-
International Journal of Molecular... Jan 2023Taste and smell disorders (TSDs) are common side effects in patients undergoing cancer treatments. Knowing which treatments specifically cause them is crucial to improve... (Review)
Review
Taste and smell disorders (TSDs) are common side effects in patients undergoing cancer treatments. Knowing which treatments specifically cause them is crucial to improve patients' quality of life. This review looked at the oncological treatments that cause taste and smell alterations and their time of onset. We performed an integrative rapid review. The PubMed, PROSPERO, and Web of Science databases were searched in November 2022. The article screening and study selection were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were analyzed narratively. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. A high heterogeneity was detected. Taste disorders ranged between 17 and 86%, while dysosmia ranged between 8 and 45%. Docetaxel, paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, anthracyclines, and oral 5-FU analogues were found to be the drugs most frequently associated with TSDs. This review identifies the cancer treatments that mainly lead to taste and smell changes and provides evidence for wider studies, including those focusing on prevention. Further studies are warranted to make conclusive indication possible.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Olfaction Disorders; Quality of Life; Smell; Taste; Taste Disorders
PubMed: 36768861
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032538 -
ESMO Open 2017To compare the efficacy and toxicity of anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) versus docetaxel in previously...
Anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
To compare the efficacy and toxicity of anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Phase III randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were identified after systematic review of databases and conference proceedings. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled HR for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response. The pooled OR for overall response and treatment-related side effects were calculated using the inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was measured using the τ and I statistics.
RESULTS
After the systematic review, we included four phase III RCTs (n=2737) in this meta-analysis. The use of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 agents (atezolizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) was associated with better OS in comparison with docetaxel alone (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75; p<0.00001). Similarly, the PFS and duration of response was significantly longer for patients receiving immunotherapy (HR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96; p=0.007 and HR:0.32; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.43; p<0.00001, respectively) versus single agent chemotherapy. The overall response rate was also higher for patients who received any anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in comparison with docetaxel (OR: 1.77; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.50; p=0.001). Regarding treatment-related side effects grade 3 or higher, patients who received immunotherapy experienced less events than patients allocated to docetaxel (OR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.30; p<0.00001).
CONCLUSION
The use of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in patients with progressive advanced NSCLC is significantly better than the use of docetaxel in terms of OS, PFS, duration of response and overall response rate.
PubMed: 29181191
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000236 -
European Review For Medical and... Sep 2021Although bevacizumab and trastuzumab have been widely added to the standard regimen for metastatic breast cancer, the clinical outcomes remain controversial. The purpose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Although bevacizumab and trastuzumab have been widely added to the standard regimen for metastatic breast cancer, the clinical outcomes remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to conduct meta-analysis to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel and bevacizumab with or without trastuzumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All available literature of clinical trials about docetaxel, bevacizumab, trastuzumab and metastatic breast cancer was pooled from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library database. The meta-analysis combined the progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and incidence of all grades adverse events in MBC patients.
RESULTS
Seven clinical trials were included by two reviewers. Docetaxel and bevacizumab with trastuzumab show the pooled PFS was 16.53 months (95% CI: 13.95-19.11 months), the pooled ORR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80) in HER2-positive MBC patients. Docetaxel and bevacizumab show that the pooled PFS was 8.49 months (95% CI: 7.80-9.18 months), the pooled ORR was 0.51(95% CI: 0.47-0.55) in HER2-negative MBC patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Both for patients with HER2-positive and negative metastatic breast cancer, docetaxel and bevacizumab with or without trastuzumab as first-line treatment resulted in long survival, especially in terms of progression-free survival. Although the overall response rates are also significantly improved, it is still controversial based on the current evidence.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Breast Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Female; Humans; Progression-Free Survival; Receptor, ErbB-2; Survival Rate; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 34533811
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202109_26643 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2015It is generally accepted that taxanes are among the most active chemotherapy agents in the management of metastatic breast cancer. This is an update of a Cochrane review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
It is generally accepted that taxanes are among the most active chemotherapy agents in the management of metastatic breast cancer. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to compare taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing a taxane in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer.
