-
Internal Medicine (Tokyo, Japan) Apr 2024Objective Drug fever is defined as a fever that temporally coincides with the start of a culprit drug and disappears after discontinuation of the drug. It is a common... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Objective Drug fever is defined as a fever that temporally coincides with the start of a culprit drug and disappears after discontinuation of the drug. It is a common cause of nosocomial fever, which refers to a fever that develops beyond the first 48 h after hospital admission. However, the exact prevalence of drug fever among cases of nosocomial fever is unclear, as is the variation in prevalence depending on the clinical setting and most common causative drugs. Methods PubMed MEDLINE, Dialog EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched. Studies that reported the prevalence of drug fever in patients with nosocomial fever were included. Two of the four reviewers conducted independent assessments of the inclusion, data extraction, and quality. Pooled adjusted odds ratios were generated using a random-effects model and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Fifteen meta-analysis from 15 studies were included. Ten studies did not report the definition of drug fever or excluded febrile patients who were admitted to the hospital within 24-48 h. The pooled prevalence of drug fever among cases of nosocomial fever was 3.0% (95% CI, 0.6-6.8%), which was largely consistent across the settings, except for at oriental medicine hospital. Only four studies reported the causative agents, and antibiotics were the most frequently reported. Conclusions The prevalence of drug fever is low in patients with nosocomial fever. Clinicians should recognize that drug fever is a diagnosis of exclusion, even in cases of nosocomial fever.
Topics: Humans; Cross Infection; Drug Fever; Prevalence; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Hospitals
PubMed: 37690845
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2322-23 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Mar 2024To report cases of new onset sarcoidosis upon biologic (bDMARDs) treatment administration in patients with seronegative inflammatory arthritis in a real-life cohort,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To report cases of new onset sarcoidosis upon biologic (bDMARDs) treatment administration in patients with seronegative inflammatory arthritis in a real-life cohort, alongside a systematic literature review (SLR) on this topic.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis on clinical records of patients with seronegative arthritis followed up in a monocentric cohort who underwent bDMARDs treatment due to the underlying rheumatic disease and described any newly diagnosed sarcoidosis in this cohort. Only ascertained cases with available radiological and/or histological documentation were considered. A SLR on new-onset sarcoidosis in seronegative arthritis receiving bDMARDs was performed across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus and Ovid (Cochrane, Embase) electronic databases using appropriate strings.
RESULTS
In our cohort, 4 new-onset cases of sarcoidosis were reported among patients with seronegative inflammatory arthritis receiving biologics. Three out of 4 patients were receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) while 1 patient was on secukinumab (anti-IL17A) prior to sarcoidosis onset. The SLR disclosed 46 new-onset sarcoidosis cases upon biological treatment for seronegative arthritis, of whom 43 occurred during treatment with anti-TNFα, while 3 during anti-IL-17A therapy. In our cohort as well as in the majority of cases reported in the SLR, sarcoidosis presented with lymph nodal and lung involvement and displayed a benign course with spontaneous resolution in about 1 fourth of the cases.
CONCLUSION
The use of biologics may relate to the onset of sarcoidosis; hence, clinicians must remain aware of the potential occurrence or reactivation of sarcoidosis when starting biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis, performing adequate patient assessment and surveillance. Since TNFα inhibitors may represent a therapeutic option for sarcoidosis, further evaluation on larger cohorts is needed to investigate any causal link with the development of sarcoidosis.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Biological Products; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoidosis; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 38008299
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103481 -
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 2017Lamotrigine is an antiepileptic drug used for the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder and numerous off-label uses. The development of rash significantly affects its...
Identifying the incidence of rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in patients taking lamotrigine: a systematic review of 122 randomized controlled trials.
Lamotrigine is an antiepileptic drug used for the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder and numerous off-label uses. The development of rash significantly affects its use. The most concerning of these adverse reactions is Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials using lamotrigine as a monotherapy to quantify the incidence of cutaneous reactions, particularly Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Of a total of 4,364 papers regarding lamotrigine, 122 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 18,698 patients were included with 1,570 (8.3%) of patients experiencing an adverse dermatologic reaction. The incidence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis was 0.04%.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Exanthema; Incidence; Lamotrigine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Triazines
PubMed: 28225977
DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175070