-
Journal of Thoracic Disease Aug 2021Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant neoplasms originating from thymic epithelial cells. The current treatment for localized TETs is surgical removal.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant neoplasms originating from thymic epithelial cells. The current treatment for localized TETs is surgical removal. However, 20-30% of thymomas and 70-80% of thymic carcinomas are unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic at the time of detection. The standard therapy for these patients is chemotherapy, but the effect is limited. With a deeper understanding of tumor immunity, immunotherapy for various cancers has rapidly developed. Antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed death-1, and programmed death-ligand 1 have been approved for the treatment of many solid tumors. Compared with traditional treatments, these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have better efficacy and lower toxicity. Recently, ICIs have been used more enthusiastically in the treatment of TETs. However, due to the unique biological characteristics of the thymus, immunotherapy usually causes severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Most previous studies on immunotherapy in TETs had small sample sizes and reported diverse conclusions.
METHODS
We collected relevant studies in PubMed during the last five years and analyzed the available data to discuss the efficacy and safety of ICIs in TETs.
RESULTS
According to 14 previous studies in the past five years, all TETs showed expression of programmed death-ligand 1, while thymic carcinomas showed 100% expression. The best median progression-free survival (mPFS) among the five studies was 6.5 months, and the best median overall survival (mOS) was 24.9 months. In addition, the most common irAEs were myasthenic symptoms, liver enzyme elevation, and elevated creatine phosphokinase levels.
CONCLUSIONS
ICIs can be used in TET treatment, especially for thymic carcinomas, in the absence of standard second-line treatment. However, more attention should be paid to irAEs.
PubMed: 34527346
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-290 -
Acta Neurologica Belgica Oct 2023To ascertain the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AEs). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To ascertain the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (AEs).
METHODS
Two cases of CASPR2 antibody-associated AEs have been reported. In addition, a systematic search of literature published between January 2010 and March 2022 through six online databases was conducted to identify the pediatric patients with CASPR2 antibody-associated AEs. Data on demographics, clinical symptoms, laboratory examinations, imaging, treatment, and outcome were collected.
RESULTS
Our updated literature search yielded 1,837 publications, of which 21 were selected, and 40 patients in this study met the diagnostic criteria for AE. There were 25 males and 15 females with a mean age of 9.2 years. The most common presenting symptoms are psychiatric symptoms (72.5%), sleep changes (62.5%), and movement disorders (60%). The psychiatric symptoms included mood changes (39.1%), behavior changes (25%), and hallucination (7.5%). In total, 23 cases (57.5%) combined with autonomic dysfunction, such as gastrointestinal dysmotility, cardiovascular-related symptoms, and sweating. No tumors were observed in children. Thirty-eight patients received first-line immunotherapy, and eight received first-line and second-line immunotherapy. All patients had a good clinical response to immune therapy. Mean mRS at onset was 3.4; It was 0.88 at the last follow-up. There was no recurrence during follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Psychiatric symptoms, sleep disorders, movement disorders, and cardiovascular-related symptoms are the most common presentation in pediatric patients with CASPR2 antibody-associated AEs. Tumor, particularly with thymoma, is uncommon in children diagnosed with CASPR2 antibody-associated AEs. In addition, prompt diagnosis and immunotherapy can relieve symptoms and improve the prognosis.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Child; Autoantibodies; Thymus Neoplasms; Movement Disorders; Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System; Contactins
PubMed: 36662402
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02174-5 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Sep 2020Despite the burgeoning literature describing preoperative and postoperative risks of a myasthenic crisis after thymectomy (MCAT) in patients with myasthenia gravis,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Despite the burgeoning literature describing preoperative and postoperative risks of a myasthenic crisis after thymectomy (MCAT) in patients with myasthenia gravis, substantial differences exist in the risk factors identified by previous studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the reported risk factors and MCAT risk.
METHODS
We collected relevant studies on the risk factors for MCAT by searching the PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine (CBM), WanFang Data, VIP and CNKI databases. The search period ranged from the establishment of the database to November 2019.
RESULTS
Twenty-five of the 458 identified studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Seven retrospective cohort studies and 18 case-control studies were included, and 14 risk factors for MCAT were extracted. Meta-analyses of the association between MCAT and risk factors related to the patient's preoperative condition included a preoperative history of MC, preoperative bulbar symptoms, IIa + IIb + III + VI, IIb + III + VI, VI + V, dosage of pyridostigmine bromide prior to the operation, a preoperative AchR-Ab level > 100 (nm/L), preoperative pulmonary function, preoperative complications, and preoperative disease course. Meta-analyses of the association between MCAT and surgery-related risk factors included intraoperative blood loss > 1000 mL and the mode of operation. Meta-analyses of the association between MCAT and postoperative risk factors included postoperative lung infection, thymoma and the WHO classification. The operation time was not an independent risk factor for MCAT.
CONCLUSIONS
The independent risk factors for MCAT were a preoperative history of MC, preoperative bulbar symptoms, preoperative MG Osserman stage, preoperative dosage of pyridostigmine bromide, preoperative serum AchR-Ab level, lung function, major postoperative complications, disease duration before thymectomy, blood loss, thoracotomy, postoperative lung infection, thymoma, and WHO classification.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Male; Myasthenia Gravis; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Thymectomy
PubMed: 32993739
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01320-x -
BMJ Case Reports Dec 2021Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction characterised by weakness and fatiguability, carrying a high morbidity if...
