-
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Apr 2023NAFLD is a leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. We assessed the global and regional prevalence, incidence, and mortality of NAFLD using an in-depth... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
NAFLD is a leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. We assessed the global and regional prevalence, incidence, and mortality of NAFLD using an in-depth meta-analytic approach.
APPROACH AND RESULTS
PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for NAFLD population-based studies from 1990 to 2019 survey year (last published 2022) per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. Bias risk assessment was per Joanna Briggs Institute. Of 2585 studies reviewed, 92 studies (N=9,361,716) met eligibility criteria. Across the study period (1990-2019), meta-analytic pooling of NAFLD prevalence estimates and ultrasound-defined NAFLD yielded an overall global prevalence of 30.05% (95% CI: 27.88%-32.32%) and 30.69% (28.4-33.09), respectively. Global NAFLD prevalence increased by +50.4% from 25.26% (21.59-29.33) in 1990-2006 to 38.00% (33.71-42.49) in 2016-2019 ( p <0.001); ultrasound-defined NAFLD prevalence increased by +38.7% from 25.16% (19.46-31.87) in 1990-2006 to 34.59% (29.05-40.57) ( p =0.029). The highest NAFLD prevalence was in Latin America 44.37% (30.66%-59.00%), then Middle East and North Africa (MENA) (36.53%, 28.63%-45.22%), South Asia (33.83%, 22.91%-46.79%), South-East Asia (33.07%, 18.99%-51.03%), North America (31.20%, 25.86%-37.08%), East Asia (29.71%, 25.96%-33.76%), Asia Pacific 28.02% (24.69%-31.60%), Western Europe 25.10% (20.55%-30.28%). Among the NAFLD cohort diagnosed without a liver biopsy, pooled mortality rate per 1000 PY was 12.60 (6.68-23.67) for all-cause mortality; 4.20 (1.34-7.05) for cardiac-specific mortality; 2.83 (0.78-4.88) for extrahepatic cancer-specific mortality; and 0.92 (0.00-2.21) for liver-specific mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
NAFLD global prevalence is 30% and increasing which requires urgent and comprehensive strategies to raise awareness and address all aspects of NAFLD on local, regional, and global levels.
Topics: Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; North America; Risk Assessment; Prevalence
PubMed: 36626630
DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Apr 2015Little is known about differences in rates of fibrosis progression between patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Little is known about differences in rates of fibrosis progression between patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies that assessed paired liver biopsy specimens to estimate the rates of fibrosis progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) including NAFL and NASH.
METHODS
Through a systematic search of multiple databases and author contact, up to June 2013, we identified studies of adults with NAFLD that collected paired liver biopsy specimens at least 1 year apart. From these, we calculated a pooled-weighted annual fibrosis progression rate (number of stages changed between the 2 biopsy samples) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and identified clinical risk factors associated with progression.
RESULTS
We identified 11 cohort studies including 411 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (150 with NAFL and 261 with NASH). At baseline, the distribution of fibrosis for stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 35.8%, 32.5%, 16.7%, 9.3%, and 5.7%, respectively. Over 2145.5 person-years of follow-up evaluation, 33.6% had fibrosis progression, 43.1% had stable fibrosis, and 22.3% had an improvement in fibrosis stage. The annual fibrosis progression rate in patients with NAFL who had stage 0 fibrosis at baseline was 0.07 stages (95% CI, 0.02-0.11 stages), compared with 0.14 stages in patients with NASH (95% CI, 0.07-0.21 stages). These findings correspond to 1 stage of progression over 14.3 years for patients with NAFL (95% CI, 9.1-50.0 y) and 7.1 years for patients with NASH (95% CI, 4.8-14.3 y).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on a meta-analysis of studies of paired liver biopsy studies, liver fibrosis progresses in patients with NAFL and NASH.
Topics: Biopsy; Disease Progression; Histocytochemistry; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Risk Factors
PubMed: 24768810
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014 -
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) May 2017Liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Quantitative risk of mortality by fibrosis stage has not been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
Liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Quantitative risk of mortality by fibrosis stage has not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to quantify the fibrosis stage-specific risk of all-cause and liver-related mortality in NAFLD. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified five adult NAFLD cohort studies reporting fibrosis stage-specific mortality (0-4). Using fibrosis stage 0 as a reference population, fibrosis stage-specific mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause and liver-related mortality were estimated. The study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Included were 1,495 NAFLD patients with 17,452 patient years of follow-up. Compared to NAFLD patients with no fibrosis (stage 0), NAFLD patients with fibrosis were at an increased risk for all-cause mortality, and this risk increased with increases in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.58 (95% CI 1.19-2.11); stage 2, MRR = 2.52 (95% CI 1.85-3.42); stage 3, MRR = 3.48 (95% CI 2.51-4.83); and stage 4, MRR = 6.40 (95% CI 4.11-9.95). The results were more pronounced as the risk of liver-related mortality increased exponentially with each increase in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.41 (95% CI 0.17-11.95); stage 2, MRR = 9.57 (95% CI 1.67-54.93); stage 3, MRR = 16.69 (95% CI 2.92-95.36); and stage 4, MRR = 42.30 (95% CI 3.51-510.34). Limitations of the study include an inability to adjust for comorbid conditions or demographics known to impact fibrosis progression in NAFLD and the inclusion of patients with simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without fibrosis in the reference comparison group.
