-
Surgical Endoscopy May 2023In the advancement of transanal local excision, robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery is the newest development. In the confined area of the rectum,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In the advancement of transanal local excision, robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery is the newest development. In the confined area of the rectum, robot-assisted surgery should, theoretically, be superior due to articulated utensils, video enhancement, and tremor reduction, however, this has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to review the evidence reported to-date on experience of using robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery for treatment of rectal neoplasms.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of Embase and PubMed from May to August 2021were performed. Studies including patients diagnosed with rectal neoplasia or benign polyps who underwent robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery were included. All studies were assessed for risk of bias through assessment tools. Main outcome measures were feasibility, excision quality, and complications.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies with a total of 322 local excisions were included. The studies included were all retrospective, primarily case-reports, -series, and cohort studies. The median distance from the anal verge ranged from 3.5 to 10 cm and the median size was between 2.5 and 5.3 cm. Overall, 4.6% of the resections had a positive resection margin. The overall complication rate was at 9.5% with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score III) at 0.9%.
CONCLUSION
Based on limited, retrospective data, with a high risk of bias, robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery seems feasible and safe for local excisions in the rectum.
Topics: Humans; Robotics; Retrospective Studies; Feasibility Studies; Rectum; Rectal Neoplasms; Anal Canal; Transanal Endoscopic Surgery; Margins of Excision; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36707419
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09853-z -
International Journal of Surgery... Aug 2022There are no consensus guidelines on the optimal dose or injection site of botulinum toxin (BT) for chronic anal fissure (CAF). The objective of this study was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There are no consensus guidelines on the optimal dose or injection site of botulinum toxin (BT) for chronic anal fissure (CAF). The objective of this study was to determine the appropriate dose and injection site of BT for CAF by comparing healing rate and adverse effects (incontinence and recurrence).
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus were searched from inception through May 31, 2021. Randomized controlled trials evaluating healing and adverse effects of BT injection for CAF published in any language were selected. Multiple treatment comparisons and ranking were performed using a two-stage network meta-analysis, and results were graded by Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven trials involving 1880 patients were included. The results demonstrated that high-dose-BT had significantly higher short-term healing when injected out of the fissure (OF) site than each side of the fissure (SF) site, with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.12 (1.08, 4.15); low-dose-BT did not show any difference across OF and SF site with RR of 1.20 (0.85, 1.68). High-dose-BT at the OF site showed similar healing to low-dose-BT at the same site (RR of 1.02 (0.79, 1.31)) but with a higher risk of incontinence with RR of 3.54 (0.85, 14.76). In contrast, high-dose-BT at the SF site showed lower healing compared to low-dose-BT at the same site with RR of 0.57 (0.29, 1.14). Both high-dose-BT and low-dose-BT at the OF site had higher recurrence than high-dose-BT or low-dose-BT at the SF site with RR of 2.08 (0.33, 13.11) and 1.89 (0.60, 5.94), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Given moderate level of evidence, low-dose BT is optimal; injection out of the fissure site improves short-term outcomes while injection each side of the fissure site tends to reduce recurrence in the longer term.
Topics: Anal Canal; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Chronic Disease; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35934283
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106798 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Aug 2001Faecal incontinence is a common health care problem. Biofeedback is extensively used in clinical practice to treat faecal incontinence. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Faecal incontinence is a common health care problem. Biofeedback is extensively used in clinical practice to treat faecal incontinence.
AIM
To systematically review and evaluate the evidence from clinical studies on the effectiveness of biofeedback as a treatment for faecal incontinence in adults.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was undertaken using electronic databases, with review of the retrieved references.
RESULTS
The search identified 46 studies published in English using biofeedback to treat adults complaining of faecal incontinence. Those studies included a total of 1364 patients. Of those studies with adequate data, 275 out of 566 patients (49%) were said to be cured of symptoms of faecal incontinence following biofeedback therapy and 617 out of 861 (72%) patients were reported to be cured or improved. Studies varied in the method of biofeedback used, criteria for success and the outcome measures used. Only eight of the 46 studies employed any form of control group.
