-
Archives of Disease in Childhood Aug 2001To develop an evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of the child who presents to hospital with diarrhoea (with or without vomiting), a common problem... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To develop an evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of the child who presents to hospital with diarrhoea (with or without vomiting), a common problem representing 16% of all paediatric medical attenders at an accident and emergency department. Clinical assessment, investigations (biochemistry and stool culture in particular), admission, and treatment are addressed. The guideline aims to aid junior doctors in recognising children who need admission for observation and treatment and those who may safely go home.
EVIDENCE
A systematic review of the literature was performed. Selected articles were appraised, graded, and synthesised qualitatively. Statements on recommendation were generated.
CONSENSUS
An anonymous, postal Delphi consensus process was used. A panel of 39 selected medical and nursing staff were asked to grade their agreement with the generated statements. They were sent the papers, appraisals, and literature review. On the second and third rounds they were asked to re-grade their agreement in the light of other panelists' responses. Consensus was predefined as 83% of panelists agreeing with the statement.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Clinical signs useful in assessment of level of dehydration were agreed. Admission to a paediatric facility is advised for children who show signs of dehydration. For those with mild to moderate dehydration, estimated deficit is replaced over four hours with oral rehydration solution (glucose based, 200-250 mOsm/l) given "little and often". A nasogastric tube should be used if fluid is refused and normal feeds started following rehydration. Children at high risk of dehydration should be observed to ensure at least maintenance fluid is tolerated. Management of more severe dehydration is detailed. Antidiarrhoeal medication is not indicated.
VALIDATION
The guideline has been successfully implemented and evaluated in a paediatric accident and emergency department.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Antidiarrheals; Child; Child, Preschool; Dehydration; Delphi Technique; Diagnosis, Differential; Diarrhea; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fluid Therapy; Gastroenteritis; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Patient Admission
PubMed: 11466188
DOI: 10.1136/adc.85.2.132 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Jul 2006Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common, chronic disorder, characterized by abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating and altered bowel habit. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common, chronic disorder, characterized by abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating and altered bowel habit.
AIM
To conduct a systematic evidence-based review of pharmacological therapies currently used, or in clinical development, for the treatment of IBS in Europe. The safety and tolerability of these therapies are the subject of an accompanying review.
METHODS
A literature search was completed for randomized controlled studies which included adult patients with IBS and an active or placebo control, assessed IBS symptoms, and were published in English between January 1980 and June 2005. The level of evidence for efficacy was graded according to the quality of the trial design and the study outcome.
RESULTS
There is some evidence for improvement of individual IBS symptoms with antidiarrhoeals (diarrhoea), antispasmodics (abdominal pain/discomfort), bulking agents (constipation), tricyclic antidepressants (abdominal pain/discomfort) and behavioural therapy. In contrast, there is strong evidence for the improvement of global IBS symptoms with two new serotonergic agents: the 5-HT4 selective agonist tegaserod (IBS with constipation) and the 5-HT3 antagonist alosetron (IBS with diarrhoea). Further data are required for the 5-HT3 antagonist, cilansetron, and the mixed 5-HT3 antagonist/5-HT4 agonist renzapride before their utility in IBS can be appraised.
CONCLUSIONS
There is limited evidence for the efficacy, safety and tolerability of therapies currently available in Europe for the treatment of IBS. Overall, there is an absence of pharmacological agents licensed specifically for the treatment of IBS subtypes, and new agents are awaited in Europe that will allow changes in clinical practice to focus on and improve global IBS symptoms.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Behavior Therapy; Cathartics; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Europe; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Parasympatholytics; Serotonin Antagonists; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 16842448
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02938.x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2019Acute diarrhoea is a leading cause of death for children under five years of age. Most deaths are caused by excessive fluid and electrolyte losses. Racecadotril is an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute diarrhoea is a leading cause of death for children under five years of age. Most deaths are caused by excessive fluid and electrolyte losses. Racecadotril is an anti-secretory drug that has been used for acute diarrhoea in children as an adjunct to oral rehydration therapy.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of racecadotril for treating acute diarrhoea in children under five years of age.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, published in the Cochrane Library Issue 3, March 2019); MEDLINE; Embase; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), up to 4 March 2019, for clinical trials regardless of publication language or status.