-
The Journal of International Medical... Dec 2013A substantial percentage (8%) of all newly diagnosed cancer cases are in patients with previous tumours, with a similar trend in lung cancer. Cases of multiple primary... (Review)
Review
A substantial percentage (8%) of all newly diagnosed cancer cases are in patients with previous tumours, with a similar trend in lung cancer. Cases of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) are increasing worldwide, due to improved diagnostic and surveillance mechanisms and the ageing population. Diagnosis of MPLC is complicated by difficulties in distinguishing it from lung cancer metastasis. Clinicopathological assessment, diagnosis and management have evolved, but remain severely limited by the lack of robust and dependable molecular markers for the differential diagnosis of metastasis and MPLC. This systematic review evaluates diagnostic criteria for MPLC, and the subsequent management and success rates. The incorporation of molecular biology techniques into the diagnostic process for MPLC is also discussed.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); ras Proteins
PubMed: 24265329
DOI: 10.1177/0300060513504707 -
Modern Pathology : An Official Journal... Oct 2022Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) have overlapping histopathological appearances and sites of occurrence, which may cause diagnostic...
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) have overlapping histopathological appearances and sites of occurrence, which may cause diagnostic difficulty impacting subsequent treatment. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to determine whether molecular alterations were sufficiently different in MEC and ASC to aid in classifying the two entities. We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science for studies reporting molecular determinations of ASC and/or MEC and screened retrieved records for eligibility. Two independent researchers reviewed included studies, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Of 8623 identified records, 128 articles were included for analysis: 5 which compared the two tumors in the same investigation using the same methods and 123 which examined the tumors separately. All articles, except one were case series of moderate to poor methodological quality. The 5 publications examining both tumors showed that 52/88 (59%) MEC and 0% of 110 ASC had rearrangement of the MAML2 gene as detected by FISH and/or RT-PCR, but did not investigate other genes. In the entire series MEC had MAML2 gene rearrangement in 1337/2009 (66.6%) of tumors studied. The articles examining tumors separately found that MEC had mutations in EGFR (11/329 cases, 3.3%), KRAS (11/266, 4.1%) and ERBB2 (9/126, 7.1%) compared with ASC that had mutations in EGFR (660/1705, 38.7%), KRAS (143/625, 22.9%) and ERBB2 (6/196, 3.1%). The highest level of recurrent mutations was in pancreatic ASC where (108/126, 85.7%) reported mutations in KRAS. The EGFR mutations in ASC were similar in number and kind to those in lung adenocarcinoma. By standards of systematic review methodology and despite the large number of retrieved studies, we did not find adequate evidence for a distinctive molecular profile of either MEC or ASC that could definitively aid in its classification, especially in histologically difficult cases that are negative for MAML2 rearrangement. The case series included in this review indicate the relevance of MAML2 rearrangement to support the diagnosis of MEC, findings that should be confirmed by additional research with adequate study design.
Topics: Carcinoma, Adenosquamous; Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid; DNA-Binding Proteins; ErbB Receptors; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Nuclear Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Trans-Activators; Transcription Factors
PubMed: 35871081
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01100-z -
The Oncologist Oct 2023HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
Five high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates.
CONCLUSIONS
While this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Colorectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; ErbB Receptors; Panitumumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37463037
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad200 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Jul 2017Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis that increases mortality. The most common causes of AKI in these patients are prerenal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis that increases mortality. The most common causes of AKI in these patients are prerenal azotemia, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and hepatorenal syndrome; it is important to determine the etiology of AKI to select the proper treatment and predict patient outcome. Urine biomarkers could be used to differentiate between patients with ATN and functional causes of AKI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to determine whether urine levels of interleukin (IL)18 and lipocalin 2 or neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) are associated with the development of ATN in patients with cirrhosis.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and conference abstracts through December 31, 2015, for studies that assessed urine biomarkers for detection of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis or reported an association between urine biomarkers and all-cause mortality in these patients. We included only biomarkers assessed in 3 or more independent studies, searching for terms that included urine biomarkers, cirrhosis, NGAL, and IL18. We calculated the pooled sensitivities and specificities for detection and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values using a bivariate logistic mixed-effects model. We used the χ test to assess heterogeneity among studies.
RESULTS
We analyzed data from 8 prospective studies, comprising 1129 patients with cirrhosis. We found urine levels of the markers discriminated between patients with ATN and other types of kidney impairments, with AUC values of 0.88 for IL18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.97) and 0.89 for NGAL (95% CI, 0.84-0.94). Urine levels of IL18 identified patients who would die in the hospital or within 90 days (short-term mortality) with an AUC value of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68-0.85); NGAL identified these patients with the same AUC (0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82).
