-
American Journal of Obstetrics and... May 2023Green-stained amniotic fluid, often referred to as meconium-stained amniotic fluid, is present in 5% to 20% of patients in labor and is considered an obstetric hazard.... (Review)
Review
Green-stained amniotic fluid, often referred to as meconium-stained amniotic fluid, is present in 5% to 20% of patients in labor and is considered an obstetric hazard. The condition has been attributed to the passage of fetal colonic content (meconium), intraamniotic bleeding with the presence of heme catabolic products, or both. The frequency of green-stained amniotic fluid increases as a function of gestational age, reaching approximately 27% in post-term gestation. Green-stained amniotic fluid during labor has been associated with fetal acidemia (umbilical artery pH <7.00), neonatal respiratory distress, and seizures as well as cerebral palsy. Hypoxia is widely considered a mechanism responsible for fetal defecation and meconium-stained amniotic fluid; however, most fetuses with meconium-stained amniotic fluid do not have fetal acidemia. Intraamniotic infection/inflammation has emerged as an important factor in meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term and preterm gestations, as patients with these conditions have a higher rate of clinical chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. The precise mechanisms linking intraamniotic inflammation to green-stained amniotic fluid have not been determined, but the effects of oxidative stress in heme catabolism have been implicated. Two randomized clinical trials suggest that antibiotic administration decreases the rate of clinical chorioamnionitis in patients with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. A serious complication of meconium-stained amniotic fluid is meconium aspiration syndrome. This condition develops in 5% of cases presenting with meconium-stained amniotic fluid and is a severe complication typical of term newborns. Meconium aspiration syndrome is attributed to the mechanical and chemical effects of aspirated meconium coupled with local and systemic fetal inflammation. Routine naso/oropharyngeal suctioning and tracheal intubation in cases of meconium-stained amniotic fluid have not been shown to be beneficial and are no longer recommended in obstetrical practice. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials suggested that amnioinfusion may decrease the rate of meconium aspiration syndrome. Histologic examination of the fetal membranes for meconium has been invoked in medical legal litigation to time the occurrence of fetal injury. However, inferences have been largely based on the results of in vitro experiments, and extrapolation of such findings to the clinical setting warrants caution. Fetal defecation throughout gestation appears to be a physiologic phenomenon based on ultrasound as well as in observations in animals.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Meconium Aspiration Syndrome; Meconium; Amniotic Fluid; Chorioamnionitis; Pregnancy Complications; Inflammation; Heme
PubMed: 37012128
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1283 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2016Chorioamnionitis is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Amnioinfusion aims at reducing the adverse effects of chorioamnionitis by dilution of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chorioamnionitis is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Amnioinfusion aims at reducing the adverse effects of chorioamnionitis by dilution of the infective organisms or by an anti-microbial effect of the fluid infused.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to determine the effect of amnioinfusion on clinical and sub-clinical chorioamnionitis, fetal well-being, fetal heart rate characteristics and perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (6 July 2016), PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (6 July 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of amnioinfusion (treatment group) versus no amnioinfusion in women with chorioamnionitis.We would have also considered trials comparing amnioinfusion with sham amnioinfusion; different types or volumes of amnioinfusion fluid but none were identified.Cluster-RCTs and quasi-RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. We identified one study published in abstract form but it did not contain any numerical data and has therefore been excluded. Studies using a cross-over design are not an appropriate study design and thus were not eligible for inclusion in this review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed potential studies for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Both review authors independently extracted data and data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
