-
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival for advanced wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly, but few studies compared single ICI... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Single and Double Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based First-Line Treatments for Advanced Driver-Gene Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival for advanced wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly, but few studies compared single ICI (SICI)-based treatments and double ICIs (DICI)-based treatments. We summarized the general efficacy of ICI-related treatments, compared the efficacy and safety of SICI-based [programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors ± chemotherapy (CT)] and DICI-based (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors+CTLA-4 inhibitors ± chemotherapy) treatments . CT in the first-line treatment.
METHODS
We included phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV driver-gene wild-type NSCLC who received first-line ICI-related therapy in at least one arm. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2020. This network meta-analysis was performed in a Bayesian framework using GEMTC and JAGS package in R.3.6.1. The research was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020184534).
RESULTS
Twenty RCTs were involved, including 13,032 patients and 17 treatment regimens. The results showed that ICI-based therapies could provide a pooled median overall survival (mOS) (POS) of 15.79 (95% CI: 14.85-16.73) months, and there were no significant differences in OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs) between DICI-based treatments (POS: 14.81, 12.11-17.52 months) and SICI-based treatments (POS: 16.17, 14.59-17.74 months) in overall patients. However, DICI-based treatments had significantly prolonged the OS over SICI-based treatments in squamous and PD-L1 <1% subgroups. The ranking of OS benefit by Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) spectrum showed that DICI+chemotherapy ranked first for overall population and subgroups including squamous, non-squamous, any level of PD-L1 expression, smoking, male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) = 0/1, age < 65/≥65 while SICI+CT for low tumor mutation burden (TMB), non-smoking, and female subgroups, and DICI for high TMB subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
In the first-line therapy for advanced wild-type NSCLC, both SICI- and DICI-based treatments could bring significant overall advantages over chemotherapy, with comparable outcomes of efficacy and ≥3AEs. DICI-based treatments were more effective than SICI-based treatments in squamous and PD-L1 <1% subgroups. For most populations, DICI+chemotherapy could be the best choice with a survival benefit, while SICI+chemotherapy has established its position actually.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020184534].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; B7-H1 Antigen; CTLA-4 Antigen; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Network Meta-Analysis; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors
PubMed: 34484242
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.731546 -
BMC Medical Genetics Jul 2011Asthma is a phenotypically diverse disease with genetic susceptibility. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the CD14 gene at position -260 (also known as -159) C>T... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Asthma is a phenotypically diverse disease with genetic susceptibility. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the CD14 gene at position -260 (also known as -159) C>T has been inconsistently associated with asthma. The aim of this study was to estimate the combined likelihood of developing asthma given the CD14 -260C>T genotype.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to estimate the association between this SNP and asthma. Planned subgroup analyses were performed to detect potential sources of heterogeneity from selected study characteristics. Post-hoc sensitivity analysis was performed to identify studies exerting excessive influence on among-study heterogeneity and combined effects.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis of 23 studies yielded a non-significant overall association with high heterogeneity across studies. After restricting analysis to studies using atopic asthma and non-atopic non-asthma case-control phenotypes and excluding studies influencing heterogeneity, the genotype-specific odds ratios (ORs) suggested a codominant model. Carriers of the TT and CT genotypes were about 33% less likely (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.84) and about 20% less likely (OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95), respectively, to have atopic asthma compared to carriers of the CC genotype. Among-study heterogeneity may be explained by overly broad asthma phenotype definitions, gene-environment interactions, and gene-gene interactions.
CONCLUSIONS
A protective dose-response relationship between the CD14 -260T allele and atopic asthma susceptibility was observed. These results demonstrate the importance of precisely specified case-control groups as well as the need to assess interactions in the investigation of complex diseases such as asthma.
Topics: Asthma; Case-Control Studies; Gene Dosage; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Observer Variation; Odds Ratio; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 21745379
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-93 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) checkpoint have been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) checkpoint have been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in patients positive for PD-L1 expression. Negative results from the recent phase III trials (IMPassion131 and IMPassion132) have raises questions on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression. Here we attempt to systematically analyze the biomarker value of PD-L1 expression for predicting the response of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed database was searched until Dec 2021 for studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors plus/minus chemotherapy in mTNBC. Outcome of interest included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. was used for data-analysis.