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction characterised by weakness and fatiguability, carrying a high morbidity if treatment is delayed. A clear association with thymoma has led to management with thymectomy as a common practice, but MG presenting post-thymectomy has rarely been reported. We present a case of an 82- year-old woman developing fatigue, ptosis and dysarthria 3 months after thymectomy. After a clinical diagnosis of MG was made, she responded well to prompt treatment with prednisolone and pyridostigmine. Her anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR) subsequently came back positive. Our systematic review reveals that post-thymectomy MG can be categorised as early-onset or late-onset form with differing aetiology, and demonstrated correlation between preoperative anti-AChR titres and post-thymectomy MG. The postulated mechanisms for post-thymectomy MG centre around long-lasting peripheral autoantibodies. Clinicians should actively look for MG symptoms in thymoma patients and measure anti-AChR preoperatively to aid prognostication.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Autoantibodies; Myasthenia Gravis; Receptors, Cholinergic; Thymectomy; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 34857591
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246005 -
Medicine Sep 2022Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) originate in the thymic epithelial cell, including thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Surgical resection is the first choice for most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) originate in the thymic epithelial cell, including thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Surgical resection is the first choice for most patients. However, some studies have shown that the factors affecting the prognosis of these patients are not consistent. To evaluate prognostic factors in patients with surgically resected thymic epithelial tumors, we performed a meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched the Chinese biomedical literature database, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other electronic databases. Studies including postoperative overall survival (OS) and predictors of TETs were included. We made a comprehensive analysis the hazard ratios (HRs) through a single proportional combination. HRs were combined using single proportion combinations.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 11,695 patients from 26 studies. The pooled OS was 84% at 5 years and 73% at 10 years after TETs operation. The age as continuous-year (HR 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.04), incomplete resection (HR 4.41, 95% CI 3.32-5.85), WHO histologic classification (B2/B3 vs A/AB/B1 HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.25-6.21), Masaoka Stage (stage III/IV vs I/II HR 2.74, 95% CI 2.12-3.55,) were the poor prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS
For patients with TETs after surgical resection, advanced age, incomplete resection, WHO classification B2/B3, and higher Masaoka stage are risk factors for poor prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 36181069
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030867 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Apr 2021Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga (M/MK) stage II/III... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected Masaoka/Masaoka-Koga (M/MK) stage II/III thymomas.
METHODS
We systematically searched four online databases and included studies that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus a PORT for completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were evaluated as the primary and secondary end points, respectively. We performed a subgroup analysis for OS with respect to M/MK stage II, III, and inseparable II/III cases. A generic inverse variance meta-analysis using a random model was conducted.
RESULTS
Five studies including 4746 patients (among them, 2408 patients received PORT) met our selection criteria. A meta-analysis of these five studies revealed that PORT was associated with a significantly better OS (HR = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83, p < 0.001, I = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97). Subgroup analyses for M/MK stage II disease (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, p = 0.01, I = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80) and M/MK stage III disease (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95, p = 0.02, I = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84) revealed similar results. PORT was not associated with an improved disease-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.33, p = 0.83, I = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS
Currently available evidence from observational studies suggests PORT for patients with completely resected M/MK stage II/III thymoma. A randomized trial is warranted.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 33515812
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.12.023 -
Medicine Jun 2020The pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has strong connection with thymic abnormalities. Thymic hyperplasia or thymoma can be found with most patients. Thymectomy is... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone compares with prednisone monotherapy for the treatment of non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis: Protocol for a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
The pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has strong connection with thymic abnormalities. Thymic hyperplasia or thymoma can be found with most patients. Thymectomy is currently one of the regular treatment in clinic, which is, however, still controversial for non-thymomatous MG. This research will assess the effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone compared to prednisone monotherapy for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG systematically.
METHODS
According to eligibility and ineligibility criteria, 8 databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan-fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ), will be searched to gather the up-to-standard articles from September 2000 to September 2025. Inclusion criteria are as follows: randomized controlled trials of thymectomy plus prednisone for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG) and the dose of prednisone required will be accepted as the main outcomes. Data synthesis, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. We will use Egger or Begg test to evaluate symmetry on a funnel plot which is made to assess reporting bias, and use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to exclude the probability of false positives.
RESULTS
This systematic review will measure the QMG and the dose of prednisone required, the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living scale scores (MG-ADL), treatment-associated complications, incidence of myasthenic crisis and other aspects to comprehensively assess the clinical benefits of thymectomy plus prednisone for MG patients without thymoma.
CONCLUSION
The conclusion of this study will achieve convincing evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thymectomy plus prednisone for the treatment of non-thymomatous MG.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD 42020167735.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Prednisone; Thymectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32569233
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020832 -
BMJ Case Reports Dec 2020Nocardiosis is a rare infection in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We identified three cases of MG admitted with nocardiosis in our unit. We performed systematic...
Nocardiosis is a rare infection in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We identified three cases of MG admitted with nocardiosis in our unit. We performed systematic literature search of previous publications and identified 18 patients. This paper presents three patients and reviews the clinical characteristics of 21 patients. The first case was a 69-year-old woman with thymomatous MG who presented with pustules and left lower limb pain. Evaluation showed osteomyelitis of the pubic ramus and ileopsoas abscess. The second case was a 54-year-old man who presented in myasthenic crisis due to pulmonary nocardiosis. The third case was a 48-year-old man with thymomatous MG who presented with lung abscess. All of them recovered completely after treatment with co-trimoxazole. Analysis of the 21 patients identified four risk factors for nocardiosis in MG: elderly men; thymoma; immunosuppressant medication, mainly steroid therapy; and pre-existing lung disease. Lungs was the most common site of infection. Suppurative disease was common manifestation regardless of organ involved. Clinical course is not unfavourable.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myasthenia Gravis; Nocardia Infections; Rare Diseases; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 33384345
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237208