-
Acta Odontologica Latinoamericana : AOL Apr 2023Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent complication in cancer patients who are undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy. It manifests as an inflammation of the oral mucosa,...
UNLABELLED
Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent complication in cancer patients who are undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy. It manifests as an inflammation of the oral mucosa, sometimes provoking severe consequences such as eating limitations, difficulty in speaking, and possibly superinfection.
AIM
The aim of this review was to update the evidence published during the last five years on the treatment of oral mucositis induced by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in patients with cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
A search was conducted in Pubmed, Scielo and Scopus, using the search terms mucositis, stomatitis, therapy, treatment, oral cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer and head and neck carcinoma, with Mesh terms and free terms, from 2017 to January 2023. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total 287 articles were retrieved, of which 86 were selected by title and abstract, and 18 were included after full-text analysis. The most frequently assessed variables were OM severity, pain intensity and healing time. Treatment types were diverse, and included drugs, mouthwashes, medicines based on plant extracts, cryotherapy and low-intensity laser therapies.
CONCLUSION
Dentoxol mouthwashes, Plantago major extract, thyme honey extract, zinc oxide paste, vitamin B complex combined with GeneTime, and the consumption of L-glutamine are effective in diminishing the severity of OM. Pain intensity was lower with doxepin mouthwashes and diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwashes.
Topics: Humans; Mucositis; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 37314054
DOI: 10.54589/aol.36/1/3 -
The International Journal of Oral &... 2014To test whether or not immediate loading of single-implant crowns renders different results from early and conventional loading with respect to implant survival,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To test whether or not immediate loading of single-implant crowns renders different results from early and conventional loading with respect to implant survival, marginal bone loss, stability of peri-implant soft tissue, esthetics, and patient satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search of Medline and Embase databases including studies published prior to August 1, 2012, was performed and complemented by a manual search. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different loading protocols of single-implant crowns with a follow-up after restoration of at least 1 year were included. A meta-analysis yielded odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
RESULTS
The search provided 10 RCTs comparing immediate and conventional loading and 1 RCT comparing immediate and early loading. When assessing the implant survival at 1 year of loading, the meta-analysis of 10 studies found no significant differences between immediate and conventional loading (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.76). The total difference of marginal bone loss during the first year of function between immediate and conventional loading protocols in 7 RCTs did not reach statistical significance (SMD = -0.05 mm; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.31 mm). There were no significant differences between immediate and conventional loading regarding implant survival and marginal bone loss at 2, 3, and 5 years of loading. Three RCTs comparing the change of papilla level between immediate and conventional loading identified no significant differences. One study investigated the recession of the buccal mucosa after implant placement and found significantly inferior soft tissue loss for immediate loading as compared to conventional loading. Two RCTs investigated the recession of the buccal mucosa after insertion of the definitive crown and found no differences between immediate and conventional loading. The esthetics and the patient satisfaction were assessed in one and two RCTs, respectively. There were no significant differences between immediate and conventional loading.
CONCLUSIONS
Immediately and conventionally loaded single-implant crowns are equally successful regarding implant survival and marginal bone loss. This conclusion is primarily derived from studies evaluating implants inserted with a torque ≥ 20 to 45 Ncm or an implant stability quotient (ISQ) ≥ 60 to 65 and with no need for simultaneous bone augmentation. Immediately and conventionally loaded implants do not appear to differently affect the papilla height during the first year of loading. Due to the heterogeneity of the time point of baseline measurements and contradictory findings in the studies, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions regarding the recession of the buccal mucosa. With respect to the assessment of esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction, the data available remain inconclusive.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Alveolar Bone Loss; Bone Density; Crowns; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants, Single-Tooth; Dental Restoration Failure; Gingival Recession; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Mandible; Maxilla; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Torque
PubMed: 24660200
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.1 -
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and... Oct 2022This systematic review purposed to investigate reports of oral lesions in confirmed COVID-19 patients summarizing clinical characteristics, histological findings,...
