-
Neuro-oncology Practice Jul 2020Primary CNS tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that share a considerable morbidity and mortality rate. To help control tumor growth and clinical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Primary CNS tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that share a considerable morbidity and mortality rate. To help control tumor growth and clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life) symptoms, patients often resort to alternative therapies, including the use of cannabis. Despite rapidly growing popularity, cannabis and its impact on patients with primary malignant CNS tumors is understudied.
METHODS
To shed light on the lack of scientific evidence in this field, in November 2018 we conducted a search and examination of cannabis in neuro-oncology in major journal databases and bibliographies of selected articles, and through abstracts of annual meetings using prespecified criteria in line with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.
RESULTS
We identified 45 publications, of which 9 were selected. Five studies were included. Publication dates ranged from 2004 to 2018 and included varying histologies of primary brain tumors. The average survival at 1 year was 56.09% (95% CI: 48.28-63.9). There was no difference in risk ratio (RR) for death at 1 year between groups (RR: 1.069 [95% CI: 0.139-8.25]). We found strong evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 74.0%; = .021). We found no statistical evidence of publication bias ( = .117; SD = 1.91).
CONCLUSIONS
There was limited moderate-quality evidence that supports the use of cannabinoids as adjuvant to the standard of care in the treatment of brain and CNS tumors. There was very low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with adult-onset gliomas. Further prospective clinical trials are necessary to adequately evaluate the impact of cannabinoids on CNS tumors, specifically on survival and quality of life.
PubMed: 32765889
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa013 -
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Jun 2015To systematically review the literature for studies on cognitive functioning in patients with low-grade glioma to evaluate assessment methods and prevalence of cognitive... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the literature for studies on cognitive functioning in patients with low-grade glioma to evaluate assessment methods and prevalence of cognitive dysfunction.
DATA SOURCES
A search was made in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO for articles published between January 2002 and June 2012 using cognition, memory, attention, executive functioning, and low-grade glioma as search terms.
STUDY SELECTION
Two reviewers independently performed the study selection and data extraction. Inclusion criteria were: studies including at least 10 adult patients, with suspected or confirmed low-grade glioma and cognitive functioning as outcome measure.
DATA EXTRACTION
A standard data extraction form was used, with items regarding study quality, patient characteristics, type of measurement instruments, cognitive domain, definition of cognitive dysfunction, and reported prevalence.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Of the 312 articles screened on title/abstract, 69 were screened on full-text and, finally, 17 were included. A total of 46 different measurement instruments were found for the assessment of cognitive functioning; 5 of these were used 5 or more times. There was variability in the definition of cognitive dysfunction. The reported prevalence of cognitive dysfunction ranged from 19% to 83%.
CONCLUSION
Many patients with low-grade glioma experience cognitive dysfunction. However, there is no consensus on how to assess cognitive functioning in these patients.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Glioma; Humans; Neuropsychological Tests; Prevalence
PubMed: 25994416
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1975 -
IScience Jun 2023This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from...
This study aims to evaluate deep learning (DL) performance in differentiating low- and high-grade glioma. Search online database for studies continuously published from 1st January 2015 until 16th August 2022. The random-effects model was used for synthesis, based on pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was estimated using the Higgins inconsistency index (I). 33 were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled SE and SP were 94% and 93%, with an AUC of 0.98. There was great heterogeneity in this field. Our evidence-based study shows DL achieves high accuracy in glioma grading. Subgroup analysis reveals several limitations in this field: 1) Diagnostic trials require standard method for data merging for AI; 2) small sample size; 3) poor-quality image preprocessing; 4) not standard algorithm development; 5) not standard data report; 6) different definition of HGG and LGG; and 7) poor extrapolation.
PubMed: 37250800
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106815 -
BMC Cancer Jun 2010The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan is a new chemotherapy protocol increasingly used for recurrent malignant glioma. Results from phase II trials suggest this... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan is a new chemotherapy protocol increasingly used for recurrent malignant glioma. Results from phase II trials suggest this drug combination is beneficial to patients, but no conclusive comparisons between this and other treatment protocols have been published.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and survival gain analysis of phase II studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus irinotecan treatment. To do this, we utilized a preexisting database from which the mean overall survival and response rate of patients could be predicted. Survival gain, which characterized the influence of treatment, was defined as the difference between observed and predicted mean overall survival. Response gain was calculated similarly.
