-
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Mar 2022Lipoma arborescens (LA) is a rare benign synovial tumour characterized by the proliferation of mature adipocytes within the synovial cells. Given its rarity, current... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lipoma arborescens (LA) is a rare benign synovial tumour characterized by the proliferation of mature adipocytes within the synovial cells. Given its rarity, current evidence is mainly based on case reports and case series, and no guidelines are available. The present study investigated the current surgical management and related outcomes of LA in the upper limb.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library were accessed in September 2021. Clinical studies evaluating patients with LA undergoing surgical treatment were considered eligible for this systematic review. Only studies which reported data on LA located in the upper limb with histopathological confirmation were considered. Articles that reported data from nonsurgical management were not considered.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies reporting 22 lesions in 21 patients were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 48.48 years (range 22-77). Most studies evaluated the restoration of range of motion and symptom resolution for the functional outcome assessment. Open or arthroscopic excision and synovectomy were the most common surgical procedures for LA. The concomitant lesions were treated in a single-stage procedure. All patients had satisfactory outcomes after open or arthroscopic excision and synovectomy without recurrence at a mean follow-up of 21.14 months (range 2-60). One patient developed postoperative cellulitis (4.55%).
CONCLUSION
Open and arthroscopic excision combined with synovectomy should be considered the standard treatment option of upper limb LA. Concomitant pathologies can be addressed in a one-stage procedure. Although LA was recognized as a clinical entity decades ago, there is a lack of evidence based guidelines and long term outcome data are unavailable.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Arthroscopy; Humans; Knee Joint; Lipoma; Middle Aged; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Synovectomy; Synovial Membrane; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 35246183
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02997-7 -
The Bone & Joint Journal Jan 2018α-defensin is a biomarker which has been described as having a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Current meta-analyses... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
α-defensin is a biomarker which has been described as having a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Current meta-analyses are based on the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay rather than the quick on-table lateral flow test kit. This study is the first meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay and the lateral flow test kit for the diagnosis of PJI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria were all clinical studies where the diagnosis of PJI was uncertain. All studies selected used the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) or modified MSIS criteria. Two independent reviewers reviewed the studies and extracted data. A meta-analysis of results was carried out: pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, heterogeneity and areas under curves are reported.
RESULTS
Ten studies (759 patients) were included. Of these, seven studies (640 patients) evaluated the laboratory-based α-defensin immunoassay and three (119 patients) the lateral flow test. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the qualitative α-defensin laboratory immunoassay was 0.953 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 0.984) and 0.965 (95% CI 0.943 to 0.979) respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 34.86 (95% CI 19.34 to 62.85) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.11). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the lateral flow test were 0.774 (95% CI 0.637 to 0.870) and 0.913 (95% CI 0.828 to 0.958), respectively. The pooled PLR and NLR were 8.675 (95% CI 4.229 to 17.794) and 0.248 (95% CI 0.147 to 0.418), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the lateral flow test were lower than those of the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay test. Hence, care must be taken with interpretation of the lateral flow test when relying on its results for the intra-operative diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: 2018;100-B:66-72.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Immunoassay; Joint Prosthesis; Prosthesis Failure; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Reoperation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Synovial Fluid; alpha-Defensins
PubMed: 29305453
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1 -
Clinical Rheumatology Sep 2021Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that carries high social and economic costs and can lead to permanent disability. RA pathogenesis has not... (Review)
Review
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that carries high social and economic costs and can lead to permanent disability. RA pathogenesis has not been completely elucidated yet. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-contained vesicles released by cells playing a role in cell-to-cell communication and they could be involved in different diseases. Evidence on the involvement of EVs in RA is currently inconclusive. Therefore, a systematic review on the role of EVs in RA was performed in order to explore this relationship. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The research was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to March 5, 2020: 41 studies were analyzed out of 674 screened. The total plasmatic and synovial fluid (SF) EV number seems increased in RA as compared with healthy controls. Both RA plasma and SF contained EVs subpopulations of heterogenous origin, especially derived from platelets and immune system cells. No univocal evidence emerged on miRNA expression and EV content profile within RA patients. EVs showed to enhance pro-inflammatory pathways, such as cytokines and chemokine release and TNF blockade seemed to revert this effect. Our work highlights the requirement to standardize study methodologies in order to make results comparable and draw conclusions that remain, at present, unclear.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Platelets; Extracellular Vesicles; Humans; MicroRNAs; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 33544235
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05614-w -
Annals of Internal Medicine Jan 2017Alternative strategies exist for diagnosing gout that do not rely solely on the documentation of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Alternative strategies exist for diagnosing gout that do not rely solely on the documentation of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals.
