-
JAMA Network Open Jan 2021Programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors widely used in the treatment of metastatic clear cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Factors Modifying the Associations of Single or Combination Programmed Cell Death 1 and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitor Therapies With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
IMPORTANCE
Programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors widely used in the treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and other cancers. There is a lack of understanding regarding which factors are associated with therapeutic response.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic literature review of trials reporting on factors associated with differential response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors among patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC and quantitatively synthesize the magnitude to which each factor modified the response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
DATA SOURCES
The MEDLINE and Cochrane Register of Trials databases were searched for studies published in English from 2006 onward. Searches were last run on September 3, 2019.
STUDY SELECTION
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed 662 phase 2/3 randomized clinical trials that provided subgroup analyses of any baseline characteristics regarding the treatment response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, alone or as part of a combination therapy, with respect to overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with metastatic ccRCC.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
A novel quantitative approach was used to synthesize subgroup findings across trials. The ratio of the subgroup-specific hazard ratios (HRs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis whereby ratios of 1.00 would indicate that the subgroup-specific HRs were equal in magnitude.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Main outcomes were OS and PFS.
RESULTS
From an initial 662 reports, 7 trials were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses suggested the treatment response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with metastatic ccRCC was significantly associated with age (OS: ratio of HR for age ≥75 years to HR for age <65 years, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.26), PD-L1 expression (PFS: ratio of HR for PD-L1 < 1% to HR for PD-L1 ≥ 10%, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.14-4.27; ratio of HR for PD-L1 < 1% to HR for PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.10-1.68), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk score (PFS: ratio of HR for immediate risk score to HR for poor risk score, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.14-2.29; ratio of HR for favorable risk score to HR for poor risk score, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.00-2.34; ratio of HR for favorable risk score to HR for intermediate risk score, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70-1.30), and sarcomatoid tumor presence (PFS: ratio of HR for no sarcomatoid differentiation to HR for sarcomatoid differentiation, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.07-2.21).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This analysis suggests that older age, low levels of PD-L1 expression, and the absence of sarcomatoid tumor differentiation are associated with a diminished response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies with respect to survival outcomes among patients with metastatic ccRCC.
Topics: Age Factors; B7-H1 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Immunotherapy; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33496794
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34201 -
International Journal of Molecular... Aug 2020The treatment landscape in oncology has witnessed a major revolution with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors: anti-PD1, anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA-4. These agents... (Review)
Review
The treatment landscape in oncology has witnessed a major revolution with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors: anti-PD1, anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA-4. These agents enhance the immune response towards cancer cells instead of targeting the tumor itself, contrary to standard chemotherapy. Although long-lasting durable responses have been observed with immune checkpoints inhibitors, the response rate remains relatively low in many cases. Some patients respond in the beginning but then eventually develop acquired resistance to treatment and progress. Other patients having primary resistance never respond. Multiple studies have been conducted to further elucidate these variations in response in different tumor types and different individuals. This paper provides an overview of the mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors and highlights the possible therapeutic approaches under investigation aiming to overcome such resistance in order to improve the clinical outcomes of cancer patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; B7-H1 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; CTLA-4 Antigen; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 32867025
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176176 -
Scientific Reports Apr 2022The cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) is one of the main receptors implicated in the pathogenesis of the cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) is one of the main receptors implicated in the pathogenesis of the cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to assess the association between CD36 rs1761667 polymorphism and cardiometabolic risk factors including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, HDL-C, LDL-C, blood pressure and fasting blood glucose (FBG). PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, web of science, and Google Scholar were searched up to December 2021. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Eighteen eligible studies (6317 participants) were included in the study. In the overall analysis, a significant association was found between rs1761667 polymorphism of CD36 and TG in allelic (p < 0.001), recessive (p = 0.001) and homozygous (p = 0.006) models. A relationship between this polymorphism and HDL-C and FBG level was observed in the recessive genetic model. In the subgroup analysis, the A allele was associated with impaired lipid profiles (TC, LDL-C and HDL-C) in the Asian population. The influences of health status, design of the study, confounders, and other sources of heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting present findings. Cohort studies with large sample size and in different ethnicities are needed to confirm the relationship between rs1761667 SNP and cardiometabolic risk factors.