SEARCH METHODS
In this review update, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 14 February 2013 using keywords such as 'advanced breast cancer' and 'chemotherapy'. We searched reference lists of articles, contacted study authors, and did not apply any language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens to regimens without taxanes in women with metastatic breast cancer. We included published and unpublished studies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We derived hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival, time to progression, and time to treatment failure where possible, and used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis. We represented objective tumour response rates and toxicity as risk ratios (RRs). We extracted quality of life data where present.
MAIN RESULTS
This review included 28 studies. The updated analysis included 6871 randomised women, while the original review had 3643 women. Of the 28 included studies, we considered 19 studies to be at low risk of bias overall; however, some studies failed to report details on allocation concealment and methods of outcome assessment for those outcomes that are more likely to be influenced by a lack of blinding (for example tumour response rate). Studies varied in the taxane-containing chemotherapy backbone, and the comparator arms and were categorised into three groups: Regimen A plus taxane versus Regimen A (2 studies); Regimen A plus taxane versus Regimen B (14 studies); and single-agent taxane versus Regimen C (13 studies). Thirteen studies used paclitaxel, 14 studies used docetaxel, and 1 study allowed the investigator to decide on the type of taxane; the majority of studies delivered a taxane every 3 weeks. Twenty studies administered taxanes as first-line treatment, and 21 studies involved anthracycline naïve women in the metastatic setting. The combined HR for overall survival and time to progression favoured the taxane-containing regimens (HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.99, P = 0.002, deaths = 4477; and HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97, P = 0.002, estimated 5122 events, respectively) with moderate to substantial heterogeneity across trials. If the analyses were restricted to studies of first-line chemotherapy, this effect persisted for overall survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99, P = 0.03) but not for time to progression (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.02, P = 0.22). Tumour response rates appeared to be better with taxane-containing chemotherapy in assessable women (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.27, P < 0.00001) with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Taxanes were associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity (RR 4.84, 95% CI 3.18 to 7.35, P < 0.00001, 24 studies) and hair loss (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.87, P = 0.0006, 11 studies) but less nausea/vomiting compared to non-taxane-containing regimens (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83, P = 0.001, 26 studies). Leukopaenia and treatment-related death did not differ between the two groups (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.17, P = 0.16, 28 studies; and RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57, P = 0.99, 23 studies, respectively). For quality of life measures, none of the individual studies reported a difference in overall or any of quality of life subscales between taxane-containing and non-taxane chemotherapy regimens.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Taxane-containing regimens appear to improve overall survival, time to progression, and tumour response rate in women with metastatic breast cancer. Taxanes are also associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity but less nausea and vomiting compared to non-taxane-containing regimens. The considerable heterogeneity encountered across studies probably reflects the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in these studies and indicates that taxane-containing regimens are more effective than some, but not all, non-taxane-containing regimens.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Breast Neoplasms; Bridged-Ring Compounds; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tamoxifen; Taxoids
PubMed: 26058962
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003366.pub3 -
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental Sep 2022Several anticancer agents have been associated with cardiac toxic effects. The currently proposed mechanisms to explain cardiotoxicity differ among anticancer agents,... (Review)
Review
Several anticancer agents have been associated with cardiac toxic effects. The currently proposed mechanisms to explain cardiotoxicity differ among anticancer agents, but in fact, the specific modulation is not completely elucidated. Thus, this systematic review aims to provide an integrative perspective of the molecular mechanisms underlying the toxicity of anticancer agents on heart muscle while using a high-throughput technology, mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics. A literature search using PubMed database led to the selection of 27 studies, of which 13 reported results exclusively on animal models, 13 on cardiomyocyte-derived cell lines and only one included both animal and a cardiomyocyte line. The reported anticancer agents were the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib, the anthracyclines daunorubicin, doxorubicin, epirubicin and idarubicin, the antimicrotubule agent docetaxel, the alkylating agent melphalan, the anthracenedione mitoxantrone, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib, lapatinib, sorafenib and sunitinib, and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Regarding the MS-based proteomic approaches, electrophoretic separation using two-dimensional (2D) gels coupled with tandem MS (MS/MS) and liquid chromatography-MS/MS (LC-MS/MS) were the most common. Overall, the studies highlighted 1826 differentially expressed proteins across 116 biological processes. Most of them were grouped in larger processes and critically analyzed in the present review. The selection of studies using proteomics on heart muscle allowed to obtain information about the anticancer therapy-induced modulation of numerous proteins in this tissue and to establish connections that have been disregarded in other studies. This systematic review provides interesting points for a comprehensive understanding of the cellular cardiotoxicity mechanisms of different anticancer drugs.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiotoxicity; Chromatography, Liquid; Proteomics; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 35809654
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155250 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023In the REVEL trial, ramucirumab plus docetaxel demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate...
