-
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2021To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory...
To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and to calculate the frequencies of different autoantibodies to paranodal proteins. Diagnosis of CIDP relies on clinical and neurophysiologic criteria and lacks useful diagnostic biomarkers. A subset of CIDP patients exhibit atypical clinical phenotypes and impaired response to conventional treatments. These patients were reported as having autoantibodies targeting paranodal protein neurofascin isoform 155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein-1 (CASPR1). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these autoantibodies, especially for anti-NF155 antibody. We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Eligible studies provided information to calculate the frequencies of anti-NF155 antibody and anti-CNTN1 antibody, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody, and the incidence of improvement and deterioration among anti-NF155 antibody seropositive CIDP patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and statistics. The pooled frequency of anti-NF155 autoantibody across 14 studies was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.10] with high heterogeneity; the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody for the diagnosis of a specific subgroup of CIDP patients were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97), respectively. For diagnosing of a specific subset of CIDP characterized by poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), we found a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity. The anti-NF155 antibody test should be used as a confirmatory test rather than a screening test. PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020203385 and CRD42020190789.
PubMed: 34108854
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.637336 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Recently, circulating donor-derive cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has gained growing attention in the field of solid organ transplantation. The aim of the study was to analyze...
OBJECTIVE
Recently, circulating donor-derive cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has gained growing attention in the field of solid organ transplantation. The aim of the study was to analyze circulating dd-cfDNA levels in graft rejection, ACR and AMR separately for each rejection type compared with non-rejection, and assessed the diagnostic potential of dd-cfDNA levels in predicting graft rejection after lung transplantation.
METHODS
A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases without restriction of languages. The search date ended on June 1, 2023. STATA software was used to analyze the difference between graft rejection, ACR, AMR and stable controls, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating dd-cfDNA in detecting graft rejection.
RESULTS
The results indicated that circulating dd-cfDNA levels in graft rejection, ACR, and AMR were significantly higher than non-rejection (graft rejection: SMD=1.78, 95% CI: 1.31-2.25, 88.6%, < 0.001; ACR: SMD=1.03, 95% CI: 0.47-1.59, 89.0%, < 0.001; AMR: SMD= 1.78, 95% CI: 1.20-2.35, 89.8%, < 0.001). Circulating dd-cfDNA levels distinguished graft rejection from non-rejection with a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) and a pooled specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The corresponding SROC yield an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93).
CONCLUSION
Circulating dd-cfDNA could be used as a non-invasive biomarker to distinguish the patients with graft rejection from normal stable controls.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023440467.
Topics: Humans; Organ Transplantation; Lung Transplantation; Biomarkers; Graft Rejection; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
PubMed: 37885888
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1263389 -
BMJ Open Jul 2017To present meta-analytic test accuracy estimates of levels of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and antibodies to anti-TNF to predict loss of response or lack of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To present meta-analytic test accuracy estimates of levels of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and antibodies to anti-TNF to predict loss of response or lack of regaining response in patients with anti-TNF managed Crohn's disease.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index were searched from inception to October/November 2014 to identify studies which reported 2×2 table data of the association between levels of anti-TNF or its antibodies and clinical status. Hierarchical/bivariate meta-analysis was undertaken with the user-written 'metandi' package of Harbord and Whiting using Stata V.11 software, for infliximab, adalimumab,anti-infliximab and anti-adalimumab levels as predictors of loss of response. Prevalence of Crohn's disease in included studies was meta-analysed using a random effects model in MetaAnalyst software to calculate positive and negative predictive values. The search was updated in January 2017.
RESULTS
31 studies were included in the review. Studies were heterogeneous with respect to the type of test used, criteria for establishing response and loss of response, population examined and results. Meta-analytic summary point estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 65.7% and 80.6% for infliximab trough levels and 56% and 79% for antibodies to infliximab, respectively. Pooled results for adalimumab trough levels and antibodies to adalimumab were similar. Pooled positive and negative predictive values ranged between 70% and 80% implying that between 20% and 30% of both positive and negative test results may be incorrect in predicting loss of response.
CONCLUSION
The available evidence suggests that these tests have modest predictive accuracy for clinical status; direct test accuracy comparisons in the same population are needed. More clinical trial evidence from test-treat studies is required before the clinical utility of the tests can be reliably evaluated.
Topics: Adalimumab; Antibodies; Crohn Disease; Humans; Infliximab; Predictive Value of Tests; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 28674134
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014581 -
International Journal of Infectious... Jul 2016Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis. Microbiological confirmation is rare and treatment is often delayed. Early diagnosis and immediate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis. Microbiological confirmation is rare and treatment is often delayed. Early diagnosis and immediate initiation of treatment are essential for effective TBM control. A systematic review was performed in this study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), according to standard methods. Test performance was summarized using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis.
METHODS
Studies were identified by a search of the literature, up to July 25, 2015, in the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases via Ovid SP and PubMed. The Cochrane Library was also searched for original, peer-reviewed molecular epidemiology studies that reported the diagnosis of TBM based on antibody detection in the CSF.
