-
Clinical Oral Investigations Oct 2021This systematic review assesses dental implant survival, calculates the incidence rate of osteoradionecrosis, and evaluates risk factors in irradiated head and neck... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review assesses dental implant survival, calculates the incidence rate of osteoradionecrosis, and evaluates risk factors in irradiated head and neck cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Various databases (e.g., Medline/Embase using Ovid) and gray literature platforms were searched using a combination of keywords and subject headings. When appropriate, meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Otherwise, pooled analysis was applied.
RESULTS
A total of 425 of the 660 included patients received radiotherapy. In total, 2602 dental implants were placed, and 1637 were placed in irradiated patients. Implant survival after an average follow-up of 37.7 months was 97% (5% confidence interval, CI 95.2%, 95% CI 98.3%) in nonirradiated patients and 91.9% (5% CI 87.7%, 95% CI: 95.3%) after an average follow-up of 39.8 months in irradiated patients. Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 11 cases, leading to an incidence of 3% (5% CI 1.6%, 95% CI 4.9%). The main factors impacting implant survival were radiation and grafting status, while factors influencing osteoradionecrosis could not be determined using meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Our data show that implant survival in irradiated patients is lower than in nonirradiated patients, and osteoradionecrosis is-while rare-a serious complication that any OMF surgeon should be prepared for. The key to success could be a standardized patient selection and therapy to improve the standard of care, reduce risks and shorten treatment time.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Our analysis provides further evidence that implant placement is a feasible treatment option in irradiated head and neck cancer patients with diminished oral function and good long-term cancer prognosis.
Topics: Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Dental Implants; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Osteoradionecrosis
PubMed: 34401944
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04065-6 -
Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie : Organ... Mar 2022To seek evidence for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) after dental extractions before or after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To seek evidence for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) after dental extractions before or after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC).
METHODS
Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 until 2020. Articles on HNC patients treated with IMRT and dental extractions were analyzed by two independent reviewers. The risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios (OR) for ORN related to extractions were calculated using Fisher's exact test. A one-sample proportion test was used to assess the proportion of pre- versus post-IMRT extractions. Forest plots were used for the pooled RR and OR using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Seven of 630 publications with 875 patients were eligible. A total of 437 (49.9%) patients were treated with extractions before and 92 (10.5%) after IMRT. 28 (3.2%) suffered from ORN after IMRT. ORN was associated with extractions in 15 (53.6%) patients, eight related to extractions prior to and seven cases related to extractions after IMRT. The risk and odds for ORN favored pre-IMRT extractions (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.74, p = 0.031, I = 0%, OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.99, p = 0.049, I = 0%). However, the prediction interval of the expected range of 95% of true effects included 1 for RR and OR.
CONCLUSION
Tooth extraction before IMRT is more common than after IMRT, but dental extractions before compared to extractions after IMRT have not been proven to reduce the incidence of ORN. Extractions of teeth before IMRT have to be balanced with any potential delay in initiating cancer therapy.
Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Osteoradionecrosis; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Tooth Extraction
PubMed: 35029717
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01896-w -
Scientific Reports May 2024Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of total free flap failure following free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (mORN) and assess the impact... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of total free flap failure following free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (mORN) and assess the impact of potential moderators on this outcome. A comprehensive systematic literature search was independently conducted by two reviewers using the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed, and prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outlier and influential analyses were conducted, and meta-regression analyses was employed to investigate the effects of continuous variables on the estimated prevalence. Ultimately, forty-six eligible studies (involving 1292 participants and 1344 free flaps) were included in our meta-analysis. The findings of our study revealed a prevalence of 3.1% (95% CI 1.3-5.4%) for total free flap failure after reconstruction for mORN. No study was identified as critically influential, and meta-regression analysis did not pinpoint any potential sources of heterogeneity. These findings provide valuable insights for researchers and serve as a foundation for future investigations into the management of mandibular osteoradionecrosis and the prevention of free flap failure in this context.
Topics: Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Free Tissue Flaps; Prevalence; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Mandibular Diseases; Mandibular Reconstruction; Mandible
PubMed: 38750124
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61862-1 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... May 2023Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) is a severe and challenging complication of head and neck radiation therapy. Despite its aggressiveness and controversy respect to...
BACKGROUND
Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) is a severe and challenging complication of head and neck radiation therapy. Despite its aggressiveness and controversy respect to its efficacy, surgical intervention remains the main treatment modality. Nevertheless, due to advances in the understanding of ORNJ physiopathology, new treatment alternatives such as the combination of pentoxifylline with tocopherol (PENTO) have emerged. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the reported efficacy of PENTO for the treatment of ORNJ. Material and Methods: Studies were search using Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science data bases following the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were cohort, case series, randomized or non-randomized clinical studies published in English including human subjects who received PENTO as treatment for ORN of the jaws. Results: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and were included for data analysis. All studies reported patients with complete mucosal coverage with no exposed bone (considered healthy) after PENTO treatment, ranging from 16.6% to 100% of the patients, depending on the study. Clinical improvement or disease stabilization was reported between 7.6% and 66.6% of studied individuals, while disease progression was seen in only 5 studies involving 7.6 - 32% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
PENTO treatment achieved a complete disease control in a significant number of patients in all studies. However, there is no standardized protocol for administering the therapy. It is necessary to determine the pharmacological doses and to evaluate the benefits of adding antibiotics and clodronate. Good quality clinical trials are needed to develop a successful algorithm for the management of ORN of the jaws.