PURPOSE
To summarize evidence regarding the accuracy of clinical tests and classification algorithms compared with that of a reference standard of MSU crystals in joint aspirate for diagnosing gout.
DATA SOURCES
Several electronic databases from inception to 29 February 2016.
STUDY SELECTION
21 prospective cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies including participants with joint inflammation and no previous definitive gout diagnosis who had MSU analysis of joint aspirate.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment by 2 reviewers independently; overall strength of evidence (SOE) judgment by group.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Recently developed algorithms including clinical, laboratory, and imaging criteria demonstrated good sensitivity (up to 88%) and fair to good specificity (up to 96%) for diagnosing gout (moderate SOE). Three studies of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) showed sensitivities of 85% to 100% and specificities of 83% to 92% for diagnosing gout (low SOE). Six studies of ultrasonography showed sensitivities of 37% to 100% and specificities of 68% to 97%, depending on the ultrasonography signs assessed (pooled sensitivity and specificity for the double contour sign: 74% [95% CI, 52% to 88%] and 88% [CI, 68% to 96%], respectively [low SOE]).
LIMITATION
Important study heterogeneity and selection bias; scant evidence in primary and urgent care settings and in patients with conditions that may be confused with or occur with gout.
CONCLUSION
Multidimensional algorithms, which must be validated in primary and urgent care settings, may help clinicians make a provisional diagnosis of gout. Although DECT and ultrasonography also show promise for gout diagnosis, accessibility to these methods may be limited.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol registration: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/564/1937/gout-protocol-140716.pdf).
Topics: Algorithms; Gout; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reference Standards; Sensitivity and Specificity; Synovial Fluid; Uric Acid
PubMed: 27802505
DOI: 10.7326/M16-0462 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Jan 2022Various methods exist for managing the joint capsule during the Latarjet procedure. Repairing the capsule to the native glenoid rim results in an extra-articular bone... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Various methods exist for managing the joint capsule during the Latarjet procedure. Repairing the capsule to the native glenoid rim results in an extra-articular bone block, while repairing it to the remnant coracoacromial ligament stump of the coracoid graft renders it intra-articular. The technique that optimizes patient outcomes is not well defined.
PURPOSE
To compare the outcomes of intra-articular and extra-articular bone block techniques for the Latarjet procedure.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we queried the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all studies reporting outcomes of the Latarjet procedure with a clearly defined method of capsular repair that rendered the coracoid graft intra-articular or extra-articular. The included levels of evidence and degree of heterogeneity in this study precluded meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest included preoperative variables, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocols, functional outcome assessments, recurrent instability, range of motion, and radiographic findings.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies including 816 patients were included. A total of 8 studies employed an intra-articular bone block in 338 patients, while the other 8 employed an extra-articular technique in 478 patients. There was variation among studies in reference to baseline patient characteristics, surgical techniques, rehabilitation, methods for assessing patient outcomes, and follow-up times. Rates of postoperative instability were reported in 8 intra-articular (0%, 0%, 2.1%, 2.7%, 3.2%, 5%, 5.4%, 5.9%) and 7 extra-articular (0%, 0%, 1.2%, 2%, 3.9%, 6.3%, 14%) bone block studies. Postoperative osteoarthritis or progression of preoperative osteoarthritis was reported in 5 intra-articular bone block studies (0%, 5.6%, 23.5%, 23.5%, 25%) and 4 extra-articular bone block studies (0%, 1.9%, 5.2%, 8.6%).
