-
JMIR Dermatology Nov 2023Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that predominantly manifests as facial flushing, irritation, and acne. Rosacea and cancer are thought to be linked by... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that predominantly manifests as facial flushing, irritation, and acne. Rosacea and cancer are thought to be linked by the commonality of inflammatory and immune response dysfunction. Studies that have looked into this possible association have reported mixed results.
OBJECTIVE
Given the conflicting literature on this topic, our study sought to evaluate the overall association between rosacea and several cancers commonly investigated in the literature.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using the Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Ovid databases. Studies were screened independently for inclusion of rosacea and glioma and breast, thyroid, hepatic, or skin cancers. Using information from the articles, rosacea and each cancer were categorized as having a positive, negative, or unclear association.
RESULTS
Our systematic review included 39 full-text studies that investigated the association between rosacea and various malignancies. Among the malignancies of concern, 41% (16/39) of the studies reported an association with basal cell carcinoma, with 2 cohorts revealing an adjusted risk ratio (RR) of 1.50 (95% CI 1.35-1.67) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.93). In total, 33% (13/39) of the studies reported an association with squamous cell carcinoma, with 2 cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 1.4 (95% CI 1.02-1.93) and 1.30 (95% CI 0.90-1.88). A total of 8% (3/39) of the studies reported an association between breast cancer and melanoma, with breast cancer cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 8.453 (95% CI 1.638-43.606), 1.03 (95% CI 0.89-1.20), and 1.36 (95% CI 1.18-1.58) and melanoma cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 1.10 (95% CI 0.95-1.27), 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.85), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.57-1.62). A total of 5% (2/39) of the studies reported an association among nonmelanoma skin cancers, hepatic cancer, and thyroid carcinomas, with nonmelanoma skin cancer cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.47) and 2.66 (95% CI 1.53-4.61), hepatic cancer cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.06-1.90) and 1.32 (95% CI 0.89-1.95), and thyroid carcinoma cohorts revealing an adjusted RR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.68-1.65) and 1.59 (95% CI 1.07-2.36). Only 1 cohort reported an association with glioma, revealing an adjusted RR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.18-1.58). According to our review, patients with rosacea were statistically more likely to have nonmelanoma skin cancers, breast cancer, and glioma. Rosacea was not found to be substantially associated with melanoma. The associations between rosacea and hepatic and thyroid cancers were unclear because of conflicting results.
CONCLUSIONS
The current literature shows that rosacea is significantly associated with increased odds of nonmelanoma skin cancers, glioma, and breast cancer. Rosacea does not appear to be associated with melanoma. Further studies should be conducted to clarify the association between thyroid and hepatic cancers and rosacea.
PubMed: 37938876
DOI: 10.2196/47821 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2022The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies in Medline, Embase and Cochrane published until November 2020. Screening used prespecified eligibility criteria. Following a transitivity assessment across included studies, Bayesian NMA was conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 43 publications reporting 15 targeted therapy trials and 42 reporting 18 immunotherapy trials were retained from the SLR and considered for the NMA. Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity with immunotherapy trials, the analysis considered a network restricted to targeted therapies. Among combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib was superior to dabrafenib + trametinib for overall response rate (OR = 1.86; 95 % credible interval [CrI] 1.10, 3.17), superior to vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 0.51; 95 % CrI 0.29, 0.91) and fewer discontinuations due to AEs (OR = 0.45; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.96), and superior to atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer SAEs (OR = 0.41; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.82). Atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib and encorafenib + binimetinib were generally comparable for efficacy endpoints. Among double combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib showed high probabilities of being better for all efficacy and safety endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS
This NMA confirms that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies. Encorafenib + binimetinib has a favourable efficacy profile compared to other double combination therapies and a favourable safety profile compared to both double and triple combination therapies.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bayes Theorem; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Network Meta-Analysis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib
PubMed: 36099854
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102463 -
JCO Precision Oncology Aug 2022Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified into three classes according to molecular characteristics. Consensus treatment strategies for class 2 and 3 BRAF mutations have not yet been established.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with published reports of individual patients with cancer harboring class 2 or 3 BRAF mutations from 2010 to 2021, to assess treatment outcomes with US Food and Drug Administration-approved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy (MAPK TT) according to BRAF class, cancer type, and MAPK TT type. Coprimary outcomes were response rate and progression-free survival.
