-
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Dec 2022Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly used as a treatment for end-stage ankle arthropathy. However, TAA may be more sensitive to complications, failure and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly used as a treatment for end-stage ankle arthropathy. However, TAA may be more sensitive to complications, failure and subsequent re-operations compared to ankle arthrodesis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to generate an overview of complications of TAA surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched between 2000 and 2020 to identify all papers reporting on complications in TAA surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted based on type of complication in TAA surgery. Pooled estimates of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Risk of bias and quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in estimates was rated and described according to the recommendations of the GRADE working group.
RESULTS
One hundred twenty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. All combined, they reported on 16.964 TAAs with an average follow-up of 47.99 ± 29.18 months. Complications with highest reported pooled incidence were intra-operative fracture 0.06 (95 %CI 0.04-0.08) (GRADE Very low) and impingement 0.06 (95 %CI 0.04-0.08) (GRADE low) respectively.
CONCLUSION
Reported complication incidence of TAA surgery is still high and remains a significant clinical problem that can be severely hampering long-term clinical survival of the prosthesis. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can help guide surgeons in informing their patient about complication risks. Implementation of more stringent patient selection criteria might contribute to diminishing TAA complication rates.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Arthrodesis; Ankle Joint; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35872118
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.07.004 -
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Sep 2020Ankle fractures are common in the elderly. However, their association with osteoporosis remains controversial. This systematic review aims to determine the relationship...
OBJECTIVES
Ankle fractures are common in the elderly. However, their association with osteoporosis remains controversial. This systematic review aims to determine the relationship between ankle fracture and bone mineral density (BMD), and to investigate the risk of subsequent fractures after ankle fracture.
METHODS
MEDLINE and Scopus publications were searched from inception to March and April 2019, respectively. Articles were selected by 2 independent reviewers for cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control studies comparing BMD or subsequent fracture risk in low-energy ankle fractures patients with that of the normal population. Data extraction was performed by 2 investigators. Discrepancies were resolved with the third reviewer. Quality assessment was conducted using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Overall, 19 articles were included. The quality assessment showed a generally low-to-moderate risk of bias among studies, mainly due to potential confounders and inadequate follow-up. Of 13 studies exploring BMD in ankle fractured-patients, lower central and peripheral BMD was found in 3 and 2 studies, respectively. The risk of subsequent fracture was examined in 11 studies with relative risks ranging from 0.7 to 4.59. An increased risk of any subsequent fractures in women, both genders, and men was found in 5, 2, and 1 articles, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the lack of clear association with BMD, the contribution of ankle fracture to increased subsequent fracture risk and its associated microarchitectural changes cannot be overlooked. Moreover, its potential role as an early predictor of future fracture may promote secondary prevention. Further studies with longer follow-up and stricter confounder control are recommended.
PubMed: 33102810
DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.08.003 -
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Jun 2024This systematic review aimed to analyse the effect of early weight bearing versus late weight bearing on rehabilitation outcomes after ankle fractures, which primarily... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effect of early weight-bearing and later weight-bearing rehabilitation interventions on outcomes after ankle fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to analyse the effect of early weight bearing versus late weight bearing on rehabilitation outcomes after ankle fractures, which primarily include ankle function scores, time to return to work/daily life and complication rates.
METHODS
The China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Science and Technology Journal, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The focus was on identifying randomised controlled trials centred on early weight-bearing interventions for post-operative ankle fracture rehabilitation. All databases were searched for eligible studies published within the period from database inception to 20 June 2023. The eligible studies were screened according to the inclusion criteria. Study quality was evaluated using the methodology recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for the Systematic Evaluation of Interventions. Two authors independently performed the literature search and data extraction. Eligible studies were subjected to meta-analyses using Review Manager 5.3. Based on the time points at which post-operative ankle function was reported in the studies included in this paper, we decided to perform a meta-analysis of ankle function scores at 6 weeks post-operatively, 12 weeks post-operatively, 24-26 weeks post-operatively and 1 year post-operatively.
