-
Materials (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2022The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to evaluate the adjunctive use of leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontal... (Review)
Review
The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to evaluate the adjunctive use of leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontal endosseous and furcation defects, as compared without L-PRF. The endosseous defect group was subclassified into: L-PRF/open flap debridement (L-PRF/OFD) versus OFD, L-PRF/osseous graft (L-PRF/OG) versus OG, L-PRF/Emdogain (L-PRF/EMD) versus EMD, and L-PRF/guided tissue regeneration (L-PRF/GTR) versus GTR. The furcation defect group was subclassified into L-PRF/OFD versus OFD, and L-PRF/OG versus OG. Mean difference, 95% confidence intervals and forest plots were calculated for probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic defect depth (DD). Nineteen studies concerning systemically healthy non-smokers were included. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed in two- and/or three-wall endosseous defects that the adjunctive use of L-PRF to OFD or OG was significantly beneficial for PPD reduction, CAL gain and DD reduction, as compared without L-PRF. Furthermore, the data showed that for two- and/or three-wall endosseous defects, the adjunctive use of L-PRF to GTR was significantly beneficial for CAL and DD improvement, whereas adding L-PRF to EMD had no significant effect, and that for class II furcation defects, the addition of L-PRF to OFD was significantly beneficial for PPD, CAL and DD improvement, whereas the addition of L-PRF to OG was significantly clinically beneficial. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis found that there was significant clinical and radiographic additive effectiveness of L-PRF to OFD and to OG in two- and/or three-wall periodontal endosseous defects of systemically healthy non-smokers, as compared without L-PRF.
PubMed: 35329540
DOI: 10.3390/ma15062088 -
Brazilian Oral Research May 2017This study aimed to investigate the differences in the subgingival microbiological outcomes between periodontal patients submitted to a supragingival control (SPG)... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to investigate the differences in the subgingival microbiological outcomes between periodontal patients submitted to a supragingival control (SPG) regimen as compared to subgingival scaling and root planing performed combined with supragingival debridement (SPG + SBG) intervention during the periodontal maintenance period (PMP). A systematic literature search using electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) was conducted looking for articles published up to August 2016 and independent of language. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, quality assessment and data collection. Only human randomized or non-randomized clinical trials with at least 6-months-follow-up after periodontal treatment and presenting subgingival microbiological outcomes related to SPG and/or SPG+SBG therapies were included. Search strategy found 2,250 titles. Among these, 148 (after title analysis) and 39 (after abstract analysis) papers were considered to be relevant. Finally, 19 studies were selected after full-text analysis. No article had a direct comparison between the therapies. Five SPG and 14 SPG+SBG studies presented experimental groups with these respective regimens and were descriptively analyzed while most of the results were only presented graphically. The results showed that both SPG and SPG+SBG protocols of PMP determined stability in the microbiological results along time. Nevertheless, new studies comparing these interventions in PMP are needed, especially if the limitations herein discussed could be better controlled.
Topics: Dental Scaling; Female; Humans; Male; Periodontal Debridement; Periodontal Diseases; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28513785
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017vol310033 -
Management of Peri-Implantitis Lesions without the Use of Systemic Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.Dentistry Journal Sep 2020This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence on the efficacy of surgical and non-surgical debridement techniques in the treatment of peri-implantitis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence on the efficacy of surgical and non-surgical debridement techniques in the treatment of peri-implantitis lesions without the use of any antimicrobials.
METHOD
Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane) were used, alongside hand searches, to find relevant articles. Full-text articles that were randomised controlled trials, published in the English language from 2011 onwards without pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative antibiotic usage were included. The study was conducted according to the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-P protocols, the latest Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and each investigated intervention was evaluated using the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system.
RESULTS
The search yielded 2718 results. After initial screening, 38 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. From these, 11 studies satisfied all inclusion criteria. These 11 articles described six non-surgical and five surgical debridement therapies. Most articles were classified as having either a high risk of bias or presenting with some concerns. Small sample sizes, in combination with this risk of bias, meant that all interventions were adjudged to be of either low or very low quality of evidence.
CONCLUSION
While all investigated modalities displayed some sort of efficacy, this review suggests that a surgical approach may be best suited to treating peri-implantitis lesions in the absence of antibiotic therapy. Despite this weak indication, further research is required in this field.