CONCLUSIONS
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that urine levels of IL18 and NGAL from patients with cirrhosis discriminate between those with ATN and other types of kidney impairments, with AUC values of 0.88 and 0.89, respectively. Urine levels of IL18 and NGAL identified patients with short-term mortality with an AUC value of 0.76. These biomarkers might be used to determine prognosis and select treatments for patients with cirrhosis.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Interleukin-18; Kidney Tubular Necrosis, Acute; Lipocalin-2; Liver Cirrhosis
PubMed: 28013112
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.035 -
British Journal of Haematology Aug 2015'Double-hit lymphomas' (DHL), defined by concurrent MYC and BCL2 (or, alternatively, BCL6) rearrangements, have a very poor outcome compared to standard-risk, diffuse... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Front-line, dose-escalated immunochemotherapy is associated with a significant progression-free survival advantage in patients with double-hit lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
'Double-hit lymphomas' (DHL), defined by concurrent MYC and BCL2 (or, alternatively, BCL6) rearrangements, have a very poor outcome compared to standard-risk, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Consequently, dose-intensive (DI) therapies and/or consolidation with high-dose therapy and transplant have been explored in DHL, although benefit has been debated. This meta-analysis compared survival outcomes in DHL patients receiving dose-escalated regimens [DI: R-Hyper-CVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) or R-CODOX-M/IVAC (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, high dose cytarabine); or intermediate-dose: R-EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)] versus standard-dose regimens (R-CHOP; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in the first-line setting. Data were synthesized to estimate hazard ratios of dose-escalated treatments versus R-CHOP using a Weibull proportional hazards model within a Bayesian meta-analysis framework. Eleven studies examining 394 patients were included. Patients were treated with either front-line R-CHOP (n = 180), R-EPOCH (n = 91), or R-Hyper-CVAD/rituximab, methotrexate, cytarabine (R-M/C), R-CODOX-M/R-IVAC (DI) (n = 123). Our meta-analysis revealed that median progression-free survival (n = 350) for the R-CHOP, R-EPOCH and DI groups was 12·1, 22·2, and 18·9 months, respectively. First-line treatment with R-EPOCH significantly reduced the risk of a progression compared with R-CHOP (relative risk reduction of 34%; P = 0·032); however, overall survival (n = 374) was not significantly different across treatment approaches. A subset of patients might benefit from intensive induction with/without transplant. Further investigation into the role of transplant and novel therapy combinations is necessary.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; DNA-Binding Proteins; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Survival Rate
PubMed: 25907897
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13463 -
Journal of Diabetes and Its... 2014The aim of this study was to perform a systematic meta-analysis of biomarkers investigated with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the vitreous, and to explore the molecular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic meta-analysis of biomarkers investigated with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the vitreous, and to explore the molecular pathway interactions of these markers found to be consistently associated with DR. Relevant databases [PubMed and ISI web of science] were searched for all published articles investigating molecular biomarkers of the vitreous associated with DR. Based on set exclusion/inclusion criteria available data from studies with human vitreous samples were extracted and used for our meta-analysis. The interactions of significant biomarkers in DR were investigated via STRING and KEGG pathway analysis. Our meta-analysis of DR identifies eleven biomarkers as potential therapeutic candidates alternate to current anti-VEGF therapy. Four of these are deemed viable therapeutic targets for PDR; ET receptors (ET A and ET B), anti-PDGF-BB, blocking TGF-β using cell therapy and PEDF. The identification of supplementary or synergistic therapeutic candidates to anti VEGF in the treatment of DR may aid in the development of future treatment trials.
Topics: Becaplermin; Biomarkers; Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis; Receptor, Endothelin A; Receptor, Endothelin B; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Vitreous Body
PubMed: 24630762
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.09.010 -
Health Technology Assessment... 2011Breast cancer is the uncontrolled, abnormal growth of malignant breast tissue affecting predominantly women. Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is an advanced stage of the... (Review)
Review
Lapatinib and trastuzumab in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer which over-expresses human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2): a systematic review and economic analysis.
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the uncontrolled, abnormal growth of malignant breast tissue affecting predominantly women. Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is an advanced stage of the disease when the disease has spread beyond the original organ. Hormone receptor status and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status are two predictive factors that are taken into consideration when estimating the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES
To review the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence base for lapatinib (LAP) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and trastuzumab (TRA) in combination with an AI for the first-line treatment of patients who have hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) mBC.
DATA SOURCES
Relevant electronic databases and websites, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, were searched until May 2010. Further data were derived from the manufacturers' submissions for LAP + AI and TRA + AI.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LAP + AI and TRA + AI was undertaken. As it was deemed inappropriate to compare LAP + AI with TRA + AI, two separate assessments of cost-effectiveness versus AIs alone were undertaken.
RESULTS
Three trials were included in the systematic review [the patient populations of the efficacy and safety of lapatinib combined with letrozole (EGF30008) trial, the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with anastrozole (TAnDEM) trial and the efficacy and safety of letrozole combined with trastuzumab (eLEcTRA) trial]. As a result of differences in the exclusion criteria and because one trial was halted prematurely, comparisons across trials were believed to be inappropriate and meta-analysis was not possible. Individually, however, the findings from the trials all suggest that LAP + AI or TRA + AI results in improved progression-free survival and/or time to progression when compared with AIs alone. The trials do not show a statistically significant benefit in terms of overall survival. Two separate economic analyses were conducted based on the completed trials; neither LAP + AI nor TRA + AI was found to be cost-effective when compared with AI monotherapy.
