-
JPRAS Open Jun 2022Age-related changes to the dorsum of the hand present as dyschromia, soft-tissue atrophy, and volume loss, resulting in wrinkles and prominent deep structures. Volume... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Age-related changes to the dorsum of the hand present as dyschromia, soft-tissue atrophy, and volume loss, resulting in wrinkles and prominent deep structures. Volume augmentation by means of autologous fat transfer (AFT) is one of the options to rejuvenate the hand; theoretically, autologous fat is the ideal filler because of durability and biocompatibility.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aims to summarize and describe the current evidence on the technique, effectiveness, and safety of AFT in hand rejuvenation.
METHODS
Three major databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched up to November 2020 for studies reporting on AFT and hand rejuvenation.
RESULTS
A total of 10 articles were included, reporting on a total of 320 patients treated by AFT to improve the aesthetic appearance of the dorsum of the hand. Some degree of postoperative oedema was present in nearly all patients. Other complications were infection (0.67%), cysts/irregularities (1.3%), temporary dysesthesia (5.3%), and ecchymosis (7%). There were no major complications. Of all patients, 97.6% self-reported to be satisfied with the result.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, by combining the current evidence, AFT is considered a promising and safe technique to rejuvenate the aging hand with very high patient satisfaction. Future research, using validated patient questionnaires, objective volumetric measurements, and longer follow-up, is needed to confirm these results.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3.
PubMed: 35449731
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.03.001 -
JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck... Sep 2018Evidence has emerged on the efficacy of tranexamic acid to control blood loss and postoperative complications after rhinoplasty. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Evidence has emerged on the efficacy of tranexamic acid to control blood loss and postoperative complications after rhinoplasty.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the results of tranexamic acid use to reduce intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema, and periorbital ecchymosis in rhinoplasty.
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
For this systematic review of randomized clinical trials, searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Google Scholar, OpenThesis, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 23, 2017. Key words included tranexamic acid, rhinoplasty, and nasal surgical procedures. The following elements were used to define eligibility criteria: (1) population: patients undergoing rhinoplasty surgery; (2) intervention and controls: tranexamic acid vs placebo solution or no-treatment control group; (3) outcomes: intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis, and thromboembolic events; and (4) study type: randomized clinical trials.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality according to the Cochrane guidelines for randomized clinical trials. Treatment effects were defined as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CIs. The strength of evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis. To calculate the effect sizes, means and SDs were obtained for each study group and outcome of interest.
RESULTS
Five studies comprising 276 patients were included in the systematic review: 177 patients (64.1%) were women, and mean age was 26.8 (range, 16-42) years. Four studies comprising 246 patients estimated the amount in intraoperative bleeding as a primary outcome and were included in the meta-analysis. Eyelid edema and ecchymosis were evaluated as outcomes in 2 studies. Tranexamic acid was associated with reduced bleeding during rhinoplasty was found (WMD, -42.28 mL; 95% CI, -70.36 to -14.21 mL), with differences (P = .01) between oral (WMD, -61.70 mL; 95% CI, -83.02 to -40.39 mL; I2 = 0%) and intravenous (WMD, -23.88 mL; 95% CI, -45.19 to -2.58 mL; I2 = 56%) administration. Eyelid edema and ecchymosis scores in patients receiving tranexamic acid were significantly lower compared with the control group within the first postoperative week: lower eyelid edema, WMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.49 and lower eyelid ecchymosis, WMD, -0.94; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.08. No cases of thromboembolic events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Current available evidence suggests that preoperative administration of tranexamic acid is safe and may reduce intraoperative bleeding as well as postoperative eyelid edema and ecchymosis in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.
Topics: Antifibrinolytic Agents; Blood Loss, Surgical; Drug Administration Schedule; Ecchymosis; Edema; Eyelids; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care; Rhinoplasty; Tranexamic Acid; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30098161
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1381 -
Breast Cancer (Dove Medical Press) 2016Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain... (Review)
Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables.
RESULTS
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup.
CONCLUSION
In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs.