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared racecadotril to placebo or no intervention in addition to standard care (oral rehydration therapy) in children under five with acute diarrhoea. The primary outcomes were failure of oral rehydration, duration of diarrhoea, and number of stools. The secondary outcomes were stool output, length of the hospital stay, and adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias. We presented dichotomous data with risk ratios (RR) and continuous data with mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD). Where appropriate, we combined trials with meta-analysis and used a random-effects model if there was significant heterogeneity (I² ≥ 50%). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Seven RCTs with a total of 1140 participants met the inclusion criteria. The trials were carried out on children aged three months to five years, in outpatient and inpatient facilities from France, Spain, Peru, India, Kenya, and Ecuador. The efficacy and safety of racecadotril were compared to placebo or no treatment. Racecadotril may reduce the risk of rehydration failure (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.23; 2 RCTs, 192 participants; low-certainty evidence). Data on duration of diarrhoea, number of stools in the first 48 hours are insufficient to reach a conclusion; stool output in the first 48 hours appears to be lower in the two trials measuring this, although the data is not combinable. Length of hospital stay was similar in two studies measuring this, and overall there was no evidence that racecadotril increased overall rate of adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.22; 5 RCTs, 688 participants; low-certainty evidence). Most adverse events in the racecadotril group were mild or moderate.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Racecadotril seems to be a safe drug but has little benefit in improving acute diarrhoea in children under five years of age. Current evidence does not support routine use of racecadotril in management of acute diarrhoea in children under five outside of the context of placebo controlled RCTs. 18 December 2019 Up to date All studies incorporated from most recent search All studies identified during the most recent search (4 Mar, 2019) have been incorporated in the review, and no ongoing studies identified.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Infant; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiorphan; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31858591
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009359.pub2 -
Nutrients Nov 2013Evidence supporting the impact of therapeutic zinc supplementation on the duration and severity of diarrhea among children under five is largely derived from studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Evidence supporting the impact of therapeutic zinc supplementation on the duration and severity of diarrhea among children under five is largely derived from studies conducted in South Asia. China experiences a substantial portion of the global burden of diarrhea, but the impact of zinc treatment among children under five has not been well documented by previously published systematic reviews on the topic. We therefore conducted a systematic literature review, which included an exhaustive search of the Chinese literature, in an effort to update previously published estimates of the effect of therapeutic zinc. We conducted systematic literature searches in various databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and abstracted relevant data from studies meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We used STATA 12.0 to pool select outcomes and to generate estimates of percentage difference and relative risk comparing outcomes between zinc and control groups. We identified 89 Chinese and 15 non-Chinese studies for the review, including studies in 10 countries from all WHO geographic regions, and analyzed a total of 18,822 diarrhea cases (9469 zinc and 9353 control). None of the included Chinese studies had previously been included in published pooled effect estimates. Chinese and non-Chinese studies reported the effect of therapeutic zinc supplementation on decreased episode duration, stool output, stool frequency, hospitalization duration and proportion of episodes lasting beyond three and seven days. Pooling Chinese and non-Chinese studies yielded an overall 26% (95% CI: 20%-32%) reduction in the estimated relative risk of diarrhea lasting beyond three days among zinc-treated children. Studies conducted in and outside China report reductions in morbidity as a result of oral therapeutic zinc supplementation for acute diarrhea among children under five years of age. The WHO recommendation for zinc treatment of diarrhea episodes should be supported in all low- and middle-income countries.
Topics: Acute Disease; Antidiarrheals; China; Diarrhea; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Trace Elements; Zinc
PubMed: 24284615
DOI: 10.3390/nu5114715 -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Jul 2021A large number of studies have evaluated the pharmacology, safety, and/or efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate for the relief of common gastrointestinal symptoms, diarrhea... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A large number of studies have evaluated the pharmacology, safety, and/or efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate for the relief of common gastrointestinal symptoms, diarrhea and vomiting due to acute gastroenteritis. In addition, short-term (48 h) medication with bismuth subsalicylate is known to be effective against infectious gastroenteritis such as travelers' diarrhea.
AIMS
Previous studies have documented the bacteriostatic/bactericidal effects of bismuth subsalicylate against a variety of pathogenic gastrointestinal bacteria. However, meta-analyses of the clinical efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate for both prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea have not yet been published.
METHODS
A total of 14 clinical studies (from 1970s to 2007) comprised the core data used in this assessment of efficacy of bismuth subsalicylate against infectious (including travelers') diarrhea. These studies allowed for statistical meta-analyses regarding prevention (three travelers' diarrhea studies) and treatment of infectious diarrhea (11 studies [five travelers' diarrhea]).
