-
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Jul 2023Tegumentary leishmaniasis is often subject to limited funding, underpowered studies, and a paucity of high-quality interventional studies. Intravenous liposomal...
BACKGROUND
Tegumentary leishmaniasis is often subject to limited funding, underpowered studies, and a paucity of high-quality interventional studies. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been increasingly used to treat cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis (CL and ML, respectively) despite the lack of well-conducted interventional studies. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the descriptive evidence on the efficacy and safety of L-AmB in treating CL and ML.
METHODS
Several online databases and the reference lists of included studies were searched to extract data from 132 studies comprising both case reports and case series. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used.
RESULTS
Of 132 studies included, 92 were case reports and 40 were case series. Of the 92 cases, 65 (82.3%) were considered cured after receiving L-AmB as part of their treatment regimen. Twenty-one of the 92 (22.8%) cases reported adverse reactions to L-AmB. A pooled cure rate of 87.0% (95% CI, 79.0%-92.0%) was reported for the 38 case series that reported on treatment efficacy; 40.7% of the cases were associated with an adverse reaction.
CONCLUSIONS
Observational data on cure rates using L-AmB suggest efficacy between 80% and 90%, similar to rates reported for other antileishmanial drugs. The highest efficacy rates were observed when a single cycle of L-AmB was administered to patients with mild-moderate CL and ML. The limitations of this study include the heterogeneity observed among the included studies and the increased likelihood of publication bias associated with the inclusion of case reports and case series. This systematic review further illustrates the need for high-quality comparative trials of intravenous L-AmB for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis.
PubMed: 37520422
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad348 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Sep 2008Acute renal failure is characterised by abrupt and sustained decline in glomerular filtration rate, which leads to accumulation of urea and other chemicals in the blood.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acute renal failure is characterised by abrupt and sustained decline in glomerular filtration rate, which leads to accumulation of urea and other chemicals in the blood. The term acute kidney injury has been recently introduced to encompass a wide spectrum of acute alterations in kidney function from very mild to severe. Acute renal failure/acute kidney injury is classified according to the RIFLE criteria where a change from baseline serum creatinine or urine output determines the level of renal dysfunction.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions to prevent acute renal failure in people at high risk? What are the effects of treatments for critically ill people with acute renal failure? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2007 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 77 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: albumin supplementation plus loop diuretics (intravenous), aminoglycosides, aminophylline, amphotericin B, calcium channel blockers, contrast media, dialysis membranes, dopamine, fenoldopam, loop diuretics, mannitol, N-acetylcysteine, natriuretic peptides, renal replacement therapy, sodium bicarbonate-based fluids, sodium chloride-based fluids, and theophylline.
Topics: Acetylcysteine; Acute Kidney Injury; Fenoldopam; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency; Renal Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 19445797
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2015The incidence of invasive fungal infections has increased globally as a result of several factors. Conventional amphotericin B (sodium deoxycholate) has been used as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The incidence of invasive fungal infections has increased globally as a result of several factors. Conventional amphotericin B (sodium deoxycholate) has been used as standard therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, it is associated with adverse drug reactions, including acute kidney injury (AKI). New formulations of amphotericin B have aimed to improve the safety profile of the conventional formulation.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to assess the effects of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B on kidney function.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register to 10 March 2015 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared amphotericin B sodium deoxycholate with liposomal amphotericin B.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and conducted risk of bias evaluation.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 12 studies (2298 participants) in this review. Of these, 10 were meta-analysed (2172 participants). Liposomal amphotericin B was found to be significantly safer than conventional amphotericin B in terms of serum creatinine increase (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59). There was significant decrease in all infusion-related reactions in the liposomal group compared with the conventional group: fever (4 studies, 1092 participants): RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.55; I(2) = 32%); chills and/or rigours (5 studies, 1081 participants): RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.48; I(2) = 75%); fever and/or rigours (2 studies, 720 participants): RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.90; I(2) = 58%); nausea (6 studies, 1187 participants): RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.72; I(2) = 0%); and vomiting (3 studies, 1019 participants): RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.95; I(2) = 61%). Overall, risk of bias in included studies was low or unclear for most domains. However, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment and other bias (funding) tended to have a high risk of bias. The sensitivity analysis performed did not change the significance of difference in favour of the liposomal formulation. Assessment for publication bias found that review results were robust.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence suggests that liposomal amphotericin B is less nephrotoxic than conventional amphotericin B (when the effect on kidney function is measured as an increase in serum creatinine level equal to or greater than two-fold from the baseline level). We also found that there were fewer infusion-related reactions associated with the liposomal formulation.
