-
Arthritis Care & Research Sep 2015People with meniscal tears are at high risk to develop or progress to knee osteoarthritis. Knee extensor weakness is considered a risk factor for osteoarthritis and is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
People with meniscal tears are at high risk to develop or progress to knee osteoarthritis. Knee extensor weakness is considered a risk factor for osteoarthritis and is often reported in these individuals. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate knee extensor strength in people undergoing an arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM).
METHODS
Six databases (Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase, PEDro, and AMED) were searched up to June 22, 2014. Studies that measured knee extensor muscle strength in people age ≥30 years undergoing APM for a meniscal tear and used either a healthy control group or the contralateral leg to compare knee extensor muscle strength were included. Methodological quality was assessed using guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
RESULTS
Eleven studies, in which participants were predominantly male, were included (n = 596). A moderate reduction in muscle strength was observed prior to APM compared to controls (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.04, 1.13) and continued up to 6 months postsurgery (SMD range -2.42 to -0.47). There was no difference in muscle strength at 2 years post-APM (SMD -0.01 [95% CI -0.36, 0.35]), while a moderate reduction was again apparent at 4 years post-APM (SMD -0.56, [95% CI -1.20, 0.08]) compared to controls.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that middle-aged and older individuals undergoing APM have reduced knee extensor muscle strength in the operated leg compared to control data. As meniscus pathology and knee extensor muscle weakness are risk factors for osteoarthritis, these results highlight the clinical importance of addressing muscle weakness in these individuals.
Topics: Aged; Arthroscopy; Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength
PubMed: 25776139
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22581 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024This study delves into the cutting-edge field of deep learning techniques, particularly deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), which have demonstrated unprecedented... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This study delves into the cutting-edge field of deep learning techniques, particularly deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), which have demonstrated unprecedented potential in assisting radiologists and orthopedic surgeons in precisely identifying meniscal tears. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning models in recognizing, localizing, describing, and categorizing meniscal tears in magnetic resonance images (MRIs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review was rigorously conducted, strictly following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Extensive searches were conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. All identified articles underwent a comprehensive risk of bias analysis. Predictive performance values were either extracted or calculated for quantitative analysis, including sensitivity and specificity. The meta-analysis was performed for all prediction models that identified the presence and location of meniscus tears.
RESULTS
This study's findings underscore that a range of deep learning models exhibit robust performance in detecting and classifying meniscal tears, in one case surpassing the expertise of musculoskeletal radiologists. Most studies in this review concentrated on identifying tears in the medial or lateral meniscus and even precisely locating tears-whether in the anterior or posterior horn-with exceptional accuracy, as demonstrated by AUC values ranging from 0.83 to 0.94.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these findings, deep learning models have showcased significant potential in analyzing knee MR images by learning intricate details within images. They offer precise outcomes across diverse tasks, including segmenting specific anatomical structures and identifying pathological regions. Contributions: This study focused exclusively on DL models for identifying and localizing meniscus tears. It presents a meta-analysis that includes eight studies for detecting the presence of a torn meniscus and a meta-analysis of three studies with low heterogeneity that localize and classify the menisci. Another novelty is the analysis of arthroscopic surgery as ground truth. The quality of the studies was assessed against the CLAIM checklist, and the risk of bias was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool.
PubMed: 38893617
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111090 -
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Aug 2015Despite widespread reporting on clinical results, the effect of meniscus allograft transplantation on the development of osteoarthritis is still unclear. The aim of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Despite widespread reporting on clinical results, the effect of meniscus allograft transplantation on the development of osteoarthritis is still unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review all studies on the effect of meniscus allograft transplantation on articular cartilage in animals. Pubmed and Embase were searched for original articles concerning the effect of meniscus allograft transplantation on articular cartilage compared with both its positive (meniscectomy) and negative (either sham or non-operated) control in healthy animals. Outcome measures related to assessment of damage to articular cartilage were divided in five principal outcome categories. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated and pooled to obtain an overall SMD and 95% confidence interval. 17 articles were identified, representing 14 original animal cohorts with an average timing of data collection of 24 weeks [range 4 weeks; 30 months]. Compared to a negative control, meniscus allograft transplantation caused gross macroscopic (1.45 [0.95; 1.95]), histological (3.43 [2.25; 4.61]) damage to articular cartilage, and osteoarthritic changes on radiographs (3.12 [1.42; 4.82]). Moreover, results on histomorphometrics and cartilage biomechanics are supportive of this detrimental effect on cartilage. On the other hand, meniscus allograft transplantation caused significantly less gross macroscopic (-1.19 [-1.84; -0.54]) and histological (-1.70 [-2.67; -0.74]) damage to articular cartilage when compared to meniscectomy. However, there was no difference in osteoarthritic changes on plain radiographs (0.04 [-0.48; 0.57]), and results on histomorphometrics and biomechanics did neither show a difference in effect between meniscus allograft transplantation and meniscectomy. In conclusion, although meniscus allograft transplantation does not protect articular cartilage from damage, it reduces the extent of it when compared with meniscectomy.