This systematic review purposed to investigate reports of oral lesions in confirmed COVID-19 patients summarizing clinical characteristics, histological findings, treatment and correlation of oral lesions and COVID-19 severity. Electronic search was conducted on November 2021 using seven databases to identify case reports/series describing lesions in oral mucosa in COVID-19 confirmed cases. A total of 5,179 studies were found, being 39 eligible from 19 countries, totalling 116 cases. It was observed only COVID-19 non-vaccinated cases and no sex or age predilection. The oral lesions presentation was mostly single location (69.8%), commonly in the tongue, lips, and palate, being ulcer the main clinical presentation. According to severity index for COVID-19, the reports were more frequent in patients with mild and moderate symptoms, being 75.8% in acute phase. The oral lesion appearance in post-acute COVID-19 were described after 14 to two months after patient recovery. Histologically, keratinocytes with perinuclear vacuolization, thrombosis and mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate were also described with the presence of the virus in keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and minor salivary glands. In conclusion, health care professionals should consider COVID-19 association when patient present ulcerated oral lesions and mild to moderate symptoms for COVID-19 or had acute-COVID-19.
Topics: COVID-19; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Mouth Mucosa
PubMed: 35550190
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.05.005 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Aug 2020The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) with other commonly utilized treatment modalities for root... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) with other commonly utilized treatment modalities for root coverage procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the performance of PRF with that of other modalities in the treatment of Miller class I or II (Cairo RT I) gingival recessions. Studies were classified into 5 categories as follows: (1) coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone vs CAF/PRF, (2) CAF/connective tissue graft (CAF/CTG) vs CAF/PRF, (3) CAF/enamel matrix derivative (CAF/EMD) vs CAF/PRF, (4) CAF/amnion membrane (CAF/AM) vs CAF/PRF, and (5) CAF/CTG vs CAF/CTG/PRF. Studies were evaluated for percentage of relative root coverage (rRC; primary outcome), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and probing depth (PD) (secondary outcomes).
RESULTS
From 976 articles identified, 17 RCTs were included. The use of PRF statistically significantly increased rRC and CAL compared with CAF alone. No change in KMW or reduction in PD was reported. Compared with PRF, CTG resulted in statistically significantly better KMW and RC. No statistically significant differences were reported between the CAF/PRF and CAF/EMD groups or between the CAF/PRF and CAF/AM groups for any of the investigated parameters.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of CAF/PRF improved rRC and CAL compared with the use of CAF alone. While similar outcomes were observed between CAF/PRF and CAF/CTG for CAL and PD change, the latter group led to statistically significantly better outcomes in terms of rRC and KTW. In summary, the use of PRF in conjunction with CAF may represent a valid treatment modality for gingival recessions exhibiting adequate baseline KMW.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The data indicate that the use of PRF in conjunction with CAF statistically significantly improves rRC when compared with CAF alone but did not improve KMW. Therefore, in cases with limited baseline KMW, the use of CTG may be preferred over PRF.
Topics: Connective Tissue; Gingiva; Gingival Recession; Humans; Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Surgical Flaps; Tooth Root; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32591868
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03400-7 -
Archives of Oral Biology Nov 2022The purpose was to describe whether there are field cancerization (FC) indicators in clinically normal mucosa opposite to primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose was to describe whether there are field cancerization (FC) indicators in clinically normal mucosa opposite to primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
METHODS
A search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Livivo databases was performed on June 12, 2022, which retrieved 152 records without duplicates. Studies that analyzed FC in biopsies in clinically normal tissue opposite to primary OSCC were included. The search was conducted under the PRISMA guideline and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017077125).
