-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2015Endoscopy and surgery are the treatment modalities of choice for patients with chronic pancreatitis and dilated pancreatic duct (obstructive chronic pancreatitis).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Endoscopy and surgery are the treatment modalities of choice for patients with chronic pancreatitis and dilated pancreatic duct (obstructive chronic pancreatitis). Physicians face, without clear consensus, the choice between endoscopy or surgery for this group of patients.
OBJECTIVES
To assess and compare the effects and complications of surgical and endoscopic interventions in the management of pain for obstructive chronic pancreatitis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases in The Cochrane Library: CENTRAL (2014, Issue 2), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2014, Issue 2), and DARE (2014, Issue 2). We also searched the following databases up to 25 March 2014: MEDLINE (from 1950), Embase (from 1980), and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) (from 1990). We performed a cross-reference search. Two review authors independently performed the selection of trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of endoscopic or surgical interventions in obstructive chronic pancreatitis. We included trials comparing endoscopic versus surgical interventions as well as trials comparing either endoscopic or surgical interventions to conservative treatment (i.e. non-invasive treatment modalities). We included relevant trials irrespective of blinding, the number of participants randomised, and the language of the article.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. Two authors independently extracted data from the articles. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included trials and requested additional information from study authors in the case of missing data.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified three eligible trials. Two trials compared endoscopic intervention with surgical intervention and included a total of 111 participants: 55 in the endoscopic group and 56 in the surgical group. Compared with the endoscopic group, the surgical group had a higher proportion of participants with pain relief, both at middle/long-term follow-up (two to five years: risk ratio (RR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 2.15) and long-term follow-up (≥ five years, RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.05). Surgical intervention resulted in improved quality of life and improved preservation of exocrine pancreatic function at middle/long-term follow-up (two to five years), but not at long-term follow-up (≥ 5 years). No differences were found in terms of major post-interventional complications or mortality, although the number of participants did not allow for this to be reliably evaluated. One trial, including 32 participants, compared surgical intervention with conservative treatment: 17 in the surgical group and 15 in the conservative group. The trial showed that surgical intervention resulted in a higher percentage of participants with pain relief and better preservation of pancreatic function. The trial had methodological limitations, and the number of participants was relatively small.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For patients with obstructive chronic pancreatitis and dilated pancreatic duct, this review shows that surgery is superior to endoscopy in terms of pain relief. Morbidity and mortality seem not to differ between the two intervention modalities, but the small trials identified do not provide sufficient power to detect the small differences expected in this outcome.Regarding the comparison of surgical intervention versus conservative treatment, this review has shown that surgical intervention in an early stage of chronic pancreatitis is a promising approach in terms of pain relief and pancreatic function. Other trials need to confirm these results because of the methodological limitations and limited number of participants assessed in the present evidence.
Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Pressure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25790326
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007884.pub3 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Dec 2019The role of enucleation (EN) for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) is poorly defined. This systematic review aims to review EN for BD-IPMN... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The role of enucleation (EN) for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) is poorly defined. This systematic review aims to review EN for BD-IPMN and compare it with pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy and central pancreatectomy).
METHODS
A systematic review of published literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines, and included a search of PubMed, MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis comprising 991 patients with 293 EN patients and 698 resected patients. EN was most often performed for low grade (77%, 151/197) BD-IPMN's (99%, 251/253) of the pancreatic head (64%, 106/165), with a pooled mean diameter of 21 mm (SD 28 mm). EN was a shorter procedure (MD -115.8 min, CI -142.2 to -89.5 min, P=<0.001) with a lower rate of post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (EN 1% 2/144, Resection 5% 10/186, RR 0.32, CI 0.11 to 0.94, P = 0.043) and postoperative exocrine and endocrine insufficiency (P = <0.001 and P = 0.003 respectively) than resection.
CONCLUSION
EN for BD-IPMN's appears to be a reasonable alternative to resection in low risk BD-IPMN's, allowing preservation of exocrine and endocrine function with comparable reoperation and recurrence rates to resection. However, surveillance was indicated in these low risk patients based on current published guidelines.
Topics: Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency; Gastric Emptying; Humans; Length of Stay; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Operative Time; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage
PubMed: 31153837
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.015 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2015To verify the utility of fluorescent cholangiography for more rigorous identification of the extrahepatic biliary system. (Review)
Review
AIM
To verify the utility of fluorescent cholangiography for more rigorous identification of the extrahepatic biliary system.