RESULTS
The results show that subjects treated with bismuth subsalicylate for up to 21 days have 3.5 times greater odds of preventing travelers' diarrhea compared with placebo (95% CI 2.1, 5.9; p < 0.001). In addition, subjects with infectious diarrhea treated with bismuth subsalicylate had 3.7 times greater odds of diarrhea relief (recorded on diaries as subjective symptomatic improvement) compared to those receiving placebo (95% CI 2.1, 6.3; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that bismuth subsalicylate can be beneficial for those at risk or affected by food and waterborne diarrheal disease such as traveler's (infectious) diarrhea, and may decrease the risk of inappropriate antibiotic utilization.
Topics: Bismuth; Communicable Diseases; Diarrhea; Humans; Organometallic Compounds; Salicylates; Travel
PubMed: 32772204
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06509-7 -
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative... 2023Cassava ( Crantz) is considered one of the essential tuber crops, serving as a dietary staple food for various populations. This systematic review provides a... (Review)
Review
Cassava ( Crantz) is considered one of the essential tuber crops, serving as a dietary staple food for various populations. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the nutritional and therapeutic properties of cassava, which is an important dietary staple and traditional medicine. The review aims to evaluate and summarize the phytochemical components of cassava and their association with pharmacological activities, traditional uses, and nutritional importance in global food crises. To collect all relevant information, electronic databases; Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Preprint Platforms were searched for studies on cassava from inception until October 2022. A total of 1582 studies were screened, while only 34 were included in this review. The results of the review indicate that cassava has diverse pharmacological activities, including anti-bacterial, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-diarrheal, anti-inflammatory, hypocholesterolemic effects, and wound healing properties. However, more studies that aim to isolate the phytochemicals in cassava extracts and evaluate their pharmacological property are necessary to further validate their medical and nutritional values.
Topics: Manihot; Vegetables; Crops, Agricultural; Plant Tubers; Nutritive Value
PubMed: 37822215
DOI: 10.1177/2515690X231206227 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Dec 2001Somatostatin and octreotide have multiple effects which make them ideal for treating diarrhoea of different aetiologies. Their use in a variety of conditions with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Somatostatin and octreotide have multiple effects which make them ideal for treating diarrhoea of different aetiologies. Their use in a variety of conditions with refractory diarrhoea, however, is based on a limited number of studies.
AIM
We undertook a systematic review of the available English literature to maximize an evidence-based approach to the treatment of refractory diarrhoea. We tested the hypothesis that efficacy is independent of aetiology.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A Medline and individual article search from 1965 to 2000 was undertaken on the use of somatostatin and octreotide in diarrhoea. All reports containing at least five subjects were included. The percentage response in case series and randomized controlled trials was compared, and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials where patient level data were provided was carried out. There were 30 publications found (18 case series, 12 randomized controlled trials). The response percentage was 73% overall in case series and 64% in randomized controlled trials (not significant). A meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials revealed significant heterogeneity despite an overall relative risk of 0.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.91). Subgroup analysis of the largest aetiological groups showed that acquired immunodeficiency syndrome studies were homogeneous, but somatostatin and octreotide were less effective. Post-chemotherapy studies remained heterogeneous and somatostatin and octreotide were highly effective.
CONCLUSIONS
While this review strengthens the consensus guidelines on the use of somatostatin and octreotide for refractory diarrhoea, evidence-based support requires additional studies.
Topics: Antidiarrheals; Case-Control Studies; Diarrhea; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; MEDLINE; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Octreotide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Somatostatin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 11736719
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01114.x -
Anales de Pediatria (Barcelona, Spain :... Nov 2008To estimate, through a systematic review of the literature, the efficacy of racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhoea. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To estimate, through a systematic review of the literature, the efficacy of racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhoea.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Randomised trials carried out in children comparing racecadotril with placebo in terms of diarrhoea recovery, stools output and adverse effects were selected. Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, mRCT, Pascal) and bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched, and the drug developer was contacted. Two authors independently assessed the quality of the retrieved articles and extracted the data.
RESULTS
Two small sample size randomised trials (135 and 172 children) of moderate quality were selected. They included children with less than five days diarrhoea and aged between 3 months and 4 years. There was no difference in the proportion of children who recovered by day 5 (RR=0.73, CI 95% 0.29 to 1.81), although the stools volume during the first 48 hours was less in the racecadotril group (SMD=-0.65, CI 95% -0.88 to -0.52). There is no difference in the risk of vomiting (RR=1.16, CI 95% 0.64 to 2.12).
CONCLUSION
The proportion of recoveries by the 5th day is the same, although the stool volumes during the first 48 hours are less in the racecadotril treated children. It would be interesting to study the efficacy in a primary care setting assessing the cure rate, the stool volumes and the admission rate to elucidate if there is room for this drug.