LIMITATIONS
Because of differences in the EGF30008 and the TAnDEM trials, the Assessment Group believes the indirect comparisons analyses conducted by the manufacturers are inappropriate and, for the same reason, chooses not to compare LAP + AI with TRA + AI in an economic evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS
LAP + AI and TRA + AI appear to be clinically more effective than AI monotherapy, but neither is cost-effective compared with AIs alone. It was not possible to compare LAP + AI with TRA + AI. Future research should include research into treating mBC in the HR+/HER2+ population who are not TRA (or LAP) naive and into comparing the clinical effectiveness of AIs as monotherapy in patients with HER2+ and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Anastrozole; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lapatinib; Letrozole; Nitriles; Quinazolines; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab; Triazoles
PubMed: 22152751
DOI: 10.3310/hta15420 -
BMJ Open Mar 2017The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib have complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic antitumour actively in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib have complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic antitumour actively in models of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the efficacy of trastuzumab in combination with lapatinib remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare combination treatment with lapatinib and trastuzumab to trastuzumab or lapatinib alone in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, were systematically reviewed to assess the survival benefits and toxicity profile of HER2-positive patients with breast cancer who were treated with lapatinib and trastuzumab. Outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results were expressed as the risk ratio (RR) or HR with 95% CIs. Pooled estimates were calculated by using a fixed-effects model or a randomised-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 7 RCTs involving 2084 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab significantly improved pCR (RR=1.43, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.67; p<0.001), EFS (HR=0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.93; p=0.009) and OS (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.93; p=0.011) in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer compared with trastuzumab or lapatinib alone. The combination treatment also increased the pCR irrespective of hormone receptor status and tumour size. More frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including diarrhoea, rash or erythema, neutropenia and hepatic adverse events, were found in the combination group than in the trastuzumab or lapatinib group.
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of the current evidence, our results reveal that the addition of lapatinib to trastuzumab can significantly improve pCR, EFS and OS with a tolerated toxicity in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Further well-conducted, large-scale trials are needed to validate these findings.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lapatinib; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Quinazolines; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 28289045
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013053 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Jul 2014To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on systemic therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)... (Review)
Review
Systemic therapy for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.
PURPOSE
To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on systemic therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.
METHODS
The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic literature review from January 2009 to October 2012. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 16 trials met the systematic review criteria. The CLEOPATRA trial found survival and PFS benefits for docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in first-line treatment, and the EMILIA trial found survival and PFS benefits for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line treatment. T-DM1 also showed a third-line PFS benefit. One trial reported on duration of HER2-targeted therapy, and three others reported on endocrine therapy for patients with HER-positive advanced breast cancer.
RECOMMENDATIONS
HER2-targeted therapy is recommended for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, except for those with clinical congestive heart failure or significantly compromised left ventricular ejection fraction, who should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and taxane for first-line treatment and T-DM1 for second-line treatment are recommended. In the third-line setting, clinicians should offer other HER2-targeted therapy combinations or T-DM1 (if not previously administered) and may offer pertuzumab, if the patient has not previously received it. Optimal duration of chemotherapy is at least 4 to 6 months or until maximum response, depending on toxicity and in the absence of progression. HER2-targeted therapy can continue until time of progression or unacceptable toxicities. For patients with HER2-positive and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer, clinicians may recommend either standard first-line therapy or, for selected patients, endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy or endocrine therapy alone.
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Anastrozole; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Docetaxel; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Health Status Disparities; Healthcare Disparities; Humans; Lapatinib; Letrozole; Maytansine; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nitriles; Quinazolines; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Societies, Medical; Taxoids; Trastuzumab; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; United States
PubMed: 24799465
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0948 -
Acta Histochemica Jan 2023Epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) is a cell surface protein composed of approximately 160 amino acids and encoded by the growth arrest-specific 3 (GAS3)/peripheral... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) is a cell surface protein composed of approximately 160 amino acids and encoded by the growth arrest-specific 3 (GAS3)/peripheral myelin protein 22 kDa (PMP22) gene family. Although EMP2 expression has been investigated in several diseases, much remains unknown regarding its mechanism of action and the extent of its role in pathogenesis. Our aim was to perform a systematic review on the involvement of EMP2 in disease processes and the current usage of anti-EMP2 therapies.
METHODS
A Boolean search of the English-language medical literature was performed. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science were used to identify relevant citations. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
52 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Of those, 28 (53.8%) were human-only studies, 11 (21.2%) were animal-only studies, and 13 (25%) studies included both human and animal models. Furthermore, 34 (65.4%) studies focused on EMP2's role in neoplasms, while the remaining 18 (34.6%) articles evaluated its role in other pathologies.
CONCLUSION
Overall, the evidence suggests the mechanisms of action of EMP2 are context dependent. Promising results have been produced by utilizing EMP2 as a biomarker and therapeutic target. More studies are warranted to better understand the mechanism and comprehend the role of EMP2 in the pathogenesis of diseases.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Proteins
PubMed: 36455339
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2022.151976