RESULTS
In total, 20 clinical trials comprising 3962 mTNBC patients (ICT: 2665 (67%); CT: 1297 (33%) were included in this study. Overall ORR was 22% (95%CI, 14-30%) and significant improvement was observed for PD-L1+ patients (ORR 1.78 [95%CI, 1.45-2.19], p<0.00001) as compared to PD-L1- cohort. Pooled outcome also indicated a significant 1-year PFS and 2-year OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 expression (1-year PFS: ORR 1.39 [95%CI, 1.04-1.85], p=0.02; I 0%; 2-year OS: (ORR 2.47 [95%CI, 1.30-4.69], p=0.006; I 63%). Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression can successfully predict tumor response and 2-year OS benefit in mTNBC patients regardless of the type of investigating agent, line of treatment administration, and to some extent the type of treatment. Biomarker ability of PD-L1 expression to predict 1-year PFS was slightly better with pembrolizumab (p=0.09) than atezolizumab (p=0.18), and significantly better when treatment was administered in the first-line setting (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.87], p=0.04) and chemotherapy was added (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.86], p=0.03). Immune-related toxicity of any grade and grade≥3 was 39% (95%CI, 26%-52%) and 10% (95%CI, 8%-13%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
PD-L1 expression can predict objective response rate and 2-year OS in mTNBC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. One-year PFS is also predicted in selected patients. PD-L1 expression can be a useful biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.
Topics: Humans; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; B7-H1 Antigen; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 36949944
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1060308 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy offers promising results for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy offers promising results for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, patients show highly heterogeneous responses to treatment, and predictive biomarkers are lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker for treatment response and survival in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature search through June 2023, utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to PD-L1 expression. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify possible sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies was included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed no significant differences in ORR (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.94-2.56) and DCR (OR, 1.84; 95% CIs, 0.88-3.82) between PD-L1 (+) and PD-L1 (-) patients. In contrast, survival analysis showed improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54, 95% CIs, 0.41-0.71) and OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.72) among PD-L1 (+) patients compared to PD-L1 (-) patients. Sensitivity analysis excluding retrospective studies showed no significant differences with the primary results. Furthermore, meta-regression demonstrated that drug target (PD-1 PD-L1), presence of additional intervention (monotherapy combination therapy), and PD-L1 cut-off level (1% ≥5%) significantly affected the predictive value of PD-L1 expression.
CONCLUSION
PD-L1 expression might be a helpful biomarker for predicting PFS and OS in patients with BTC undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The predictive value of PD-L1 expression can be significantly influenced by diagnostic or treatment variables.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023434114.
Topics: Humans; B7-H1 Antigen; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Ligands; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
PubMed: 38605964
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1321813 -
Oncotarget Dec 2015CD133 is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are characterized by their ability for self-renewal and tumorigenicity. However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
CD133 is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are characterized by their ability for self-renewal and tumorigenicity. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of CD133 in gastric cancer remains controversial. To clarify a precise determinant of the clinical significance of CD133, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the correlation of CD133 overexpression with prognosis and clinicopathological features of GC patients.
METHODS
A search in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Web of Knowledge and Chinese CNKI, CBM (up to Jun 30, 2015) was performed using the following keywords gastric cancer, CD133, AC133, prominin-1, etc. Electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists, abstracts and proceedings from meetings. Outcomes included overall survival and various clinicopathological features. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, and then RevMan 5.2.0 software was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 603 gastric cancer patients from 8 studies were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that, there were significant differences of CD133 expression in the following comparisons: gastric cancer tissues vs. normal esophageal tissue (OR = 3.49, 95% CI [2.48, 490], P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis vs. non-lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.75, 95% CI [1.99, 3.81], P < 0.00001), distant metastasis vs. non-distant metastasis (OR = 2.38, 95%CI [1.47, 3.85], P < 0.0004), clinical stages III~IV vs. clinical stages I~II (OR = 2.83, 95% CI [2.13, 3.76], P < 0.00001), as well as the accumulative 5-year overall survival rates of CD133-positive vs. CD133-negative patients (OR = 0.23, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33], P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION
Overexpression of CD133 is associated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, poor TNM stage. Additionally, CD133-positive gastric cancer patients had worse prognosis. Our results indicate that CD133 may be involved in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer. Evaluation of cytoplasmic CD133 overexpression in gastric cancer tissue sections may be useful in the future as a novel prognostic factor. Nevertheless, due to the poor quality and small sample size of included trials, more well-designed multi-center randomized controlled trials should be performed.