Topics: Adult; Blood Pressure; CD36 Antigens; Cardiometabolic Risk Factors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Humans; Risk Factors; Waist Circumference
PubMed: 35396566
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09908-0 -
PloS One 2015It's difficult to differentiate sepsis from non-sepsis, especially non-infectious SIRS, because no good standard exists for proof of infection. Soluble CD14 subtype... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
It's difficult to differentiate sepsis from non-sepsis, especially non-infectious SIRS, because no good standard exists for proof of infection. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST), recently re-named presepsin, was identified as a new marker for the diagnosis of sepsis in several reports. However, the findings were based on the results of individual clinical trials, rather than a comprehensive and overall estimation. Thus, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled accuracy of presepsin in patients with sepsis suspect.
METHODS
A comprehensive electronic search was performed via internet retrieval system up to 15 December 2014. Methodological quality assessment was applied by using the QUADAS2 tool. The diagnostic value of presepsin in sepsis was evaluated by using the pooled estimate of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio, as well as summary receiver operating characteristics curve.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 10 trials and 2159 cases were included in the study. Only two trials had low concerns regarding applicability, whereas all trials were deemed to be at high risk of bias. Heterogeneity existed in the non-threshold effect, but not in the threshold effect. The pooled sensitivity of presepsin for sepsis was 0.78 (0.76-0.80), pooled specificity was 0.83 (0.80-0.85), pooled positive likelihood ratio was 4.63 (3.27-6.55), pooled negative likelihood ratio was 0.22 (0.16-0.30), and pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 21.73 (12.81-36.86). The area under curve of summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.84 to 0.94) and Q* index was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.87).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis demonstrates that presepsin had some superiority in the management of patients, and may be a helpful and valuable biomarker in early diagnosis of sepsis. However, presepsin showed a moderate diagnostic accuracy in differentiating sepsis from non-sepsis which prevented it from being recommended as a definitive test for diagnosing sepsis in isolation, but the results should be interpreted cautiously.
Topics: Area Under Curve; Biomarkers; Databases, Factual; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; ROC Curve; Risk Factors; Sepsis
PubMed: 26192602
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133057 -
Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma, and... Apr 2020Despite the importance of CD44 and CD133 in various cancers, the clinicopathological and prognostic values of these biomarkers in esophageal cancer remain debated.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Despite the importance of CD44 and CD133 in various cancers, the clinicopathological and prognostic values of these biomarkers in esophageal cancer remain debated. Hence, in this study, we did a meta-analysis to explore the correlation between overexpression of these markers and some clinicopathological features and their influence on the survival of esophageal cancer patients. A search in PubMed and Web of Science (among all articles published up to January 16, 2018) was done using the following keywords: esophageal cancer, CD44, CD133, prominin-1, AC133. Suitable studies, that were selected based on the criteria listed in the Materials and Methods section, were chosen and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated if available. Heterogeneity and sensitivity were also analyzed. Furthermore, publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Egger, and Begg tests. The study included 1346 patients from 13 related studies. The median rates of marker expressions by immunohistochemistry were 35.7% (30%-76.6%) from 9 studies for CD44 and 31.9% (21%-44.2%) from 5 studies for CD133. The accumulative 5-year overall survival rates of CD44-positive and CD133-positive were 1.59% (1.22-2.06) and 1.27% (0.93-1.73), respectively. Meta-analysis showed that CD44 expression had a significant correlation with 5-year overall survival. CD44 overexpression showed a correlation with some clinicopathological features such as lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and recurrence of the disease, while it was not the case for coexpression of CD44 and CD133. In conclusion, CD44 overexpression was associated with a 5-year overall survival rate and thus this biomarker can be a suitable prognostic tool in esophageal cancer.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; CD13 Antigens; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagus; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Immunohistochemistry; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 32372624