PubMed: 32937892
DOI: 10.3390/dj8030106 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2022The need to predict, diagnose and treat peri-implant diseases has never been greater. We present a systematic review of the literature on the changes in the expression... (Review)
Review
The need to predict, diagnose and treat peri-implant diseases has never been greater. We present a systematic review of the literature on the changes in the expression of biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) before and after treatment of peri-implantitis. Bacterial composition, clinical and radiographic parameters, and systemic biomarkers before and after treatment are reported as secondary outcomes. A total of 17 studies were included. Treatment groups were non-surgical treatment or surgical treatment, either alone or with adjunctive therapy. Our findings show that non-surgical treatment alone does not influence biomarker levels or clinical outcomes. Both adjunctive photodynamic therapy and local minocycline application resulted in a reduction of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 twelve months after treatment. Non-surgical treatments with adjunctive use of lasers or antimicrobials were more effective at improving the clinical outcomes in the short-term only. Access flap debridement led to matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 and tumour necrosis factor-α reduction twelve months post-surgery. Surgical debridement with adjunctive antimicrobials achieved a decrease in MMP-8 at three months. Adjunctive use of Emdogain (EMD) was associated with a reduction in 40 PICF proteins compared to access flap surgery alone. Surgical interventions were more effective at reducing probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing both in the short- and long-term. Surgical treatment in combination with EMD was found to be more effective in resolving inflammation up to twelve months.
Topics: Humans; Peri-Implantitis; Minocycline; Biomarkers; Debridement; Anti-Infective Agents
PubMed: 36360962
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114085 -
Iranian Journal of Pathology 2022Cerebral mucormycosis (CM) is a life-threatening manifestation of mucormycosis, an angioinvasive fungal infection caused by Mucorales. We sought to systematically review... (Review)
Review
Cerebral mucormycosis (CM) is a life-threatening manifestation of mucormycosis, an angioinvasive fungal infection caused by Mucorales. We sought to systematically review all available case reports to describe epidemiologic features, clinical manifestations, predisposing factors, and diagnostic and treatment strategies of CM. A systematic search was conducted using a combination of the following keywords: "Mucor", "Zygomycetes", "mucormycosis", "cereb*", "brain", "central nervous system", and "intracranial", separately and in combination until December 31 2018. Data sources included PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Proquest without limiting the time of publication. We included 287 articles corresponding to 345 cases of CM. Out of the 345 cases, 206 (60%) were male with a median age of 44 years; 130 (38%) were reported from North America; 87 (25%) from Asia; and 84 (24%) from Europe. The median time from onset of symptoms to presentation was 3-7 days (65/345, 65%). The highest mortality was observed among patients with diabetes mellitus (=0.003). Debridement of infected brain tissue was associated with improved survival in CM cases (OR 1.5; 95% CI 01.3-1.8; <0.0001). The use of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) was significantly associated with patients' recovery (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.2-3.4; =0.003). The combination of L-AMB and posaconazole (12.5%) was more effective than the monotherapy treatment of CM cases (=0.009). Clinicians should consider DM as an important risk factor for CM. Moreover, surgical debridement and antifungal combination therapy could be an effective approach in the management of CM patients.
PubMed: 35463720
DOI: 10.30699/IJP.2022.538690.2721 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jul 2021We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of arthroscopic debridement and proximal fibular osteotomy (AD & PFO) on medial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of arthroscopic debridement and proximal fibular osteotomy (AD & PFO) on medial tibial articular genu osteoarthritis (MTAGO), so as to provide a theoretical reference for clinical surgical analgesia for patients.
METHODS
We searched and screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on AD & PFO on MTAGO surgical analgesia published before December 31, 2020 in English databases including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid, Springer, and Web of Science. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention 5.0.2 was adopted for bias risk assessment, and Review Manager 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twelve eligible studies were included, involving 765 research subjects. The meta-analysis results indicated that, relative to control group, satisfaction was markedly increased [mean difference (MD) =3.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), (1.48 to 6.51); Z=3; P=0.003], adverse reactions were reduced [MD =0.33; 95% CI, (0.08 to 1.32); Z=1.56; P=0.12] the hospital special surgery (HSS) score was lower [MD =5.37; 95% CI, (3.18 to 7.55); Z=4.82; P<0.00001], the visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased [MD =-1.68; 95% CI, (-2.22 to -1.13); Z=6.01; P<0.00001], and the Knee Society score (KSS) was reduced [MD =6.16; 95% CI, (3.85 to 8.47); Z=5.23; P<0.00001]. However, the difference in the femoro-tibial (FT) angle between the control and study groups was not statistically considerable [MD =0.14; 95% CI, (-6.22 to 6.49); Z=0.04; P=0.97].