Topics: AC133 Antigen; Antigens, CD; Female; Glycoproteins; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Peptides; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 26503471
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5714 -
Oncotarget Jun 2017The effects of CD20+ B-cell infiltration during acute rejection on graft outcomes are controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effects of CD20+ B-cell infiltration during acute rejection on graft outcomes are controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to clarify this issue. We performed a systematic literature search for studies published up to January 14, 2016. A total of 5 studies, with 200 patients, were included. The presence of CD20+ B cells in renal biopsies during allograft rejection was associated with graft loss and steroid resistance. No association of CD20+ B-cell infiltration with C4d-positive staining of the peritubular capillaries in renal biopsies was found in the analysis of patients who experienced kidney graft rejection. In conclusion, CD 20+ B cell infiltration during allograft rejection was associated with an increased risk of graft loss and steroid resistance.
Topics: Acute Disease; Allografts; Antigens, CD20; B-Lymphocytes; Graft Rejection; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28415773
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16229 -
BioMed Research International 2022To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PD-1/PD-L inhibitor) and adjuvant chemotherapy to treat NSCLC and provide evidence-based reference... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor vs. Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PD-1/PD-L inhibitor) and adjuvant chemotherapy to treat NSCLC and provide evidence-based reference for clinical use.
METHODS
By searching the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, according to the inclusion criteria, literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation were carried out for the included literature. The test was used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies, and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software provided by Cochrane.
RESULTS
Finally, 14 relevant documents meeting the standards were included. It is a statistical difference in one-year survival rate [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.28, 1.76), < 0.00001, = 0%, = 4.99]; overall response rate[OR =1.57, 95% CI (1.29, 1.90), < 0.00001, = 0%, = 4.58]; progression-free survival [OR = 2.99, 95% CI (2.29, 3.91), < 0.00001, = 26%, = 8.00]; and overall survival [OR = 1.38, 95% CI (1.07, 1.78), = 0.01, = 46%, = 2.50] and reduces the incidence of adverse drug reactions [OR = 2.54, 95% CI (1.99, 3.25), < 0.00001, = 69%, = 7.43].
CONCLUSION
Pembrolizumab adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, but attention should be paid to the occurrence of adverse reactions in clinical. Due to the limitations of the methodology included in the study, this conclusion required more validation of large-sample RCT.
Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36033563
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9500319 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Previous trials demonstrated evidence involving the total effects of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an anti-CD33 humanized antibody, on treating acute myeloid leukemia... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical Benefits and Safety of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Treating Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Various Subgroups: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Previous trials demonstrated evidence involving the total effects of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an anti-CD33 humanized antibody, on treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed to comprehensively explore the clinical benefits and safety of GO in various subtypes of AML.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Chinese databases were filtered to search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies that compared clinical efficiency and toxicity of GO with non-GO groups in AML. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Relative risk (RR) was used for estimating complete remission (CR), early death, and toxicity. Hazard risk (HR) was accomplished to evaluate survival.
RESULTS
Fifteen RCTs and 15 retrospective cohort studies were identified (GO: 4,768; Control: 6,466). GO tended to improve CR (RR 0.95, p = 0.084), followed by significantly improved survival (overall survival: HR 0.86, p = 0.003; event-free survival: HR 0.86, p = 0.015; relapse-free survival: HR 0.83, p = 0.001; cumulative incidence of relapse: HR 0.82, p < 0.001). GO benefits of CR and survival were evident in favorable- and intermediate-risk karyotypes (p ≤ 0.023). GO advantages were also associated with nucleophosmin 1 mutations (p ≤ 0.04), wild-type FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication gene (p ≤ 0.03), age of <70 years (p < 0.05), AML (p ≤ 0.017), and CD33(+) (p ≤ 0.021). Both adding GO into induction therapy (p ≤ 0.011) and a lower (<6 mg/m) dose of GO (p ≤ 0.03) enhanced survival. Prognosis of combined regimens with GO was heterogeneous in both meta-analysis and NMA, with several binding strategies showing improved prognosis. Additionally, GO was related to increased risk of early death at a higher dose (≥6 mg/m) (RR 2.01, p = 0.005), hepatic-related adverse effects (RR 1.29, p = 0.02), and a tendency of higher risk for hepatic veno-occlusive disease or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (RR 1.56, p = 0.072).