METHODS
MEDLINE and PubMed searches were performed using the key words "fluorescent cholangiography", "fluorescent angiography", "intraoperative fluorescent imaging", and "laparoscopic cholecystectomy" in order to identify relevant articles published in English, French, German, and Italian during the years of 2009 to 2014. Reference lists from the articles were reviewed to identify additional pertinent articles. For studies published in languages other than those mentioned above, all available information was collected from their English abstracts. Retrieved manuscripts (case reports, reviews, and abstracts) concerning the application of fluorescent cholangiography were reviewed by the authors, and the data were extracted using a standardized collection tool. Data were subsequently analyzed with descriptive statistics. In contrast to classic meta-analyses, statistical analysis was performed where the outcome was calculated as the percentages of an event (without comparison) in pseudo-cohorts of observed patients.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies were found that involved fluorescent cholangiography during standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (n = 11), single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (n = 3), multiport robotic cholecystectomy (n = 1), and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 1). Overall, these preliminary studies indicated that this novel technique was highly sensitive for the detection of important biliary anatomy and could facilitate the prevention of bile duct injuries. The structures effectively identified before dissection of Calot's triangle included the cystic duct (CD), the common hepatic duct (CHD), the common bile duct (CBD), and the CD-CHD junction. A review of the literature revealed that the frequencies of detection of the extrahepatic biliary system ranged from 71.4% to 100% for the CD, 33.3% to 100% for the CHD, 50% to 100% for the CBD, and 25% to 100% for the CD-CHD junction. However, the frequency of visualization of the CD and the CBD were reduced in patients with a body mass index > 35 kg/m(2) relative to those with a body mass index < 35 kg/m(2) (91.0% and 64.0% vs 92.3% and 71.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Fluorescent cholangiography is a safe procedure enabling real-time visualization of bile duct anatomy and may become standard practice to prevent bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Topics: Anatomic Landmarks; Bile Ducts; Cholangiography; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Fluorescent Dyes; Humans; Indocyanine Green; Intraoperative Care; Luminescent Measurements; Optical Imaging; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 26167088
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7877 -
BioMed Research International 2015The safety and efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation (EPLBD) are unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy between EPLBD and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
The safety and efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy with large balloon dilation (EPLBD) are unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy between EPLBD and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Literatures were searched for randomized controlled trials in PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements included adverse events; stone removal rate; requirement of mechanical lithotripsy.
RESULTS
Four RCTs with a total of 596 patients were included. Three RCTs compared EPLBD versus EST alone for stone removal; one RCT compared EPLBD versus EST plus mechanical lithotripsy for stone removal. Pooled data from three RCTs showed that there was no significant difference in the adverse event of ERCP. A significantly higher cholangitis rate was seen in patients who received EST plus mechanical lithotripsy, compared to those treated with EPLBD (13.3% versus 0.0, P = 0.026). No statistical difference was found between EPLBD and EST for stone removal rate. Significant differences in requirement of mechanical lithotripsy were seen with removal of large stones (>15 mm), with EPLBD reducing the use of mechanical lithotripsy (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS
EPLBD and EST have similar efficacy and safety for bile duct stones clearance. With larger stones, EPLBD can reduce requirement of mechanical lithotripsy.
Topics: Gallstones; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25756050
DOI: 10.1155/2015/673103 -
Surgery Apr 2023Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection often lacks stratification by extent of resection or diagnosis. Although a liver resection for different... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection often lacks stratification by extent of resection or diagnosis. Although a liver resection for different indications may have technical similarities, postoperative outcomes differ. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the risk of major complications and mortality after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
METHODS
Meta-analysis was performed to assess postoperative mortality (in-hospital, 30-, and 90-day) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III).
