-
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie Feb 2024This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 08 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and claims data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on prevalences for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. Prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.
RESULTS
Screening by two authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 claims data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalences ranged from 0.42 to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjögren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. The prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of 0-18-year-olds, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on claims data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are, overall, uncertain sources for prevalence estimates, with a moderate to high risk of bias.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Prevalence; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Sjogren's Syndrome; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Rheumatic Fever; Giant Cell Arteritis; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 36749363
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01302-5 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... May 2022Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is currently the gold standard procedure to diagnose giant cell arteritis. Despite low sensitivity, TAB is routinely performed even if a...
UNLABELLED
Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is currently the gold standard procedure to diagnose giant cell arteritis. Despite low sensitivity, TAB is routinely performed even if a clinical diagnosis has already been made. The objective of this study was to determine the usefulness of TAB for giant cell arteritis management.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review to identify studies that compared steroid treatment between TAB+ and TAB- patients. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until April 4, 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed by two independent reviewers and conflicts resolved by consensus. Studies reporting TAB result and steroid treatment were included. Information pertaining to steroid treatment was compared between TAB+ and TAB- groups. Steroid duration was compared by grouping patients in a less than 6 month group, a 6-24 month group, and a more than 24 month group.
RESULTS
An estimated 5288 abstracts were screened and 13 studies involving 1355 patients were included. Rate of prebiopsy steroid treatment was higher in TAB+ patients compared with TAB- patients [93% versus 63% ( < 0.001)]. The TAB+ group was more likely to be started on steroids prebiopsy [28% versus 8% ( < 0.001)]. TAB+ and TAB- patients had similar steroid duration for all groups [<6-month group 17% versus 19% (-0.596), the 6-24-month group 16% versus 19% (-0.596), and the >24-month group 66% versus 63% (-0.642)].
CONCLUSION
TAB results have minimal impact on treatment, and the utility should be reconsidered when a clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis is possible.
PubMed: 35620490
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004185 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Oct 2020Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual prevalence. To survey the current evidence of pharmacotherapies for rare rheumatic diseases, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RDs in rheumatology for different pharmaco-interventions were included into this meta-analysis if there were two or more trials investigating the same RD and using the same assessment tools or outcome parameters. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PUBMED were searched up to April 2nd 2020. The overall objective of this study was to identify RCTs of RDs in rheumatology, evaluate the overall quality of these studies, outline the evidence of pharmacotherapy, and summarize recommended therapeutic regimens.
RESULTS
We screened 187 publications, and 50 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. In total, we analyzed data of 13 different RDs. We identified several sources of potential bias, such as a lack of description of blinding methods and allocation concealment, as well as small size of the study population. Meta-analysis was possible for 26 studies covering six RDs: Hunter disease, Behçet's disease, giant cell arteritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, reactive arthritis, and systemic sclerosis. The pharmacotherapies tested in these studies consisted of immunosuppressants, such as corticosteroids, methotrexate and azathioprine, or biologicals. We found solid evidence for idursulfase as a treatment for Hunter syndrome. In Behçet's disease, apremilast and IF-α showed promising results with regard to total and partial remission, and Tocilizumab with regard to relapse-free remission in giant cell arteritis. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine were equally effective in ANCA-associated vasculitis, while mepolizumab improved the efficacy of glucocorticoids. The combination of rifampicin and azithromycin showed promising results in reactive arthritis, while there was no convincing evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in systemic sclerosis.