DISCUSSION
The combined adoption of AD & PFO for MTAGO surgical analgesia can reduce the HSS, KSS, and VAS scores of patients. The postoperative analgesia effect is good, and effectively reduces pain and adverse reactions in patients. Thus, it is suitable for analgesia in MTAGO.
Topics: Debridement; Fibula; Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Osteotomy; Tibia
PubMed: 34353077
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1381 -
Burns & Trauma 2019Cutaneous manifestations of purpura fulminans (PF) present many challenges for clinicians and surgeons. In a state of septic shock complicated by limb ischemia, surgical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cutaneous manifestations of purpura fulminans (PF) present many challenges for clinicians and surgeons. In a state of septic shock complicated by limb ischemia, surgical interventions are necessary to control the pathological cascade and improve patient outcomes. The objective of this article was to report etiologies and surgical outcomes associated with cutaneous manifestations in adults.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared 190 adult patients with etiologies, signs and symptoms, and surgical outcomes associated with cutaneous manifestations of PF. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically and independently searched. Patient and clinical characteristics, surgical interventions, outcomes, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine studies were eligible for the systematic review, and 77 were eligible for meta-analysis using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines. A total of 71/190 (38%) cases reported surgical debridement. Fasciotomies were reported in 12/190 (6%) cases and 20 procedures. Amputations were reported in 154/190 (81%) cases. Reconstruction was reported in 45 cases. Skin grafts were applied in 31 cases. Flaps were used for reconstruction in 28 cases. Median (IQR) surgical procedures per patient were 4 (4, 5) procedures. Infectious organisms causing PF were 32% ( = 55) and 32% ( = 55). Coagulase-negative (95% confidence interval (CI)(8.2-177.9), = 0.032), (95%CI (7.2-133), = 0.029), (95% CI (13.3-75.9), = 0.006), and West Nile Virus (95%CI (8.2-177.9), = 0.032) were associated with significantly more extensive amputations compared to other organisms.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis found the most common presentation of PF was septic shock from an infectious organism. and were equally the most common organisms associated with PF. The majority of cases were not treated in a burn center. The most common surgeries were amputations, with below-the-knee-amputations being the most common procedure. Skin grafting was the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure. The most common complications were secondary infections. Organisms with significantly more extensive amputations were coagulase-negative , , , and West Nile Virus. Interpretation of findings should be cautioned due to limited sample data.
PubMed: 31641673
DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0168-x -
Health Technology Assessment... 2001Most surgically sutured wounds heal without any complication. However, in some cases wound healing can be delayed due to the presence of infection or wound breakdown.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Most surgically sutured wounds heal without any complication. However, in some cases wound healing can be delayed due to the presence of infection or wound breakdown. This can result in the wounds becoming cavity wounds and thus necessitate healing by secondary intention. Other surgical wounds that are not sutured but left to heal by secondary intention include abscess cavities such as perianal abscesses or breast abscesses. Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention are thought to heal more slowly than wounds healing by primary intention, especially if infection is present or healing is compromised by factors such as decreased blood supply, poor nutritional status or a general suppression of the immune response. Such wounds may contain dead tissue and have a moderate or high level of exudate. Debridement involves the removal of devitalised, necrotic tissue or fibrin from a wound. There are many different methods that can be used to debride a wound, which are broadly classified as surgical/sharp, biosurgical, mechanical, chemical, enzymatic and autolytic. Although it is generally agreed that the management of surgical wounds which contain devitalised tissue and are healing by secondary intention requires debridement, it is not always clear as to what is the best method or agent to use. There is currently a large selection of products with debriding properties available on the market, which vary considerably in cost. It is important that the choice of both debriding method and product is based on the best scientific evidence available, taking into account both cost and effectiveness data.