Topics: Humans; Tocopherols; Pentoxifylline; Osteoradionecrosis; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Jaw
PubMed: 36641743
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25729 -
Cancers Nov 2021Teeth extractions before or after radiotherapy (RT) could be procedures at high risk for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) onset. This systematic review was performed to... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Teeth extractions before or after radiotherapy (RT) could be procedures at high risk for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) onset. This systematic review was performed to investigate the ORN incidence following teeth extractions during and after RT for head and neck (H&N) cancer and to evaluate any other possible risk factor.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA protocol, and the PROSPERO registration number was CRD42018079986. An electronic search was performed on the following search engines: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A cumulative meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Two thousand two hundred and eighty-one records were screened, and nine were finally included. This systematic review revealed an ORN incidence of 5.8% (41 patients out of 462, 95% CI = 2.3-9.4); 3 ORN developed in the maxilla. No other clinical risk factors were detected.
CONCLUSION
Post-RT teeth extractions represent a major risk factor for ORN development, especially in the mandible, with a diminishing trend in the last years. Further research on other possible risk factors might improve this evidence.
PubMed: 34830954
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225798 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Osteoradionecrosis of the hip is a serious complication of radiotherapy that is easily overlooked by physicians and patients in the early stages. There are relatively...
BACKGROUND
Osteoradionecrosis of the hip is a serious complication of radiotherapy that is easily overlooked by physicians and patients in the early stages. There are relatively few reports on this subject, so there is no clear scientific consensus for the pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and clinical treatment of hip osteoradionecrosis. In this paper, we report two cases of hip osteoradionecrosis and systematically review the related literature.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report two cases of hip osteoradionecrosis. One patient successfully underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital and recovered well postoperatively. Another patient although we offered a variety of surgical options for this patient, the patient was worried that the bone loss would lead to poor prosthesis fixation, resulting in prosthesis loosening and infection, and therefore ultimately refused surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION
With the development of radiological techniques, the incidence of hip osteoradionecrosis is decreasing year by year, but early diagnosis and rational treatment remain challenging. The effects of non-surgical treatment are limited. Early prevention, early detection, and early intervention are crucial to delay or prevent the emergence of more serious complications.
PubMed: 35402457
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.858929 -
Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part... Jun 2022Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the skull base can have catastrophic consequences if not detected early and managed appropriately. This is a systematic review of the...
Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the skull base can have catastrophic consequences if not detected early and managed appropriately. This is a systematic review of the different treatment modalities for skull base ORN and their outcomes. This study is a systematic review. Two researchers extracted information including patient population, surgical technique, outcomes of interest, and study design. A computerized search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library (January 1990-June 2020) looked for several papers on the subject of skull base ORN. A total of 29 studies had met inclusion criteria, including data from 333 patients. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma was the most common primary tumor (85%). Average age at diagnosis of ORN was 55.9 years (range = 15-80 years) and 72.3% of patients were males. The average time to diagnosis of ORN after radiation therapy was 77 months with an average radiation dose of 76.2 Gy (range = 46-202 Gy). Nighty-eight patients (29.4%) also had chemotherapy as part of their treatment regimen. Although all parts of the central skull base were reported to be involved, the clivus and sphenoid bone were the most commonly reported subsites. Trial of medical treatment had a success rate of 41.1%. About 66% of patients needed surgical treatment, either primarily or after failing medical treatment. Success rate was 77.3%. Overall, the surgical treatment was superior to medical treatment ( < 0.0001). ORN is a rare complication of the treatment of skull base tumors. Most cases require surgical treatment, including endoscopic debridement or free flap reconstruction, which has a high success rate. Level 3 evidence as a systematic review of case studies, case reports, retrospective, and prospective trials with no blinding or controls.
PubMed: 35832934
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733973 -
Discovery Medicine 2015Cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CRT) offers head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients better overall survival when compared to radiation alone. However, it... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CRT) offers head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients better overall survival when compared to radiation alone. However, it also increases acute and late toxicity (LT). Here we aimed to review the main aspects of diagnosis and treatment of long-term toxicities in HNSCC patients after CRT.
METHODS
We crossed-searched PubMed MeshTerms: Survivors, Deglutition Disorders, Xerostomia, Hypothyroidism, Cisplatin, Kidney, Hearing, and Osteoradionecrosis, with keywords: "Head and Neck Neoplasms" and "Chemoradiotherapy." A total of 5,541 publications were retrieved and 48 were selected for this systematic review.