CONCLUSION
Varying capsular repair methods appeared to provide similar outcomes regarding stability. There was an apparent trend toward higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis among studies in which an intra-articular bone block technique was employed; however, it is possible that this was influenced by substantially different follow-up times between groups and other various sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. There were no studies in the literature directly comparing intra-articular and extra-articular bone block techniques. Large-scale randomized controlled trials or comparative studies are needed to draw stronger conclusions comparing the 2 techniques.
PubMed: 35097145
DOI: 10.1177/23259671211068371 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2020Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common complication after artificial joint replacement as previously reported. However, the main problem at present is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common complication after artificial joint replacement as previously reported. However, the main problem at present is its difficulty in diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of -defensin, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in clinical practice.
METHOD
Online databases were systematically searched until June 18th, 2020 with keywords and medical sub-headings terms. Studies mentioned the sensitivity and specificity of biological markers in detecting PJI were included in our study. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were obtained after integration.
RESULTS
A total of 34 studies with 1036 patients diagnosing as PJI were included for comparing -defensin, D-dimer, and IL-6. The sensitivity and specificity of -defensin for PJI were 0.88 and 0.96, and the DOR was 189 (95% CI 72-496), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer (0.82 and 0.72) and IL-6 (0.80 and 0.89) were lower than -defensin.
CONCLUSION
The detection of -defensin is a promising biomarker for diagnosing PJI. The optional cut-off needs to be curtained when using other biomarkers.
Topics: Biomarkers; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Interleukin-6; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Synovial Fluid; alpha-Defensins
PubMed: 33225796
DOI: 10.1177/2309499020971861 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Apr 2020Prior studies have compared the posterior capsule repair group in primary total hip arthroplasty by posterior approach with the control group without posterior capsule... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prior studies have compared the posterior capsule repair group in primary total hip arthroplasty by posterior approach with the control group without posterior capsule repair suggesting that the posterior capsule repair group had better clinical outcomes. However, it is still a controversy which treatment is more helpful for hip diseases. The purpose of our article is to obtain the postoperative outcomes between the 2 procedures.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search by browsing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library. There is no restriction on the date of publication. Before we submit our manuscript, we have re-searched the literatures again, including the articles which directly compared the postoperative outcomes of the 2 procedures.
RESULTS
A total of 8 comparative studies were included in our meta-analysis. The posterior capsule repair group showed less dislocation rate, higher HHS, and even less postoperative bleeding volume. Meanwhile, there is no significant difference in ROM between 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, according to current evidences, repairing posterior capsule during primary THA may have better functional outcomes, less dislocation incidence, and less loss of blood.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Connective Tissue; Hip Dislocation; Hip Joint; Humans; Incidence; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32316961
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03244-y -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Nov 2018Several tests are used before reimplantation to detect persistent infection in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergoing two-stage revision. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Several tests are used before reimplantation to detect persistent infection in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergoing two-stage revision. However, there is no consensus as to the optimal tests for excluding persistent infection or predicting successful reimplantation by stage. We aimed to determine the accuracy of different tests used to detect persistent infection after the first stage, and/or predicting failure following reimplantation in patients with PJI.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently conducted quality assessments and data extractions to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUSROC) for each test.
RESULTS
We included 24 studies published between May 1999 and September 2017. Synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN)% had the highest sensitivity of 0.70, followed by serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.57) and spacer sonication fluid culture (0.53). Synovial fluid culture had the highest specificity of 0.97, followed by frozen section (0.93) and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (0.92). Spacer sonication fluid culture was the most accurate test with an AUSROC of 0.8089, followed by synovial fluid culture (0.7749) and frozen section (0.7819).