CONCLUSION
The risk of liver-related mortality increases exponentially with increase in fibrosis stage; these data have important implications in assessing the utility of each stage and benefits of regression of fibrosis from one stage to another. (Hepatology 2017;65:1557-1565).
Topics: Fibrosis; Humans; Liver; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
PubMed: 28130788
DOI: 10.1002/hep.29085 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Sep 2022Lifestyle interventions that focus on reduced energy intake and improved dietary pattern are the mainstay of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) management.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Lifestyle interventions that focus on reduced energy intake and improved dietary pattern are the mainstay of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) management. However, it remains unclear which dietary approaches are most beneficial and promote greatest adherence. We aimed to synthesise data from randomised and clinical controlled trials, describing the effects of Mediterranean Diet and Calorie Restriction interventions on NAFLD surrogate markers, in adults.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (October 2021). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools: risk of bias for randomised controlled trials, and risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model, and the I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Of 4041 records identified, 26 articles with 3037 participants met the inclusion criteria, including studies on calorie-restricted interventions (CRI) (n 9), Mediterranean diet (MD) interventions (n 13) and MD component interventions (n 4). Studies were heterogeneous regarding intervention components, assessment of liver status and diet outcomes. 3 studies reported zero attrition and mean attrition rate for the remaining 23 studies was 14%. Post-intervention meta-analyses revealed that dietary interventions reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P < 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.004), Fatty Liver Index (FLI) (P < 0.001), hepatic steatosis (HS) (P = 0.02), and liver stiffness (P = 0.01). CRI had favourable effects on ALT (P < 0.001), HS (P < 0.001) and liver stiffness (P = 0.009). MD reduced ALT (P = 0.02), FLI (P < 0.001) and liver stiffness (P = 0.05). There was a dose-response relationship between degree of calorie restriction and beneficial effects on liver function and weight loss, suggesting that this approach should remain the cornerstone of NAFLD management. In addition, diet composition changes have potential for improving NAFLD and the limited data suggest that MD may be an effective diet therapy.
CONCLUSION
These results support the current guidelines in NAFLD. However, further studies, which robustly evaluate the effects of interventions on dietary intake, acceptability and sustainability of the interventions, and quality of life and other patient-related outcomes are needed to support effective care delivery.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Caloric Restriction; Diet, Mediterranean; Life Style; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Quality of Life; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35947894
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.037 -
The Lancet. Oncology Apr 2022The clinical presentation and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma are unclear when compared with hepatocellular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical characteristics, surveillance, treatment allocation, and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The clinical presentation and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma are unclear when compared with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. We aimed to establish the prevalence, clinical features, surveillance rates, treatment allocation, and outcomes of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception until Jan 17, 2022, for articles in English that compared clinical features, and outcomes of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma versus hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal observational studies and excluded paediatric studies. Study-level data were extracted from the published reports. The primary outcomes were (1) the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to NAFLD, (2) comparison of patient and tumour characteristics of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma versus other causes, and (3) comparison of surveillance, treatment allocation, and overall and disease-free survival outcomes of NAFLD-related versus non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. We analysed proportional data using a generalised linear mixed model. Pairwise meta-analysis was done to obtain odds ratio (OR) or mean difference, comparing NAFLD-related with non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. We evaluated survival outcomes using pooled analysis of hazard ratios.