Topics: Adult; Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Child; Chills; Creatinine; Deoxycholic Acid; Drug Combinations; Female; Fever; Humans; Kidney; Male; Nausea; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vomiting
PubMed: 26595825
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010481.pub2 -
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Oct 2023Evidence for efficacy of single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis and histoplasmosis is growing. No systematic review... (Review)
Review
Safety of Single High-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Induction Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis and Histoplasmosis in People With HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Evidence for efficacy of single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis and histoplasmosis is growing. No systematic review has examined the safety of this regimen across multiple studies.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2023 for studies reporting grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) with single high-dose LAmB vs traditional amphotericin regimens for HIV-associated fungal infections.
RESULTS
Three trials (n = 946) were included. Compared with traditional regimens, single high-dose LAmB was associated with equivalent risk of grade 3 and 4 AEs (risk ratio [RR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06) and lower overall risk of grade 4 AEs (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86), grade 4 renal (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94) and grade 4 hematological AEs (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65).
CONCLUSIONS
Single, high-dose LAmB is associated with a lower risk of life-threatening AEs compared with other World Health Organization-endorsed amphotericin B-based regimens in invasive HIV-related fungal infection.
PubMed: 37808894
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad472 -
Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia.The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2014Patients with cancer who are treated with chemotherapy or receive a bone marrow transplant have an increased risk of acquiring fungal infections. Such infections can be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Patients with cancer who are treated with chemotherapy or receive a bone marrow transplant have an increased risk of acquiring fungal infections. Such infections can be life-threatening. Antifungal drugs are therefore often given prophylactically to such patients, or when they have a fever.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the benefits and harms of lipid soluble formulations of amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched PubMed from 1966 to 7 July 2014 and the reference lists of identified articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised clinical trials comparing lipid soluble formulations of amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and abstracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We found 13 trials (1960 patients). Lipid-based amphotericin B was not more effective than conventional amphotericin B on mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.14) but decreased invasive fungal infection (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.97), nephrotoxicity defined as a 100% increase in serum creatinine (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.54), and number of dropouts (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97).For the drug used in most patients, AmBisome (4 trials, 1214 patients), there was no significant difference in mortality (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.10) whereas it tended to be more effective than conventional amphotericin B on invasive fungal infection (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.01, P value 0.053).AmBisome, amphotericin B in Intralipid (6 trials, 379 patients), amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) (2 trials, 262 patients), and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) (1 trial, 105 patients) all decreased the occurrence of nephrotoxicity, but conventional amphotericin B was rarely administered under optimal circumstances.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It is not clear whether there are any advantages of lipid-based formulations if conventional amphotericin B is administered under optimal circumstances, and their high cost prohibits routine use in most settings. There is a need for large trials comparing lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B given in the same dose, with routine premedication for prevention of infusion-related toxicity, and with supplementation with fluid, potassium, and magnesium for prevention of nephrotoxicity.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Humans; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25188673
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000969.pub2 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2022Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are a major global public health concern. The incidence of IFD has increased the demand for antifungal agents. Isavuconazole (ISA) is a... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are a major global public health concern. The incidence of IFD has increased the demand for antifungal agents. Isavuconazole (ISA) is a new triazole antifungal agent that has shown promising efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent real-world experiences of using ISA for the treatment and prevention of IFD.
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for clinical applications of ISA in the real world. Tables and reference lists are presented for this systematic review.
RESULTS
IFD poses a major threat to public health and causes high mortality rates. ISA may provide a good treatment. For example, the efficacy of ISA in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is comparable to that of voriconazole, and its efficacy in the treatment of invasive mucormycosis (IM) is similar to that of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB); therefore, ISA is recommended as the first-line treatment for IA and IM. ISA can also achieve good efficacy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) and can be used as an alternative to de-escalation therapy after first-line drug therapy. In addition, most studies have shown the efficacy and safety of ISA for the prophylaxis of IFD.
CONCLUSION
Taken together, ISA are expected to become a new choice for the treatment and prevention of IFD because of their good tolerability, high bioavailability, and few drug interactions.
Topics: Humans; Triazoles; Invasive Fungal Infections; Nitriles; Antifungal Agents; Aspergillosis; Mucormycosis; Candidiasis, Invasive
PubMed: 36530445
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1049959 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Nov 2023Although the level of medical care has been improved in recent years, the probability of patients contracting pathogens has increased greatly, with a rising incidence of...