Topics: Allografts; Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cartilage, Articular; Menisci, Tibial; Models, Animal; Osteoarthritis; Radiography; Stifle
PubMed: 25960117
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.04.025 -
Cartilage Jul 2020The purpose of this manuscript is to analyze the evidence regarding etiopathogenesis of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions through a systematic review, so to...
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this manuscript is to analyze the evidence regarding etiopathogenesis of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions through a systematic review, so to summate the current understanding of the origin and progression of this pathologic articular processes.
DESIGN
A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed and Cochrane databases on October 2017 by 2 independent authors and included all levels of evidence. This included all English language literature, pertaining specifically to etiopathology of knee OCD with exclusions for review articles and expert opinion. Of 965 identified records, 154 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 86 studies met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
According to these studies, the etiology of OCD can be of a biological or mechanical origin: 40 articles proposed a biological hypothesis, including genetic causes (27), ossification center deficit (12), and endocrine disorders (9); conversely, 52 articles supported a mechanical hypothesis, including injury/overuse (18), tibial spine impingement (5), discoid meniscus (16), and biomechanical alterations (20) as the cause of the onset of OCD. The pathogenic processes were investigated by 36 of these articles, with a focus on subchondral bone fracture and ischemia as the ultimate events leading to OCD.
CONCLUSIONS
Biological and mechanical factors are found to result in subchondral bone remodeling alterations, acting independently or more likely synergically in the progression of knee OCD. The former includes genetic causes, deficit of ossification centers and endocrine disorders; the latter, tibial spine impingement, discoid meniscus, and biomechanical alterations, together with injuries and overuse. The resultant subchondral bone ischemia and/or fracturing appears to determine the onset and progression of OCD.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review of level II-IV studies, level IV.
Topics: Adolescent; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Remodeling; Cartilage, Articular; Causality; Child; Cumulative Trauma Disorders; Female; Humans; Knee; Knee Injuries; Knee Joint; Male; Menisci, Tibial; Osteochondritis Dissecans; Tibia; Young Adult
PubMed: 29998741
DOI: 10.1177/1947603518786557 -
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related... Apr 2023Tendinopathy, enthesopathy, labral degeneration, and pathologic conditions of the articular disc (knee meniscus and ulnocarpal) are sometimes described in terms of...
BACKGROUND
Tendinopathy, enthesopathy, labral degeneration, and pathologic conditions of the articular disc (knee meniscus and ulnocarpal) are sometimes described in terms of inflammation or damage, while the histopathologic findings are often consistent with mucoid degeneration. A systematic review of the histopathology of these structures at diverse locations might reconceptualize these diseases as expected aspects of human aging. The potential benefits of this evolution might include healthier patient and clinician mindsets as well as a reduced likelihood of overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from greater awareness of base rates of pathology.
QUESTION/PURPOSE
In this systematic review of studies of surgical specimens, we asked: Are there are any differences in the histopathologic findings of structural soft tissue conditions (mucoid degeneration, inflammation, and vascularity) by anatomic site (foot, elbow, or knee) or structure (tendon body, muscle or tendon origin or insertion [enthesis], labrum, or articular disc)?
METHODS
Studies between 1980 and 2021 investigating the histopathologic findings of specimens from surgery for trigger digit, de Quervain tendinopathy, plantar fasciitis, lateral and medial elbow enthesopathy, rotator cuff tendinopathy, posterior tibial tendinopathy, patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, or disease of the hip labrum, ulnocarpal articular disc, or knee meniscus were searched for in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were the prespecified anatomic location or structure being analyzed histologically and any findings described with respect to inflammation, vascularity, or mucoid degeneration. Studies were excluded if they were nonhuman studies or review articles. Search terms included "anatomy," "pathology," and "histopathology." These terms were coupled with anatomic structures or disorders and included "trigger finger," "de Quervain," "fasciitis, plantar," "tennis elbow," "rotator cuff tendinopathy," "elbow tendinopathy," "patellar tendonitis," "posterior tibial tendon," and "triangular fibrocartilage." This resulted in 3196 studies. After applying the inclusion criteria, 559 articles were then assessed for eligibility according to our exclusion criteria, with 52 eventually included. We recorded whether the study identified the following histopathologic findings: inflammatory cells or molecular markers, greater than expected vascularity (categorized as quantitative count, with or without controls; molecular markers; or qualitative judgments), and features of mucoid degeneration (disorganized collagen, increased extracellular matrix, or chondroid metaplasia). In the absence of methods for systematically evaluating the pathophysiology of structural (collagenous) soft tissue structures and rating histopathologic study quality, all studies that interpreted histopathology results were included. The original authors' judgment regarding the presence or absence of inflammation, greater than expected vascularity, and elements of mucoid degeneration was recorded along with the type of data used to reach that conclusion.