RESULTS
741 cohorts were enrolled in the database. Among them, 282 cohorts were based on recurrent adult HGG, mean reported median overall survival was 10.96 +/- 8.4 months, and mean response rate was 18.9% +/- 20.5. We found that compared with other treatment protocols, bevacizumab plus irinotecan largely improved response rates (P = 0.00002) and had a possible moderate effect on overall survival time (P = 0.024). Hemorrhage, thromboembolic complications, and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most frequently reported side effects.
CONCLUSION
The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan might improve outcome in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Randomized controlled trials are recommended to evaluate this treatment protocol and the additional value of irinotecan.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Brain Neoplasms; Camptothecin; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Glioma; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 20525214
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-252 -
Neurologia Medico-chirurgica Apr 2022Malignant progression of diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG) is a critical event affecting patient survival; however, the incidence and related factors have been inconsistent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Malignant progression of diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG) is a critical event affecting patient survival; however, the incidence and related factors have been inconsistent in literature. According to the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed articles from 2009, meta-analyzed the incidence of malignant progression, and clarified factors related to the transformation. Forty-one articles were included in this study (n = 7,122; n, number of patients). We identified two definitions of malignant progression: histologically proven (Htrans) and clinically defined (Ctrans). The malignant progression rate curves of Htrans and Ctrans were almost in parallel when constructed from the results of meta-regression by the mean follow-up time. The true transformation rate was supposed to lie between the two curves, approximately 40% at the 10-year mean follow-up. Risk of malignant progression was evaluated using hazard ratio (HR). Pooled HRs were significantly higher in tumors with a larger pre- and postoperative tumor volume, lower degree of resection, and notable preoperative contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging than in others. Oligodendroglial histology and IDH mutation (IDHm) with 1p/19q codeletion (Codel) also significantly reduced the HRs. Using Kaplan-Meier curves from eight studies with molecular data, we extracted data and calculated the 10-year malignant progression-free survival (10yMPFS). The 10yMPFS in patients with IDHm without Codel was 30.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 22.2-39.0) in Htrans and 38.3% (95% CI: 32.3-44.3) in Ctrans, and that with IDHm with Codel was 71.7% (95% CI: 61.7-79.5) in Htrans and 62.5% (95% CI: 55.9-68.5) in Ctrans. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy could not be determined.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Incidence; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation
PubMed: 35197400
DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0313 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2022Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant tumour of the central nervous system. Recent appreciation of the heterogeneity amongst these tumours not only changed... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and malignant tumour of the central nervous system. Recent appreciation of the heterogeneity amongst these tumours not only changed the WHO classification approach, but also created the need for developing novel and personalised therapies. This systematic review aims to highlight recent advancements in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of the GBM and discuss related novel treatment targets. A systematic search of the literature in the PubMed library was performed following the PRISMA guidelines for molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic advances. Original and meta-analyses studies from the last ten years were reviewed using pre-determined search terms. The results included articles relevant to GBM development focusing on the aberrancy in cell signaling pathways and intracellular events. Theragnostic targets and vaccination to treat GBM were also explored. The molecular pathophysiology of GBM is complex. Our systematic review suggests targeting therapy at the stemness, p53 mediated pathways and immune modulation. Exciting novel immune therapy involving dendritic cell vaccines, B-cell vaccines and viral vectors may be the future of treating GBM.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 35269752
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052607 -
Evidence-based Preclinical Medicine Dec 2014The development of therapeutics is often characterized by promising animal research that fails to translate into clinical efficacy; this holds for the development of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The development of therapeutics is often characterized by promising animal research that fails to translate into clinical efficacy; this holds for the development of gene therapy in glioma. We tested the hypothesis that this is because of limitations in the internal and external validity of studies reporting the use of gene therapy in experimental glioma.
METHOD
We systematically identified studies testing gene therapy in rodent glioma models by searching three online databases. The number of animals treated and median survival were extracted and studies graded using a quality checklist. We calculated median survival ratios and used random effects meta-analysis to estimate efficacy. We explored effects of study design and quality and searched for evidence of publication bias.