We included one small trial (with data from 34 participants) comparing transcervical amnioinfusion with no amnioinfusion. The trial was considered to be at a high risk of bias overall, due to small numbers, inconsistency in the reporting and lack of information on blinding. Meta-analysis was not possible. Transcervical amnioinfusion was with room temperature saline at 10 mL per minute for 60 minutes, then 3 mL per minute until delivery versus no amnioinfusion. All women received intrauterine pressure catheter, acetaminophen and antibiotics (ampicillin or, if receiving Group B beta streptococcal prophylaxis, penicillin and gentamycin). We did not identify any trials that used transabdominal amnioinfusion.Compared to no amnioinfusion, transcervical amnioinfusion had no clear effect on the incidence of postpartum endometritis (risk ratio (RR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 7.87; absolute risk 176/1000 (95% CI 34 to 96) versus 118/1000;low-quality evidence). Nor was there a clear effect in the incidence of neonatal infection (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 68.84; absolute risk 0/1000 (95% CI 0 to 0) versus 0/1000; low-quality evidence). The outcome of perinatal death or severe morbidity (such as neonatal encephalopathy, intraventricular haemorrhage, admission to intensive/high care) was not reported in the included trial.In terms of this review's secondary outcomes, the rate of caesarean section was the same in both groups (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.83; absolute risk 294/1000 (95% CI 103 to 832) versus 294/1000; low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the duration of maternal antibiotic treatment between the amnioinfusion and no amnioinfusion control group (mean difference (MD) 16 hours, 95% CI -1.75 to 33.75); nor in the duration of hospitalisation (MD 3.00 hours, 95% CI -15.49 to 21.49). The study did not report any information about how many babies had a low Apgar score at five minutes after birth.Women in the amnioinfusion group had a lower temperature at delivery compared to women in the control group (MD -0.38°C, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.02) but this outcome was not pre-specified in the protocol for this review.The majority of this review's secondary outcomes were not reported in the included study.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to fully evaluate the effectiveness of using transcervical amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis and to assess the safety of this intervention or women's satisfaction. We did not identify any trials that used transabdominal amnioinfusion. The evidence in this review can neither support nor refute the use of transcervical amnioinfusion outside of clinical trials. We included one small study that reported on a limited number of outcomes of interest in this review. The numbers included in this review are too small for meaningful assessment of substantive outcomes, where reported. For those outcomes we assessed using GRADE (postpartum endometritis, neonatal infection, and caesarean section), we downgraded the quality of the evidence to low - with downgrading decisions based on small numbers and a lack of information on blinding. The included study did not report on this review's other primary outcome (perinatal death or severe morbidity).The reduction in pyrexia, though not a pre-specified outcome of this review, may be of relevance in terms of benefits to the fetus of reduced exposure to heat. We postulate that the temperature reduction found may be a direct cooling effect of amnioinfusion with room temperature fluid, rather than reduction of infection. Larger trials are needed to confirm and extend the findings of the trial reviewed here. These should be randomised controlled trials; participants, women with chorioamnionitis; interventions, amnioinfusion; comparisons, no amnioinfusion; outcomes, maternal and perinatal outcomes including neurodevelopmental measures.Further research is justified to determine possible benefits or risks of amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis, and to investigate possible benefits of reducing temperature in fetuses considered at risk of neurological damage. Research should include randomised trials to examine transcervical or transabdominal amnioinfusion compared with no infusion for chorioamnionitis and examine outcomes listed in the methods of this review.
Topics: Amniotic Fluid; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cervix Uteri; Cesarean Section; Chorioamnionitis; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infections; Length of Stay; Perinatal Death; Pregnancy
PubMed: 27556818
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011622.pub2 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Apr 2011Preterm birth occurs in about 5% to 10% of all births in resource-rich countries, but in recent years the incidence seems to have increased in some countries,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Preterm birth occurs in about 5% to 10% of all births in resource-rich countries, but in recent years the incidence seems to have increased in some countries, particularly in the USA. We found little reliable evidence for incidence in resource-poor countries. The rate in northwestern Ethiopia has been reported to vary from 11% to 22%, depending on the age group of mothers studied, and is highest in teenage mothers.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of preventive interventions in women at high risk of preterm delivery? What are the effects of interventions to improve neonatal outcome after preterm rupture of membranes? What are the effects of treatments to stop contractions in preterm labour? What are the effects of elective compared with selective caesarean delivery for women in preterm labour? What are the effects of interventions to improve neonatal outcome in preterm delivery? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 58 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: amnioinfusion for preterm rupture of membranes, antenatal corticosteroids, antibiotic treatment, bed rest, beta-mimetics, calcium channel blockers, elective caesarean, enhanced antenatal care programmes, magnesium sulphate, oxytocin receptor antagonists (atosiban), progesterone, prophylactic cervical cerclage, prostaglandin inhibitors (e.g., indometacin), selective caesarean, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) (plus corticosteroids).