INTRODUCTION
In the REVEL trial, ramucirumab plus docetaxel demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) compared with placebo plus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Since the approval of ramucirumab plus docetaxel, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy, have become the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, efficacy and safety data for ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior ICI treatment from randomized controlled clinical studies are lacking.
METHODS
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed. Electronic databases and select international oncology conference proceedings were searched. Studies published between 01 January 2014 and 01 July 2022, which evaluated 2 efficacy outcomes (and included at least 1 time-to-event endpoint) or safety outcomes of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in NSCLC that progressed after prior ICI treatment, were identified. Twelve studies were included in the analysis. Two treatment groups were selected: ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior ICI ± chemotherapy (RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated) and ramucirumab plus docetaxel after prior chemotherapy only (RAM + DTX ICI naïve). OS, PFS, ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety data were extracted and descriptively summarized across both treatment groups.
RESULTS
The pooled weighted median PFS and median OS were 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-6.8) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 7.5-17.5), respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated group and 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.1) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 8-24.0), respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI naïve group. The ORR and DCR ranged from 20.9% to 60.0% and from 62.4% to 90.0%, respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI pre-treated group and from 17.7% to 20.0% and from 57.1% to 75.0%, respectively, in the RAM + DTX ICI naïve group. The safety profile across studies was consistent between both treatment groups, and no new safety signals were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Cumulatively, these results support the combination of ramucirumab plus docetaxel as an effective and safe subsequent therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with disease progression irrespective of previous ICI treatment.
PubMed: 37731641
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1247879 -
European Urology Oncology Apr 2024It remains unclear to what extent the therapy of the primary local tumor, such as radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT), improves overall survival in... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
It remains unclear to what extent the therapy of the primary local tumor, such as radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT), improves overall survival in patients with low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, data suggest a benefit of these therapies in preventing local events secondary to local tumor progression.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of adding local therapy (RP or RT) to systemic therapies, including androgen deprivation therapy, docetaxel, and/or androgen receptor axis-targeted agents, in preventing local events in mHSPC patients compared with systemic therapy alone (ie, without RT of the prostate or RP).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Three databases and meeting abstracts were queried in November 2023 for studies analyzing mHSPC patients treated with local therapy. The primary outcome of interest was the prevention of overall local events (urinary tract infection, urinary tract obstruction, and gross hematuria) due to local disease progression. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential outcomes according to the type of local therapy (RP or RT).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Overall, six studies, comprising two randomized controlled trials, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall incidence of local events was significantly lower in the local treatment plus systemic therapy group than in the systemic therapy only groups (relative risk [RR]: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.88, p = 0.016). RP significantly reduced the incidence of overall local events (RR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.52) and that of local events requiring surgical intervention (RR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.25). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the RT plus systemic therapy and systemic therapy only groups in terms of overall local events, the incidence of local events requiring surgical intervention was significantly lower in the RT plus systemic therapy group (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-0.99); local events requiring surgical intervention of the upper urinary tract was significantly lower in local treatment groups (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37-0.98, p = 0.04). However, a subgroup analysis revealed that neither RP nor RT significantly impacted the prevention of local events requiring surgical intervention of the upper urinary tract.
CONCLUSIONS
In some patients with mHSPC, RP or RT of primary tumor seems to reduce the incidence of local progression and events requiring surgical intervention. Identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from local therapy, and at what time point (eg, after response of metastases), will be necessary to set up a study assessing the risk, benefits, and alternatives to therapy of the primary tumor in the mHSPC setting.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Our study suggests that local therapy of the prostate, such as radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer can prevent local events, such as urinary obstruction and gross hematuria.