DISCUSSION
Spacer sonication fluid culture had a relatively high diagnostic accuracy. We emphasize that no test can be used alone to exclude persistent infection beyond the first stage and/or predict failed reimplantation beyond the second stage.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II, systematic review and meta-analysis of level 2 to level 4 studies with inconsistent results.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Blood Sedimentation; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Frozen Sections; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Leukocyte Count; Neutrophils; Prosthesis-Related Infections; ROC Curve; Reoperation; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 30030145
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.03.017 -
Neurosurgery Nov 2020Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex neuropsychiatric disease characterized by obsessions and compulsions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has demonstrated...
BACKGROUND
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex neuropsychiatric disease characterized by obsessions and compulsions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms in medically refractory patients. Multiple targets have been investigated.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the current level and quality of evidence supporting OCD-DBS by target region with the goal of establishing a common nomenclature.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database and a patient/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome search with the terms "DBS" and "OCD." Of 86 eligible articles that underwent full-text review, 28 were included for review. Articles were excluded if the target was not specified, the focus on nonclinical outcomes, the follow-up period shorter than 3 mo, or the sample size smaller than 3 subjects. Level of evidence was assigned according to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons joint guideline committee recommendations. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
RESULTS
Selected publications included 9 randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort study, 1 case-control study, 1 cross-sectional study, and 16 case series. Striatal region targets such as the anterior limb of the internal capsule, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, and nucleus accumbens were identified, but stereotactic coordinates were similar despite differing structural names. Only 15 of 28 articles included coordinates.
CONCLUSION
The striatal area is the most commonly targeted region for OCD-DBS. We recommend a common nomenclature based on this review. To move the field forward to individualized therapy, active contact location relative to stereotactic coordinates and patient specific anatomical and clinical variances need to be reported.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32615588
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa249 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Apr 2023Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease that is clinically diagnosed using components of history, physical exam, and characteristic radiographic findings, such as joint... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease that is clinically diagnosed using components of history, physical exam, and characteristic radiographic findings, such as joint space narrowing. Currently, there are no laboratory findings that are specific to a diagnosis of OA. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the state of current studies of metabolomic biomarkers that can aid in the diagnosis and treatment of OA.
METHODS
Articles were gathered from PubMed and Web of Science using the search terms "osteoarthritis" and "biomarkers" and "metabolomics". Last search of databases took place December 3rd, 2022. Duplicates were manually screened, along with any other results that were not original journal articles. Only original reports involving populations with diagnosed primary or secondary OA (human participants) or surgically induced OA (animal participants) and a healthy control group for comparison were considered for inclusion. Metabolites and metabolic pathways reported in included articles were then manually extracted and evaluated for importance based on reported a priori p-values and/or area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC).
RESULTS
Of the 161 results that were returned in the database searches, 43 unique articles met the inclusion criteria. Articles were categorized based on body fluid analyzed: 6 studies on urine samples, 13 studies on plasma samples, 11 studies on synovial fluid (SF) samples, 11 studies on serum samples, 1 study on both synovial fluid and serum, and 1 study that involved both plasma and synovial fluid. To synthesize results, individual metabolites, as well as metabolic pathways that involve frequently reported metabolites, are presented for each study. Indications as to whether metabolite levels were increased or decreased are also included if this data was included in the original articles.
CONCLUSIONS
These studies clearly show that there are a wide range of metabolic pathways perturbed in OA. For this period, there was no consensus on a single metabolite, or panel of metabolites, that would be clinically useful in early diagnosis of OA or distinguishing OA from a healthy control. However, many common metabolic pathways were identified in the studies, including TCA cycle, fatty acid metabolism, amino acid metabolism (notably BCAA metabolism and tryptophan metabolism via kynurenine pathway), nucleotide metabolism, urea cycle, cartilage matrix components, and phospholipid metabolism. Future research is needed to define effective clinical biomarkers of osteoarthritis from metabolomic and other data.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Metabolomics; Biomarkers; Synovial Fluid; Metabolic Networks and Pathways
PubMed: 36736024
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152163