RESULTS
A total of 11 papers, comprising 862 patients, were included. Meta-analysis indicated that patients receiving early weight-bearing interventions, which referred to weight-bearing for 6 weeks post-operatively, experienced enhancements in ankle function scores (Olerud-Molander score, AOFAS score or Baird-Jackson score) at various post-operative milestones: 6 weeks (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88 and p < 0.01), 12 weeks (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92 and p < 0.01) and the 24-26 weeks range (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85 and p < 0.01). The results of subgroup analyses revealed that the effects of early weight-bearing interventions were influenced by ankle range-of-motion exercises. Additionally, early weight bearing allows patients to return to daily life and work earlier, which was evaluated by time when they resumed their preinjury activities (MD = -2.74, 95% CI: -3.46 to -2.02 and p < 0.01), with no distinct elevation in the incidence of complications (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.85-2.61 and p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results showed that early weight bearing is effective in improving ankle function among post-operative ankle fracture patients and allows patients to return to daily life earlier. Significantly, the safety profile of early weight bearing remains favourable, with no higher risk of complications than late weight bearing.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Treatment Outcome; China; Weight-Bearing; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38635458
DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12011 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Aug 2021This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to study the efficacy of surgical repair treatment on ankle fractures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to apply meta-analysis to study the efficacy of surgical repair treatment on ankle fractures.
METHODS
The Boolean logic search method was adopted to retrieve relevant randomized control trials (RCTs), with "Fracture", "Ankles", "Fractured Foot", "Fractures Merge", and "Surgical Treatment" as search terms. The databases PubMed, Medline, HowNet, and others were searched from the time of their establishment. The software Review Manager (Rev Man 5.3) was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 10 references were included in the study, and most of them had low-risk bias (medium-high quality). The results of meta-analysis showed that after surgical repair treatment, gait was good, while the gait score of the non-surgical group was poor. The result was Chi2 (Chi-squared Test) =57.91, df (degree of freedom) =5, I2=91%, P<0.1, mean difference (MD) =-9.21, 95% CI: -10.25 to -8.17, Z=17.36, P<0.05. The non-surgical group showed a higher degree of pain and poorer ankle and hindfoot functions vs. the surgical group. Also, the pain degree of the non-surgical repair combined with surrounding tissue group was higher, and the ankle and hindfoot functions were poorer vs. the surgical repair treatment group. The Pain intensity results of the surgical and non-surgical groups were Chi2 =12.89, df =2, I2=84%, P<0.1, MD =-9.51, 95% CI: -10.47 to -8.55, Z=19.39, P<0.05; the AOFAS scores of surgical repair treatment and non-surgical repair treatment were Chi2 =27.07, df =6, I2=78%, P<0.1, MD =8.89, 95% CI: 8.26 to 9.71, Z=24.30, P<0.05. It was revealed that surgical repair treatment can significantly reduce the postoperative pain of patients with ankle joint fractures, while the non-surgical repair treatment group had a higher degree of postoperative pain. The result was (MD =2.32, 95% CI: 2.16 to 2.48, I2=100%, Z=28.33, P<0.05).
DISCUSSION
Surgical repair treatment of ankle fracture demonstrated significant curative effects, with fewer adverse reactions, and the stability of the ankle joint was well restored.
Topics: Ankle Fractures; Ankle Joint; Humans
PubMed: 34488374
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1618 -
Quality of Life Research : An... Jan 2023Ankle fractures are commonly occurring fractures, especially in the aging population, where they often present as fragility fractures. The disease burden and economic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Ankle fractures are commonly occurring fractures, especially in the aging population, where they often present as fragility fractures. The disease burden and economic costs to the patient and society are considerable. Choosing accurate outcome measures for the evaluation of the management of ankle fractures in clinical trials facilitates better decision-making. This systematic review assesses the evidence for the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the evaluation of adult patients with ankle fractures.
METHODS
Searches were performed in CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar from the date of inception to July 2021. Studies that assessed the measurement properties of a PROM in an adult ankle fracture population were included. The included studies were assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of PROMs.
RESULTS
In total, 13 different PROMs were identified in the 23 included articles. Only the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM) presented some evidence on content validity. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) displayed good evidence of construct validity and internal consistency. The measurement properties of the OMAS, LEFS and SEFAS were most studied.