RESULTS
Thirty-six articles (58 studies) were identified. The sensitivity of antibody detection was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.82), specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98). By subgroup analysis, the detection of anti-M37Ra was the highest (AUROC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00), followed by anti-antigen 5 (AUROC 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) and anti-M37Rv (AUROC 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98).
CONCLUSIONS
For the early diagnosis of TBM based on antibodies in the CSF, the detection of anti-M37Ra, anti-antigen 5, or anti-M37Rv provides the greatest sensitivity and specificity.
Topics: Antibodies, Bacterial; Early Diagnosis; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; ROC Curve; Tuberculosis, Meningeal
PubMed: 27173078
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.05.007 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2022The present systematic review and meta-analysis about the accuracy of diagnostic tests aim to describe the findings of literature over the last thirty years for the... (Review)
Review
The present systematic review and meta-analysis about the accuracy of diagnostic tests aim to describe the findings of literature over the last thirty years for the diagnosis of Chagas disease (CD). This work aimed to determine the accuracy of diagnostic techniques for CD in the disease's acute and chronic phases. The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 1990 and 2021 on CD diagnostics. Fifty-six published studies that met the criteria were analyzed and included in the meta-analysis, evaluating diagnostic accuracy through sensitivity and specificity. For Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Fluorescent Antibody Technique (IFAT), Hemagglutination Test (HmT), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) diagnosis methods, the sensitivity had a median of 99.0%, 78.0%, 75.0%, 76.0%, and 94.0%, respectively; while specificity presented a median of 99.0%, 99.0%, 99.0%, 98.0%, and 98.0%, respectively. This meta-analysis showed that ELISA and qPCR techniques had a higher performance compared to other methods of diagnosing CD in the chronic and acute phases, respectively. It was concluded utilizing the Area Under the Curve restricted to the false positive rates (AUC), that the ELISA diagnostic test presents the highest performance in diagnosing acute and chronic CD, compared to serological and molecular tests. Future studies focusing on new CD diagnostics approaches should be targeted.
PubMed: 36359595
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112752 -
International Journal of Dentistry 2018Periodontal disease is a common inflammatory disease. It affects about 20-50% of global population in both developed and developing countries. Early detection of slight... (Review)
Review
Periodontal disease is a common inflammatory disease. It affects about 20-50% of global population in both developed and developing countries. Early detection of slight changes of periodontal tissue plays an important role in prevention of onset and progression of periodontal disease. Hence, there is a need of a screening test to assess periodontal tissue for health check-ups. Salivary levels hemoglobin (Hb) has been proposed to assess the conditions of the inflammation of gingiva. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate and summarize critically the current evidences for Hb as periodontal screening test. We performed a literature search of report published using PubMed databases. A total of 55 articles were retrieved and 16 were selected. Our review focuses on corelation coefficient with periodontal clinical parameters or sensitivity and specificity. As a result, fourteen studies calculated sensitivity and specificity of Hb. Six studies measured salivary levels hemoglobin at laboratory: three studies used polyclonal antibody reactions and other studies used colorimetric tests. Eight studies used paper strip method: 4 studies used monoclonal antibody reaction and 4 studies used colorimetric tests. Youden's indexes by antibody reaction were better than those of colorimetric methods. Evidences are described above and further studies are necessary to set the cut off values stratified by gender, age and number of remaining teeth.
PubMed: 29755526
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2541204 -
Gastroenterology Apr 2024Current international guidelines recommend duodenal biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease in adult patients. However, growing evidence suggests that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Current international guidelines recommend duodenal biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease in adult patients. However, growing evidence suggests that immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTg) antibody levels ≥10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) can accurately predict celiac disease, eliminating the need for biopsy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of the no-biopsy approach to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease in adults.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1998 to October 2023 for studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of IgA-tTG ≥10×ULN against duodenal biopsies (Marsh grade ≥2) in adults with suspected celiac disease. We used a bivariate random effects model to calculate the summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were used to calculate the positive predictive value of the no-biopsy approach across different pretest probabilities of celiac disease. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. This study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42023398812.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies comprising 12,103 participants from 15 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of biopsy-proven celiac disease in the included studies was 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40%-83%). The proportion of patients with IgA-tTG ≥10×ULN was 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%). The summary sensitivity of IgA-tTG ≥10×ULN was 51% (95% CI, 42%-60%), and the summary specificity was 100% (95% CI, 98%-100%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77 - 0.89). The positive predictive value of the no-biopsy approach to identify patients with celiac disease was 65%, 88%, 95%, and 99% if celiac disease prevalence was 1%, 4%, 10%, and 40%, respectively. Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I =30.3%), and additional sensitivity analyses did not significantly alter our findings. Only 1 study had a low risk of bias across all domains.