RESULTS
Regarding differences in the histopathology of surgical specimens of structural soft tissue conditions by anatomic site, there were no differences in inflammation or mucoid degeneration, and the knee meniscus was less often described as having greater than normal vascularity. There were no differences by anatomic structure. Overall, 20% (10 of 51) of the studies that investigated for inflammation reported it (nine inflammatory cells and one inflammatory marker). Eighty-three percent (43 of 52) interpreted increased vascularity: 40% (17 of 43) using quantitative methods (14 with controls and three without) and 60% (26 of 43) using imprecise criteria. Additionally, 100% (all 52 studies) identified at least one element of mucoid degeneration: 69% (36 of 52) reported an increased extracellular matrix, 71% (37 of 52) reported disorganized collagen, and 33% (17 of 52) reported chondroid metaplasia.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review of the histopathology of diseases of soft tissue structures (enthesopathy, tendinopathy, and labral and articular disc) identified consistent mucoid degeneration, minimal inflammation, and imprecise assessment of relative vascularity; these findings were consistent across anatomic sites and structures, supporting a reconceptualization of these diseases as related to aging (senescence or degeneration) rather than injury or activity.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This reconceptualization supports accommodative mindsets known to be associated with greater comfort and capability. In addition, awareness of the notable base rates of structural soft tissue changes as people age might reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment of incidental, benign, or inconsequential signal changes and pathophysiology.
Topics: Humans; Tendinopathy; Enthesopathy; Achilles Tendon; Joint Diseases; Spinal Diseases; Inflammation; Meniscus
PubMed: 36563131
DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002499 -
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.... Dec 2012Meniscal repair offers the potential to avoid the long-term articular cartilage deterioration that has been shown to result after meniscectomy. Failure of the meniscal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Meniscal repair offers the potential to avoid the long-term articular cartilage deterioration that has been shown to result after meniscectomy. Failure of the meniscal repair can occur several years postoperatively. Limited evidence on the long-term outcomes of meniscal repair exists.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of meniscal repair at a minimum of five years postoperatively. Pooling of data and meta-analysis with a random-effects model were performed to evaluate the results.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of meniscal repair failure (reoperation or clinical failure) was 23.1% (131 of 566). The pooled rate of failure varied from 20.2% to 24.3% depending on the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the meniscus repaired, and the technique utilized. The rate of failure was similar for the medial and the lateral meniscus as well as for patients with an intact and a reconstructed ACL.
CONCLUSIONS
A systematic review of the outcomes of meniscal repair at greater than five years postoperatively demonstrated very similar rates of meniscal failure (22.3% to 24.3%) for all techniques investigated. The outcomes of meniscal repair at greater than five years postoperatively have not yet been reported for modern all-inside repair devices.
Topics: Humans; Knee Injuries; Menisci, Tibial; Reoperation; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23318612
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01584 -
Medical Ultrasonography May 2018To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of meniscal tears using B-mode ultrasound and high-frequency linear probe by conducting a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of meniscal tears using B-mode ultrasound and high-frequency linear probe by conducting a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Cochrane library, Embase, and Pubmed were searched for relevant studies up to 29 July 2017. The arthroscopy was used as the reference standard. The results were estimated by pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, likelihood ratio, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC).
RESULTS
Seven prospective studies met the selection criteria, comprising 321meniscal tears from 472 patients. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the SROC curve were 88.80% (95%CI: 82.83-92.87), 84.66% (95%CI: 75.89-90.64), 5.79(95%CI: 3.66-9.15), 0.13 (95%CI: 0.09-0.20), and 43.74 (95%CI: 24.01-79.68), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 93% (95%CI: 91-95).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis indicates that 2-dimensional ultrasound is useful, and could be routinely used for estimating meniscal injuries in the human knee joint.
Topics: Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 29730682
DOI: 10.11152/mu-1252 -
Sports Health 2019Meniscal injuries are common among both sport- and non-sport-related injuries, with over 1.7 million meniscal surgeries performed worldwide every year. As meniscal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT:
Meniscal injuries are common among both sport- and non-sport-related injuries, with over 1.7 million meniscal surgeries performed worldwide every year. As meniscal surgeries become more common, so does meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). However, little is known about the outcomes of MAT in active patients who desire to go back to preinjury activities.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate return to sport, clinical outcome, and complications after MAT in sport-active patients.
DATA SOURCES:
A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases was performed on February 25, 2018.