CONCLUSION
For some diseases such as systemic sclerosis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, or Behcet's disease, higher quality trials were available. These RCTs showed satisfactory efficacies for immunosuppressants or biological drugs, except for systemic sclerosis. More high quality RCTs are urgently warranted for a wide spectrum of RDs in rheumatology.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Rare Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Rituximab
PubMed: 33129321
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01576-5 -
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases May 2023Myocardial infarction is rare in children, teenagers and young adults (aged<20 years). The most common aetiologies identified include Kawasaki disease, familial... (Review)
Review
Myocardial infarction is rare in children, teenagers and young adults (aged<20 years). The most common aetiologies identified include Kawasaki disease, familial hypercholesterolaemia, collagen vascular disease-induced coronary arteritis, substance abuse (cocaine, glue sniffing), trauma, complications of congenital heart disease surgery, genetic disorders (such as progeria), coronary artery embolism, occult malignancy and several other rare conditions. Nephrotic syndrome is a very rare cause of myocardial infarction, but it is probably underestimated. The purpose of this review was to determine the current state of knowledge on acute coronary syndrome related to nephrotic syndrome. We thus performed a comprehensive structured literature search of the Medline database for articles published between January 1st, 1969 and December 31st, 2021. Myocardial infarction in young adults can be broadly divided into two groups: cases of angiographically normal coronary arteries; and cases of coronary artery disease of varying aetiology. There are several possible mechanisms underlying the association between acute coronary syndrome and nephrotic syndrome: (1) coronary thrombosis related to hypercoagulability and/or platelet hyperactivity; (2) atherosclerosis related to hyperlipidaemia; and (3) drug treatment. All of these mechanisms must be evaluated systematically in the acute phase of disease because they evolve rapidly with the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. In this review, we propose a decision algorithm for the management of acute coronary syndrome in the context of nephrotic syndrome. The final part of the review presents the short- and medium-term therapeutic strategies available. Thromboembolism related to nephrotic syndrome is a rare non-atherosclerotic cause of acute coronary syndrome, and prospective studies are needed to evaluate a systematic approach with personalized therapeutic strategies.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Child; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Nephrotic Syndrome; Myocardial Infarction; Coronary Artery Disease; Atherosclerosis
PubMed: 37088677
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.03.002 -
ACR Open Rheumatology Feb 2023
PubMed: 36637032
DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11519 -
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine... Nov 2021Monitoring disease activity in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be challenging. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used to evaluate treatment response in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Monitoring disease activity in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be challenging. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used to evaluate treatment response in LVV. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on the value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for treatment monitoring in LVV.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane library database were searched from inception through October 21, 2020. Studies containing patients with LVV (i.e. giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis and isolated aortitis) that received treatment and underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT were included. Screening, full-text review and data extraction were performed by 2 investigators. The risk of bias was examined with the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis of proportions and diagnostic test accuracy was performed by a random-effects model and bivariate model, respectively.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review, of which 8 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Arterial [18F]FDG uptake decreased upon clinical remission in longitudinal studies. High heterogeneity (I statistic 94%) precluded meta-analysis of the proportion of patients in which the scan normalized during clinical remission. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies indicated that [18F]FDG-PET/CT may detect relapsing/refractory disease with a sensitivity of 77% (95%CI 57-90%) and specificity of 71% (95%CI 47-87%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the cross-sectional studies. Both variation in clinical aspects and imaging procedures contributed to the heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
Treatment of LVV leads to reduction of arterial [18F]FDG uptake during clinical remission. [18F]FDG-PET/CT has moderate diagnostic accuracy for detecting active LVV. [18F]FDG-PET/CT may aid treatment monitoring in LVV, but its findings should be interpreted in the context of the clinical suspicion of disease activity. This study underlines the relevance of published procedural recommendations for the use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in LVV.
Topics: Arteritis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 33942141
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05362-8 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2014Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common inflammatory condition that affects medium and large-sized arteries and can cause sudden, permanent blindness. At present there is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common inflammatory condition that affects medium and large-sized arteries and can cause sudden, permanent blindness. At present there is no alternative to early treatment with high-dose corticosteroids as the recommended standard management. Corticosteroid-induced side effects can develop and further disease-related ischaemic complications can still occur. Alternative and adjunctive therapies are sought. Aspirin has been shown to have effects on the immune-mediated inflammation in GCA, hence it may reduce damage caused in the arterial wall.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the safety and effectiveness of low-dose aspirin, as an adjunctive, in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2013, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to January 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2014), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to January 2014), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en) and the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) web site (www.fda.gov). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 24 January 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of GCA with and without concurrent adjunctive use of low-dose aspirin.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed the search results for trials identified by the electronic searches. No trials met our inclusion criteria, therefore we undertook no assessment of risk of bias or meta-analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
We found no RCTs that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is currently no evidence from RCTs to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose aspirin as an adjunctive treatment in GCA. Clinicians who are considering the use of low-dose aspirin as an adjunctive treatment in GCA must also recognise the established haemorraghic risks associated with aspirin, especially in the context of concurrent treatment with corticosteroids. There is a clear need for effectiveness trials to guide the management of this life-threatening condition.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans
PubMed: 25087045
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010453.pub2 -
PloS One 2021Whether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Whether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein (CRP) in TAK activity assessment has been investigated in this study.