CONCLUSION
The results of this meta-analysis suggest that selected adult patients with IgA-tTG ≥10×ULN and a moderate to high pretest probability of celiac disease could be diagnosed without undergoing invasive endoscopy and duodenal biopsy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Celiac Disease; Transglutaminases; Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2; Immunoglobulin A; GTP-Binding Proteins; Biopsy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Autoantibodies
PubMed: 38176661
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.023 -
Archives of Medical Science : AMS 2022The rapid transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires a fast, accurate, and affordable detection method. Despite doubts of their diagnostic accuracy,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The rapid transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires a fast, accurate, and affordable detection method. Despite doubts of their diagnostic accuracy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are used worldwide due to their practicality. This systematic review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of antibody-based RDTs in detecting COVID-19.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A literature search was carried out on five journal databases using the PRISMA-P 2015 method. We included all studies published up to February 2021. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies. Data regarding peer-review status, study design, test kit information, immunoglobulin class, target antigen, and the number of samples were extracted and tabulated. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
Thirty-three studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data results showed that the combined detection method of IgM or IgG had the highest sensitivity and NPV, which were 73.41% (95% CI: 72.22-74.57) and 75.34% (95% CI: 74.51-76.16), respectively. The single IgG detection method had the highest specificity and PPV of 96.68% (95% CI: 96.25-97.07) and 95.97% (95% CI: 95.47-96.42%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Antibody-based RDTs are not satisfactory as primary diagnostic tests but have utility as a screening tool.
PubMed: 35832707
DOI: 10.5114/aoms/135910 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2022With the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic, new technologies are being implemented for more rapid, scalable, and sensitive diagnostics. The implementation of... (Review)
Review
With the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic, new technologies are being implemented for more rapid, scalable, and sensitive diagnostics. The implementation of microfluidic techniques and their amalgamation with different detection techniques has led to innovative diagnostics kits to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, antigens, and nucleic acids. In this review, we explore the different microfluidic-based diagnostics kits and how their amalgamation with the various detection techniques has spearheaded their availability throughout the world. Three other online databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were referred for articles. One thousand one hundred sixty-four articles were determined with the search algorithm of microfluidics followed by diagnostics and SARS-CoV-2. We found that most of the materials used to produce microfluidics devices were the polymer materials such as PDMS, PMMA, and others. Centrifugal force is the most commonly used fluid manipulation technique, followed by electrochemical pumping, capillary action, and isotachophoresis. The implementation of the detection technique varied. In the case of antibody detection, spectrometer-based detection was most common, followed by fluorescence-based as well as colorimetry-based. In contrast, antigen detection implemented electrochemical-based detection followed by fluorescence-based detection, and spectrometer-based detection were most common. Finally, nucleic acid detection exclusively implements fluorescence-based detection with a few colorimetry-based detections. It has been further observed that the sensitivity and specificity of most devices varied with implementing the detection-based technique alongside the fluid manipulation technique. Most microfluidics devices are simple and incorporate the detection-based system within the device. This simplifies the deployment of such devices in a wide range of environments. They can play a significant role in increasing the rate of infection detection and facilitating better health services.
PubMed: 35629317
DOI: 10.3390/life12050649 -
Health Technology Assessment... Jun 2004To determine the role of autoantibody tests for autoimmune diseases in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To determine the role of autoantibody tests for autoimmune diseases in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Citation lists of included studies were scanned and relevant professional and patient websites reviewed. Laboratories and manufacturers were contacted to identify ongoing or unpublished research.
REVIEW METHODS
Following scoping searches on thyroid and coeliac autoantibodies, a systematic review of autoantibody tests for diagnosis of coeliac disease was carried out. Studies were included where cohorts of untreated patients with unknown disease status were included, all patients had undergone the reference test (biopsy) and antibody tests, and sensitivity and specificity were reported or calculable. Selected studies were then evaluated against a quality checklist. Summary statistics of diagnostic accuracy, i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios, were calculated for all studies. A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the cost utility of screening for coeliac disease at diagnosis of diabetes.
RESULTS
All antibody tests for diagnosis of coeliac disease showed reasonably good diagnostic test accuracy. Studies reported variable measures of test accuracy, which may be due to aspects of study quality, differences in the tests and their execution in the laboratories, different populations and reference standards. The decision analytic model indicated screening for coeliac disease at diagnosis of diabetes was cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses exploring variations in the cost and disutility of gluten-free diet, the utilities attached to treated and untreated coeliac disease and the decrease in life expectancy associated with treated and untreated coeliac disease did substantially affect the cost-effectiveness of the screening strategies considered.
CONCLUSIONS
In terms of test accuracy in testing for coeliac disease, immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-endomysium is the most accurate test. If an enzyme-linked immunoassay test was required, which may be more suitable for screening purposes as it can be semi-automated, testing for IgA tissue transglutaminase is likely to be most accurate. The decision analytic model shows that the most accurate tests combined with confirmatory biopsy are the most cost-effective, whilst combinations of tests add little or no further value. There is limited information regarding test accuracy in screening populations with diabetes, and there is some uncertainty over whether the test characteristics would remain the same. Further research is required regarding the role of screening in silent coeliac disease and regarding long-term outcomes and complications of untreated coeliac disease.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Autoantibodies; Celiac Disease; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Humans; Infant; Thyroid Gland; United Kingdom
PubMed: 15191683
DOI: 10.3310/hta8220