PubMed: 27486342
DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S110461 -
Andrology Jan 2022Hyaluronic acid is a glycosaminoglycan widely used in the fields of orthopedics, ophthalmology, and aesthetic medicine due to its significant ability to reduce the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hyaluronic acid is a glycosaminoglycan widely used in the fields of orthopedics, ophthalmology, and aesthetic medicine due to its significant ability to reduce the synthesis of pro-inflammatory proteins and its activity against oxidative stress, a feature of many degenerative illnesses.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of the present review is to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the most recent literature on the use of hyaluronic acid in andrology in order to facilitate the use of this therapeutic device in the common clinical practice of many physicians. Specific conditions covered in the review are Peyronie's disease, premature ejaculation, and penile enlargement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A broad and comprehensive literature search included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries, with no time restriction up to December 2020 and restricted to English language publications. Unpublished studies were not included. The study was registered as "The role of hyaluronic acid in andrology: A systematic review and meta-analysis" in PROSPERO with the ID CRD42021223416.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Hyaluronic acid is a valid choice for the treatment of Peyronie's disease in terms of the resolution of the acute phase of the disease and of contributing to stabilizing the disease as a bridge to potential surgery. Data, furthermore, suggest that hyaluronic acid is frequently associated with an overall clinical improvement, allowing the patient to resume normal sexual activity. With regard to premature ejaculation, data suggests hyaluronic acid-based treatments were effective in prolonging intra-vaginal ejaculation time. Furthermore, hyaluronic acid was found to be safe and well-tolerated, with main adverse events limited to local discomfort, ecchymosis, papule formation, and glans numbness, all of which were reported to resolve spontaneously. Last, with regard to penile enlargement, the overall perception of experts is that hyaluronic acid may be an extremely well-tolerated compound with potential for application in specific areas of male sexual health that are often neglected as compared to more common, and relatively simpler to treat, conditions.
Topics: Andrology; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Male; Penile Diseases; Penile Induration; Premature Ejaculation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34297894
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13083 -
Dermatologic Therapy Jun 2022With dermatologic side effects being fairly prevalent following vaccination against COVID-19, and the multitude of studies aiming to report and analyze these adverse... (Review)
Review
A systematic review on mucocutaneous presentations after COVID-19 vaccination and expert recommendations about vaccination of important immune-mediated dermatologic disorders.
With dermatologic side effects being fairly prevalent following vaccination against COVID-19, and the multitude of studies aiming to report and analyze these adverse events, the need for an extensive investigation on previous studies seemed urgent, in order to provide a thorough body of information about these post-COVID-19 immunization mucocutaneous reactions. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive electronic search was performed through the international databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, Web of science, and Google scholar on July 12, 2021, and all articles regarding mucocutaneous manifestations and considerations after COVID-19 vaccine administration were retrieved using the following keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, dermatology considerations and mucocutaneous manifestations. A total of 917 records were retrieved and a final number of 180 articles were included in data extraction. Mild, moderate, severe and potentially life-threatening adverse events have been reported following immunization with COVID vaccines, through case reports, case series, observational studies, randomized clinical trials, and further recommendations and consensus position papers regarding vaccination. In this systematic review, we categorized these results in detail into five elaborate tables, making what we believe to be an extensively informative, unprecedented set of data on this topic. Based on our findings, in the viewpoint of the pros and cons of vaccination, mucocutaneous adverse events were mostly non-significant, self-limiting reactions, and for the more uncommon moderate to severe reactions, guidelines and consensus position papers could be of great importance to provide those at higher risks and those with specific worries of flare-ups or inefficient immunization, with sufficient recommendations to safely schedule their vaccine doses, or avoid vaccination if they have the discussed contra-indications.
Topics: COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Humans; Mucous Membrane; Skin; Vaccination
PubMed: 35316551
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15461 -
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Apr 2021To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials about the safety (number and severity of adverse events) and efficacy (pain reduction and functional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials about the safety (number and severity of adverse events) and efficacy (pain reduction and functional improvement) of mesotherapy in musculoskeletal disorders, and to compare them with other therapeutic options, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.