FINDINGS
Of 3631 records identified, 61 studies (done between January, 1980, and May, 2021; 94 636 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma cases secondary to NAFLD was 15·1% (95% CI 11·9-18·9). Patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma were older (p<0·0001), had higher BMI (p<0·0001), and were more likely to present with metabolic comorbidities (diabetes [p<0·0001], hypertension [p<0·0001], and hyperlipidaemia [p<0·0001]) or cardiovascular disease at presentation (p=0·0055) than patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. They were also more likely to be non-cirrhotic (38·5%, 27·9-50·2 vs 14·6%, 8·7-23·4 for hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes; p<0·0001). Patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma had larger tumour diameters (p=0·0087), were more likely to have uninodular lesions (p=0·0003), and had similar odds of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages, TNM stages, alpha fetoprotein concentration, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status to patients with non-NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. A lower proportion of patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma underwent surveillance (32·8%, 12·0-63·7) than did patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes (55·7%, 24·0-83·3; p<0·0001). There were no significant differences in treatment allocation (curative therapy, palliative therapy, and best supportive care) between patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma and those with hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1·05, 95% CI 0·92-1·20, p=0·43), but disease-free survival was longer for patients with NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma (0·79, 0·63-0·99; p=0·044). There was substantial heterogeneity in most analyses (I>75%), and all articles had low-to-moderate risk of bias.
INTERPRETATION
NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with a higher proportion of patients without cirrhosis and lower surveillance rates than hepatocellular carcinoma due to other causes. Surveillance strategies should be developed for patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis who are at high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
PubMed: 35255263
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00078-X -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... 2022Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) contributes to a large proportion of liver disease burden in the world. Several groups have studied the prevalence of NAFLD in...
BACKGROUND
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) contributes to a large proportion of liver disease burden in the world. Several groups have studied the prevalence of NAFLD in the Indian population.
AIM
A systematic review of the published literature and meta-analysis was carried out to estimate the prevalence of NAFLD in the Indian population.
METHODS
English language literature published until April 2021 was searched from electronic databases. Original data published in any form which had reported NAFLD prevalence in the Indian population were included. The subgroup analysis of prevalence was done based on the age (adults or children) and risk category, i.e., average-risk group (community population, participants of control arm, unselected participants, hypothyroidic individuals, athletes, aviation crew, and army personnel) and high-risk group (obesity or overweight, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, etc.). The prevalence estimates were pooled using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I.
RESULTS
Sixty-two datasets (children 8 and adults 54) from 50 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of NAFLD was estimated from 2903 children and 23,581 adult participants. Among adults, the estimated pooled prevalence was 38.6% (95% CI 32-45.5). The NAFLD prevalence in average-risk and high-risk subgroups was estimated to be 28.1% (95% CI 20.8-36) and 52.8% (95% CI 46.5-59.1), respectively. The estimated NAFLD prevalence was higher in hospital-based data (40.8% [95% CI 32.6-49.3%]) than community-based data (28.2% [95% CI 16.9-41%]). Among children, the estimated pooled prevalence was 35.4% (95% CI 18.2-54.7). The prevalence among non-obese and obese children was 12.4 (95% CI 4.4-23.5) and 63.4 (95% CI 59.4-67.3), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Available data suggest that approximately one in three adults or children have NAFLD in India.
PubMed: 35677499
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.11.010 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Aug 2011Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common cause of chronic liver disease, and its worldwide prevalence continues to increase with the growing obesity... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common cause of chronic liver disease, and its worldwide prevalence continues to increase with the growing obesity epidemic. This study assesses the epidemiology of NAFLD in adults based on clinical literature published over the past 30 years.
AIM
To review epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults based on clinical literature published over the past 30 years.
METHODS
An in-depth search of PubMed (1980-2010) was based on five search terms: 'non-alcoholic fatty liver disease' OR 'non-alcoholic steatohepatitis' OR 'fatty liver' OR 'steatosis' AND 'incidence' [MeSH Terms] OR 'prevalence' [MeSH Terms] OR 'natural history'. Studies of paediatric cohorts were excluded. Articles were categorised by topic and summarised, noting generalisations concerning their content.
RESULTS
Four study categories included NAFLD incidence, prevalence, risk factors and natural history. Studies related to NAFLD prevalence and incidence indicate that the diagnosis is heterogeneous and relies on a variety of assessment tools, including liver biopsy, radiological tests such as ultrasonography, and blood testing such as liver enzymes. The prevalence of NAFLD is highest in populations with pre-existing metabolic conditions such as obesity and type II diabetes. Many studies investigating the natural history of NAFLD verify the progression from NASH to advanced fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most common cause of elevated liver enzymes. Within the NAFLD spectrum, only NASH progresses to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. With the growing epidemic of obesity, the prevalence and impact of NAFLD continues to increase, making NASH potentially the most common cause of advanced liver disease in coming decades.
Topics: Adult; Biopsy; Fatty Liver; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 21623852
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x -
The American Journal of Clinical... Dec 2022Circulating concentrations of homocysteine and folate are inconsistently associated with the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in observational studies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Circulating concentrations of homocysteine and folate are inconsistently associated with the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in observational studies.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to examine these associations.