BACKGROUND
Although the level of medical care has been improved in recent years, the probability of patients contracting pathogens has increased greatly, with a rising incidence of invasive fungal infections. Deep-seated fungi have become common pathogens of nosocomial infections.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to systematically assess the effectiveness, mortality, survival rate, and adverse reactions (ARs) of high-dose (HD) liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) for human diseases.
METHODS
Ten articles (1661 patients) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; whether randomized, single-blind, or double-blind) from January 1, 1960, to December 31, 2020, of HD-L-AMB treatment of diseases were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary outcome measure was the overall therapeutic effect, and the secondary outcome measures were mortality, ≥10-week survival, and ARs. Data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.
RESULTS
Ten RCTs involving 1661 patients were included. HD-L-AMB did not show a significant therapeutic advantage in anti-infection treatment. In addition, HD-L-AMB treatment of invasive Aspergillus infection led to high mortality and low survival (≥10 weeks, OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.94, P = .03). According to subgroup analysis, the incidence of ARs and the incidence of renal dysfunction associated with invasive fungal infection treatment were higher with HD-L-AMB than with regular-dose L-AMB.
CONCLUSION
HD-L-AMB had no obvious advantage for the treatment of diseases and was accompanied by increased mortality, reduced long-term survival, and increased ARs (including renal insufficiency). Therefore, the use of HD-L-AMB to control infections is recommended with caution only when the preferred treatment is contraindicated.
PubMed: 37971463
DOI: No ID Found -
Scientific Reports Aug 2023The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use amphotericin B in patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia. We searched... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use amphotericin B in patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data database and the China Clinical Trials Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of amphotericin B for patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia from inception to May 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs was used to assess the bias risk of the included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 6 studies with a total of 1019 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of the fungal infection rate, and the differences were statistically significant [RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.32, 0.69), P < 0.0001]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mortality [RR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.61, 1.23), P = 0.43] and the incidence of colonization [OR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.25, 1.03), P = 0.06]. The evidence shows that amphotericin B prophylactic use for patients with hematologic disorders complicated by neutropenia can decrease the fungal infection rate. However, there was no significant difference in reducing mortality or the incidence of colonization. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Topics: Humans; Amphotericin B; Neutropenia; Hematologic Diseases; China; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37635176
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41268-1 -
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular... Oct 2020Although it is the most common agent among the fungal causes of endocarditis, Candida albicans endocarditis is rare.
INTRODUCTION
Although it is the most common agent among the fungal causes of endocarditis, Candida albicans endocarditis is rare.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of amphotericin B in the treatment of C. albicans endocarditis beyond a systematic review.
DATA SEARCH
Articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese, conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS and SciELO, in humans and published in the last 25 years.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies, clinical trials, and case series providing data on the amphotericin B use in patients with a C. albicans endocarditis diagnosis without age limitations.
DATA SYNTHESIS
From the initial search (n=79), 25 articles were fully evaluated, of which 19 were excluded for meeting one or more exclusion criteria, remaining five articles (two observational studies and three case series). Patients using amphotericin B demonstrated improvement in survival rates, and its main use was in association with the surgical method as well as with caspofungin association.
CONCLUSION
Literature lacks evidence to conclude about efficacy and safety of amphotericin B in the treatment of fungal endocarditis. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to provide better evidence on the subject.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Candida albicans; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Endocarditis; Humans; Infant, Newborn
PubMed: 33118745
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0159 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2022Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, and affects around 10% of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, and affects around 10% of people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. High doses of corticosteroids are the main treatment for ABPA; although the long-term benefits are not clear, and their many side effects are well-documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against A fumigatus, and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, amphotericin B, has been used in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with A fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated. This is an update of a previously published review.
OBJECTIVES
The review aimed to test the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); and 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, we planned to assess the optimal type, duration, and dose of antifungal therapy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, and abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register was 28 September 2021. We searched ongoing trials registries, most recently on 11 March 2022. Earlier, we also approached pharmaceutical companies regarding possible unpublished trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials, in which antifungal treatments were compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment were used in the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The searches identified six trials; none of which met the inclusion criteria for the review.
MAIN RESULTS
We included no completed randomised controlled trials. There is currently one ongoing trial, which we may find eligible for a future update.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
At present, there are no randomised controlled trials that evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis, although one trial is currently ongoing. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate the use of corticosteroids in people with ABPA and cystic fibrosis.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary; Aspergillus fumigatus; Cystic Fibrosis; Humans; Itraconazole
PubMed: 36053129
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002204.pub5