METHODS
A search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus database resulted in an initial total of 16,253 records. A total of 931 articles were included in the study. A final total of 7 articles, published from 1 Jan 1999 until 30 Apr 2020 were selected. Two independent reviewers selected potentially relevant studies based on the inclusion criteria for full-text reading. They evaluated the methodological quality of each study and included only studies of high methodological quality, according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, and visual analogue scale scores before and after mesotherapy were considered. A statistically significant reduction in visual analogue scale score in the mesotherapy group was reported in comparison with the control group in all except 1 of the trials. Mesotherapy was found to be a safe procedure with mild and temporary side-effects, such as nausea, fatigue, numbness, sweating, headache, ecchymosis, bleeding, pain and local reaction at the injection site.
CONCLUSION
Mesotherapy proved to be more effective than systemic therapy in the treatment of local pain and functional limitations caused by a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, because of the heterogeneity of the analysed studies in terms of injected drugs, administration technique, associated treatments, frequency and total number of sessions, more randomized controlled trials are needed, comparing a standardized mesotherapy protocol with a systemic treatments.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Mesotherapy; Middle Aged; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Physical Therapy Modalities; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33764479
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2817 -
Hematology/oncology and Stem Cell... Jun 2019Cutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig) amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis associated with overt multiple myeloma (MM) is rare and optimal treatment is not well defined. The...
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND
Cutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig) amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis associated with overt multiple myeloma (MM) is rare and optimal treatment is not well defined. The recently developed highly efficacious MM therapy has brought on a new set of challenges to this field for consideration. The goal of this paper is to describe the characteristics of cutaneous manifestations of systemic AL amyloidosis associated with MM according to age, sex, race, Ig type, plasma cell percentage, and cytogenetic and fluorescent in situ hybridization studies along with their outcomes.
METHODS
An electronic search of the PubMed database was performed to obtain key literature in AL amyloidosis and MM, using the following search terms: multiple myeloma, immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis, and cutaneous amyloidosis. The search results were narrowed by selecting studies in English. Results were confined to the following articles types: case reports, case series, and systematic reviews.
RESULTS
We identified 32 cases from the PubMed database search and examined their potential relevance. We found the following: (a) higher prevalence in women (two-thirds) and white population; (b) IgG and IgA were equally distributed with lambda (λ) light chain occurring in 53-66% of cases; (c) majority of cases (56%) presented as hemorrhagic bullous lesions, followed by purpura/ecchymosis in 25% of cases; and (d) majority (64%) died within 6 months since diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
We reviewed the constellation of the cutaneous manifestations of AL amyloidosis with concurrent MM. We found a female predominance, and more than half presented as hemorrhagic bullous lesions. There is a preponderance of λ light chains over kappa (κ) light chains, both as a free light chain (15% vs. 4%) and as an intact Ig (38% vs. 24%; absolute number of 14 vs. 7 patients, respectively). In the subgroup of patients with bullous skin lesions, λ light chain was present in eight cases and κ light chain in seven cases. All κ light chain subtypes presented with bullous lesions and no other cutaneous types of lesions. They carried very poor prognosis with majority of cases surviving only 6 months, much worse than overall patients with AL amyloidosis without myeloma or myeloma without amyloidosis.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Proteins; Sex Factors; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 30261180
DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2018.09.003 -
Pain Research & Management 2020Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease associated with joint dysfunction and pain. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency (RF) may be a promising therapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease associated with joint dysfunction and pain. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency (RF) may be a promising therapy in the treatment of chronic pain for KOA patients.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided RF treatment for chronic pain in patients with KOA.
DESIGN
A systematic review was conducted, and a meta-analysis was carried out when possible. . We examined the studies evaluating the clinical efficiency of ultrasound-guided RF on chronic pain in KOA population.
METHOD
A systematic review for the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided RF treatment for pain management of KOA patients was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from the date of inception to February 2020, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcomes of pain intensity (visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale) and knee function [the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)] were evaluated from baseline to various follow-up times by random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by statistic and the potential sources of heterogeneity by subgroup and metaregression analyses, respectively.