PubMed: 38575408
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.007 -
BioMed Research International 2017Recently, several drugs have been introduced for the first-line treatment of chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but few studies... (Review)
Review
Recently, several drugs have been introduced for the first-line treatment of chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but few studies have compared treatment outcomes directly. This indirect comparison among 10 clinical trials ( = 4870 patients) retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration, and ClinicalTrails.gov was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and sipuleucel-T for the initial treatment of mCRPC. No significant differences in primary outcome (overall survival) were found among initial treatments. However, docetaxel had the highest probability (37.53%) of being the most effective, but at the cost of more adverse events, while enzalutamide was associated with the best secondary outcomes (prostate-specific antigen response, progression-free survival, quality of life, and adverse event profile). Thus, docetaxel is recommended as the first agent used for the chemotherapy of mCRPC, while enzalutamide is recommended as the first nonchemotherapy treatment. Additional clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish the optimal order for multidrug treatment of mCRPC.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29951524
DOI: 10.1155/2017/3941217 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2018Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal cancers. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstream treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. This systematic review...
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal cancers. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstream treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. This systematic review evaluated and compared the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes obtained from recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of pancreatic cancer chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-two studies were included and compared based on chemotherapy agents or combinations used. Additionally, outcomes of first-line versus second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer were compared.
RESULTS
In studies that investigated the treatments in adjuvant settings, the highest OS reported was for S-1 in patients, who received prior surgical resection (46.5 months). In neoadjuvant settings, the combination of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine prior to the surgical resection had promising outcomes (OS of 32.5 months). In non-adjuvant settings, the highest OS reported was for the combination of temsirolimus plus bevacizumab (34.0 months). Amongst studies that investigated second-line treatment, the highest OS reported was for the combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (35.5 months), then temsirolimus plus bevacizumab (34.0 months).
CONCLUSIONS
There is a need to develop further strategies besides chemotherapy to improve the outcomes in pancreatic cancer treatment. Future studies should consider surgical interventions, combination chemotherapy, and individualized second-line treatment based on the prior chemotherapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Female; Humans; Male; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 30344279
DOI: 10.3390/medicina54030048 -
European Urology Jul 2022Several recent randomised trials have evaluated the role of combination systemic treatment using androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus chemotherapy or an androgen... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Several recent randomised trials have evaluated the role of combination systemic treatment using androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus chemotherapy or an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with high-risk and/or unfavourable nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPC).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the outcomes associated with adding combination systemic treatment to primary definitive local therapy in patients with high-risk and/or unfavourable nmPC.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We queried the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and conference abstracts to identify prospective randomised trials examining the value of adding chemotherapy or an ARSI to ADT and primary local therapy with curative intent for nmPC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and failure-free survival (FFS). Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and pathologic outcomes.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We identified 15 randomised studies, of which nine evaluated chemohormonal and six investigated ARSI-based treatment strategies. In both radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT) settings, addition of docetaxel to ADT was associated with significantly better CSS (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.95; p = 0.025), MFS (pooled HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95; p = 0.008), and FFS (pooled HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.79; p < 0.001); the difference did not meet the conventional level of statistical significance for OS (pooled HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.01; p = 0.072). For patients treated with RT alone, docetaxel-based combination treatment did not meet the significance threshold set for OS (p = 0.3), CSS (p = 0.072), or MFS (p = 0.079), but the difference for FFS was statistically significant (pooled HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.84; p < 0.001). On network meta-analyses including RT studies, ARSI + ADT outperformed docetaxel + ADT for survival endpoints and had a more favourable AE profile.
CONCLUSIONS
Intensification of systemic therapy with docetaxel or an ARSI in addition to ADT improves oncologic endpoints in high-risk and/or unfavourable nmPC treated with local definitive therapy. The highest efficacy was achieved with ARSI + ADT, specifically in patients treated with RT.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Our findings highlight that selected patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer benefit from intensification of systemic therapy beyond hormonal treatment.
Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35465985
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.031