RESULTS
Eight articles with 302 patients were included, 192 men and 110 women, mean age 57.1 years. Most patients had deleterious habits. All studies performed histopathological confirmation of OSCC and biopsies were obtained the clinically normal mirror mucosa. The meta-analysis carried out with eight studies. The studies showed 57.3 % of cases with histopathological changes of clinically normal mucosa opposite to primary OSCC (Confidence interval 95 %, 0.443-0.703; heterogeneity: Q value 18.715; I 73.284 %; n = 205). p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical analysis may be predictive for detecting changes. There was p53 immunoexpression in 41.3 % of cases (p = 0.872) (n = 55), ki-67 immunoexpression (< 20 %) in 68 % (p = 0.001) (n = 97) and ki-67 immunoexpression (> 20 %) in 28.4 % of cases (p = 0.000) (n = 110).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that FC can occur, and there are histopathological changes in clinically normal tissue opposite to primary OSCC. Nevertheless, the review showed that more longitudinal studies on FC are needed to draw a conclusive indication of the occurrence of FC in oral tissues opposite to OSCC.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Ki-67 Antigen; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth Mucosa; Mouth Neoplasms; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 36126567
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2022.105544 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Mar 2023: Gaucher disease (GD) is a lysosomal storage disorder with the genetic autosomal recessive transmission. Bone involvement is a prevalent finding in Gaucher disease. It... (Review)
Review
: Gaucher disease (GD) is a lysosomal storage disorder with the genetic autosomal recessive transmission. Bone involvement is a prevalent finding in Gaucher disease. It causes deformity and limits daily activities and the quality of life. In 75% of patients, there is bone involvement. This review aims to evaluate the principal findings in the jaw by a Cone-beam computed tomography (CBTC) and X-ray orthopantomography; : PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs and Scopus were systematically searched until 31 December 2022. In addition, a manual search was performed using the bibliography of selected articles and a Google Scholar search. Clinical studies were selected that considered principal radiographic findings in radiography in a group of patients affected by GD. : Out of 5079 papers, four studies were included. The main findings are generalized rarefaction and enlarged narrow space, anodontia. : The exact mechanism of bone manifestation is probably due to the infiltration of Gaucher cells in the bone marrow and, consequently, the destruction of bone architecture. All long bones are a potential means of skeletal manifestation. The jaw is more affected than the maxilla, and the principal features are cortical thinning, osteosclerosis, pseudocystic lesions, mental demineralization, flattening in the head of the condyle, effacement of anatomical structures, thickening of maxillary sinus mucosa. The dentist plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating these patients. Sometimes the diagnosis can be made by a simple panoramic radiograph. All long bones are affected, and the mandible is particularly involved.
Topics: Humans; Gaucher Disease; Quality of Life; Radiography; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Bone Marrow
PubMed: 37109627
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040670 -
Medicine Dec 2021SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) disease, which has been shown to trigger multiple affectations. One of the first tissue areas...
BACKGROUND
SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) disease, which has been shown to trigger multiple affectations. One of the first tissue areas to come into contact with the virus is the oral cavity, which develops various alterations. Hence, the objective of this systematic review was to identify the main signs and symptoms of this disease in the oral cavity, and the following research question was established: What are the main oral signs and symptoms in COVID-19-positive persons?
METHODS
The electronic databases of PUBMED, SCOPUS, and SCIENCE DIRECT were analyzed, the keywords "ORAL DISEASES," "ORAL MANIFESTACTIONS," and "COVID-19" were used taking into account the following inclusion criteria: studies whose main objective was oral manifestations secondary to the confirmation of COVID-19, plus clinical cases, case series, and retrospective or prospective studies. For the assessment of the risk of bias the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series tool was used.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies were included, the most common initial signs/symptoms after contagion of SARS-CoV-2 were dysgeusia, dry mouth, and burning mouth, and the main signs/symptoms were the presence of ulcerative lesions, dysgeusia, and Candida albicans infections.
CONCLUSIONS
It is very important to detect any alteration in the mucosa in patients with COVID-19 and to provide assertive treatment to avoid complications, and try to maintain adequate oral hygiene throughout the course of the disease to avoid the colonization of opportunistic microorganisms and to avoid complications both orally and systemically.