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that biofeedback and exercises help a majority of patients with faecal incontinence. However, methodological variation, lack of controls and a lack of validated outcome measures are problems in evaluating these results.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Clinical Trials as Topic; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Male; Pelvis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 11472317
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01039.x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2012For almost one hundred years abdominoperineal excision has been the standard treatment of choice for rectal cancer. With advances in the techniques for rectal resection... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
For almost one hundred years abdominoperineal excision has been the standard treatment of choice for rectal cancer. With advances in the techniques for rectal resection and anastomosis, anterior resection with preservation of the sphincter function has become the preferred treatment for rectal cancers, except for those cancers very close to the anal sphincter. The main reason for this has been the conviction that the quality of life for patients with a colostomy after abdominoperineal excision was poorer than for patients undergoing an operation with a sphincter-preserving technique. However, patients having sphincter-preserving operations may experience symptoms affecting their quality of life that are different from stoma-patients.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without permanent colostomy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group's specialised register. Abstract books from major gastroenterological and colorectal congresses were searched. Reference lists of the selected articles were scrutinized.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All controlled clinical trials and observational studies in which quality of life was measured in patients with rectal cancer having either abdominoperineal excision/Hartmann's operation or low anterior resection, using a validated quality of life instrument, were considered.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
One reviewer (JP) checked the titles and abstracts identified from the databases and hand search. Full text copies of all studies of possible relevance were obtained. The reviewer decided which studies met the inclusion criteria. Both reviewers independently extracted data. If information was insufficient the original author was contacted to obtain missing data. Extracted data were cross-checked and discrepancies resolved by consensus.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixty-nine potential studies were identified. Thirty-five of these, all non-randomised and representing 5127 participants met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen trials found that people undergoing abdominoperineal excision/Hartmann's operation did not have poorer quality of life measures than patients undergoing anterior resection. The rest of the studies found some difference, but not always in favour of non-stoma patients. Due to clinical heterogeneity and the fact that all studies were observational trials, meta-analysis of the included studies was not possible.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The studies included in this review do not allow firm conclusions as to the question of whether the quality of life of people after anterior resection is superior to that of people after abdominoperineal excision/Hartmann's operation. The included studies challenges the assumption that anterior resection patients fare better. Larger, better designed and executed prospective studies are needed to answer this question.
Topics: Anal Canal; Colostomy; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Organ Sparing Treatments; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum
PubMed: 23235607
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004323.pub4 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Mar 2010Conflicting results are reported about the contribution of maternal, obstetric and fetal characteristics to postpartum fecal incontinence (FI), which is hampering... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Conflicting results are reported about the contribution of maternal, obstetric and fetal characteristics to postpartum fecal incontinence (FI), which is hampering prevention and management of FI.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review identifying delivery-related etiological factors for postpartum FI. Search strategy. Literature searches of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, DocOnline and reference lists from 1980 up to 2009 were conducted. Selection criteria. Prospective cohort studies evaluating maternal, obstetric or fetal risk factors for postpartum FI, with a follow-up period of at least three months, were assessed. We reviewed full reports in English, German or Dutch, with anal incontinence (AI), FI, flatus incontinence, soiling, urgency and FI severity scores as reported outcomes. Data collection and analysis. Data on study characteristics, methodological quality and outcome were extracted from 31 studies according to a standardized protocol. Clinical and methodological sources of heterogeneity permitted only a qualitative analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
A third- or fourth-degree sphincter rupture was the only etiological factor strongly (AI) or moderately (flatus incontinence) associated with postpartum FI. No association with other postulated risk factors was found, for example, birth weight or instrumental delivery. The potential co-existence of different risk factors impedes the interpretation of the influence of a single delivery-related risk factor.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review, including only longitudinal studies and recognizing the importance of separating results for different outcomes, identifies that a third- or fourth-degree sphincter rupture is the only factor that is strongly (AI) or moderately (flatus incontinence) associated with postpartum FI.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Flatulence; Humans; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Puerperal Disorders; Risk Factors; Rupture
PubMed: 20199348
DOI: 10.3109/00016340903576004 -
International Urogynecology Journal Jun 2022OASI complicates approximately 6% of vaginal deliveries. This risk is increased with operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs), particularly forceps. However, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
OASI complicates approximately 6% of vaginal deliveries. This risk is increased with operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs), particularly forceps. However, there is conflicting evidence supporting the use of mediolateral/lateral episiotomy (MLE/LE) with OVD. The aim of this study was to assess whether MLE/LE affects the incidence of OASI in OVD.