METHODS
We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies identified from 3 databases to evaluate the associations of serum homocysteine and folate concentrations with NAFLD from inception to 7 April 2022. We conducted MR analyses to strengthen the causal inference in these associations. Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms without linkage disequilibrium (r2 < 0.01) that were strongly associated (P < 5 × 10-8) with serum homocysteine (n = 13) and folate (n = 2) concentrations were selected as instrumental variables from 2 meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of 44,147 and 37,645 individuals of European ancestry, respectively. Data on NAFLD were obtained from a GWAS of 8434 NAFLD cases and 770,180 controls of European ancestry. We further included 4 liver enzymes as secondary outcomes from a GWAS of 361,194 individuals with European descent.
RESULTS
Twenty-two observational studies comprising 30,368 participants were included in the meta-analysis. There was a positive association between serum homocysteine and NAFLD risk (n = 20; OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.57, 2.45) and an inverse association between serum folate and NAFLD risk (n = 12; OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.99). In MR analysis, the ORs of NAFLD were 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.36) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55, 1.02) per 1-SD increment of genetically predicted circulating concentrations of homocysteine and folate, respectively. Each 1-SD increase of genetically predicted circulating homocysteine and folate conferred a change in ALT concentrations of 0.62 U/L (95% CI: 0.20, 1.04) and -0.84 U/L (95% CI: -0.14, -1.54).
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests a potential role of circulating homocysteine and possibly folate in NAFLD, which calls for future clinical exploration of the possibility of lowering homocysteine concentrations to prevent NAFLD. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42021296434.
Topics: Humans; Folic Acid; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Homocysteine; Genome-Wide Association Study; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 36205540
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac285 -
Nutrients May 2023Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to chronic caloric excess and physical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to chronic caloric excess and physical inactivity. Previous meta-analyses have confirmed associations between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and obesity and T2D. We aim to ascertain the contribution of UPF consumption to the risk of developing NAFLD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO (CRD42022368763)). All records registered on Ovid Medline and Web of Science were searched from inception until December 2022. Studies that assessed UPF consumption in adults, determined according to the NOVA food classification system, and that reported NAFLD determined by surrogate (steatosis) scores, imaging or liver biopsy were included. The association between UPF consumption and NAFLD was assessed using random-effects meta-analysis methods. Study quality was assessed, and evidence credibility evaluated, using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and NutriGrade systems, respectively. A total of 5454 records were screened, and 112 records underwent full text review. From these, 9 studies (3 cross-sectional, 3 case-control and 3 cohort), analysing 60,961 individuals, were included in the current review. Both moderate (vs. low) (pooled relative risk 1.03 (1.00-1.07) ( = 0.04) (I = 0%)) and high (vs. low) (1.42 (1.16-1.75) (<0.01) (I = 89%)) intake of UPF significantly increased the risk of NAFLD. Funnel plots demonstrate low risk of publication bias. Consumption of UPF is associated with NAFLD with a dose-response effect. Public health measures to reduce overconsumption of UPF are imperative to reduce the burden of NAFLD, and the related conditions, obesity and T2D.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Food, Processed; Cross-Sectional Studies; Obesity
PubMed: 37242149
DOI: 10.3390/nu15102266 -
PloS One 2015Narrative reviews of paediatric NAFLD quote prevalences in the general population that range from 9% to 37%; however, no systematic review of the prevalence of NAFLD in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Narrative reviews of paediatric NAFLD quote prevalences in the general population that range from 9% to 37%; however, no systematic review of the prevalence of NAFLD in children/adolescents has been conducted. We aimed to estimate prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in young people and to determine whether this varies by BMI category, gender, age, diagnostic method, geographical region and study sample size.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting a prevalence of NAFLD based on any diagnostic method in participants 1-19 years old, regardless of whether assessing NAFLD prevalence was the main aim of the study.
RESULTS
The pooled mean prevalence of NAFLD in children from general population studies was 7.6% (95%CI: 5.5% to 10.3%) and 34.2% (95% CI: 27.8% to 41.2%) in studies based on child obesity clinics. In both populations there was marked heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 98%). There was evidence that prevalence was generally higher in males compared with females and increased incrementally with greater BMI. There was evidence for differences between regions in clinical population studies, with estimated prevalence being highest in Asia. There was no evidence that prevalence changed over time. Prevalence estimates in studies of children/adolescents attending obesity clinics and in obese children/adolescents from the general population were substantially lower when elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was used to assess NAFLD compared with biopsies, ultrasound scan (USS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
CONCLUSIONS
Our review suggests the prevalence of NAFLD in young people is high, particularly in those who are obese and in males.
Topics: Adolescent; Biomarkers; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Population Surveillance; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 26512983
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140908