RESULTS
Eight publications with 256 patients were included in the meta-analysis. RF could relieve pain with -4.196 of pooled mean difference and improve knee function by decreasing 23.155 points in WOMAC. Three patients had ecchymosis, two with hypoesthesia and one with numbness after the procedure, and improved within 6 months. Furthermore, study design and treatment target were the sources of heterogeneity by subgroup and metaregression analyses, accounting for 37% and 74% of variances, respectively. Target of genicular nerve achieved better pain relief than intra-articular or sciatic nerve. Sensitivity analysis showed that removal of any single study was unlikely to overturn the findings. . There were some limitations in the study. Firstly, the small number of relevant studies limited the confidence level of the meta-analysis. Also, the significant heterogeneity may not be explained due to the limited data. Secondly, the direct comparison of two different guidance methods (ultrasound vs. fluoroscopy) for RF therapy is lacking. In addition, the outcomes were blindly assessed in the meta-analysis from all studies according to evaluation of bias, which could affect the reality of the data. Finally, most of the studies only provided short follow-up times, so we could not analyze the long-term effectiveness of ultrasound-guided RF in the treatment of patients with KOA.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasonography is an effective, safe, nonradiative, and easily applicable guidance method for RF in pain relief and functional improvement in KOA patients.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Humans; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 33014212
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2537075 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Sep 2010To estimate the occurrence and type of adverse effects after application of an extra-articular (soft tissue) corticosteroid injection. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
To estimate the occurrence and type of adverse effects after application of an extra-articular (soft tissue) corticosteroid injection.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was made based on a PubMed and Embase search covering the period 1956 to January 2010. Case reports were included, as were prospective and retrospective studies that reported adverse events of corticosteroid injection. All clinical trials which used extra-articular corticosteroid injections were examined. We divided the reported adverse events into major (defined as those needing intervention or not disappearing) and minor ones (transient, not requiring intervention).
RESULTS
The search yielded 87 relevant studies:44 case reports, 37 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies. The major adverse events included osteomyelitis and protothecosis; one fatal necrotizing fasciitis; cellulitis and ecchymosis; tendon ruptures; atrophy of the plantar fat was described after injecting a neuroma; and local skin effects appeared as atrophy, hypopigmentation or as skin defect. The minor adverse events effects ranged from skin rash to flushing and disturbed menstrual pattern. Increased pain or steroid flare after injection was reported in 19 studies. After extra-articular injection, the incidence of major adverse events ranged from 0-5.8% and that of minor adverse events from 0-81%. It was not feasible to pool the risk for adverse effects due to heterogeneity of study populations and difference in interventions and variance in reporting.
CONCLUSION
In this literature review it was difficult to accurately quantify the incidence of adverse effects after extra-articular corticosteroid injection. The reported adverse events were relatively mild, although one fatal reaction was reported.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Humans; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 20836867
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-206 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Nov 2022Previous systematic reviews evaluating piezoelectric osteotomy are of critically low quality. We conducted a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate...
UNLABELLED
Previous systematic reviews evaluating piezoelectric osteotomy are of critically low quality. We conducted a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes for piezoelectric versus conventional osteotomy.
METHODS
The study protocol was published a priori (PROSPERO: CRD42021287877). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing piezoelectric versus conventional osteotomes and reporting at least one outcome of interest (clinical or patient-reported outcomes, PROs). Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using GRADE and Cochrane's RoB-2/ROBINS-I tools, respectively. Random effects models were applied.
RESULTS
Of 347 articles, 10 studies (nine randomized controlled trials; one prospective cohort study) including 554 patients were included. Piezoelectric osteotomy was associated with significantly reduced edema [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.03 to -0.30; < 0.0004], ecchymosis (SMD, -0.93; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.73; < 0.00001), and pain (SMD, -1.48; 95% CI, -2.07 to -0.88; < 0.00001) compared with standard osteotomy. Odds of mucosal injury were significantly lower following piezoelectric osteotomy (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.52; = 0.01). There was no difference in duration of osteotomy (SMD, 3.15; 95% CI, -1.82 to 8.12; = 0.22) or total procedure duration (SMD, 0.46; 95% CI, -0.43 to 1.36; = 0.31). One study reported PROs, favoring piezoelectric osteotomy.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides support (albeit weak, due to low-quality evidence) for piezoelectric over conventional osteotomy, for reducing morbidity in the early postoperative period. High-quality level I data reporting PROs will optimize shared decision-making/informed consent.
PubMed: 36448013
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004673