RESULTS
Dysphagia (25%), xerostomia (40-80%, depending on the technique used), hypothyroidism (42%), ototoxicity (27%), and osteoradionecrosis (4%) were the most commonly reported LT and were related to compromised quality of life aspects in HNSCC patients. Concurrent cisplatin and higher radiation doses, especially to normal tissue, increased the rates of LT.
CONCLUSIONS
Late CRT toxicities were reported mostly in retrospective studies. Addressing these adverse effects as endpoints in future clinical trials is necessary to provide tools to prevent and treat them adequately, allowing better quality of life and survival results.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans
PubMed: 26321088
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2016Cancer is a significant global health problem. Radiotherapy is a treatment for many cancers and about 50% of people having radiotherapy will be long-term survivors. Some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cancer is a significant global health problem. Radiotherapy is a treatment for many cancers and about 50% of people having radiotherapy will be long-term survivors. Some will experience late radiation tissue injury (LRTI) developing months or years later. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested as a treatment for LRTI based upon the ability to improve the blood supply to these tissues. It is postulated that HBOT may result in both healing of tissues and the prevention of problems following surgery.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of HBOT for treating or preventing LRTI.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 11), MEDLINE, EMBASE, DORCTIHM and reference lists of articles in December 2015. We also searched for ongoing trials at clinicaltrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of HBOT versus no HBOT on LRTI prevention or healing.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently evaluated the quality of the relevant trials using the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and extracted the data from the included trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen trials contributed to this review (753 participants). There was some moderate quality evidence that HBOT was more likely to achieve mucosal coverage with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) (risk ratio (RR) 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 1.6, P value = 0.003, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 5; 246 participants, 3 studies). There was also moderate quality evidence of a significantly improved chance of wound breakdown without HBOT following operative treatment for ORN (RR 4.2; 95% CI 1.1 to 16.8, P value = 0.04, NNTB 4; 264 participants, 2 studies). From single studies there was a significantly increased chance of improvement or cure following HBOT for radiation proctitis (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9, P value = 0.04, NNTB 5), and following both surgical flaps (RR 8.7; 95% CI 2.7 to 27.5, P value = 0.0002, NNTB 4) and hemimandibulectomy (RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.8, P value = 0.001, NNTB 5). There was also a significantly improved probability of healing irradiated tooth sockets following dental extraction (RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7, P value = 0.009, NNTB 4).There was no evidence of benefit in clinical outcomes with established radiation injury to neural tissue, and no randomised data reported on the use of HBOT to treat other manifestations of LRTI. These trials did not report adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
These small trials suggest that for people with LRTI affecting tissues of the head, neck, anus and rectum, HBOT is associated with improved outcome. HBOT also appears to reduce the chance of ORN following tooth extraction in an irradiated field. There was no such evidence of any important clinical effect on neurological tissues. The application of HBOT to selected participants and tissues may be justified. Further research is required to establish the optimum participant selection and timing of any therapy. An economic evaluation should be undertaken.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Neoplasms; Organs at Risk; Osteoradionecrosis; Radiation Injuries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 27123955
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005005.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2013Dental implants offer one way to replace missing teeth. Patients who have undergone radiotherapy and those who have also undergone surgery for cancer in the head and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Dental implants offer one way to replace missing teeth. Patients who have undergone radiotherapy and those who have also undergone surgery for cancer in the head and neck region may particularly benefit from reconstruction with implants. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) has been advocated to improve the success of implant treatment in patients who have undergone radiotherapy but this remains a controversial issue.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the success, morbidity, patient satisfaction and cost effectiveness of dental implant treatment carried out with and without HBO in irradiated patients.
SEARCH METHODS
The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 17 June 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 5), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 17 June 2013) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 17 June 2013). No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. We checked the bibliographies of relevant clinical trials and review articles for studies outside the searched journals. We wrote to authors of the identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and to more than 55 oral implant manufacturers; we used personal contacts and we made a request on an internet discussion group in an attempt to identify unpublished or ongoing RCTs.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of HBO therapy for irradiated patients requiring dental implants.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Screening of eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and independently by two review authors. Results were analysed using random-effects models to determine mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals.
MAIN RESULTS
Only one RCT, providing very low quality evidence, was identified and included. Thirteen patients received HBO therapy while another 13 did not. Two to six implants were placed in people with fully edentulous mandibles to be rehabilitated with bar-retained overdentures. One year after implant loading, four patients had died from each group. One patient, treated with HBO, developed an osteoradionecrosis and lost all implants so the prosthesis could not be provided. Five patients in the HBO group had at least one implant failure versus two in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences for prosthesis and implant failures, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction between the two groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Despite the limited amount of clinical research available, it appears that HBO therapy in irradiated patients requiring dental implants may not offer any appreciable clinical benefits. There is a definite need for more RCTs to ascertain the effectiveness of HBO in irradiated patients requiring dental implants. These trials ought to be of a high quality and reported as recommended by the CONSORT statement (www.consort-statement.org/). Each clinical centre may have limited numbers of patients and it is likely that trials will need to be multicentred.
Topics: Dental Implants; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Mouth, Edentulous; Osteoradionecrosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 24085641
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003603.pub3