STUDY DESIGN
Research works such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI and WanFang) were searched for studies conducted till August 30th, 2019. Two investigators searched the studies independently, who evaluated the quality of the study using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and extracted data. Pooled standard mean difference (SMD) and diagnostic indexes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
Totally, 8 studies involving 473 TAK (208 active and 265 inactive TAK) patients and 252 healthy controls were eventually included in the meta-analysis. PTX3 level in the blood in active TAK patients were found to be higher than that in dormant TAK with pooled SMD of 0.761 (95% CI = 0.38-1.14, p<0.0001; I2 = 68%, p of Q test = 0.003). And there was no publication bias. Among the 8 studies, 5 studies identified active TAK with both PTX3 and CRP. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of PTX3 in active TAK diagnosis were higher than those of CRP (0.78 [95% CI = 0.65-0.87] vs. 0.66 [95% CI = 0.53-0.77], p = 0.012; 0.85 [95% CI = 0.77-0.90] vs. 0.77 [95% CI = 0.56-0.90], p = 0.033; 0.88 [95% CI = 0.85-0.90] vs. 0.75 [95% CI = 0.71-0.79], p < 0.0001). It showed potential publication bias using Egger's test (p of PTX3 = 0.031 and p of CRP = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS
PTX3 might be better than CRP in the assessment of TAK activity. Yet, it should be cautious before clinical use for moderate heterogeneity and potential publication bias of the meta-analysis.
Topics: C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data Accuracy; Humans; Serum Amyloid P-Component; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 33529185
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245612 -
European Journal of Internal Medicine Jun 2021To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in newly diagnosed or relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA) in terms of relapse rate at week 52 (primary outcome)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in newly diagnosed or relapsing giant cell arteritis (GCA) in terms of relapse rate at week 52 (primary outcome) and to assess the impact of GC tapering regimen on adjuvant effectiveness.
METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, trial registries, from inception to November 2020. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled prospective studies evaluating adjuvant treatments in GCA, without date or language restriction. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Quality of evidence was summarised with GRADE.
RESULTS
Of the 680 records identified, 16 studies were included (1,068 participants) evaluating various adjuvant therapies compared to GC only. No study compared adjuvants with each other. Risk of bias was high in 5/7 trials evaluating our primary outcome. Risk of relapse at week 52 was reduced for only the anti-IL6 and IL6-receptor drug class versus the control (RR=0.45, 95%CI 0.30-0.66, I2=38%), particularly tocilizumab (RR=0.38, 95%CI 0.23-0.63, I2=42%) with a moderate quality of evidence. We found no significant interaction according to GC tapering regimen. Our meta-analysis did not show a significant benefit for methotrexate. Except for dapsone, ciclosporine and hydroxychloroquine, other adjuvants did not seem to show increased risk of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Tocilizumab seems to reduce the relapse rate in GCA at week 52 but the quality of evidence was moderate. No other molecule has shown efficacy. No significant interaction on relapse rate by GC tapering regimen was found.
STUDY REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020172011.
Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Giant Cell Arteritis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Methotrexate; Steroids
PubMed: 33879385
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.040 -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Nov 2018Comorbidities are known to exist in many rheumatological conditions. Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common inflammatory rheumatological condition affecting older...
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Comorbidities are known to exist in many rheumatological conditions. Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common inflammatory rheumatological condition affecting older people which, prior to effective treatment, causes severe disability. Our understanding of associated comorbidities in PMR is based only on case reports or series and small cohort studies. The objective of this study is to review systematically the existing literature on the comorbidities associated with PMR.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched for original observational research from inception to November 2016. Papers containing the words 'Polymyalgia Rheumatica' OR 'Giant Cell Arteritis' OR the terms 'PMR' OR 'GCA' were included. Article titles were reviewed based on pre-defined criteria by two reviewers. Following selection for inclusion, studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool and data were extracted.
RESULTS
A total of 17,329 papers were reviewed and 41 were incorporated in this review, including three published after the search took place. Wide variations were found in study design, comorbidities reported and populations studied. Positive associations were found between PMR diagnosis and stroke, cardiovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, diverticular disease and hypothyroidism. Two studies reported a positive association between PMR and overall malignancy rate. Seven studies reported an association between PMR and specific types of cancer, such as leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloproliferative disease and specified solid tumours, although nine studies found either no or negative association between cancer and PMR.
CONCLUSION
Quantification of the prevalence of comorbidities in PMR is important to accurately plan service provision and enable identification of cases of PMR which may be more difficult to treat. This review highlights that research into comorbidities in PMR is, overall, methodologically inadequate and does not comprehensively cover all comorbidities. Future studies should consider a range of comorbidities in patients with a validated diagnosis of PMR in representative populations.
Topics: Age Factors; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Neoplasms; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30458857
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1757-y