CONCLUSION
The absence of validation studies covering all measurement properties of PROMs used in the adult ankle fracture population precludes the recommendation of a specific PROM to be used in the evaluation of this population. Further research should focus on validation of the content validity of the instruments used in patients with ankle fractures.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Humans; Ankle; Ankle Fractures; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35716224
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03166-3 -
Sports Medicine - Open Jan 2021Netball is estimated to be played by more than 20 million people worldwide, but there is evidence of high injury incidence. A thorough understanding of the types and...
BACKGROUND
Netball is estimated to be played by more than 20 million people worldwide, but there is evidence of high injury incidence. A thorough understanding of the types and rates of netball injuries is essential for effective injury management and prevention strategies to be developed and implemented. This systematic review summarises the published findings with respect to injury types, participant characteristics and any identified risk factors for netball injuries.
METHODS
A librarian-assisted computer search of seven scientific databases was conducted for studies reporting on netball injuries. Inclusion criteria were studies published in English, in peer-reviewed journals, which reported data on injuries and variables (e.g. age and competition level) that have been proposed as possibly associated with netball injury risk.
RESULTS
Forty-six studies (43.5% prospective, 37% hospital/insurance records, 19.5% retrospective) from 45 articles were included after screening. The majority of studies (74%) were conducted in Australia or New Zealand. There was little consistency in the definition of 'injury'. Elite or sub-elite level players were included in 69% of studies where the level of competition was reported. The duration of injury surveillance was generally related to the format of competition from which data were collected. Self-report questionnaires were used in 48% of studies and only 26% of studies used qualified health professionals to collect data courtside. Injuries to the ankle and knee were the most common (in 19 studies) although the incidence varied considerably across the studies (ankle 13-84% and knee 8-50% of injuries). Prevention of ankle and knee injuries should be a priority. Children sustained more upper limb injuries (e.g. fractures) compared with adults who sustained more lower limb injuries (e.g. ankle and knee sprains/strains). A large number of potential risk factors for injury in netball have been investigated in small numbers of studies. The main circumstances of injury are landings, collisions and falls.
CONCLUSION
Further studies should be directed towards recreational netball, reporting on injury incidence in players by age and utilising high-quality, standardised methods and criteria. Specific injury diagnosis and a better understanding of the circumstances and mechanisms of injury would provide more meaningful data for developing prevention strategies.
PubMed: 33409965
DOI: 10.1186/s40798-020-00290-7 -
EFORT Open Reviews Oct 2022The aim of this study was to update the scientific evidence for ankle fracture prognosis by addressing radiographic osteoarthritis, time course and prognostic factors. A... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to update the scientific evidence for ankle fracture prognosis by addressing radiographic osteoarthritis, time course and prognostic factors. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, controlled trials or observational studies, including case series and case-control studies investigating radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis in adults with a classified ankle fracture, treated with or without surgery, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Also included were studies examining prognostic factors predicting radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis. Tibial plafond and talus fractures were excluded. Thirty-four studies were included examining 3447 patients. Extracted data included study type, inclusion and exclusion criteria, age, number of patients, number of fractures according to the author-reported classification method, radiological osteoarthritis, follow-up period, prognostic factors, and treatment. Severe heterogeneity was visible in the analyses (I2 > 90%), reflecting clinical heterogeneity possibly arising from the presence of osteoarthritis at baseline, the classifications used for the fractures and for osteoarthritis. The incidence of osteoarthritis was 25% (95% CI: 18-32) and 34% (95% CI: 23-45) for more severe fractures with involvement of the posterior malleolus. The severity of the trauma, as reflected by the fracture classification, was the most important prognostic factor for the development of radiographic osteoarthritis, but there is also a risk with simpler injuries. The period within which osteoarthritis develops or becomes symptomatic with an indication for treatment could not be specified.
PubMed: 36287098
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0065 -
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and... May 2021This systematic review evaluated the surgical outcomes of various ankle fracture treatment modalities in patients with Diabetes Mellitus as well as the methodological...
AIM
This systematic review evaluated the surgical outcomes of various ankle fracture treatment modalities in patients with Diabetes Mellitus as well as the methodological quality of the studies.