STUDY SELECTION:
Studies of level 1 through 4 evidence looking at MAT in physically active patients with reported return to activity outcomes and at least 2-year follow-up were included.
STUDY DESIGN:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
Level 4.
DATA EXTRACTION:
Details of sport-related outcomes and reoperations were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS:
Nine studies were included in this systematic review. A majority (77%) of athletes and physically active patients were able to return to sport after MAT; two-thirds were able to perform at preinjury levels. Graft-related reoperations were reported in 13% of patients, while the joint replacement rate with partial or total knee prosthesis was 1.2%.
CONCLUSION:
Physical activity after MAT appears possible, especially for low-impact sports. However, because of the limited number of studies, their low quality, and the short-term follow-up, the participation recommendation for high-impact and strenuous activities should be considered with caution until high-quality evidence of long-term safety becomes available.
Topics: Humans; Menisci, Tibial; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Return to Sport; Tibial Meniscus Injuries; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30638438
DOI: 10.1177/1941738118819723 -
The Libyan Journal of Medicine Dec 2022The meniscus is a relatively avascular fibrocartilaginous structure that provides a key role in shock absorption and load transmission. However, accurate diagnosis of...
The meniscus is a relatively avascular fibrocartilaginous structure that provides a key role in shock absorption and load transmission. However, accurate diagnosis of meniscal retear can present a clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the available literature, which compare the sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of different diagnostic modalities of diagnosing knee meniscal retears in patients who have undergone surgical meniscal repair, such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic Resonance Arthrography with intraarticular contrast (direct MRA), and a combination of MRI and direct MRA. Two authors independently searched two databases (PubMed and Scopus) for literature related to knee meniscus retear according to the PRISMA guidelines. Four studies were found, which resulted in 291 patients with 293 menisci. All studies were published in 2008 and 2014. In our analysis, we calculated sensitivity to be 78.79% (95% CI, 64.07-93.51), specificity to be 56.58% (95% CI, 20.21-92.94), and overall accuracy to be 66.25% (95% CI, 54.29-78.22) for MRI and sensitivity to be 87.84% (95% CI, 83.93-91.74), specificity to be 88.68% (95% CI, 81.93-95.43), and overall accuracy to be 87.22% (95% CI, 82.22-91.62) for direct MRA. We recommend the use of direct MRA for the diagnosis of meniscal retears due to its higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy as compared to MRI and its reduced cost and invasive nature as compared to second-look arthroscopy. However, our review is limited by the number of studies available on this topic. More studies using study designs such as randomized controlled trials, involving MRI, direct MRA, and combinations of such techniques, should be performed to accurately assess the different techniques and aid in designing guidelines to guide the diagnosis of meniscal retears following meniscal repair.
Topics: Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Menisci, Tibial; Meniscus; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tibial Meniscus Injuries
PubMed: 35048785
DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2022.2030024 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Feb 2021The anterior meniscofemoral ligament (aMFL) of Humphrey is an anatomically variable fibrous band of connective tissue that attaches between the lateral aspect of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The anterior meniscofemoral ligament (aMFL) of Humphrey is an anatomically variable fibrous band of connective tissue that attaches between the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle and posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, running posterior to the anterior cruciate ligament and anterior to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The presence of an intact aMFL may contribute to stabilization of the lateral compartment of the knee joint.
PURPOSE
The original magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arm of this study aimed to assess the aMFL incidence among Polish patients. The goal of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to review the literature discussing the clinical anatomy of the aMFL and provide data on its prevalence. It was hypothesized that significant heterogeneity exists within the published literature.
STUDY DESIGN
Cross-sectional study and systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
A retrospective investigation was performed on the MRI scans of 100 knees (52 right, 48 left) of Polish patients. Scans were randomly selected from a database of MRI examinations performed in 2019. For the meta-analysis, major online databases were queried for data on the aMFL, and 2 authors independently assessed and extracted data from all included studies. A quality assessment of the included articles was performed using the Anatomical Quality Assessment tool.
RESULTS
In the MRI arm of this study, the aMFL was found in 62 of the 100 lower limbs. The meta-analysis included 41 studies with a total of 4220 limbs. The aMFL was present in 55.5% (95% CI, 45.5%-65.3%) of cases. Arthroscopic studies yielded the highest prevalence (82.3% [95% CI, 36.6%-100.0%]); of MRI studies, the highest prevalence was at 3.0-T strength (51.0% [95% CI, 13.3%-88.2%]).
CONCLUSION
Significant variability in the prevalence of the aMFL was found in the literature. More emphasis should be placed on the clinical relevance of injuries to the aMFL because of its significant role in the function of the knee. It is important to be aware that, because of the anatomy of the aMFL, the ligament can also function to support a torn PCL.
PubMed: 33748296
DOI: 10.1177/2325967120973192