DOI: 10.18502/ijaai.v19i2.2756 -
Cancer Gene Therapy Jun 2023Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment approach for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment approach for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, identifying the factors that influence long-term response to this therapy is necessary to optimize patient selection and treatment allocation. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the use of autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with R/R B-ALL, using several databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Journals@Ovid, Embase, and clinicaltrial.gov. A total of 38 reports were analyzed, which enrolled 2134 patients. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using reconstructed patient survival data. The study explored key modulators of response, including costimulatory domains, disease status, age, and lymphodepletion. The median overall survival and event-free survival were 36.2 months [95% CI 28.9, NR] and 13.3 months [95% CI 12.2, 17], respectively. The overall response rate was 76% [95% CI 71, 81]. The use of 4-1BB costimulatory domain in the CAR construct, administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion, and pretreatment morphologic remission were associated with better overall survival, with hazard ratios of 0.72, 0.56, and 0.66, respectively. Morphologic remission and 4-1BB domain were associated with better event-free survival, with hazard ratios of 0.66 and 0.72, respectively. These findings suggest that CAR T cell therapy may offer long-term benefits to patients with R/R B-ALL. However, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and better understand the impact of various factors on the outcome of CAR T cell therapy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Antigens, CD19; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 36750666
DOI: 10.1038/s41417-023-00593-3 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Therapies based on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) are transforming the treatment landscape of esophageal cancer.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Therapies based on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) are transforming the treatment landscape of esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, the available data on adverse events (AEs) mainly stemmed from several prospective clinical trials and retrospective studies, in which, AE data are often handled and reported with less rigor than the primary beneficial outcomes of the study. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the toxicity spectrum of these novel regimens.
METHOD
We searched for all prospective clinical trials investigating the role of ICIs combined with TRT published between January 2010 and August 2022. Study articles and conference proceedings involving esophageal cancers and reporting the overall incidence or details of treatment-related AEs (trAEs) were synthesized to determine the toxicity profile of combination treatment. We compared trAEs between cancer type, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, and between sequential and concurrent administration of ICIs and TRT to identify potentially high-risk patients.
RESULTS
We obtained toxicity data from 14 clinical trials involving 863 patients. The pooled overall incidence was 88.97% for any-grade trAEs and 18.48% for high-grade trAEs. The three most frequent non-hematologic any-grade trAEs were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP, 63.80%), esophagitis (51.54%), and fatigue (33.63%). Meanwhile, RCCEP (15.69%) was the most common non-hematologic high-grade trAE, followed by nausea (4.91%) and anorexia (3.81%). The occurrence rates of any-grade and high-grade pneumonitis were 10.82% and 0.66%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, the toxicity profiles of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were mostly similar, except for any-grade pneumonitis (15.20% vs 4.88%, p=0.03) and high-grade leukopenia (6.25% vs 59.09%, p=0.00). In addition, concurrent treatment seemed to have a higher incidence of any-grade trAEs (95.20% vs 70.85%, p=0.03) compared with sequential treatment. ESCC seems to have higher incidence of any-grade hypothyroidism (22.55% vs 8.96%, p=0.049) compared to EAC.
CONCLUSION
Our study is the first systematic review to provide a toxicity profile of trAEs in esophageal cancer patients who received ICIs combined with TRT. Most AEs of this combination treatment are tolerable, although the incidence of any-grade trAEs was higher in the concurrent group. The difference in any-grade pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor groups needs further validation in a large clinical trial.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Esophageal Neoplasms
PubMed: 36439117
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039020 -
Transfusion Medicine Reviews Apr 2023Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells mobilization is now the basis of most stem cell transplants. In a very limited number of cases, mobilization is suboptimal leading...
Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells mobilization is now the basis of most stem cell transplants. In a very limited number of cases, mobilization is suboptimal leading to further collection procedures, to suboptimal cell doses infusion with delayed engraftment time, increased risks of transplant procedure and of related costs. To date we have no recognized and shared criteria for early estimating the probability of poor mobilization in healthy donors. We then analyzed allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations performed at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS Hospital from January 2013 to December 2021 in order to identify premobilization factors associated with successful mobilization. The following data were collected: age, gender, weight, complete blood cell count at baseline, G-CSF dose, number of collection procedures, CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood on the first day of collection, CD34+ cell dose per kg body weight of recipient. Mobilization efficacy was defined according to the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood on day +5 of G-CSF administration. We classified donors as sub-optimal mobilizers or good mobilizers according to the achievement of the 50 CD34+ cell/μL threshold. We observed 30 suboptimal mobilizations in 158 allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell donations. Age and baseline white blood cell count were factors significantly associated with negative or positive impact on mobilization, respectively. We did not find significant differences in mobilization based on gender or G-CSF dose. Using cut-off values of 43 years and 5.5×10/L WBC count, we built a suboptimal mobilization score: donors who reach 2, 1 or 0 points have a 46%, 16% or 4% probability of suboptimal mobilization, respectively. Our model explains 26% of the variability of mobilization confirming that most of the mobilization magnitude depends on genetically determined factors; however, suboptimal mobilization score is a simple tool providing an early assessment of mobilization efficacy before G-CSF administration begins in order to support allogeneic stem cells selection, mobilization and collection. Through a systematic review, we looked for confirmation of our findings. According to the published articles, all the variables we included in our model are confirmed to be strongly related to the success of mobilization. We believe that score system approach could be applied in clinical practice to assess the risk of mobilization failure at baseline allowing for a priori intervention.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization; Peripheral Blood Stem Cells; Antigens, CD34; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 37315997
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150725 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Oct 2020We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the response rates of patients with treatment-refractory urothelial carcinoma treated with programmed cell death 1... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the response rates of patients with treatment-refractory urothelial carcinoma treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. We reviewed the literature for prospective studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in refractory urothelial carcinoma patients, which formed the basis for US Food and Drug Administration approval of 5 different antagonistic antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab). We considered studies examining PD-1/PD-L1-treated patients, which we identified using the following key terms in the Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies had ≥ 20 patients each and reported response rates, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). We performed fixed and random-effects meta-analyses to model the point estimates for objective response rate and complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for studies reporting these statistics were evaluated. We found 10 eligible studies that met our inclusion criteria, providing extractable numerators and denominators for response rates, PFS, and OS for 1934 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The objective response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval, 15-22) for second-line or later therapies. The random-effects estimate for complete response was 4% (95% confidence interval, 3-5), including all disease locations and all PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Median OS and PFS were < 13 months and 3 months, respectively, across all studies, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. We found that the estimated response rates of agents included in this meta-analysis seem to be more favorable than other salvage therapies.
Topics: B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Prospective Studies; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 32146152
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.01.004 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2020Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors provide a survival advantage over conventional therapies for treatment of advanced or metastatic cancer. However, the factors determining... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors provide a survival advantage over conventional therapies for treatment of advanced or metastatic cancer. However, the factors determining which patients benefit the most from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are unknown, making treatment-related decisions difficult. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of acquired data to assess the efficacy and toxicity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced and metastatic cancer. A thorough search strategy was applied to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and major conferences. Studies meeting predefined selection criteria were selected, and two independent investigators performed data extraction; overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate were compared between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and control therapies. We calculated the pooled response rate and 95% CIs of all-grade and high-grade (≥3) adverse effects and evaluated the within-study heterogeneity using subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses. In final, we included eligible 35 RCTs (21047 patients). The main estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS were 0.76 (0.71-0.82) and 0.81 (0.73-0.89) in a random-effects model. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group had a significantly high risk for all-grade immune-related adverse events. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were identified as a preferable treatment option for advanced or metastatic cancer patients who are male, aged < 65 years, current or former smokers, had no CNS or liver metastasis, had not EGFR mutation, and had high PD-L1 expression.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; B7-H1 Antigen; Humans; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32034198
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58674-4