CONCLUSIONS
These data indicated therapeutic benefits and safety of GO in AML, especially in some subtypes, for which further head-to-head RCTs are warranted.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020158540].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Biomarkers, Tumor; Gemtuzumab; Humans; Karyotype; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Prognosis; Sialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34484181
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683595 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jun 2024Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Significant costs and complex manufacturing underscore the importance of evidence-based counseling regarding the outcomes of these treatments. With the aim of examining the efficacy and safety of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL, we performed a systematic literature search of comparative studies evaluating outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL after treatment with axi-cel or tisa-cel. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and hematotoxicity. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics. A total of 2372 participants were included in the 8 studies in our analysis. The dropout rate between apheresis and infusion was 13% for axi-cel versus 18% for tisa-cel, and the median time from apheresis to infusion was 32 days versus 45 days. Axi-cel showed higher odds for a complete response (OR, 1.65; P < .001) and was associated with higher odds for PFS at 1 year after infusion (OR, .60; P < .001). OS appeared to be improved with axi-cel (OR, .84; 95% CI, .68 to 1.02; P = .08), whereas the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 11.5% for axi-cel versus 3.7% for tisa-cel (P = .002). The main predictors for survival were lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and response to bridging, and axi-cel maintained superior efficacy even in elderly patients. In terms of safety, axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of any-grade CRS (OR, 3.23; P < .001), but not of grade ≥3 CRS (P = .92). Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of severe ICANS grade ≥3 (OR, 4.03; P < .001). In terms of hematotoxicity, axi-cel was significantly associated with higher odds of severe neutropenia at 1 month after infusion (OR, 2.06; P = .003). As a result, axi-cel was associated with significantly greater resource utilization, including prolonged hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, and use of agents such as tocilizumab for toxicity management. We provide strong evidence of the greater efficacy of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL. The higher toxicity and NRM seen with axi-cel might not counterbalance the overall results, highlighting the need for timely intervention and careful selection of patients, balancing resource utilization and clinical benefit.
Topics: Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Biological Products; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Antigens, CD19; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38281590
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.074 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Nov 2022During the first year of life, B-cell level is a valuable indicator of whether external factors, such as exposure to B-cell-depleting therapies, have an adverse impact... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
During the first year of life, B-cell level is a valuable indicator of whether external factors, such as exposure to B-cell-depleting therapies, have an adverse impact on immune system development. However, there are no standard reference ranges of B-cell levels in healthy infants by age.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to estimate the normal range of B-cell levels in infants, by age, during the first year of life by pooling data from published studies.
METHODS
Studies reporting B-cell levels measured by using flow cytometry and CD19 markers in healthy infants were identified via a systematic literature review. Quality and feasibility assessments determined suitability for inclusion in meta-analyses by age group and/or continuous age. Means and normal ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentile) were estimated for absolute and percentage B-cell levels. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of various assumptions.
RESULTS
Of the 37 relevant studies identified, 28 were included in at least 1 meta-analysis. The means and normal ranges of B-cell levels were found to be 707 cells/μL in cord blood (range 123-2324 cells/μL), 508 cells/μL in infants aged 0 to 1 month (range 132-1369 cells/μL), 1493 cells/μL in infants aged 1 to 6 months (range 416-3877 cells/μL), and 1474 cells/μL in infants older than 6 months (range 416-3805 cells/μL). The continuous age model showed that B-cell levels peaked at week 26. Trends were similar for the percentage B-cell estimates and in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
These meta-analyses provide the first normal reference ranges for B-cell levels in infants, by week of age, during the first year of life.
Topics: Infant; Humans; Reference Values; Flow Cytometry; B-Lymphocytes; Antigens, CD19
PubMed: 35728653
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.06.006