METHODS
Electronic searches were performed in OVID Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomised and non-randomised observational studies investigating the risk of OASI in OVD with/without MLE/LE were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Revman 5.3. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
A total of 703,977 patients from 31 studies were pooled for meta-analysis. MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate of OASI in OVD (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.42-0.84]). On sub-group analysis, MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate in nulliparous ventouse (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.42-0.84]) and forceps deliveries (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.29-0.61]). In multiparous women, although the incidence of OASI was lower when a ventouse or forceps delivery was performed with an MLE/LE, this was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity remained significant across all studies (I > 50). The quality of all evidence was downgraded to "very low" because of the critical risk of bias across many studies.
CONCLUSIONS
MLE/LE may reduce the incidence of OASI in OVDs, particularly in nulliparous ventouse or forceps deliveries. This information will be useful in aiding clinical decision-making and counselling in the antenatal period and during labour.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Female; Humans; Obstetric Labor Complications; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Risk Reduction Behavior
PubMed: 35426490
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05145-1 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Nov 2023Inguinal lymph nodes are a rare but recognised site of metastasis in rectal adenocarcinoma. No guideline or consensus exists for the management of such cases. This... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Inguinal lymph nodes are a rare but recognised site of metastasis in rectal adenocarcinoma. No guideline or consensus exists for the management of such cases. This review aims to provide a contemporary and comprehensive analysis of the published literature to aid clinical decision-making.
METHODS
Systematic searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL Library databases from inception till December 2022. All studies reporting on the presentation, prognosis or management of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM) were included. Pooled proportion meta-analyses were completed when possible and descriptive synthesis was utilised for the remaining outcomes. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool for case series was used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion, encompassing 18 case series and one population-based study using national registry data. A total of 487 patients were included in the primary studies. The prevalence of ILNM in rectal cancer is 0.36%. ILNM are associated with very low rectal tumours with a mean distance from the anal verge of 1.1 cm (95% CI 0.92-1.27). Invasion of the dentate line was found in 76% of cases (95% CI 59-93). In patients with isolated inguinal lymph node metastases, modern chemoradiotherapy regimens in combination with surgical excision of inguinal nodes are associated with 5-year overall survival rates of 53-78%.
CONCLUSION
In specific subsets of patients with ILNM, curative-intent treatment regimens are feasible, with oncological outcomes akin to those demonstrated in locally advanced rectal cancers.
Topics: Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Inguinal Canal; Adenocarcinoma; Lymph Nodes; Rectal Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37233960
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02826-x -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Jul 2016Tobacco smoking is associated with a reduced risk of developing ulcerative colitis (UC). A high proportion of UC patients perceive a benefit in disease outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tobacco smoking is associated with a reduced risk of developing ulcerative colitis (UC). A high proportion of UC patients perceive a benefit in disease outcomes secondary to smoking. However, the effects of smoking on the natural history of UC are uncertain.
AIM
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of tobacco smoking on the natural history of UC.