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Cerclage, Cervical; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Premature Birth; Progesterone; Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone
PubMed: 21463540
DOI: No ID Found -
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2022Midtrimester prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) between 16 and 24 weeks of gestational age is a major obstetric complication with high rates of perinatal morbidity and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Midtrimester prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) between 16 and 24 weeks of gestational age is a major obstetric complication with high rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Amnioinfusion has been proposed in women with midtrimester PROM to target oligohydramnios and subsequently enhance pulmonary development and perinatal outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis including all randomized clinical trials investigating amnioinfusion versus no intervention in women with PROM between 16+0 and 24+0 weeks of gestational age. Databases Central, Embase, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and references of identified articles were searched from inception of database to December 2021. The primary outcome was perinatal mortality. Secondary outcomes included neonatal, maternal, and long-term developmental outcomes as defined in the core outcome set for preterm birth studies. Summary measures were reported as pooled relative risk (RR) or mean difference with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Two studies (112 patients, 56 in the amnioinfusion group and 56 in the no intervention group) were included in this review. Pooled perinatal mortality was 66.1% (37/56) in the amnioinfusion group compared with 71.4% (40/56) in no intervention group (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.19). Other neonatal and maternal core outcomes were similar in both groups, although due to the relatively small number of events and wide CIs, there is a possibility that amnioinfusion can be associated with clinically important benefits and harms. Long-term healthy survival was seen in 35.7% (10/28) of children assessed for follow-up and treated with amnioinfusion versus 28.6% (8/28) after no intervention (RR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these findings, the benefits of amnioinfusion for midtrimester PROM <24 weeks of gestational age are unproven, and the potential harms remain undetermined.
Topics: Pregnancy; Child; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Premature Birth; Delivery, Obstetric; Perinatal Mortality; Perinatal Death; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35835036
DOI: 10.1159/000526020 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2014Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Amnioinfusion aims to restore amniotic fluid volume by infusing a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Amnioinfusion aims to restore amniotic fluid volume by infusing a solution into the uterine cavity.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of amnioinfusion for PPROM on perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (2 December 2013).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of amnioinfusion compared with no amnioinfusion in women with PPROM.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five trials, of moderate quality, but we only analysed data from four studies (with a total of 241 participants). One trial did not contribute any data to the review.Transcervical amnioinfusion improved fetal umbilical artery pH at delivery (mean difference 0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.14; one trial, 61 participants) and reduced persistent variable decelerations during labour (risk ratio (RR) 0.52; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.91; one trial, 86 participants).Transabdominal amnioinfusion was associated with a reduction in neonatal death (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.66; two trials, 94 participants), neonatal sepsis (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.61; one trial, 60 participants), pulmonary hypoplasia (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.88; one trial, 34 participants) and puerperal sepsis (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.84; one trial, 60 participants). Women in the amnioinfusion group were also less likely to deliver within seven days of membrane rupture (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.70; one trial, 34 participants). These results should be treated with circumspection as the positive findings were mainly due to one trial with unclear allocation concealment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
These results are encouraging but are limited by the sparse data and unclear methodological robustness, therefore further evidence is required before amnioinfusion for PPROM can be recommended for routine clinical practice.
Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Amnion; Amniotic Fluid; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Injections; Isotonic Solutions; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Chloride
PubMed: 24683009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000942.pub3 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2009Approximately one million stillbirths occur annually during labour; most of these stillbirths occur in low and middle-income countries and are associated with absent,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Approximately one million stillbirths occur annually during labour; most of these stillbirths occur in low and middle-income countries and are associated with absent, inadequate, or delayed obstetric care. The low proportion of intrapartum stillbirths in high-income countries suggests that intrapartum stillbirths are largely preventable with quality intrapartum care, including prompt recognition and management of intrapartum complications. The evidence for impact of intrapartum interventions on stillbirth and perinatal mortality outcomes has not yet been systematically examined.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review of the published literature, searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library, of trials and reviews (N = 230) that reported stillbirth or perinatal mortality outcomes for eight interventions delivered during labour. Where eligible randomised controlled trials had been published after the most recent Cochrane review on any given intervention, we incorporated these new trial findings into a new meta-analysis with the Cochrane included studies.
RESULTS
We found a paucity of studies reporting statistically significant evidence of impact on perinatal mortality, especially on stillbirths. Available evidence suggests that operative delivery, especially Caesarean section, contributes to decreased stillbirth rates. Induction of labour rather than expectant management in post-term pregnancies showed strong evidence of impact, though there was not enough evidence to suggest superior safety for the fetus of any given drug or drugs for induction of labour. Planned Caesarean section for term breech presentation has been shown in a large randomised trial to reduce stillbirths, but the feasibility and consequences of implementing this intervention routinely in low-/middle-income countries add caveats to recommending its use. Magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia is effective in preventing eclamptic seizures, but studies have not demonstrated impact on perinatal mortality. There was limited evidence of impact for maternal hyperoxygenation, and concerns remain about maternal safety. Transcervical amnioinfusion for meconium staining appears promising for low/middle income-country application according to the findings of many small studies, but a large randomised trial of the intervention had no significant impact on perinatal mortality, suggesting that further studies are needed.
CONCLUSION
Although the global appeal to prioritise access to emergency obstetric care, especially vacuum extraction and Caesarean section, rests largely on observational and population-based data, these interventions are clearly life-saving in many cases of fetal compromise. Safe, comprehensive essential and emergency obstetric care is particularly needed, and can make the greatest impact on stillbirth rates, in low-resource settings. Other advanced interventions such as amnioinfusion and hyperoxygenation may reduce perinatal mortality, but concerns about safety and effectiveness require further study before they can be routinely included in programs.
Topics: Breech Presentation; Causality; Cesarean Section; Delivery, Obstetric; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fetal Death; Fetal Growth Retardation; Global Health; Humans; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Labor, Obstetric; Magnesium Sulfate; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Perinatal Care; Pregnancy; Stillbirth
PubMed: 19426469
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S6 -
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2022We aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical outcomes of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) with proximate cord insertions. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical outcomes of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) with proximate cord insertions.
METHODS
This was retrospective cohort study of TTTS cases managed at single fetal center between 2012 and 2020. Presence of proximate cord insertions was defined as a distance of equal or less than 4 cm between placental cord insertions that was recorded based on sonographic and fetoscopic examinations. Clinical outcomes were investigated compared to unmatched cohort and to 1:2 matched controls using preoperative variables including Quintero staging, selective fetal growth restriction, anterior placenta, preoperative cervical length, and gestational age at fetal intervention. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRSMA guidelines through searching PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Medline databases from inception until January 2021.
RESULTS
The prevalence of proximate cord insertions in monochorionic placentas with TTTS was 2% (5/246). All 5 cases were managed by fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS). Procedure time was significantly longer (mean: 61.4 min in proximate cord vs. 37.5 min in nonproximate cord, p < 0.001), and amnioinfusion was significantly more common (100% in proximate cord vs. 43% in nonproximate cord, p = 0.01). Perinatal survival and neonatal outcomes were not different between groups. Similar findings were seen following 1:2 control matching. Systematic review yielded total of 19 case reports of which different management options were applied including FLS (n = 13), amniodrainage (n = 3), and selective reduction (n = 3). Clinical outcomes results were mixed and inconsistent. FLS was described as technically challenging and residual anastomosis was common. Overall fetal and neonatal survival following FLS was 85% and 80%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Presence of proximate cords in TTTS cases poses serious technical challenges even for highly experienced surgeons. Feasibility should be only determined by fetoscopic examination.