METHODS
For our review, four online databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). The overall methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. Data regarding diabetic ankle fractures were pooled into three outcomes groups for comparison: (1) the standard fixation cohort with management of diabetic ankle fractures using ORIF with small or mini fragment internal fixation techniques following AO principles, (2) the minimally invasive cohort with diabetic ankle fracture management utilizing percutaneous cannulated screws or intramedullary fixation, and (3) the combined construct cohort treated with a combination of ORIF and another construct (transarticular or external fixation).
RESULTS
The search strategy identified 2228 potential studies from the four databases and 11 were included in the final review. Compared to the standard fixation cohort, the minimally invasive cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration and the combined constructs cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration, surgical site infection and nonunion. Limb salvage rates were similar for the standard fixation and minimally invasive cohorts; however, the combined constructs cohort had a significantly lower limb salvage rate compared to that of the standard fixation cohort. The mean Coleman Methodology Score indicated the quality of the studies in the review was poor and consistent with its limitations.
DISCUSSION
The overall quality of published studies on operative treatment of diabetic ankle fractures is low. Treating diabetic ankle fractures operatively results in a high number of complications regardless of fixation method. However, limb salvage rates remain high overall at 97.9% at a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. To achieve improved limb salvage rates and decrease complications, it is critical is to follow basic AO principles, respect the soft tissue envelope or utilize minimally invasive techniques, and be wary that certain combined constructs may be associated with higher complication rates.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
2.
PubMed: 33717936
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.013 -
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Jan 2021Patients undergoing fixation for foot and ankle fractures may experience poor outcomes despite achieving apparent anatomic reduction. Adjunct arthroscopy to identify... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing fixation for foot and ankle fractures may experience poor outcomes despite achieving apparent anatomic reduction. Adjunct arthroscopy to identify missed concomitant injuries and subtle displacements has been proposed as a vehicle to enhance functional results for these patients. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the literature regarding arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AAORIF) methods for commonly encountered foot and ankle injuries including pilon, ankle, and calcaneus fractures published to date.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database to access all studies reporting on arthroscopically assisted internal fixation methods for pilon, ankle, and calcaneus fractures. Relevant publications were analyzed for details on their respective study designs, the operative technique used, clinical outcomes, outcome instruments used, and reported complications.
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies were included in this review. Two studies on pilon fractures, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and case series with a total of 243 patients, met inclusion criteria. Postoperative articular reductions, bone union, and Mazur scores were found to be significantly better for those using adjunct arthroscopy when compared to those with no arthroscopy use. Patient-reported outcomes were overall reported as excellent for most patients, with no difference in patient-reported outcomes reported in the RCT. For ankle fractures, a total of 17 studies comprising of 2 systematic reviews, 1 meta-analysis, 2 RCTs, 5 retrospective comparative studies, 6 case series, and 1 case-control study met inclusion criteria for this review. Results were mixed, though the overall consensus was that arthroscopy use may help to better visualize concomitant intra-articular injuries and is generally considered safe with at least comparable outcomes to conventional methods. For the calcaneus, 13 studies met the criteria. Two studies were review papers, 8 were case series, and 3 were retrospective comparative studies. A total of 308 patients with 316 fractures formed the basis of analysis. In general, the studies found comparable functional outcomes between with or without arthroscopy use, but found that anatomical reductions were significantly improved with the use of arthroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS
Arthroscopy shows promise as a valuable adjunct tool for internal fixation of foot and ankle fractures, though definitive conclusions as to its clinical significance have yet to be drawn because of limited evidence. Potential advantages related to the direct visualization of the fracture site and minimally invasive nature of arthroscopy were suggested throughout studies examined in this review. The presence of intra-articular pathology may lead to unexpectedly poor outcomes seen in some patients who undergo surgical fixation of ankle fractures with an otherwise anatomic reduction on postoperative radiographs; the ability to diagnose and address these lesions with arthroscopy, therefore, has the potential to improve patient outcomes. To date, however, available literature has not shown that significant improvements in anatomical reductions and treatment of these intra-articular injuries provide any improvement in outcomes over standard fixation methods. Few prospective randomized controlled studies have been performed comparing these 2 operative techniques, rendering any suggestion that AAORIF improves clinical outcomes over traditional open fixation difficult to justify. Further research is indicated for what may be a potentially promising surgical adjunct prior to advocating for its routine use in patients.
PubMed: 35097419
DOI: 10.1177/2473011420950214