma circRNAs are accurate biomarkers suitable for clinical use for detecting HCC, and the combination of circRNAs and AFP improved the diagnostic accuracy.
PubMed: 34659344
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.722208 -
Fertility and Sterility Nov 2016To study the current literature on the association between IVF treatment and maternal serum screening marker levels and nuchal translucency thickness. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To study the current literature on the association between IVF treatment and maternal serum screening marker levels and nuchal translucency thickness.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
SETTINGS
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S)
Eligible studies included those with an exposed group of pregnant women that used IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection to conceive and a control group of pregnant women who conceived spontaneously.
INTERVENTION(S)
IVF treatment to conceive.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Outcomes evaluated included maternal serum screening markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A], alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, unconjugated estriol, dimeric inhibin-A) and nuchal translucency thickness.
RESULT(S)
Database searches identified 4,118 titles and abstracts that were independently screened, which resulted in 76 articles that were assessed for eligibility. Additionally, one study was added for consideration based on expert knowledge. There were 29 cohort and 11 case-control studies in the descriptive review. The most commonly reported markers were PAPP-A and free β-hCG, which were reported in 28 and 26 studies, respectively. The studies that reported effect sizes for PAPP-A and free β-hCG were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION(S)
A decrease in PAPP-A and an increase in total hCG was consistently reported among the included studies. However, owing to the variability in the levels of the other maternal serum screening markers reported and the inability to conduct a meta-analysis, we were unable to generalize about the differences between prenatal screening results in the IVF population.
Topics: Biomarkers; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Chromosome Disorders; Estriol; Female; Fertility; Fertilization in Vitro; Humans; Infertility; Inhibins; Nuchal Translucency Measurement; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A; Reproducibility of Results; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Treatment Outcome; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 27530061
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1120