METHODS
A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and EMBASE classic was carried out (up to December 2015) to identify observational studies reporting data on smoking and rates of colectomy, flare of disease activity, proximal disease extension, and development of pouchitis following panproctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with UC. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The search identified 16 eligible studies: five (2615 patients) studying colectomy; four (620 patients) reporting on flare of disease activity; four (687 patients) examining proximal disease extension and three (355 patients) assessing development of pouchitis. Compared with nonsmokers, the odds of colectomy (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.62-1.26), flare of disease activity (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 0.65-2.44), proximal extension of disease (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.20-1.66) or the development of pouchitis (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.21-1.53) were not significantly lower in smokers.
CONCLUSIONS
Smoking may not improve the natural history of ulcerative colitis. Given the health benefits of smoking cessation and the lack of clear benefit in ulcerative colitis, smoking cessation advice should be incorporated into guidance on the management of ulcerative colitis.
Topics: Anal Canal; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonic Pouches; Humans; Pouchitis; Smoking
PubMed: 27193202
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13663 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery Apr 2016Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has emerged as a treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). However, its objective effect on symptoms and anorectal function is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has emerged as a treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). However, its objective effect on symptoms and anorectal function is inconsistently described. This study aimed to systematically review the impact of SNM on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology in patients with FI, including factors that may predict treatment outcome.
METHODS
An electronic search of MEDLINE (1946-2014)/EMBASE database was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles that reported the relevant outcome measures following SNM were included. Clinical outcomes evaluated included: frequency of FI episodes, FI severity score and success rates. Its impact on anorectal and gastrointestinal physiology was also evaluated.
RESULTS
Of 554 citations identified, data were extracted from 81 eligible studies. Meta-analysis of the data was precluded due to lack of a comparison group in most studies. After permanent SNM, 'perfect' continence was noted in 13-88% of patients. Most studies reported a reduction in weekly FI episodes (median difference of the mean -7.0 (range: -24.8 to -2.7)) and Wexner scores (median difference of the mean -9 (-14.9 to -6)). A trend towards improved resting and squeeze anal pressures and a reduction in rectal sensory volumes were noted. Studies failed to identify any consistent impact on other physiological parameters or clinicophysiological factors associated with success.
CONCLUSION
SNM improves clinical symptoms and reduces number of incontinence episodes and severity scores in patients with FI, in part by improving anorectal physiological function. However, intervention studies with standardized outcome measures and physiological techniques are required to robustly assess the physiological impact of SNM.
Topics: Anal Canal; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Sacrum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26245170
DOI: 10.1111/ans.13257 -
Journal of Ultrasound Jun 2023Endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is the gold standard imaging investigation for evaluating the anal sphincter; unfortunately, it is not universally available in most...
INTRODUCTION
Endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is the gold standard imaging investigation for evaluating the anal sphincter; unfortunately, it is not universally available in most obstetric units. This study aims to appraise the ability of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) compared with 3D-EAUS as the gold standard to identify anal sphincter defects after primary repair of OASIS.
METHODS
A systematic search of major databases to identify diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TPUS in evaluating anal sphincter defects. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were designed for this systematic review. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Our eligibility criteria are patients with a history of primary repair of anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). They were followed up after the primary repair to detect the anal sphincter defect using 3D-TPUS vs. 3D-EAUS as a gold standard.
RESULTS
Two eligible observational studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool and showed a low risk of bias and a low risk of concerns. 3D-TPUS had various sensitivity to detect external anal sphincter defects in two studies; meanwhile, the specificity was around 67-70%. For detecting the internal anal sphincter defects, 3D-TPUS had low sensitivity but high specificity (93-94%).
CONCLUSION
3D-TPUS had various sensitivity to detect external anal sphincter defects and low sensitivity to detect internal anal sphincter defects. On the other hand, 3D-TPUS had low specificity for detecting external anal sphincter defects and high specificity for detecting internal anal sphincter defects.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Anal Canal; Ultrasonography; Abdominal Injuries
PubMed: 36630015
DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00763-3