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies that reported on 19,503 patients were included. Pooled in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality were 5.9% (95% confidence interval 4.1-8.4); 4.6% (95% confidence interval 4.0-5.2); and 6.1% (95% confidence interval 5.0-7.3), respectively. Pooled proportion of major complications was 22.2% (95% confidence interval 17.7-27.5) for all resections. The pooled 90-day mortality was 3.1% (95% confidence interval 1.8-5.2) for a minor resection, 7.4% (95% confidence interval 5.9-9.3) for all major resections, and 11.4% (95% confidence interval 6.9-18.7) for extended resections (P = .001). Major complications were 38.8% (95% confidence interval 29.5-49) after a major hepatectomy compared to 11.3% (95% confidence interval 5.0-24.0) after a minor hepatectomy (P = .001). Asian studies had a pooled 90-day mortality of 4.4% (95% confidence interval 3.3-5.9) compared to 6.8% (95% confidence interval 5.6-8.2) for Western studies (P = .02). Cohorts with patients included before 2000 had a pooled 90-day mortality of 5.9% (95% confidence interval 4.8-7.3) compared to 6.8% (95% confidence interval 5.1-9.1) after 2000 (P = .44).
CONCLUSION
When informing patients or comparing outcomes across hospitals, postoperative mortality rates after liver resection should be reported for 90-days with consideration of the diagnosis and the extent of liver resection.
Topics: Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Cholangiocarcinoma; Hepatectomy; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
PubMed: 36577599
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.027 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Apr 2017Gallstone disease is a frequent disorder in the Western world with a prevalence of 10-20%. Recommendations for the assessment and management of gallstones vary... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gallstone disease is a frequent disorder in the Western world with a prevalence of 10-20%. Recommendations for the assessment and management of gallstones vary internationally. The aim of this systematic review was to assess quality of guideline recommendations for treatment of gallstones.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and websites of relevant associations were systematically searched. Guidelines without a critical appraisal of literature were excluded. Quality of guidelines was determined using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations without consensus or with low level of evidence were considered to define problem areas and clinical research gaps.
RESULTS
Fourteen guidelines were included. Overall quality of guidelines was low, with a mean score of 57/100 (standard deviation 19). Five of 14 guidelines were considered suitable for use in clinical practice without modifications. Ten recommendations from all included guidelines were based on low level of evidence and subject to controversy. These included major topics, such as definition of symptomatic gallstones, indications for cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiography.
CONCLUSION
Only five guidelines on gallstones are evidence-based and of a high quality, but even in these controversy exists on important topics. High quality evidence is needed in specific areas before an international guideline can be developed and endorsed worldwide.
Topics: Cholecystectomy; Choledocholithiasis; Consensus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gallstones; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28117228
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.011 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Mar 2023Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most frequent hepatobiliary cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study...
BACKGROUND
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most frequent hepatobiliary cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study aimed to review existing knowledge on the genetic basis of CCA, molecular targets/signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis, disease progression and prognosis, including potential targets for targeted therapies of CCA.
METHODS
The systematic review was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search in PubMed and Science Direct databases was performed using the following keywords: "cholangiocarcinoma", AND "molecular target" AND/OR "signaling pathway", AND/OR "targeted therapy", AND/OR "cancer chemotherapy." The eligibility criteria included: i) full-text articles published in English, ii) articles with in vitro and/or in vivo and/or clinical studies of molecular targets/signaling pathwanys related to CCA pathogenesis/disease progression/prognosis and/or targeted therapy. Seventy-three studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were finally included in the final data synthesis.
RESULTS
A total of 833 relevant articles published up to April 2022 were identified and 73 sttudies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were finally included in the analysis. The molecular biomarkers and drugs targeting signalling pathways were reported. Recent research has been focused on targeting the apoptotic and cell proliferation pathways, and in addition, the angiogenesis and metastasis pathway. More effort focused on testing the efficacy of combination therapies against the cancer cell and specifically CCA. The PI3K (Phosphoinositide 3-kinases)/ERK/Akt (AKT serine/threonine kinase 1)/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling pathway and HER2 (Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) and EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) pathways are the most potential targets for CCA therapy.