OBJECTIVES
The review had two main objectives: (1) To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. (2) To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention at specialised wound care clinics as compared to conventional care. The review incorporated all debriding methods and any agent that is considered to have a debriding property. METHODS The following databases were searched using strategies designed specifically for each database: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC (Health Management Information Consortium), CCTR via the Cochrane Library, the National Research Register (NRR), the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED). Additional references were identified through reviewing manufacturer and sponsor submissions made to NICE, the bibliographies of retrieved articles, and conferences proceedings on the Internet. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised controlled trials with concurrent controls and full economic evaluations were considered for inclusion. Only studies that evaluated some sort of debriding method or a specialised wound care clinic (a nurse with specialist training in wound care; care being provided by a multidisciplinary team; a fast-track referral system to other professions (e.g. dermatologist); or access to the latest health technology) were included in the review. Studies had to include participants with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (e.g. cavity wounds, the consequences of wound dehiscence and abscesses) and report an objective measure of wound healing. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus and, when necessary, by recourse to a third reviewer. The primary outcomes of interest were wound healing and cost. Results of data extraction and quality assessment were presented in structured tables and also as a narrative summary. In addition, where feasible, the results of individual studies were presented as forest plots. Studies were grouped according to the type of wound, debriding method and outcome measure used. RESULTS - CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS: Seventeen trials met the inclusion criteria, all of which used the autolytic method of debridement. No studies were found that investigated sharp/surgical, biosurgical, mechanical, chemical or enzymatic debridement in the treatment of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. No studies were found which investigated specialised wound care clinics that included the provision of care within a clinical setting (based in either primary or secondary care). The type of surgical wounds investigated by studies included in the review were those that had broken down postoperatively, perineal wounds resulting from proctolectomy or rectal excision, and those left open after pilonidal sinus excision or abscess incision, or wounds following a laparotomy. Four additional studies investigated treatment of postoperative wounds from toenail avulsions. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Debridement; Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Wound Healing
PubMed: 11399237
DOI: 10.3310/hta5140 -
Two-Stage Primary Arthroplasty in the Infected Native Knee: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Oct 2021The knee is the commonest native joint to develop an infection. A two-stage primary knee replacement, with an interim stage of debridement and cement spacer application,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The knee is the commonest native joint to develop an infection. A two-stage primary knee replacement, with an interim stage of debridement and cement spacer application, modelled after two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) has been reported for the management of chronic infections.
AIMS
To systematically review the literature to find the infection-free survival and outcomes of this operation and explore its indications.
METHODS
PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. A systematic search of 4 online databases was conducted on 9/8/2020. After reviewing 226 abstracts and applying our selection criteria, 10 papers were selected for full-text review, and 9 included in the final synthesis.
RESULTS
On pooled analysis, an infection-free survival of 95.6% (CI 94.7-96.4) was found at 2 years in 139 knees, which was unchanged over the remainder of the follow-up (Mean 3.9 years). The complication rate after final implantation was 6% in those that did not develop reinfection. The mean pooled Knee Society Score (KSS) and KSS Function score among 70 patients (4 papers) was 83.4 (80.1-89.0) and 76.8 (71.5-78.0), respectively. The mean range of motion among 82 patients (6 papers) was more than 100°.
CONCLUSIONS
Two-stage primary knee replacement is a safe, effective and reliable procedure with good results in the short to medium term. Further studies are required to lay down precise indications and cost-effectiveness of this procedure, in comparison to other strategies for chronic infection. All joint registries should develop methods to identify patients undergoing two-stage procedures, to understand their long-term survival and outcomes.
PubMed: 34824727
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00402-9 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2022(1) Background: Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the clavicle is a rare condition due to the failure of the union process of the ossification nuclei of the clavicle. The... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the clavicle is a rare condition due to the failure of the union process of the ossification nuclei of the clavicle. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of relevant case series about the argument to find an up-to-date base of evidence for treatment choice. (2) Methods: an electronic literature research of Ovid, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted, and articles were selected based on inclusion criteria. Demographic data, clinical features, treatment options, outcomes and complications were analyzed. (3) Results: 21 articles met the inclusion criteria, showing a poor overall study quality; 231 pediatric patients (240 clavicles) were analyzed. The condition was typically right sided, showed no sex predominance and no clear predisposing factors. 156 patients underwent surgical treatment, mainly open debridement and refresh of bony ends, fixation with pin or plate and bone graft, with a successful union rate of 87.4%. The nonunion rate was significantly higher in the allograft group (44.4%, = 0.019). (4) Conclusions: this paper presents an updated systematic review about treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the clavicle. We confirm the generally satisfactory results of surgery, demonstrating that successful union is achievable in 87.4% of cases with a prevalence of 15.7% of major complications. Nonetheless our results should be interpreted with caution due to several limitations.
PubMed: 35204869
DOI: 10.3390/children9020147