RESULTS
A total of 18,167 studies were screened, identifying 80 studies with 238 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 167 patients with class 2 and 71 patients with class 3 BRAF mutations. Overall, 77 patients achieved a treatment response. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, response rate and progression-free survival were higher among patients with class 2 compared with class 3 mutations, findings that remain when analyses are restricted to patients with melanoma or lung primary cancers. MEK ± BRAF inhibitors demonstrated greater clinical activity in class 2 compared with class 3 BRAF-mutant tumors than BRAF or EGFR inhibitors.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggests that MAPK TTs have clinical activity in some class 2 and 3 BRAF-mutant cancers. BRAF class may dictate responsiveness to current and emerging treatment strategies, particularly in melanoma and lung cancers. Together, this analysis provides clinical validation of predictions made on the basis of a mutation classification system established in the preclinical literature. Further evaluation with prospective clinical trials is needed for this population.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; United States
PubMed: 35977349
DOI: 10.1200/PO.22.00107 -
Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Sep 2022Malignant mucosal melanomas of the head and neck comprise a very small portion of all melanomas, particularly in the oral cavity. These lesions are associated with high...
OBJECTIVE
Malignant mucosal melanomas of the head and neck comprise a very small portion of all melanomas, particularly in the oral cavity. These lesions are associated with high rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and a very poor 5-year survival rate; however, the clinical outcomes of mucosal melanoma in situ of the oral cavity are unclear. Therefore, we present a case report of mucosal melanoma in situ and a systematic review of the literature to shed light on this rare but important disease.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were only considered for inclusion if they described oral cavity melanoma in situ and documented specific data pertaining to treatment including modality, lesion size, or outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 28 reported cases from the literature fulfilled the inclusion criteria, as well as one case from our own institution. Men comprised the majority (64.3%) of the cases, and the average age at presentation was 57.4 years. The hard palate was the most common location, and most cases were treated with surgical excision. Eight had no evidence of disease after a minimum of six months of follow-up, one reported spread to the cervical lymph nodes, and only one reported progression with distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION
Oral mucosal melanoma in situ is a rare entity and most commonly treated with surgical excision. High rates of recurrence necessitate long term follow-up. Further studies may be useful to determine whether adjuvant therapy may play a role in reducing recurrence.
PubMed: 36452242
DOI: 10.4274/tao.2022.2022-7-5 -
Medicine Jan 2018Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are recommended for patients with erectile dysfunction by American Urological Association and European Association Urology... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are recommended for patients with erectile dysfunction by American Urological Association and European Association Urology guidelines. However, recent researches have shown that PDE5 inhibitors may lead to increased melanoma risk. Thus, we aimed to explore whether PDE5 inhibitors are associated with increased melanoma risk based on published literatures.We conducted a systematic online search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biochemical Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical databases to identify the related studies. Odds ratios (ORs), risk ratios, and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and calculated to assess the strength of associations between PDE5 inhibitors and melanoma risk. We also extracted the basal cell carcinoma (BCC) to validate the association in this study.We included 5 studies containing 100,932 participants in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The calculated results suggested positive results of PDE5 inhibitors on melanoma risk (OR: 1.13; 95%CI: 1.04-1.23). For localized and nonlocalized melanoma, the results were different (OR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.04-1.43 for localized melanoma) (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.39-0.98 for nonlocalized melanoma). It also showed that PDE5 inhibitors were associated with increased BCC risk (OR: 1.18; 95%CI: 1.11-1.27).The association between PDE5 inhibitors and melanoma might not be causal due to potential bias (patient selection, and so on) and limitations.
Topics: Humans; Melanoma; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 29504984
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009601 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Jul 2012To estimate the burden of melanoma resulting from sunbed use in western Europe. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the burden of melanoma resulting from sunbed use in western Europe.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, ISI Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded), Embase, Pascal, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and MedCarib, along with published surveys reporting prevalence of sunbed use at national level in Europe.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies reporting a measure of risk for skin cancer (cutaneous melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma) associated with ever use of sunbeds.
RESULTS
Based on 27 studies ever use of sunbeds was associated with a summary relative risk of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.34). Publication bias was not evident. Restricting the analysis to cohorts and population based studies, the summary relative risk was 1.25 (1.09 to 1.43). Calculations for dose-response showed a 1.8% (95% confidence interval 0% to 3.8%) increase in risk of melanoma for each additional session of sunbed use per year. Based on 13 informative studies, first use of sunbeds before age 35 years was associated with a summary relative risk of 1.87 (1.41 to 2.48), with no indication of heterogeneity between studies. By using prevalence data from surveys and data from GLOBOCAN 2008, in 2008 in the 15 original member countries of the European Community plus three countries that were members of the European Free Trade Association, an estimated 3438 cases of melanoma could be attributable to sunbed use, most (n=2341) occurring among women.