Topics: Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Fetofetal Transfusion; Fetoscopy; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Placenta; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Twin; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35378537
DOI: 10.1159/000524162 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2014Amnioinfusion is thought to dilute meconium present in the amniotic fluid and so reduce the risk of meconium aspiration. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Amnioinfusion is thought to dilute meconium present in the amniotic fluid and so reduce the risk of meconium aspiration.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor on perinatal outcome.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 December 2013).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials comparing amnioinfusion with no amnioinfusion for women in labour with moderate or thick meconium staining of the amniotic fluid.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen studies of variable quality (4435 women) are included.Subgroup analysis was performed for studies from settings with limited facilities to monitor the baby's condition during labour and intervene effectively, and settings with standard peripartum surveillance.Settings with standard peripartum surveillance: there was considerable heterogeneity for several outcomes. There was no significant reduction in the primary outcomes meconium aspiration syndrome, perinatal death or severe morbidity, and maternal death or severe morbidity. There was a reduction in caesarean sections (CSs) for fetal distress but not overall. Meconium below the vocal cords diagnosed by laryngoscopy was reduced, as was neonatal ventilation or neonatal intensive care unit admission, but there was no significant reduction in perinatal deaths or other morbidity. Planned sensitivity analysis excluding trials with greater risk of bias resulted in an absence of benefits for any of the outcomes studied.Settings with limited peripartum surveillance: three studies were included. In the amnioinfusion group there was a reduction in CS for fetal distress and overall; meconium aspiration syndrome (three studies, 1144 women; risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.52); perinatal mortality (three studies, 1151 women; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.53) and neonatal ventilation or neonatal intensive care unit admission. In one of the studies, meconium below the vocal cords was reduced and, in the other, neonatal encephalopathy was reduced.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Amnioinfusion is associated with substantive improvements in perinatal outcome only in settings where facilities for perinatal surveillance are limited. It is not clear whether the benefits are due to dilution of meconium or relief of oligohydramnios.In settings with standard peripartum surveillance, some non-substantive outcomes were improved in the initial analysis, but sensitivity analysis excluding trials with greater risk of bias eliminated these differences. Amnioinfusion is either ineffective in this setting, or its effects are masked by other strategies to optimise neonatal outcome.The trials reviewed are too small to address the possibility of rare but serious maternal adverse effects of amnioinfusion.
Topics: Amnion; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Injections; Meconium; Meconium Aspiration Syndrome; Obstetric Labor Complications; Perinatal Mortality; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Chloride
PubMed: 24453049
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000014.pub4 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
METHODS
Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies ( = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs ( = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, -11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Child; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Oligohydramnios; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Delivery, Obstetric
PubMed: 37408113
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Amnioinfusion aims to relieve umbilical cord compression during labour by infusing a liquid into the uterine cavity. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Amnioinfusion aims to relieve umbilical cord compression during labour by infusing a liquid into the uterine cavity.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic amnioinfusion for women in labour with oligohydramnios, but not fetal heart deceleration, compared with therapeutic amnioinfusion only if fetal heart rate decelerations or thick meconium-staining of the liquor occur.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 February 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials comparing prophylactic amnioinfusion in women in labour with oligohydramnios but not fetal heart rate deceleration in labour with therapeutic amnioinfusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The authors assessed trial quality and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
One randomized trial of 116 women was included. No differences were found in the rate of caesarean section (risk ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 2.74). There were no differences in cord arterial pH, oxytocin augmentation, neonatal pneumonia or postpartum endometritis. Prophylactic amnioinfusion was associated with increased intrapartum fever (risk ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 10.05).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be no advantage of prophylactic amnioinfusion over therapeutic amnioinfusion carried out only when fetal heart rate decelerations or thick meconium-staining of the liquor occur.
Topics: Amnion; Female; Fetal Distress; Fetal Heart; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Injections; Obstetric Labor Complications; Oligohydramnios; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 22972040
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000176.pub2