Topics: Acute Disease; Antidiarrheals; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea, Infantile; Humans; Infant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thiorphan
PubMed: 19128744
DOI: 10.1157/13127998 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Aug 2020Ceritinib is a new, oral, potent and selective second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE
Ceritinib is a new, oral, potent and selective second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States in April 2014. It is active in crizotinib-resistant patients, especially in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects and side effects of ceritinib in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.
METHODS
We searched articles published from January 1980 to March 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The pooled estimate and 95% CI were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From 15 articles, 2,598 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies reported the ORR, and the DCR was presented in 10 studies. The ORR and DCR of ceritinib were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.57) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.82), respectively. The PFS and OS were presented in nine and three eligible studies, respectively. The PFS and OS of ceritinib were 7.26 months (95% CI, 5.10-9.43) and 18.73 months (95% CI; 14.59-22.87). These results suggested that ceritinib can effectively treat patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting were the three most common AEs and occurred in 69% (95% CI 51.7-87.1%), 66% (95% CI 47.0-85.8%) and 51% (95% CI 35.9-66.8%) of patients, respectively. Considering serious gastrointestinal AEs, antiemetic and antidiarrhoeal drugs should be considered to improve a patient's tolerance to ceritinib.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
Ceritinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC with crizotinib resistance. The DCR was up to 76%, and PFS was extended to 7.6 months. The AEs were acceptable.
Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Sulfones
PubMed: 32369239
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13157 -
Acta Bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis Dec 2018Shiga-toxin Escherichia coli productor (STEC) provokes frequently an important intestinal damage that may be considered in differential diagnosis with the onset of...
BACKGROUND
Shiga-toxin Escherichia coli productor (STEC) provokes frequently an important intestinal damage that may be considered in differential diagnosis with the onset of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of this work is to review in the current literature about Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) and IBD symptoms at the onset, comparing the clinical presentation and symptoms, as the timing of diagnosis and of the correct treatment of both these conditions is a fundamental prognostic factor. A focus is made about the association between typical or atypical HUS and IBD and a possible renal involvement in patient with IBD (IgA-nephropathy).
METHODS
A systematic review of scientific articles was performed consulting the databases PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and consulting most recent textbooks of Pediatric Nephrology.
RESULTS
In STEC-associated HUS, that accounts for 90% of cases of HUS in children, the microangiopathic manifestations are usually preceded by gastrointestinal symptoms. Initial presentation may be considered in differential diagnosis with IBD onset. The transverse and ascending colon are the segments most commonly affected, but any area from the esophagus to the perianal area can be involved. The more serious manifestations include severe hemorrhagic colitis, bowel necrosis and perforation, rectal prolapse, peritonitis and intussusception. Severe gastrointestinal involvement may result in life-threatening complications as toxic megacolon and transmural necrosis of the colon with perforation, as in Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Transmural necrosis of the colon may lead to subsequent colonic stricture, as in Crohn Disease (CD). Perianal lesions and strictures are described. In some studies, intestinal biopsies were performed to exclude IBD. Elevation of pancreatic enzymes is common. Liver damage and cholecystitis are other described complications. There is no specific form of therapy for STEC HUS, but appropriate fluid and electrolyte management (better hyperhydration when possible), avoiding antidiarrheal drugs, and possibly avoiding antibiotic therapy, are recommended as the best practice. In atypical HUS (aHUS) gastrointestinal manifestation are rare, but recently a study evidenced that gastrointestinal complications are common in aHUS in presence of factor-H autoantibodies. Some report of patients with IBD and contemporary atypical-HUS were found, both for CD and UC. The authors conclude that deregulation of the alternative complement pathway may manifest in other organs besides the kidney. Finally, searching for STEC-infection, or broadly for Escherichia coli (E. coli) infection, and IBD onset, some reviews suggest a possible role of adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC) on the pathogenesis of IBD.
CONCLUSIONS
The current literature shows that gastrointestinal complications of HUS are quite exclusive of STEC-associated HUS, whereas aHUS have usually mild or absent intestinal involvement. Severe presentation as toxic megacolon, perforation, ulcerative colitis, peritonitis is similar to IBD at the onset. Moreover, some types of E. coli (AIEC) have been considered a risk factor for IBD. Recent literature on aHUS shows that intestinal complications are more common than described before, particularly for patients with anti-H factor antibodies. Moreover, we found some report of patient with both aHUS and IBD, who benefit from anti-C5 antibodies injection (Eculizumab).
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Anemia, Hemolytic; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Apoptosis; Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; Combined Modality Therapy; Contraindications, Drug; Diagnosis, Differential; Diarrhea; Escherichia coli Infections; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Granuloma; Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Necrosis; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 30561409
DOI: 10.23750/abm.v89i9-S.7911