RESULTS
We identified 193 publications using gene therapy in experimental glioma, including 6,366 animals. Overall, gene therapy improved median survival by a factor of 1.60 (95% CI 1.53-1.67). Study quality was low and the type of gene therapy did not account for differences in outcome. Study design characteristics accounted for a significant proportion of between-study heterogeneity. We observed similar findings in a data subset limited to the most common gene therapy.
CONCLUSION
As the dysregulation of key molecular pathways is characteristic of gliomas, gene therapy remains a promising treatment for glioma. Nevertheless, we have identified areas for improvement in conduct and reporting of studies, and we provide a basis for sample size calculations. Further work should focus on genes of interest in paradigms recapitulating human disease. This might improve the translation of such therapies into the clinic.
PubMed: 27668084
DOI: 10.1002/ebm2.6 -
Medicine Nov 2020Glioma is the most common type of brain tumor because of the destructiveness of the disease itself and the side effects of treatment, patients often leave symptoms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Glioma is the most common type of brain tumor because of the destructiveness of the disease itself and the side effects of treatment, patients often leave symptoms of neurological defects. At present, rehabilitation treatment is not popular in glioma patients. There is a lack of definite evidence to prove the benefits of rehabilitation therapy for glioma patients. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether rehabilitation therapy can significantly improve the prognosis of neurological function and improve the quality of life of patients with glioma.
METHODS
The articles about rehabilitation treatment of glioma in Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase, Web of Science, and Medline database from January 1990 to May 2020 were searched. Before rehabilitation as the control group, after rehabilitation as the experimental group. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used as the outcome index, including total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Use STATA12.0 for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 8 articles were included in the study, with a total of 375 glioma patients. Meta-analysis of total FIM (SMD = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.66-1.26, P < .001), motor FIM (SMD = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.54-0.96, P < .001) and cognitive FIM (SMD = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.19-0.50, P < .001) indicated that the neurological function of rehabilitation was significantly improved in total, motor and consciousness.
CONCLUSION
The published studies show that rehabilitation therapy can improve the functional prognosis and quality of life of glioma patients. More attention should be paid to the therapeutic value of rehabilitation for glioma patients in the future.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42020188740.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33157978
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023087 -
The Oncologist Feb 2015Bevacizumab, currently an option for treatment of different types of tumors including glioblastoma, has a peculiar toxicity profile related to its antiangiogenic effect.... (Review)
Review
Bevacizumab, currently an option for treatment of different types of tumors including glioblastoma, has a peculiar toxicity profile related to its antiangiogenic effect. Because some bevacizumab-related adverse events can be life threatening, it is important to identify risk factors and to establish treatment protocols to minimize treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In glioblastoma patients, the risk of developing certain side effects, such as gastrointestinal perforation, venous thromboembolism, and intracranial hemorrhages, is slightly higher than in patients treated with bevacizumab for other tumor types. We performed a systematic review of the side effects of bevacizumab and their incidence, causal mechanisms, and available treatments. Finally, we identified risk factors and proposed preventive and therapeutic measures for these adverse events.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Disease Management; Glioblastoma; Humans; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 25568148
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0330 -
Cureus Aug 2022As oncology practice is rapidly shifting away from toxic chemotherapy, gene therapy provides a highly specific therapeutic approach for brain tumors. In this systematic... (Review)
Review
As oncology practice is rapidly shifting away from toxic chemotherapy, gene therapy provides a highly specific therapeutic approach for brain tumors. In this systematic review, we investigate gene therapy's status in pediatric brain tumors and future recommendations. The search was conducted systematically using PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The field search used in the process was selected based on the keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), depending on the database used. We included cases of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) brain tumors in all age groups with the additional inclusion of English language, free full text, articles published within the last 20 years, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. We excluded case reports, case studies, and editorials. The search identified a total of 1,213 articles from the databases. We included 19 studies with 16 narrative reviews, one systematic review, and two randomized clinical trials with 43 patients. After reviewing all data in the articles, we found that gene therapy can improve standard treatment efficacy when used as adjuvant therapy. It can be used to overcome barriers such as chemotherapy resistance by downregulating resistance genes. It is associated with mild toxicity when compared with other available treatment options, but given the overall poor prognosis in pediatric brain tumors, further studies are warranted.
PubMed: 36120213
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27963