CONCLUSIONS
Sunbed use is associated with a significant increase in risk of melanoma. This risk increases with number of sunbed sessions and with initial usage at a young age (<35 years). The cancerous damage associated with sunbed use is substantial and could be avoided by strict regulations.
Topics: Age Factors; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; Skin Neoplasms; Sunbathing; Ultraviolet Rays
PubMed: 22833605
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e4757 -
Cancers Sep 2020More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease.
METHODS
A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically.
RESULTS
After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.
PubMed: 32911759
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092557 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2024Standard non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatment involves surgery, recently combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy in cases of advanced tumors. EVs, including... (Review)
Review
Standard non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatment involves surgery, recently combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy in cases of advanced tumors. EVs, including exosomes, are integral to carcinogenesis, and are found in NMSC releasing mediators impacting tumor progression. Nevertheless, the precise intercellular signaling role of NMSC-derived EVs remains unclear. This review aims to elucidate their potential role in NMSC diagnosis and treatment. This systematic review encompassed literature searches in electronic databases from inception to September 2023, based on certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, addressing NMSC-derived EVs, their molecular cargo, and their implications in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of NMSC. Key components were identified. Extracellular vesicle (EV) proteins and RNA have emerged as diagnostic biomarkers in EV-based liquid biopsy. Circular RNA CYP24A1, known for its molecular stability, holds promise as a diagnostic biomarker. Long noncoding RNAs (lincRNA-PICSAR) and Desmoglein 2 (DSg2) are linked to drug resistance, serving as prognostic biomarkers. EV mediators are being actively investigated for their potential role as drug delivery agents. In conclusion, this systematic review showed that NMSC-derived EVs display promise as therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers. Further research is imperative to fully comprehend EV mechanisms and explore their potential in cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Topics: Humans; Extracellular Vesicles; Exosomes; Liquid Biopsy; Skin Neoplasms; Biomarkers
PubMed: 38473864
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052617 -
Acta Dermato-venereologica Nov 2015Transplant recipients have a raised risk of melanoma but the relative magnitude is uncertain. We undertook a systematic review by searching major databases for relevant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Transplant recipients have a raised risk of melanoma but the relative magnitude is uncertain. We undertook a systematic review by searching major databases for relevant publications to June 2014. Cohort studies quantifying the association between transplantation and melanoma were included and data were pooled using the weighted average method. Among 20 eligible studies the pooled relative risk (pRR) of melanoma was 2.71 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.23-3.30) with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001). There was no indication of publication bias. Sub-group analyses by study design, follow-up period, adjustment for confounding and quality score did not materially alter results. Among liver and heart transplant patients pRR for melanoma was 5.27 (95% CI 4.50-6.62), higher than the pRR of 2.54 (95% CI 2.18-2.96) among kidney transplant patients. Transplant recipients are at more than double the risk of melanoma overall compared with the general population.
Topics: Heart Transplantation; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Transplantation; Liver Transplantation; Melanoma; Risk Factors; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 26012553
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2148 -
Cancers Jul 2023Sarcoma may show similarities to malignant melanoma in terms of morphologic and immunohistochemical aspects, making it difficult to differentiate between these two... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Sarcoma may show similarities to malignant melanoma in terms of morphologic and immunohistochemical aspects, making it difficult to differentiate between these two neoplasms during the diagnostic process. This systematic review aims to summarize available evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as melanoma.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was conducted through March 2023. We included case series and case reports of sarcoma patients that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
Twenty-three case reports and four case series with a total of 34 patients were included. The clinical presentation was heterogeneous, and the most involved anatomical regions were lower limbs (24%), head/neck (24%), and upper limbs (21%). IHC positivity was reported for S100 (69%), HMB45 (63%), MelanA (31%), and MiTF (3%). The main reasons for a second assessment were unusual presentation (48%) and uncertain diagnosis (28%). EWSR1 translocation was investigated in 17/34 patients (50%) and found to be positive in 16/17 (94%). The final diagnosis was clear cell sarcoma (50%) or other soft tissue sarcomas (50%).
CONCLUSIONS
Melanoma and some histotypes of sarcoma share many similarities. In cases of atypical lesions, a second diagnosis should be considered, and ESWR1 translocation should be investigated.
PubMed: 37509250
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143584