CONCLUSION
The information obtained could be exploited for further development of diagnostic tools for early diagnosis of CCA, as well as effective CCA-targeted therapies.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Signal Transduction; Cholangiocarcinoma; Cell Proliferation; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Cell Line, Tumor
PubMed: 36974526
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.741 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Dec 2016Portal biliopathy (PB) is defined as the presence of biliary abnormalities in patients with non-cirrhotic/non-neoplastic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) and... (Review)
Review
Portal biliopathy (PB) is defined as the presence of biliary abnormalities in patients with non-cirrhotic/non-neoplastic extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) and portal cavernoma (PC). The pathogenesis of PB is due to compression of bile ducts by PC and/or to ischemic damage secondary to an altered biliary vascularization in EHPVO and PC. Although asymptomatic biliary abnormalities can be frequently seen by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with PC (77%-100%), only a part of these (5%-38%) are symptomatic. Clinical presentation includes jaundice, cholangitis, cholecystitis, abdominal pain, and cholelithiasis. In this subset of patients is required a specific treatment. Different therapeutic approaches aimed to diminish portal hypertension and treat biliary strictures are available. In order to decompress PC, surgical porto-systemic shunt or transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt can be performed, and treatment on the biliary stenosis includes endoscopic (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy, balloon dilation, stone extraction, stent placement) and surgical (bilioenteric anastomosis, cholecystectomy) approaches. Definitive treatment of PB often requires multiple and combined interventions both on vascular and biliary system. Liver transplantation can be considered in patients with secondary biliary cirrhosis, recurrent cholangitis or unsuccessful control of portal hypertension.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Bile Duct Diseases; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance; Cholangitis; Cholecystitis; Cholelithiasis; Constriction, Pathologic; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Jaundice, Obstructive; Portal Vein; Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic
PubMed: 28018098
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.9909 -
Cureus Oct 2023Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been proven efficacious in the removal of CBD stones. Even after... (Review)
Review
Preventive Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones Without Intraductal Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been proven efficacious in the removal of CBD stones. Even after endoscopic stone removal, recurring cholangitis due to a residual common bile duct (CBD) stone is prevalent in clinical practice with a residual recurrence rate of 4-24% after successful stone retrieval. This comprehensive study and meta-analysis aimed to determine if preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct (PSIB) reduces the amount of residual CBD stones. Through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until November 20, 2022, we identified 164 articles comparing the efficacy of PSIB and non-PSIB post-endoscopic CBD stone removal. After stringent selection, three studies were included for meta-analysis using ReviewManager (ReVman version 5.4.1; Cochrane, London, UK). Using a random effect (RE) model, we derived a pooled odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI) (95%CI). A total of three studies have been included in the analysis. Out of which, two are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one is a non-randomized study. Out of 323 patients, 157 underwent PSIB after an endoscopic stone removal of CBD stones to reduce the residual of CBD stones, whereas 166 did not undergo saline irrigation (non-PSIB). In our analysis, PSIB significantly reduced the risk of residual stones (OR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.11-0.45). However, there was no notable link between PSIB and post-irrigation cholangitis (OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.21-2.21). Although not statistically significant, PSIB showed a trend toward lowered risks of post-procedural pancreatitis (OR: 0.65), bleeding (OR: 0.68), and other complications (OR: 0.64). PSIB effectively reduces residual CBD stones after endoscopy, offering a cost-effective alternative to invasive procedures such as intraductal ultrasound (IDUS). However, larger RCTs are needed to validate its definitive role.
PubMed: 38021516
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46720 -
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Oct 2016Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded complications are the development of a post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The prediction and prevention of POPF remains an area of debate with several questions yet to be firmly addressed with solid answers.
METHODS
A systematic review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses and randomized trials in the English literature (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, EMBASE) covering January 2005 to December 2015 on risk factors and preventive strategies for POPF.
RESULTS
A total of 49 systematic reviews and meta-analyses over the past decade discussed patient, surgeon, pancreatic disease and intraoperative related factors of POPF. Non-modifiable factors (age, BMI, comorbidity) and pathology (histotype, gland texture, duct size) that indicates surgery are associated with POPF risk. Consideration of anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly modify the risk of fistula. Sealant products appear to have no effect. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion enhance risk, but is modifiable by focus on technique and training. Drains may not prevent fistulae, but may help in early detection. Early drain-amylase may aid in detection. Predictive scores lack uniform validation, but may have a role in patient information if reliable pre-operative risk factors can be obtained.
CONCLUSIONS
Development of POPF occurs through several demonstrated risk factors. Anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly decrease risk. Drains may aid in early detection of leaks, but do not prevent POPF.
Topics: Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Drainage; Humans; Morbidity; Pancreas; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Predictive Value of Tests; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27216233
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1169317