Topics: COVID-19; Candidiasis, Oral; Dysgeusia; Humans; Mouth; Mouth Diseases; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34941133
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028327 -
European Urology Open Science Apr 2023Oral mucosa graft (OMG) and penile skin flap (PSF) are common substitutions in urethroplasty; however, the recommended substitution for anterior urethral strictures... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Oral mucosa graft (OMG) and penile skin flap (PSF) are common substitutions in urethroplasty; however, the recommended substitution for anterior urethral strictures remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of OMG and PSF in anterior urethral strictures in terms of success rate and prevalence of postvoid dribbling based on current studies.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022313879). All publications until March 1, 2022, were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases without any restriction. Studies that focused on patients with anterior urethral strictures undergoing single-stage augmentation urethroplasty with OMG and PSF, and reported comparable success rates between the two substitutions were included.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Thirteen studies involving a total of 1216 patients were included in the screening procedures, and 12 studies were eventually included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference in success rates was identified between OMG and PSF (odds ratio [OR]: 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-2.07, = 0.08). No significant difference was observed in the comparison of success rates in penile urethral strictures (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.53-1.70, = 0.86) and in the comparison of postvoid dribbling (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.31-1.11, = 0.10). However, a subgroup analysis suggested that OMG had a higher success rate than PSF in studies with the top 50% sample size (six studies, OR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.055-2.668, = 0.029) and the top 50% follow-up period (five studies, OR: 2.279, 95% CI: 1.193-4.352, = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS
OMG provides the same success rate and postvoid dribbling as PSF. However, based on the existing evidence, OMG is more likely to perform better in a cohort with long-term follow-up and a relatively large sample size. More studies on the two substitutions are necessary to evaluate the factors of urethroplasty success rate, performance of substitutions in penile urethral strictures, and indicators of quality of life.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this research, we compared the outcomes of oral mucosa graft (OMG) and penile skin flap for urethroplasty in anterior urethral stricture patients in 13 studies. We found that these were similar in terms of success rate and postvoid dribbling. However, OMG could probably provide a higher success rate when the studies had more patients or a longer follow-up period.
PubMed: 36942323
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.010 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... May 2022Oral mucositis is one of the most common side effects in cancer patients receiving systemic antineoplastics. However, the underlying biological mechanisms leading to...
BACKGROUND
Oral mucositis is one of the most common side effects in cancer patients receiving systemic antineoplastics. However, the underlying biological mechanisms leading to this condition are still unclear. For this reason, it has been hypothesised that systemic antineoplastics may cause an imbalance on the oral microbiota that subsequently triggers oral mucosa damage.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA protocol and the PICO question established was: patients diagnosed with cancer, who are candidates for receiving systemic antineoplastics (P=Patients), that undergo oral microbiome determinations (I=Intervention), before and after systemic antineoplastics administration (C=Comparison), to analyse changes in the oral microbiome composition (O=Outcome). The bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed and other scientific repositories.
RESULTS
Out of 166 obtained articles, only 5 met eligibility criteria. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was the most frequent type of cancer (40 %) among the participants. Only one of the studies included a control group of healthy subjects. Heterogeneity in the protocols and approaches of the included studies hindered a detailed comparison of the outcomes. However, it was stated that a decrease in bacteria α diversity is often associated with oral mucositis. On the other hand, fungal diversity was not associated with oral mucositis although α diversity was lower at baseline on patients developing oral candidiasis.
CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient scientific evidence of oral microbiological changes in patients undergoing systemic antineoplastics. Further investigations ought to be carried out to identify microorganisms that might play a key role in the pathogenesis of oral mucosa damage in patients undergoing systemic antineoplastics.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Candidiasis, Oral; Humans; Microbiota; Neoplasms; Stomatitis
PubMed: 35368011
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25121 -
Cancers Jul 2022The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted discrimination of oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa based on mucosal images was evaluated. Two authors... (Review)
Review
Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Discrimination of Oral Cancerous Lesions from Normal Mucosa Based on the Oral Mucosal Image: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted discrimination of oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa based on mucosal images was evaluated. Two authors independently reviewed the database until June 2022. Oral mucosal disorder, as recorded by photographic images, autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), was compared with the reference results by histology findings. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative data were extracted. Seven studies were included for discriminating oral cancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of AI-assisted screening was 121.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.60; 500.05). Twelve studies were included for discriminating all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. The DOR of screening was 63.02 (95% CI, 40.32; 98.49). Subgroup analysis showed that OCT was more diagnostically accurate (324.33 vs. 66.81 and 27.63) and more negatively predictive (0.94 vs. 0.93 and 0.84) than photographic images and autofluorescence on the screening for all oral precancerous lesions from normal mucosa. Automated detection of oral cancerous lesions by AI would be a rapid, non-invasive diagnostic tool that could provide immediate results on the diagnostic work-up of oral cancer. This method has the potential to be used as a clinical tool for the early diagnosis of pathological lesions.
PubMed: 35884560
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143499